Measuring Proximal Tibial Metaphyseal Width and Lateral Epiphyseal Height Improves Determination of Remaining Growth in Children.

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessments of skeletal maturity is of critical importance to guide type and timing of orthopaedic surgical interventions. Several quantitative markers of the proximal tibia were recently developed using historical knee radiographs. The purpose of the present study was to determine which marker would be most effective in assessment of full-length radiographs in a modern pediatric patient population. METHODS: All full-length radiographs at our institutions between 2013 and 2018 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria for our study required that the child reached final height as defined by 2 consecutive unchanged heights, at least 6 months apart, after age 16 for boys and 14 for girls. Patients with metabolic bone disease, prior surgery such as epiphysiodesis, or previous infections around the knee were excluded. Summary statistics for each of the 3 proximal tibial ratios were calculated and multiple linear regression was performed with percent of growth remaining as a dependent variable. A recommended regression model is presented and evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 692 full-length radiographs met inclusion criteria. Proximal tibial ratios were calculated and averaged values for each percent of growth remaining was presented. Multiple linear regression demonstrated that using all 3 variables led to overfitting of the model so tibial metaphyseal width/lateral tibial epiphyseal height was selected as the optimal ratio for use by clinicians. The optimal model for determining growth was found to have R2=0.723 in the developmental set and R2=0.762 in an excluded validation set. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the proximal tibial metaphyseal width/lateral tibial epiphyseal height is the ideal measurement for clinicians seeking to determine growth remaining in children. It presents average values between 0% and 25% of growth remaining. This study also develops and validates a multivariable regression model for determining percentage of growth remaining in children that will allow for quantitative determination of growth using full-length radiographs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Missed Fracture Dislocation of the Fifth Toe in a Two-Year-Old Child: A Case Report.

Fracture dislocation injuries of the toes are rare among pediatric population. These injuries when acute are mostly treated conservatively and a good reduction must be ensured. We present the case of a 2-year-old girl who presented with missed chronic fracture dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the fifth toe, which was managed by open reduction and internal fixation and had a good outcome at over 1 year of follow up. We believe that this is the first case of this injury to be published in the peer-reviewed literature.

All-epiphyseal versus trans-epiphyseal screw fixation for tillaux fractures: Does it matter?

BACKGROUND: Tillaux fractures occur primarily in adolescents due to the pattern of physeal closure and are classified as Salter-Harris type III physeal fractures. Operative management with screw fixation is recommended for more than 2 mm of displacement or more than 1 mm of translation. However, the efficacy and complications of trans-physeal vs all-physeal screw fixation have not been investigated extensively. AIM: To compare the clinical and functional outcomes of trans-physeal (oblique) and all-epiphyseal (parallel) screw fixation in management of Tillaux fractures among pediatric patients. METHODS: This was an ethics board approved retrospective review of pediatric patients who presented to our tertiary children's care facility with Tillaux fractures. We included patients who had surgical fixation of a Tillaux fracture over a 10 year period. Data analysis included demographics, mode of injury, management protocols, and functional outcomes. The patients were divided into group 1 (oblique fixation) and group 2 (parallel fixation). Baseline patient characteristics and functional outcomes were compared between groups. Statistical tests to evaluate differences included Fisher's Exact or Chi-squared and independent samples t or Mann Whitney tests for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients (28 females and 14 males) were included. There were no significant differences in body mass index, sex, age, or time to surgery between the groups [IK2]. Sports injuries accounted for 61.9% of the cases, particularly non-contact (57.1%) and skating (28.6%) injuries. Computed Tomography (CT) scan was ordered for 28 patients (66.7%), leading to diagnosis confirmation in 17 patients and change in management plan in 11 patients. [GRC3] Groups 1 and 2 consisted of 17 and 25 patients, respectively. For mid to long-term functional outcomes, there were 14 and 10 patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in the functional outcomes, pain scores, or satisfaction between groups. No infections, non-unions, physeal arrest, or post-operative ankle deformities were reported. Two (4.8%) patients had difficulty returning to sports post-surgery due to pain. One was a dancer, and the other patient had pain while running, which led to hardware removal. Both patients had parallel fixation. Hardware removal for groups 1 and 2 were 4 (23.5%) and 5 (20.0%) patients, respectively. The reasons for removal was pain in 2 patients, and parental preference in the remaining. CONCLUSION: This is the largest reported series of pediatric patients with Tillaux fractures comparing functional outcomes of different methods of screw fixation orientation to the physis, which showed no difference regarding functional outcomes.

Pediatric and adolescent Lisfranc injuries - Presentation, treatment and outcomes.

PURPOSE: Lisfranc fracture dislocations are rare injuries and even more so in the pediatric population. The main purpose of our study is to present a descriptive analysis of Lisfranc injuries in pediatric patients to add to the current sparse literature on this topic. In addition, our secondary outcome was to analyze any differences in patients treated conservatively versus operatively, and those with isolated Lisfranc injuries versus those with associated foot injuries. METHODS: Charts of patients with Lisfranc injury treated at a tertiary pediatric hospital from January 2010 to July 2019 were reviewed to analyze their demographics, injury characteristics, management details and rehabilitation protocol. Functional outcome was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale of Pain (VAS) and the Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire for Children (OxAFQ-C). RESULTS: 30 patients/cases were included with mean age of 13.6 years and mean follow up of 36 weeks. 20% of the cases were missed on initial presentation. 19 cases were managed operatively while 11 were managed conservatively. The average OxAFQ-C and VAS pain scores were 83% and 1.3, respectively at mean follow-up of 36 weeks. The functional outcomes between conservative and operative cases or between those with isolated Lisfranc injuries and those with associated foot injuries were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Lisfranc injury in pediatrics can be easily missed. High index of suspicion, a thorough clinical examination and the use of advanced imaging is warranted. Various modalities like K-wires, screws and suture-buttons can be used for fixation. Early to mid-term functional outcomes are satisfactory provided that adequate reduction is obtained.

Does the stabilization of the calcaneocuboid joint with Steinmann pin in Evans osteotomy affect its incidence of arthritis?

PURPOSE: This study aims to determine the effect of retaining a Steinmann pin in the calcaneocuboid joint on its rates of arthritis following Evans calcaneal osteotomy lengthening procedure. The study hypothesized that leaving the pin across the calcaneocuboid joint post-operatively would lead to higher rates of arthritis. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients under 18 years of age who underwent Evans osteotomy at our hospital from January 2015 to May 2020. The Patients were stratified into 2 groups: Group 1 (pin was left post-operatively across the joint and removed on follow-up) and Group 2 (pin was removed during surgery). Demographic data were recorded, including age, sex, and body mass index. Calcaneocuboid arthritis was determined by radiographic imaging at least one-year follow-up. Time to pin removal, size of the pin and graft, and subluxation were analyzed as possible risk factors for arthritis. Odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. RESULTS: 39 patients were included in the study: 24 patients had the pin removed post-operatively, and 15 had the pin removed intra-operatively. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding body mass index, age, sex, or laterality. Calcaneocuboid arthritis rates were significantly higher in the Group 1 than Group 2 (12(50%) vs. 2(13.3%), respectively; p = 0.02). On multivariate regression, both age (OR, 1.305 [95%CI: 1.009-1.696]; p = 0.044) and leaving the pin in the joint postoperatively (OR, 7.661 [95%CI: 1.208-48.570]; p = 0.031) were found as risk factors for arthritis at follow-up. The mean time to pin removal, the size of the pin, and the size of the graft were not found to be significant predictors of arthritis (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that leaving the Steinmann pin in the calcaneocuboid joint in children post-operatively is associated with an increased risk of developing early radiographic signs of calcaneocuboid joint arthritis.