Evaluation of Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of SA001 and Its Active Metabolite Rebamipide after Single and Multiple Oral Administration.

Dry eye disease (DED) is one of the most common eye diseases caused by multiple factors. Rebamipide, which is currently used to treat peptic ulcer disease, was shown to enhance secretory function and modulate inflammation in animal disease models. Considering the pathophysiology of DED, SA001 was developed expecting enhanced systemic exposure of rebamipide. Clinical trials to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of SA001 and its active metabolite rebamipide were conducted. After oral administration of SA001, blood and urine samples were collected for PK analysis of SA001 and rebamipide. PK parameters were compared between SA001 and conventional rebamipide (Bamedin®) and also between fasted and fed. Safety and tolerability were evaluated throughout the study based on adverse events (AEs), physical examinations, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiography and clinical laboratory tests. SA001 was rapidly absorbed and quickly converted to rebamipide. The systemic exposure of rebamipide was dose-proportional after single and multiple doses. The plasma concentration of rebamipide after administration of SA001 was higher with a dose adjusted AUClast and Cmax 2.20 and 5.45 times higher in the 240 mg dose group and 4.73 and 11.94 times higher in the 600 mg dose group compared to conventional rebamipide. The favorable PK and tolerability profiles support further clinical development.

Development of a Fast Onset Proton Pump Inhibitor: Comparison of Fixed-Dose Combination of Rabeprazole and Sodium Bicarbonate (YPI-011) to the Conventional Enteric-Coated Rabeprazole.

Purpose: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the first-line therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD). Unlike conventional PPIs, non-enteric coated PPIs with antacid salt enable a faster acid suppression through the rapid absorption of the PPI. YPI-011 is a newly developed fixed-dose combination of a rabeprazole with sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3). This study compared the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of YPI-011 to the conventional enteric-coated rabeprazole (Pariet®). Materials and Methods: A randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-sequence crossover study was conducted with two different doses (10 and 20 mg) and 44 subjects in each group. They randomly received either a test or reference treatment for 7 days in the first period and the other treatment in the second period. Blood samples for the PK analysis were taken after the single- and multiple-dose. Intragastric pH monitoring for the PD analysis was implemented for baseline and after the single- and multiple-dose. Results: Gastric acid suppression evaluated by the percentage decrease from baseline in the integrated gastric acidity for a 24-hour interval after the multiple-dose was similar between the treatments in both dose groups. The systemic exposure of rabeprazole at steady state after the multiple-dose was also similar between the treatments in both dose groups. The time to reach the maximum rabeprazole concentration was faster in the test treatment. The PK-PD relationship of PPI is well known, and the faster absorption of rabeprazole resulted in a more rapid mode of action in acid suppression. Conclusion: The fixed dose combination of rabeprazole with NaHCO3 showed a faster absorption and consequently, a more rapid gastric acid suppression with a similar systemic exposure of rabeprazole at steady state compared to the conventional enteric-coated rabeprazole.

Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Two Empagliflozin Formulations in Healthy Korean Subjects.

Purpose: Empagliflozin is a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor that is commonly used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. As cocrystal formulation can improve the chemical properties of drugs, CKD-370 was newly developed as a cocrystal formulation of empagliflozin with solvate L-proline. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of these two empagliflozin formulations in healthy Korean subjects. Methods: A randomized, open-label, two-sequence, two-period crossover study was conducted on healthy Korean participants. The subjects received a single oral 25 mg dose of either test (CKD-370) or reference treatment (Jardiance®) tablet at each period. Plasma empagliflozin concentrations were determined using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were analyzed using non-compartmental methods. The primary PK parameters included the maximum concentration (Cmax) and the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to last (AUClast). The safety of both formulations was monitored and evaluated. Results: A total of 28 healthy Korean adult subjects were randomized, and 27 subjects were included in the PK analysis. The mean ± standard deviation values of the primary PK parameters, Cmax and AUClast after administration of the test treatment, were 442.02 ± 103.37 µg/L and 3131.08 ± 529.30 µg·h/L, respectively, and those after administration of the reference treatment were 436.29 ± 118.74 µg/L and 3006.88 ± 514.21 µg·h/L, respectively. The geometric mean ratio and its 90% confidence interval of test to reference treatment for Cmax and AUClast were 1.0221 (0.9527-1.0967) and 1.0411 (1.0153-1.0677), respectively, which were within the commonly accepted bioequivalence criteria of 0.80 to 1.25. Both treatments were well-tolerated. Conclusion: The two formulations of empagliflozin showed similar PK characteristics and were generally well tolerated in healthy subjects.

Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of bersiporocin, a novel prolyl-tRNA synthetase inhibitor, in healthy subjects.

Bersiporocin, a novel first-in-class prolyl-tRNA synthetase (PRS) inhibitor currently under clinical development, was shown to exert an antifibrotic effect through the downregulation of collagen synthesis in various pulmonary fibrosis models. The aim of this first-in-human, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single- and multiple-dose, dose-escalation study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics of bersiporocin in healthy adults. A total of 40 and 32 subjects were included in a single- (SAD) and multiple-ascending dose (MAD) study, respectively. No severe or serious adverse events were observed after a single oral dose up to 600 mg and multiple oral doses up to 200 mg twice daily for 14 days. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were gastrointestinal adverse events. To improve the tolerability, initial bersiporocin solution was changed to the enteric-coated formulation. Afterward, the enteric-coated tablet was used in the last cohort of SAD and in the MAD study. Bersiporocin showed dose-proportional PK characteristics after a single dose up to 600 mg and multiple doses up to 200 mg. Upon reviewing the safety and PK data, the final SAD cohort (800 mg enteric-coated tablet) was canceled by the Safety Review Committee. The levels of pro-peptide of type 3 procollagen were lower after treatment with bersiporocin than after the placebo in the MAD study, whereas no significant change was observed in other idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) biomarkers. In conclusion, the safety, PK, and PD profile of bersiporocin supported its further investigation in patients with IPF.

Considerations for clinical evaluation of the effects of bariatric surgery on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered drugs.

Obesity has been a growing worldwide concern, and surgical intervention including bariatric surgery is considered as one of the options for treatment. However, there still is controversy over the change in pharmacokinetics (PKs) of drugs after the surgery. To investigate the potential covariates that can influence the area under the curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), the design of previous studies was reviewed based on pre-determined eligibility criteria. Each study calculated the ratios of the AUC and Cmax before and after bariatric surgery. These studies investigated whether the PK parameters were affected by the time after the surgery or by the type of control group. The ratio of the AUC calculated in the early and late follow-up period was similar across Roux-en Y gastric bypass patients. No significant difference in the PK parameters was found between the pre-surgical patients and matched healthy subjects. However, certain control groups could be preferable depending on the purpose of the clinical trial. Although Cmax was inconsistent compared to the AUC, insufficient sampling of the time points may have caused such an inconsistency. This is the first article exploring the appropriate methodology in designing clinical studies for changes in the PK characteristics of orally administered drugs in patients with bariatric surgery.

Comparative Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Fixed-Dose Combination of Esomeprazole and Calcium Carbonate (AD-206) to the Conventional Esomeprazole.

PURPOSE: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are used for the treatment of acid-related disorders. Demands for enhanced stability and faster onset led to the development of AD-206, a fixed-dose combination of a PPI (esomeprazole) with an antacid salt (calcium carbonate). This study compared the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of AD-206 (Addpharma) with conventional esomeprazole (Nexium®, AstraZeneca). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-sequence crossover study was conducted with 2 different doses of esomeprazole at 20 and 40 mg with a fixed calcium carbonate dose of 600 mg in AD-206. Forty-four subjects were included in each dose group and randomly received either AD-206 or the conventional esomeprazole for 7 consecutive days in each period. After a single- and multiple-dose, blood samples for the PK analysis were analyzed, and 24-hour intragastric pH monitoring was conducted. RESULTS: The systemic exposure of esomeprazole after a multiple-dose of AD-206 was similar to that of the conventional esomeprazole in both doses, but the time to reach the peak concentration was faster in AD-206. The percentage decrease from baseline in the integrated gastric acidity for a 24-hour interval after the dose was not significantly different between the AD-206 and the conventional esomeprazole after a single- and multiple-dose for both doses, and the time to reach pH 4 was faster for AD-206. CONCLUSION: AD-206 showed a similar systemic exposure and suppression of gastric acid secretion after a multiple-dose compared to the conventional esomeprazole.