Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 82
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Sex Med ; 21(2): 163-168, 2024 Jan 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38087916

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Plaque excision and grafting (PEG) has been recommended for patients with Peyronie's disease (PD) with >60° curvature and/or hinge effect and strong preoperative erections, while placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) is recommended when rigidity is suboptimal. Nevertheless, many patients counseled to undergo an IPP decline and insist on proceeding with PEG due to personal preference or desire to avoid an implant. AIM: We aim to review long-term outcomes in patients who underwent PEG for PD at our institution and investigate whether there is any difference in long-term outcomes in patients who undergo PEG despite a recommendation to undergo IPP. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review from 2007 to 2021 on PEG surgery performed at a single tertiary care institution in patients ≥18 years old who had >3 months of follow-up. OUTCOMES: Postoperative information was gathered from the electronic medical record, including postoperative erectile function, patient satisfaction, and the ability to engage in penetrative sexual intercourse. RESULTS: An overall 251 patients underwent PEG with a median follow-up of 12 months (IQR, 6-54). Among these, 54 (22%) were initially advised to undergo IPP but elected for PEG. Patients who underwent PEG despite counseling to undergo IPP reported lower postoperative ability to engage in intercourse (51% vs 76%). Seven (13%) patients initially advised to undergo IPP eventually received an IPP, relative to 7 (4%) initially advised to undergo PEG. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Thorough preoperative assessment of erectile function and penile deformity can guide clinician counseling and manage patient expectations during decision making between PEG surgery and IPP implantation for PD. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Limitations of this study include its retrospective nature, high attrition to follow-up, and risk of recall and selection bias. This is a large study with a median follow-up of 12 months, with a high-volume single surgeon who treats patients in a specialized population of complex cases. CONCLUSION: Patients who were initially counseled to undergo IPP due to suboptimal erectile rigidity but elected for PEG had worse postoperative ability to engage in penetrative intercourse, and a higher proportion of these patients eventually received an IPP.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil , Implante Peniano , Induração Peniana , Prótese de Pênis , Adolescente , Humanos , Masculino , Aconselhamento , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia , Satisfação do Paciente , Implante Peniano/métodos , Prótese de Pênis/psicologia , Pênis/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto
2.
J Sex Med ; 20(6): 888-892, 2023 05 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37076135

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: While implantation of an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) is commonly performed via infrapubic or penoscrotal approaches, the subcoronal (SC) approach for IPP implantation may safely and reliably allow for additional reconstructive procedures through a single incision. AIM: The aim of this study is to report outcomes, including complications, of the SC approach and to determine common characteristics of patients undergoing the SC approach. METHODS: A retrospective chart review from May 11, 2012, to January 31, 2022, was performed at a single, tertiary care institution to identify patients with IPP implantation via the SC approach. OUTCOMES: Postoperative information was reviewed and extracted from all clinic notes available following the date of IPP implantation in the electronic medical record, detailing any complications including wound complications, need for revision or removal, device malfunction, and infections. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients had IPP implantation via the SC approach. Median follow-up duration was 29.4 (interquartile range 14.9-50.1) months. One (1.8%) patient had a simple wound complication. Two (3.6%) experienced postoperative infection of the prosthesis, which resulted in explantation of the device. One of these infected prostheses later experienced partial glans necrosis. Revision for mechanical failure or unsatisfactory cosmetic result was performed in 3 (7.3%) IPPs placed via a SC incision. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The SC approach for implantation of IPP is safe and feasible with low complication and revision rates. It offers urologists an alternative to the classic infrapubic and penoscrotal approaches, both of which would require a second incision for additional reconstructive procedures required to adequately address deformities associated with severe Peyronie's disease. Therefore, urologists who treat these specialized populations of men may benefit from having the SC approach in their array of techniques for IPP implantation. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: The limitations of this study include its retrospective nature, risk of selection bias, lack of comparison groups, and sample size. This study reports on early experience with the SC approach performed by a single high-volume reconstructive surgeon, who treats a specialized population of patients requiring complex repair during implantation of an IPP, particularly those with Peyronie's disease. CONCLUSION: The SC incision for IPP implantation has low rates of complications and remains our approach of choice for IPP implantation in patients with severe Peyronie's disease, including curvatures >60°, severe indentation with hinge, and grade 3 calcification, which are unlikely to respond adequately to manual modeling alone.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil , Implante Peniano , Induração Peniana , Prótese de Pênis , Masculino , Humanos , Implante Peniano/métodos , Induração Peniana/cirurgia , Prótese de Pênis/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Satisfação do Paciente , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia
3.
J Sex Med ; 20(12): 1431-1439, 2023 11 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37837552

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Culture-based studies have shown that penile prostheses harbor biofilms in the presence and absence of infection, but these findings have not been adequately validated using contemporary microbiome analytic techniques. AIM: The study sought to characterize microbial biofilms of indwelling penile prosthesis devices according to patient factors, device components, manufacturer, and infection status. METHODS: Upon penile prostheses surgical explantation, device biofilms were extracted, sonicated, and characterized using shotgun metagenomics and culture-based approaches. Device components were also analyzed using scanning electron microscopy. OUTCOMES: Outcomes included the presence or absence of biofilms, alpha and beta diversity, specific microbes identified and the presence of biofilm, and antibiotic resistance genes on each prosthesis component. RESULTS: The average age of participants from whom devices were explanted was 61 ± 11 years, and 9 (45%) of 20 had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Seventeen devices were noninfected, and 3 were associated with clinical infection. Mean device indwelling time prior to explant was 5.1 ± 5.1 years. All analyzed components from 20 devices had detectable microbial biofilms, both in the presence and absence of infection. Scanning electron microscopy corroborated the presence of biofilms across device components. Significant differences between viruses, prokaryotes, and metabolic pathways were identified between individual patients, device manufacturers, and infection status. Mobiluncus curtisii was enriched in manufacturer A device biofilms relative to manufacturer B device biofilms. Bordetella bronchialis, Methylomicrobium alcaliphilum, Pseudoxanthomonas suwonensis, and Porphyrobacter sp. were enriched in manufacturer B devices relative to manufacturer A devices. The most abundant bacterial phyla were the Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Firmicutes. Glycogenesis, the process of glycogen synthesis, was among the predominant metabolic pathways detected across device components. Beta diversity of bacteria, viruses, protozoa, and pathways did not differ among device components. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: All components of all penile prostheses removed from infected and noninfected patients have biofilms. The significance of biofilms on noninfected devices remains unknown and merits further investigation. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Strengths include the multipronged approach to characterize biofilms and being the first study to include all components of penile prostheses in tandem. Limitations include the relatively few number of infected devices in the series, a relatively small subset of devices included in shotgun metagenomics analysis, and the lack of anaerobic and other expanded conditions for culture. CONCLUSION: Penile prosthesis biofilms are apparent in the presence and absence of infection, and the composition of biofilms was driven primarily by device manufacturer, individual variability, and infection, while being less impacted by device component.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Prótese de Pênis , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Biofilmes , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Implantação de Prótese
4.
J Sex Med ; 19(4): 629-640, 2022 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35177375

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite an increasing number of publications on Peyronie's disease (PD), evidence-based clinical decision-making remains challenging due to the small number of well-designed clinical trials. AIM: To perform a critical analysis of reporting quality in PD systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analyses (MA). METHODS: Study protocol registration was performed on the Open Science Framework platform. In January 2021, a systematic electronic search of the Medline/PubMed, Embase, Ovid, Scopus, Joanne Briggs Institute, and Cochrane databases was performed. Search terms included "Peyronie's disease" and "systematic review OR meta-analysis OR meta-analysis." Eligibility criteria were English-language, relevance to PD and specification of "systematic review" or "meta-analysis" in the title or abstract. Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine levels of evidence were used to classify original studies reviewed within each publication. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBIS tool. Data were tabulated and reported as means with standard deviation, median with interquartile range and t-testing as appropriate. Strength of association between variables was calculated using Pearson correlation coefficient. Statistical analyses were performed on RStudio (version 1.4.1106). OUTCOMES: Outcomes included review type, level of evidence, authorship, journal, publication date, "A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews" (AMSTAR-2) score and "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses" (PRISMA) score. RESULTS: From 1974 to 2021, 340 articles were identified. After review, 17 full length articles were included. Thirteen were SR, 2 MA and 2 was combined. Significant heterogeneity was seen in evidence level of included studies. There was median 54% adherence to AMSTAR-2 criteria and 74% adherence to PRISMA criteria. Overall AMSTAR-2 confidence rating was Critically Low in 11 of 17 studies. Correlation analysis revealed very high positive association between AMSTAR 2 and PRISMA adherence (+0.95). ROBIS revealed "High" concern regarding methods used to collect data and appraise 12/17 studies (71%), and "High" concern regarding synthesis and findings in 8 of 17 studies (47%). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Many SR include markedly heterogenous levels of evidence and fail to meet accepted methodological criteria for reporting. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Main strengths include extensive literature review and analysis of standardized study reporting. One limitation is that aggregate scoring of AMSTAR-2 and PRISMA is not intended as primary method of quality assessment; however effect was minimized by reporting critical domains, overall quality assessments and specifics on globally poorly reported domains. CONCLUSION: More high quality randomized controlled PD trials are necessary; SR and MA should focus on these studies alone. Bole R, Gottlich HC, Ziegelmann MJ, et al. A Critical Analysis of Reporting in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Peyronie's Disease Literature. J Sex Med 2022;19:629-640.


Assuntos
Induração Peniana , Bibliometria , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Masculino , Metanálise como Assunto , Projetos de Pesquisa , Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto
5.
J Urol ; 206(3): 725-732, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33872052

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The primary aim of our study was to evaluate relief of chronic scrotal content pain after a series of spermatic cord blocks with a combination of local anesthetic and a steroid. Secondary aims were to assess factors associated with a positive response and complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent spermatic cord block series for chronic scrotal content pain at our practice between 2012 and 2019. Pain scores were compared before and after treatment using an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. We performed univariate analysis to assess differences between responders and nonresponders, and the relationship between symptom duration and response was analyzed by rank-order correlation. RESULTS: We included 44 men with chronic scrotal content pain present for a median duration of 24 months who underwent a spermatic cord block series. At a median followup of 16 months, 31 patients (70.5%) experienced sustained relief, including 9 patients (20.5%) with complete resolution of pain. There were no differences between responders and nonresponders in terms of symptom duration, perceived etiology, or previous treatments, and there was no association between response and duration of pain. Minor complications occurred in 5 cases (11.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Spermatic cord block series is a safe, minimally invasive treatment for men with refractory chronic scrotal content pain. Response to cord block series appears to be independent of symptom duration, perceived etiology or prior medical and surgical treatments. Future studies should be conducted to evaluate long-term durability and predictors of success.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/terapia , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Cordão Espermático/efeitos dos fármacos , Doenças Testiculares/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Dor Crônica/diagnóstico , Dor Crônica/etiologia , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Estudos Retrospectivos , Escroto/inervação , Doenças Testiculares/complicações , Doenças Testiculares/diagnóstico , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
6.
Curr Urol Rep ; 22(2): 12, 2021 Jan 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33447905

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic scrotal content pain (CSCP) is a complex condition with multiple etiologies that requires a thorough understanding of its pathophysiology, workup, and treatment options. We performed a comprehensive and contemporary review to augment our current understanding of CSCP. RECENT FINDINGS: We discuss new advances in CSCP-specific pain questionnaires, modern studies of microscopic spermatic cord denervation and its variations, and novel techniques including electric nerve stimulation and cryoablation in addition to randomized control trials with significant negative findings. We also present literature focusing on the prevention of CSCP secondary to surgical iatrogenic causes. The constantly evolving literature of CSCP has led to the significant evolution in its diagnosis and treatment, from oral medications to salvage options after microscopic spermatic cord denervation. With each advance, we come closer to developing a more thorough, evidence-based algorithm to guide urologists in treatment of CSCP.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/terapia , Doenças dos Genitais Masculinos/terapia , Escroto , Algoritmos , Dor Crônica/etiologia , Criocirurgia , Denervação/métodos , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Doenças dos Genitais Masculinos/diagnóstico , Doenças dos Genitais Masculinos/etiologia , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Microcirurgia , Medição da Dor , Dor Pélvica/etiologia , Dor Pélvica/terapia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Dermatopatias/diagnóstico , Dermatopatias/etiologia , Dermatopatias/terapia , Cordão Espermático/inervação , Doenças Testiculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Testiculares/terapia
7.
J Sex Med ; 17(12): 2456-2461, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33067161

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Peyronie's disease (PD) is characterized by penile pain, deformity, and sexual dysfunction, often resulting in an impaired sexual experience and significant psychological bother for the patient. However, there are limited data on the impact of PD on female sexual partners (FSPs). AIM: To compare the psychosexual experience of men with PD and their FSPs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all prospectively enrolled men and their FSPs who presented for initial PD evaluation to our sexual health clinic from July 2018 to February 2020. All men completed a PD-specific survey and the PD questionnaire (PDQ). If the patient was accompanied by an FSP during initial evaluation, she completed the PDQ for Female Sexual Partners and Female Sexual Function Index. We further queried our database that included information on patient demographics and clinical characteristics. OUTCOMES: The main outcome of this study is retrospective comparison of responses with the PDQ and PDQ for Female Sexual Partners. RESULTS: Data were available for 44 men with PD (median age, 56 years; interquartile range, 49-63) and their FSPs (median age, 54 years; interquartile range, 50-61). The majority of men presented in the chronic phase (35 of 44, 79.5%), and median objective composite curvature was 75° (interquartile range, 50-90°). Owing to PD, female and male partners reported similar difficulty with vaginal intercourse (VI) (74.3% vs 81.5%, P = .555), decreased frequency of VI (70.6% vs 85.2%, P = .228), and at least moderate discomfort/pain with VI (48.6% vs 33.3%, P = .232). FSPs were "very" or "extremely" bothered by the appearance of their partner's erect penis less often than male partners (20.0% vs 59.3%, P < .001). FSPs were "very" or "extremely" bothered by their partner's PD during VI less often than men with PD (32.3% vs 65.2%, P = .017). Few FSPs (22.9%) had "severe" or "very severe" concern with damaging their partner's penis during VI. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The sexual experience for men with PD and their FSPs differs, thus emphasizing the importance of active engagement of both men with PD and FSP during initial PD evaluation. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This initial study draws data from a single, high-volume men's health clinic with a limited sample size. Survey responses may have been shared by patients with PD and their FSPs. CONCLUSION: PD impacts the sexual experience for both men and FSPs. A similarly large proportion of men with PD and FSP noted decreased frequency of and difficulty with vaginal intercourse. Yet, FSPs were less bothered by the appearance of the erect penis and the deformity during VI compared with men. Farrell MR, Ziegelmann MJ, Bajic P, et al. Peyronie's Disease and the Female Sexual Partner: A Comparison of the Male and Female Experience. J Sex Med 2020;17:2456-2461.


Assuntos
Induração Peniana , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pênis , Estudos Retrospectivos , Comportamento Sexual , Parceiros Sexuais
8.
J Sex Med ; 17(5): 1005-1011, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32127330

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A subset of patients with Peyronie's disease (PD) treated with collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) experience persistent bother and some require surgery. AIM: We characterize patients experiencing persistent bother after CCH treatment and identify associations and predictors of surgical intervention/outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with PD from October 2014 to October 2019 and identified those presenting with persistent bother after CCH treatment by other urologists. Intracavernosal injection and penile Doppler ultrasonography were performed, and subsequent interventions/outcomes were recorded. Baseline characteristics were compared with Student t-test and chi-square test. Predictors of surgical intervention and complications were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was surgery after CCH treatment. Secondary outcomes included worsened erectile function, sensory deficits, and penile length change. RESULTS: Of 573, 67 (11.7%) patients with PD had undergone prior CCH treatment with median 6 injections (range 2-24). Mean post-CCH PD Questionnaire bother score was 10.1 (SD: 3.1), and total International Index of Erectile Function-5 was 15.3 (SD: 8.7). Mean PD duration was 27.8 (SD: 35.7) months, with a mean composite curvature (MCC) of 69.0° (SD: 33.8) measured after injection. Of 67, 44 (65.7%) patients had MCC >60°. Of 67, 52 (77.6%) patients had indent, narrowing, or hourglass and 26 (38.8%) had hinge effect (buckling of the erect penis with axial pressure) on examination. Calcification was identified in 26 of 67 (38.8%) patients, with grade 3 calcifications comprising 6 of 23 (26.1%) patients. Of 67, 33 (49.3%) patients underwent surgery, with 20 (60.1%) undergoing partial plaque excision and grafting with/without tunica albuginea plication, 6 (18.2%) undergoing tunica albuginea plication alone, and 7 (21.2%) undergoing penile prosthesis with plaque incision and grafting. Surgical patients had greater mean curvature (82.6 vs 55.4, P = .001) and were more likely to have hinge (54.5% vs 20.6%, P = .005). On multivariable analysis, MCC ≥60° predicted patient's decision for surgery (odds ratio: 2.99, P < .01, 95% confidence interval: 1.62-4.35). There were no associations between surgical complications and number of injections or CCH-associated adverse events. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Patients presenting with persistent bother after CCH treatment often have narrowing and calcifications (despite calcifications being a contraindication to CCH treatment), and those who have hinge or severe curvature are more likely to undergo surgery with low rates of complications. STRENGTHS/LIMITATIONS: This study's generalizability is limited by selection bias, but useful data are provided for patient counseling. CONCLUSION: Patients with persistent bother after CCH treatment had high rates of indentation/narrowing, plaque calcifications, and MCC >60° at completion of CCH treatment. Surgical intervention is more common with hinge and is safe and feasible in these patients, with low rates of complications. These findings suggest possible negative prognostic factors for CCH treatment, which merit further investigation. Bajic P, Wiggins AB, Ziegelmann MJ, et al. Characteristics of Men With Peyronie's Disease and Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum Treatment Failure: Predictors of Surgical Intervention and Outcomes. J Sex Med 2020;17:1005-1011.


Assuntos
Colagenase Microbiana , Induração Peniana , Clostridium histolyticum , Humanos , Injeções Intralesionais , Masculino , Colagenase Microbiana/uso terapêutico , Induração Peniana/tratamento farmacológico , Induração Peniana/cirurgia , Pênis/diagnóstico por imagem , Pênis/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Falha de Tratamento , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
J Sex Med ; 17(6): 1175-1181, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32229093

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) after radical prostatectomy (RP) improve with conservative therapy but some do not; penile prosthesis implantation rates have been sparsely reported, and have used nonrepresentative data sets. AIM: To characterize rates and timing of penile prosthesis implantation after RP and to identify predictors of implantation using a more representative data set. METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient and State Ambulatory Surgery databases for Florida from 2006 to 2015 were used. Patients undergoing RP (2006-2012) were tracked longitudinally for penile prosthesis implantation. Patient and clinical data were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was risk-adjusted predictors of prosthesis implantation, and the secondary outcome was predictors of the highest quartile of time between RP and penile prosthesis. RESULTS: Of 29,288 men who had RP, 1,449 (4.9%) patients underwent subsequent prosthesis. The mean time from RP to prosthesis was 2.6 years (median: 2.1; interquartile range [IQR]: 1.2-3.5). Adjusted predictors of prosthesis implantation included open RP (odds ratio [OR]: 1.5, P < .01), African American race (OR: 1.7, P < .01) or Hispanic ethnicity (OR: 3.2, P < .01), and Medicare (OR: 1.4, P < .01) insurance. Oler patients (age >70 years; OR: 0.7, P < .01) and those from the highest income quartile relative to the lowest (OR: 0.8, P < .05) were less likely to be implanted. Adjusted predictors of longer RP-to-implantation time (highest quartile: median: 4.7 years; IQR: 3.9-6.0 years) included open RP (OR: 1.78, P < .01), laparoscopic RP (OR: 4.67, P < .01), Medicaid (OR: 3.03, P < .05), private insurance (OR: 2.57, P < .01), and being in the highest income quartile (OR: 2.52, P < .01). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: These findings suggest ED treatment healthcare disparities meriting further investigation; upfront counseling on all ED treatment modalities and close monitoring for conservative treatment failure may reduce lost quality of life years. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by its use of administrative data, which relies on accurate coding and lacks data on ED questionnaires/prior treatments, patient-level cost, and oncologic outcomes. Quartile-based analysis of income and time between RP and prosthesis limits the conclusions that can be drawn. CONCLUSION: Less than 5% of post-RP patients undergo penile prosthesis implantation, with open RP, Medicare, African American race, and Hispanic ethnicity predicting post-RP implantation; living in the wealthiest residential areas predicts lower likelihood of implantation compared to the least wealthy areas. Patients with the longest time between RP and prosthesis are more likely to live in the wealthiest areas or have undergone open/laparoscopic RP relative to robotic RP. Bajic P, Patel PM, Nelson MH, et al. Penile Prosthesis Implantation and Timing Disparities After Radical Prostatectomy: Results From a Statewide Claims Database. J Sex Med 2020;17:1175-1181.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil , Implante Peniano , Prótese de Pênis , Idoso , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia , Disfunção Erétil/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Qualidade de Vida , Estados Unidos
10.
Curr Opin Urol ; 30(3): 355-362, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32235279

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Contrary to historic dogma, many tissues and organs in the human body contain a resident population of bacteria, fungi, and viruses collectively known as the microbiome. The microbiome plays a role in both homeostatic symbiosis and also pathogenic dysbiosis in a wide array of diseases. Our understanding of the relationship between the microbiome and male factor infertility is in its infancy but is slowly evolving. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent literature indicates that semen (and likely the testis) is not sterile and contains a distinct microbiome, and these changes in its composition are associated with alterations in semen quality and fertility status. Preliminary investigation indicates that manipulating the human microbiome may have implications in improving semen parameters and fertility. SUMMARY: In this review, we describe relationships between the microbiome and the genitourinary system, discuss the prior work on the relationship among bacteriospermia, leukocytospermia and male factor infertility, and summarize the current literature utilizing 16s rRNA-based next-generation sequencing on the seminal and testicular microbiome. We explore the specific microbial taxa implicated in various aspects of spermatic dysfunction and introduce preliminary evidence for therapeutic approaches to alter the microbiome and improve fertility status.


Assuntos
Infertilidade Masculina/microbiologia , Microbiota , Sêmen/microbiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Metagenômica , RNA Ribossômico 16S , Análise do Sêmen
11.
Int J Urol ; 27(6): 504-516, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32253786

RESUMO

Peyronie's disease is a common yet poorly understood condition characterized by penile pain, curvature, sexual dysfunction and psychological bother. Peyronie's disease represents a penile wound healing disorder, and is thought to arise from exuberant scarring in response to penile trauma in genetically predisposed men. In the absence of active treatment, the majority of men experience stable or worsening symptoms, with few reporting spontaneous resolution in penile curvature or other deformity. In contrast, penile pain improves or resolves in the majority of men. Treatment options vary based on symptom severity and stability. Several oral therapies are commonly prescribed, although to date there are no strong data to support any oral agents as monotherapy for Peyronie's disease. Other options including penile traction therapy and intralesional injections result in modest improvements for many patients, particularly when used early after symptom onset. Penile straightening through approaches, such as penile plication and plaque incision or partial excision and grafting, represent the most rapid and reliable approach to correct penile curvature once the symptoms have stabilized. Side-effects vary based on the type of surgery carried out, and include penile shortening, sensation changes and erectile dysfunction in the minority of men. In patients with drug refractory erectile dysfunction and Peyronie's disease, placement of a penile prosthesis will address both issues, and is associated with high levels of patient satisfaction. The current review provides a practical approach to the modern evaluation and management of patients presenting with Peyronie's disease.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil , Doenças do Pênis , Induração Peniana , Humanos , Injeções Intralesionais , Masculino , Induração Peniana/tratamento farmacológico , Induração Peniana/terapia , Pênis
12.
Curr Urol Rep ; 20(7): 34, 2019 May 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31104156

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize recent investigation into associations between the genitourinary microbiota and prostatic disease. RECENT FINDINGS: The genitourinary tract is not sterile. There are microbial communities (microbiota) in each niche of the genitourinary tract including the bladder, prostate, and urethra, which have been the subject of increasing scientific interest. Investigators have utilized several unique methods to study them, resulting in a highly heterogeneous body of literature. To characterize these genitourinary microbiota, diverse clinical specimens have been analyzed, including urine obtained by various techniques, seminal fluid, expressed prostatic secretions, and prostatic tissue. Recent studies have attempted to associate the microbiota detected from these samples with urologic disease and have implicated the genitourinary microbiota in many common conditions, including benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), prostate cancer, and chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). In this review, we summarize the recent literature pertaining to the genitourinary microbiota and its relationship to the pathophysiology and management of three common prostatic conditions: BPH, prostate cancer, and CP/CPPS.


Assuntos
Microbiota , Dor Pélvica/microbiologia , Doenças Prostáticas/microbiologia , Sistema Urogenital/microbiologia , Doença Crônica , Humanos , Masculino
13.
J Urol ; 210(3): 508-509, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37555601
14.
J Urol ; 209(2): 406-407, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36453159
15.
J Urol ; 210(4): 686-687, 2023 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37490614
16.
J Urol ; 210(5): 801, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37811755
18.
J Urol ; 208(4): 876-877, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35830556
20.
J Urol ; 206(3): 732, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34130495
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA