Polypseudophakia: from "Piggyback" to supplementary sulcus-fixated IOLs.

Polypseudophakia, the concept of using a second intraocular lens (IOL) to supplement an IOL that has already been placed in the capsular bag, was first used as a corrective measure where the power requirement was higher than that of available single IOLs. Subsequently, the technique was modified to compensate for post-operative residual refractive errors. In these early cases, an IOL designed for the capsular bag would be implanted in the sulcus.  Although these approaches were less than ideal, alternative means of correcting residual refractive errors were not without their limitations: IOL exchange can be traumatic to the eye and is not easily carried out once fibrosis has occurred, while corneal refractive surgical techniques are not suitable for all patients. Piggyback implantation was the term first coined to describe the use of two IOLs, placed together in the capsular bag. The term was later extended to include the procedure where an IOL designed for the capsular bag was placed in the sulcus. Unfortunately, the term piggyback has persisted even though these two approaches have been largely discredited. Intraocular lenses are now available which have been specifically designed for placement in the ciliary sulcus. As these newer IOLs avoid the many unacceptable complications brought about by both types of earlier piggyback implantation, it is time to employ a new terminology, such as supplementary IOL or secondary enhancement to distinguish between the placement of an unsuitable capsular bag IOL in the sulcus and the implantation of an IOL specifically designed for ciliary sulcus implantation. In addition to minimising possible complications, supplementary IOLs designed for the sulcus have expanded the options available to the ophthalmic surgeon. With these new IOLs it is possible to correct presbyopia and residual astigmatism, and to provide temporary correction of refractive errors in growing, or unstable, eyes. This article aims to review the literature available on supplementary IOL implantation in the ciliary sulcus and to summarise the evidence for the efficacy and safety of this intervention. KEY MESSAGES: What is known Polypseudophakia has been used for over 30 years to correct hyperopia or residual refractive error, but early techniques were associated with significant complications. What is new The development of specially designed sulcus-fixated supplementary IOLs significantly reduces the risks associated with these procedures, and has also opened up new opportunities in patient care. The reversibility of the procedure allows patients to experience multifocality, and to provide temporary and adjustable correction in unstable or growing eyes. The terms "secondary enhancement" or "DUET" to describe supplementary IOL implantation are preferential to "piggyback".

Biomechanical changes following corneal crosslinking in keratoconus patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanical and tomographic outcomes of keratoconus patients up to four years after corneal crosslinking (CXL). METHODS: In this longitudinal retrospective-prospective single-center case series, the preoperative tomographic and biomechanical results from 200 keratoconus eyes of 161 patients undergoing CXL were compared to follow-up examinations at three-months, six-months, one-year, two-years, three-years, and four-years after CXL. Primary outcomes included the Corvis Biomechanical Factor (CBiF) and five biomechanical response parameters obtained from the Corvis ST. Tomographically, the Belin-Ambrósio deviation index (BAD-D) and the maximal keratometry (Kmax) measured by the Pentacam were analyzed. Additionally, Corvis E-staging, the thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), and the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were obtained. Primary outcomes were compared using a paired t-test. RESULTS: The CBiF decreased significantly at the six-month (p < 0.001) and one-year (p < 0.001) follow-ups when compared to preoperative values. E-staging behaved accordingly to the CBiF. Within the two- to four-year follow-ups, the biomechanical outcomes showed no significant differences when compared to preoperative. Tomographically, the BAD-D increased significantly during the first year after CXL with a maximum at six-months (p < 0.001), while Kmax decreased significantly (p < 0.001) and continuously up to four years after CXL. The TCT was lower at all postoperative follow-up visits compared to preoperative, and the BCVA improved. CONCLUSION: In the first year after CXL, there was a temporary progression in both the biomechanical CBiF and E-staging, as well as in the tomographic analysis. CXL contributes to the stabilization of both the tomographic and biomechanical properties of the cornea up to four years postoperatively.

Higher phosphate concentrations as in aqueous humor of diabetic patients increase intraocular lens calcification.

BACKGROUND: Clinical evidence suggests an association between phosphate concentrations in aqueous humor and the risk of intraocular lens (IOL) calcification. To test this hypothesis the influence of different phosphate concentrations on IOL calcification was evaluated in an in vitro electrophoresis model. METHODS: 20 IOLs of two hydrophilic IOL models (CT Spheris 204, Zeiss; Lentis L-313, Oculentis) and one hydrophobic control IOL model (Clareon CNA0T0, Alcon) were exposed to physiologic and elevated phosphate concentrations, similar to diabetic aqueous humor. IOL calcification was analyzed by alizarin red staining, von Kossa staining, scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy with electron diffraction. RESULTS: Higher phosphate concentrations were associated with IOL calcification. Analyses of IOL surfaces and cross-sections documented calcification in no CT Spheris and 4 Lentis IOLs following exposure to 10 mM Na2HPO4, compared with 7 and 11 positive analyses following exposure to 14 mM Na2HPO4, respectively. Furthermore, a clear association between IOL calcification and the duration of electrophoresis was demonstrated, confirming increased phosphate concentrations and duration of exposure as risk factors of IOL calcification. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that higher phosphate concentrations in aqueous humor, as seen in diabetic patients, contribute to an increased IOL calcification risk, potentially explaining clinical observations showing an increased risk of IOL calcification in patients with diabetes.

Early intraocular lens explantations: 10-year database analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze the causes and characteristics of IOL explantation within the first year after primary implantation. METHODS: In this retrospective, cross sectional database study, a database consisting of over 2500 IOL explants sent from 199 national and international doctors over the past 10 years was analyzed. All IOLs explanted within the first year after implantation were included in this analysis. Explants with insufficient information as well as phakic and Add-on IOLs were excluded. Main outcome measures were the reason for explantation, the time between implantation and explantation, as well as IOLs' and patients' characteristics. Additionally, the explanted IOLs were microscopically and histologically analyzed, as required. RESULTS: Of all explanted IOLs from the database, 1.9% (n = 50) were explanted within the first year after implantation. The most frequent reasons for early IOL explantation were IOL dislocation (32%), visual intolerance (26%), opacification (20%), and intraoperative complications (16%). The time between implantation and explantation was the shortest in cases with intraoperative complications (1.5 ± 3.1 days), followed by IOL dislocation (90.9 ± 103.9 days), visual intolerance (98.3 ± 86.5 days), opacifications (253.5 ± 124.0 days) and other indications (249.7 ± 124.0 days). Calcification of hydrophilic IOLs was the main type of opacification (80%). Notably, seven IOLs required immediate intraoperative exchange due to an intraoperative crack in the optic or a torn off haptic. CONCLUSION: Indications for early IOL explantation were IOL dislocation, visual intolerance, opacification, and intraoperative complications. Especially intraoperative damages to the IOL and early calcification show a potential for improvement of affected IOLs and implantation systems.

Endothelial Cell Loss in Patients with Phakic Intraocular Lenses. / Endothelzellverlust bei phaken Intraokularlinsen.

Although the safety of phakic intraocular lenses (pIOLs) has been continuously improved over 70-years of development, high endothelial cell losses can occur even with current pIOL models. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the distance of a pIOL to the corneal endothelium plays a crucial role in the extent of endothelial cell loss. For this reason alone, higher endothelial cell loss tends to be observed with anterior chamber lenses than with posterior chamber lenses. Adequate preoperative anterior chamber depth is essential, at least for iris-fixed pIOLs, in order to ensure a safe distance from the endothelium. However, the anterior chamber becomes shallower with age and therefore it may be useful to consider patient age in the safety criteria. Although endothelial cell loss is generally low with current pIOL models, regular monitoring of the endothelial cell density remains essential due to large interindividual differences in patients with pIOLs. If the endothelial cell loss is greater than expected and the follow-up visits confirm the trend, the pIOL should be explanted without delay. The endothelial reserve should be considered on an individual basis by taking into account patient age, physiological endothelial cell loss, and loss due to further surgery. With careful indication and long-term patient care, pIOLs remain a safe treatment option.

Refractive Lens Exchange: A Review.

In recent decades, technical advancements in lens surgery have considerably improved safety and refractive outcomes. This has led to a much broader range of indications for refractive lens exchange (RLE). Effective restoration of uncorrected distance and near visual acuity is possible with modern presbyopia correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs). Hyperopic patients who are fully presbyopic were identified as ideal candidates for RLE. For myopic patients, an increased risk of retinal detachment has been reported, which leads to a higher threshold to perform RLE in this patient group. The most frequent postoperative complications include posterior capsular opacification, deviation from the target refraction and cystoid macular edema. Thus, adequate planning of surgery, careful patient selection, as well as comprehensive counseling are crucial for successful RLE.

Characterisation of Intraocular Lens Injectors.

In modern ophthalmic surgery, an intraocular lens (IOL) is commonly implanted into the patient's eye with an IOL injector. Many injectors are available, showing various technological differences, from the early manually loaded injector systems to the modern preloaded injectors. This review aims to give a concise overview of the defining characteristics of injector models and draws attention to complications that may occur during IOL implantation. One can differentiate injectors according to their preoperative preparation (manually loaded or preloaded), their implantation mechanism (push-type or screw-type or combined or automated), the size of the nozzle tip, the presence of an insertion depth control feature, and the injector's reusability. Potential complications are IOL misconfigurations such as a haptic-optic adhesion, adherence of the IOL to the injector plunger, an overriding plunger, uncontrolled IOL rotation, a trapped trailing haptic, or damage to the IOL. Additionally, during IOL implantation, the nozzle can become damaged with scratches, extensions, cracks, or bursts to the tip. While these complications rarely produce long-term consequences, manufacturers should try to prevent them by further improving their devices. Similarly, surgeons should evaluate new injectors carefully to ensure the highest possible surgical safety.

Cataract Classification Systems: A Review.

Cataract is among the leading causes of visual impairment worldwide. Innovations in treatment have drastically improved patient outcomes, but to be properly implemented, it is necessary to have the right diagnostic tools. This review explores the cataract grading systems developed by researchers in recent decades and provides insight into both merits and limitations. To this day, the gold standard for cataract classification is the Lens Opacity Classification System III. Different cataract features are graded according to standard photographs during slit lamp examination. Although widely used in research, its clinical application is rare, and it is limited by its subjective nature. Meanwhile, recent advancements in imaging technology, notably Scheimpflug imaging and optical coherence tomography, have opened the possibility of objective assessment of lens structure. With the use of automatic lens anatomy detection software, researchers demonstrated a good correlation to functional and surgical metrics such as visual acuity, phacoemulsification energy, and surgical time. The development of deep learning networks has further increased the capability of these grading systems by improving interpretability and increasing robustness when applied to norm-deviating cases. These classification systems, which can be used for both screening and preoperative diagnostics, are of value for targeted prospective studies, but still require implementation and validation in everyday clinical practice.

Anterior Segment Complications Following Intravitreal Injection.

Intravitreal injections (IVI s) have gained increased popularity in the past decades and are used to treat a multitude of ailments. In 2010, the total number of IVI s surpassed the number of cataract surgeries performed, making it the most common procedure in ophthalmology. As the number of injections increases, so does the number of injected-related complications. While complications in the posterior segment, such as retinal detachment or endophthalmitis, are detrimental to visual function and have therefore been well documented, IVI s can also lead to complications in the anterior segment. These include hyphema, inflammation of the sterile anterior segment (incidence rate of 0.05 to 1.1% depending on the drug), implant migration with corneal decompensation (incidence rate of 0.43%), iatrogenic lens damage (incidence rate of 0.07%), accelerated cataract formation (up to 50% for steroids and 10.9% for anti-VEGF), and an increased complication rate during subsequent cataract surgery (up to 4% per IVI). Most of these complications occur immediately and have a good prognosis if treated correctly. However, the increased risk of complications during subsequent surgery demonstrates that IVI s can also have long-term complications, a topic that needs to be explored further in future research projects.

Refractive outcomes of small lenticule extraction (SMILE) Pro® with a 2 MHz femtosecond laser.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the initial visual outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) Pro® using a 2 MHz femtosecond laser (VisuMax 800, Carl Zeiss Meditec) and to assess the efficacy, safety, predictability, accuracy, and complication rate. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included eyes which underwent the SMILE Pro® procedure using VisuMax 800 femtosecond laser to correct myopia. All surgeries were performed by one surgeon (DB). Follow-up was conducted 3 months postoperatively to evaluate visual outcomes after neuroadaptation, corrected visual acuity (CDVA) and intra- and postoperative complications. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-two eyes of 82 patients (mean age 31 ± 6 years) results at 3 months are presented. The mean spherical equivalent (SE) was - 4.44 ± 1.86 D preoperatively while -0.24 ± 0.32 D postoperatively. 99% of eyes achieved SE within ± 1.0 D of attempted correction and 91% were within ± 0.5 D. Efficacy index was 0.93 while the safety index was 1. No complications occurred intra- or postoperatively. No eyes lost more than 1 line of their preoperative CDVA. All highly myopic eyes (- 6.25 to - 10.00 D; n = 18) achieved 20/20 at 3 months postoperatively and were within 0.5 D from the attempted SE and no eyes lost more than 1 line of CDVA. CONCLUSION: The SMILE Pro® is a safe, efficient, and predictable procedure for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism, with comparable results of conventional SMILE surgery. High myopic eyes achieve better results than low and moderate myopia. No complications were recorded in our patients.

Capsule Dynamics, Implantation, and Explantation of the Smaller Incision, New-Generation Implantable Miniature Telescope: a Miyake-Apple Study.

PURPOSE: The smaller incision, new-generation implantable miniature telescope is a novel implant to optimize vision in retinal patients with central vision loss. Using Miyake-Apple techniques we visualized the device implantation, repositioning, and explantation, while noting capsular bag dynamics. METHODS: Using the Miyake-Apple technique, we assessed capsular bag deformation after successful implantation of the device in human autopsy eyes. We assessed rescue strategies for converting a sulcus implantation to a capsular implantation and explantation strategies. We noted the occurrence of posterior capsule striae, zonular stress, and the haptics' arc of contact with the capsular bag after implantation. RESULTS: Acceptable zonular stress was observed during the successful implantation of the SING IMT. When it was implanted in the sulcus, one could reposition the haptics into the bag with two spatulas using counter-pressure in an effective strategy despite inducing tolerable, medium zonular stress. A similar technique, in reverse, allows safe explantation without damaging the rhexis or the bag, while inducing similar medium, tolerable zonular stress. In all eyes we examined, the implant considerably stretches the bag, inducing a capsular bag deformation and posterior capsule striae. CONCLUSION: The SING IMT can be safely implanted without significant zonular stress. In sulcus implantation and explantation, repositioning of the haptic is achievable without perturbing zonular stress using the presented approaches. It stretches average-sized capsular bags to support its weight. This is achieved by an increased arc of contact of the haptics with the capsular equator.

Nozzle tip damage in three generations of intraocular lens injector models: an experimental laboratory study.

PURPOSE: To assess the nozzle tip damage of IOL injectors in three generations from the same manufacturer using the self-developed system-the Heidelberg Score for IOL Injector Damage. SETTING: David J Apple Center for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany DESIGN: Experimental laboratory study METHODS: The nozzle tip damage of three injector models (Emerald, iTec, and Simplicity) was determined using the Heidelberg score for IOL injector damage. Damage to the nozzle tip was examined under a microscope and graded as follows: no damage (score 0), slight scratches (1), deep scratches (2), extensions (3), cracks (4) and bursts (5). The total scores for each injector system were the sum of scores for all injectors in this model. Total scores of the three injector systems were evaluated and compared. The nozzle tip parameters (diameters, tip angles) were also measured in each group. RESULTS: The Emerald system achieved the highest total scores, while the other two systems achieved similar total scores. There was no statistically significant difference in the total scores between the study groups (P > 0.05). The outer cross-sectional diameters were 2.10 and 2.10 mm for Emerald, 1.80 and 1.78 mm for iTec, and 1.78 and 1.80 mm for Simplicity. The thickness of the nozzle tips was 0.13 mm (Emerald), 0.17 mm (iTec) and 0.17 mm (Simplicity). The tip angle for three injector models was 35° (Emerald), 45° (iTec), and 45° (Simplicity). CONCLUSIONS: Although different injector models exhibited varying degrees of damage to the nozzle tip, all injector models generally showed relatively good results. Newer generations of IOL injector models tend to perform better in terms of nozzle tip damage after IOL implantation.

Video analysis of optic-haptic-interaction during hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens implantation using preloaded injectors.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the optic-haptic interaction of different hydrophobic acrylic IOLs after using six preloaded injectors. METHODS: We reviewed the video-recordings of procedures on a total of 388 eyes that underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. For six preloaded injectors: multiSert (Hoya Surgical Optics) [System 1], TECNIS Simplicity (Johnson & Johnson Vision) [System 2], TECNIS iTec (Johnson & Johnson Vision) [System 3], AutonoMe (Alcon, Laboratories) [System 4], Bluesert (Carl Zeiss Meditec) [System 5], and Prosert (OphthalmoPro GmbH) [System 6], we noted in each case the time of IOL delivery and made a descriptive observation of IOL insertion and optic-haptic-interaction. RESULTS: We defined standard haptic behavior where the haptics emerged "folded" from the injector and quickly recovered their pre-implantation appearance. The incidence where the leading haptic emerged in a deformed way for System 1 was 20%, System 2: 19%, System 3: 14%, System 4: 56%, System 5: 24% and System 6: 5%. For trailing haptic deformed behavior, the incidence was 36%, 6%, 4%, 8%, 18% and 2%, respectively for Systems 1 to 6. Optic-haptic adhesion occurred in 2% of cases for System 1, 44% for System 2, 52% for System 3, 48% for System 4, and 11% for System 6 (P < 0.05). Adhesion was not found with System 5. CONCLUSIONS: We observed different deformed behavior for leading and trailing haptics in the six preloaded systems, some systems had as much as 52% optic-haptic adhesion.

Clinical outcomes of bilateral implantation of new generation monofocal IOL enhanced for intermediate distance and conventional monofocal IOL in a Korean population.

BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical outcomes of bilateral implantation of enhanced intermediate function intraocular lenses (IOLs) and standard monofocal IOLs. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, comparative controlled study, we compared the visual outcomes of patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery at the Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, with either enhanced monofocal IOLs (Tecnis Eyhance, ICB00, Johnson and Johnson Vision Care, Inc) (Group 1) or standard monofocal IOLs (Tecnis, ZCB00, Johnson and Johnson Vision Care, Inc) (Group 2). The assessment included monocular and binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate (UIVA at 60 cm) and near (UNVA at 40 cm) visual acuity, uncorrected defocus curves, contrast sensitivity testing (CST), and reading speed test using Quality of vision was evaluated using the Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25). RESULTS: At 3-months postoperatively, monocular and binocular outcomes of UIVA and UNVA were statistically significantly better in Group 1 (P < 0.05). The binocular uncorrected defocus curve of Group 1 showed statistically significantly better outcomes at vergence ranges of -1.5 to -4.0 D (P < 0.05). Significantly higher reading speed test was also observed in Group 1 in all ranges tested (1.0 to 0.1 LogMAR) (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in CST between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral implantation of enhanced monofocal IOLs provided better vision at intermediate and near distances compared to standard monofocal IOLs, while maintaining good distance vision and contrast sensitivity.

Evaluation of Nozzle Tip Damage in Intraocular Lens Injectors with V-Shaped Notch.

INTRODUCTION: Damage to the nozzle tips of intraocular lens (IOL) injectors has been associated with various adverse events and even IOL surface abnormalities after IOL implantation. In this study, nozzle tip damage of three different injector models with v-notched nozzle tips was systematically evaluated using our self-developed system - the Heidelberg Score for IOL injector damage. METHODS: Nozzle tip damage was categorized into 6 grades: no damage (grade 0), slight scratches (1), deep scratches (2), extensions (3), cracks (4), and bursts (5). Each grade was assigned to a score of 0-5. In each IOL injector group, all IOLs were divided into 2 subgroups based on IOL power: +15 to +21D group and +21 to +26D group. The total scores for each group were the sum of scores for all injectors in this group. Further analysis was performed on the nozzle tip configuration and parameters in each injector model. RESULTS: The median (Q1-Q3) for each injector group in group +15 to +21D was 1.5 (1-2) for Avansee, 4 (3-4) for iSert, and 4 (3-4) for multiSert. A statistically significant difference was found between Avansee and iSert (p < 0.001) as well as between Avansee and multiSert (p < 0.01) in terms of median scores. The median (Q1-Q3) for each injector group in group +21 to +26D was 1.5 (1-2) for Avansee, 4 (4-4) for iSert, and 3 (3-3.75) for multiSert. A statistically significant difference was found between Avansee and iSert in terms of median scores (p < 0.001). The outer cross-sectional diameters were 1.80 and 1.78 mm for Avansee, 1.70 and 1.69 mm for iSert, and 1.69 and 1.68 mm for multiSert. The radii of each notch-based circle were 0.21 mm (Avansee), 0.09 (iSert), and 0.06 (multiSert), respectively. The tip angles for three injector models were 48° (Avansee), 46° (iSert), and 37° (multiSert). CONCLUSIONS: Avansee showed the least nozzle tip damage of all three groups. Compared with our earlier study using preloaded injectors with intact endpieces, all the injector groups with v-notched nozzle tips had more damage to the nozzle tip. It was found that the closer the notch of the nozzle tip was to the letter "V," the more damaged the nozzle tip was after IOL implantation.

Aetiology and Management of IOL Dislocations. / Ursachen und Management von IOL-Dislokationen.

Early (< 3 months) intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation occurs due to insufficient fixation in the capsular bag, while late dislocation (≥ 3 months) is due to increasing insufficiency of the zonular apparatus. Iris-fixated IOL (IFIOL) and suture- or sutureless-fixated scleral IOL (SFIOL) are currently the most commonly used methods when IOL exchange is indicated. Different methods of scleral fixation with or without sutures have been described. The most important techniques are summarised in this paper. IFIOL and SFIOL allow comparable visual outcomes but differ in their risk profile. The decision of which method to use should be made case by case and in accordance with the surgeon's preference.

Fusarium Keratitis on the Rise - a Clinical Review. / Die Fusarien-Keratitis auf dem Vormarsch ­ eine aktuelle klinische Übersicht.

Fungal keratitis due to Fusarium species is a rare but serious ocular disease. Due to its rapid progression, often late diagnostic confirmation as well as limited topical treatment options, this is potentially sight threatening. Increasing contact lens use and global climate change have been suggested to be factors leading to an increase in cases of fusarium keratitis, even in regions with moderate climate. Early recognition and initiation of antimycotic treatment, as well as early surgical treatment by penetrating keratoplasty are decisive for the outcome.

Evaluating the Predictability of Postoperative Target Refraction Using the Prototype of a New Intraoperative Aberrometer. / Evaluation des Prototyps eines neuen intraoperativen Aberrometers für die Vorhersage der postoperativen Zielrefraktion.

Despite all the progress in cataract and refractive lens surgery, refractive surprise is common in clinical practice. A significant postoperative refractive error is particularly annoying - and contributes to the patient's dissatisfaction with the procedure and the surgeon - when a multifocal IOL, an EDOF-IOL or a toric IOL has been implanted. The relatively new technology of intraoperative aberrometry offers the surgeon the option to intraoperatively measure the eye and its refraction, either directly after lens extraction and/or following IOL implantation. Currently, three different systems are available. In a number of studies, the technology has shown a better refractive predictability than preoperative biometry. Besides giving an evaluation of the prototype of a new intraoperative aberrometer, the I-O-W-A system, we also present our results on the influence of the kind of anaesthesia chosen and of two different IOL designs on the predictability of intraoperative aberrometry.

Reversible Multifocality Achieved Through Polypseudophakia. / Reversible Multifokalität durch Polypseudophakie.

Simultaneous implantation of a monofocal or monofocal toric intraocular lens (IOL) into the capsular bag and a multifocal IOL into the ciliary sulcus, referred to as duet procedure, allows us to create multifocality that is more easily reversible than the implantation of a capsular bag-fixated multifocal IOL. The optical quality and results after the duet procedure are equivalent to those of a capsular bag-fixated multifocal IOL. Patients who cannot tolerate the side effects of multifocal optics or who develop an ocular condition leading to loss of function such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD) or glaucoma in the course of their lives may benefit from the reversibility of the procedure.

Opacification of Hydrophilic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses: Overview of Laboratory Methods for Histological Analysis and Replication of IOL Calcification. / Eintrübung hydrophiler Acrylintraokularlinsen: Überblick zu Labormethoden der histologischen Analyse und Replikation der Kalzifikation.

Opacification of intraocular lenses (IOLs) due to material changes is a serious complication that can compromise the good visual outcomes of uncomplicated cataract surgery. In hydrophobic acrylic IOLs, opacification can result from glistening formation, while in hydrophilic acrylic IOLs, there is a risk of calcification due to the formation of calcium phosphates within the polymer. Over time, various methods have been developed to investigate calcification in hydrophilic acrylic IOLs. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of standard histological staining and models used to simulate IOL calcification. Histological staining can be used to detect calcification and assess the extent of crystal formation. The development of in vivo and in vitro replication models has helped to identify the underlying pathomechanisms of calcification. In vivo models are suitable for assessing the biocompatibility of IOL materials. Bioreactors as an in vitro model can be used to investigate the kinetics of crystal formation within the polymer. The replication of IOL calcification under standardized conditions using electrophoresis allows for the comparison of different lens materials with respect to the risk of calcification. The combination of different analytical and replication methods can be used in the future to further investigate the pathomechanisms of calcium phosphate crystal formation and the influence of risk factors. This may help to prevent calcification of hydrophilic acrylic IOLs and associated explantation and complications.