Health-related quality-of-life in people living with HIV after switching to dual therapy with ritonavir-boosted darunavir + dolutegravir: a DUALIS sub-study.

The DUALIS study demonstrated efficacy and safety of switching to dolutegravir plus ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r) (2DR) as compared to standard-of-care-therapy with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors + DRV/r (3DR) in pretreated people living with HIV (PLWH), 48 weeks after switching. This DUALIS sub-study investigates health-related-quality-of-life (HrQoL) in this study-population. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Medical Outcome Survey-HIV (MOS-HIV) were used assessing anxiety and depression symptoms, respectively HrQoL. Data were collected at baseline, 4, 24, and 48 weeks after randomization. Outcome scores were dichotomized and used as criteria in longitudinal models identifying differential developments. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed as main measures of effects. ORs<1 indicate better results for HADS, and worse for MOS-HIV scores in the 2DR compared to 3DR group. In total, 263 subjects were randomized and treated (2DR n=131, 3DR n=132; median age 48 years). Significant different progressions could only be found for HADS-Depression scores (OR=.87, 95% CI: .78, .98, p=.02). While HADS-Depression scores decreased in the 2DR group, they increased in 3DR group. This sub-study showed no disadvantages regarding HrQoL in PLWH after switching to DTG+DRV/r. Considering lifelong requirements for antiretroviral medication, close attention to HrQL is required.

[Innovation in health care: the role of HTA in the introduction of new technologies]. / Innovation im Gesundheitswesen: Die Rolle von HTA bei der Einführung neuer Technologien.

Innovation in health care is a complex process taking place within a network of different stakeholders. From their specific perspective they need to continuously assess the technology under consideration to make the necessary decisions about the development and adoption of the technology. This is supported by HTA, but mainly with regard to reimbursement. Other important decisions are far less likely to be underpinned with evidence. The availability of data for both the decision criteria and the structures of decision-making processes have a role in this context. In the present contribution, we discuss the role of HTA in the innovation process. Amendments to assessment criteria, in particular from the perspective of patients, health care professionals, producers and macro-economics, are proposed to improve the basis for decisions of all relevant stakeholder groups.

[Assessment of innovations in clinical research: strengths and potentials for improvement of research in Germany]. / Bewertung von Innovationen in der klinischen Forschung: Stärken und Verbesserungspotenziale des Forschungsstandortes Deutschland.

Clinical research is a central link in the development chain of new treatment methods; scientifically, it belongs between basic science and health services research. It spans from the first application of a new substance or device in humans to the main proofs of its efficacy and safety. Economically speaking, it absorbs almost half of the total expenditures for the research and development of a new drug and represents a significant factor in the labour market for researchers and study personnel. Also, through participation in clinical trials, patients gain early access to new treatment methods, while on the other hand they are placed at higher risk for undesired side effects. Politics have taken significant steps to strengthen clinical research, but the pharmaceutical industry continues to complain about competitive disadvantages. Despite internationally recognised and, to a large extent, legally codified guidelines there are still significant national differences in implementation. In addition, traditional practices in clinical research are challenged by novel, mainly biotechnological therapeutic methods for which our current knowledge base is rather limited and which therefore entail a higher risk for patients or trial participants. The following paper summarises a report for the Office of Technology Assessment at the German Federal Parliament (TAB). Based on current regulations, scientific literature and expert interviews, current challenges and solution strategies for clinical research will be analysed in terms of an international comparison.