RESUMO
Quality of life (QOL) measures have become increasingly important in the management of patients with complex diseases. There are a number of instruments to measure QOL that include broad areas or domains of physical, psychological, social, spiritual, and environmental issues. The number of potential domains plus the large number of items within each domain have led to the development of a large variety of QOL instruments and of different approaches by using both health-related and non-health-related factors. Health-related QOL (HRQOL) measures have been incorporated into clinical trials to assess changes in the patient's perspective on his or her disease and the effects of treatment. An important aspect of these HR-QOL instruments is that these questionnaires are patient reported and usually self-administered. The life-long therapy of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) can be a challenge to the patient, his or her family and the physician. A number of patient-reported surveys have been published that examined treatment satisfaction and the comparison between IVIG and SCIG replacement therapy in patients with primary immunodeficiency. This review explores the use of HR-QOL surveys in patient preferences for mode and route of immunoglobulin therapy and site of care. Shared decision-making will be explored to emphasize the importance of this approach in optimizing patient care and compliance.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisão Compartilhada , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapêutico , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/terapia , Doenças da Imunodeficiência Primária/terapiaRESUMO
Secondary hypogammaglobulinemia (SHG) is characterized by reduced immunoglobulin levels due to acquired causes of decreased antibody production or increased antibody loss. Clarification regarding whether the hypogammaglobulinemia is secondary or primary is important because this has implications for evaluation and management. Prior receipt of immunosuppressive medications and/or presence of conditions associated with SHG development, including protein loss syndromes, are histories that raise suspicion for SHG. In patients with these histories, a thorough investigation of potential etiologies of SHG reviewed in this report is needed to devise an effective treatment plan focused on removal of iatrogenic causes (eg, discontinuation of an offending drug) or treatment of the underlying condition (eg, management of nephrotic syndrome). When iatrogenic causes cannot be removed or underlying conditions cannot be reversed, therapeutic options are not clearly delineated but include heightened monitoring for clinical infections, supportive antimicrobials, and in some cases, immunoglobulin replacement therapy. This report serves to summarize the existing literature regarding immunosuppressive medications and populations (autoimmune, neurologic, hematologic/oncologic, pulmonary, posttransplant, protein-losing) associated with SHG and highlights key areas for future investigation.
Assuntos
Agamaglobulinemia , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência , Agamaglobulinemia/diagnóstico , Agamaglobulinemia/etiologia , Agamaglobulinemia/terapia , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum/complicações , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica , Imunidade , Imunoglobulinas , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/complicações , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/diagnóstico , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/terapiaRESUMO
The article Assessment of Local Adverse Reactions to Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin (SCIG) in Clinical Trials, written by Mark Ballow, Richard L. Wasserman, Stephen Jolles, Helen Chapel, Mel Berger, Siraj A. Misbah, was originally published Online First without open access.
RESUMO
Human immunoglobulin preparations for intravenous or subcutaneous administration are the cornerstone of treatment in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases affecting the humoral immune system. Intravenous preparations have a number of important uses in the treatment of other diseases in humans as well, some for which acceptable treatment alternatives do not exist. We provide an update of the evidence-based guideline on immunoglobulin therapy, last published in 2006. Given the potential risks and inherent scarcity of human immunoglobulin, careful consideration of its indications and administration is warranted.
Assuntos
Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapêutico , Imunoglobulinas/uso terapêutico , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/terapia , Animais , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Imunidade Humoral , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/imunologia , Imunomodulação , Injeções Subcutâneas , Guias de Prática Clínica como AssuntoRESUMO
Quantification of T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs) for newborn screening for SCID has advanced the diagnosis of severe combined immune deficiency (SCID). However, it has led to the identification of infants with T cell lymphopenia without known cause. The clinical characteristics, appropriate laboratory monitoring, and outcomes of patients remain unclear. We performed a retrospective review of clinical and laboratory studies for 26 infants collected from 7 New York State referral centers from 2010 to 2016 with low TRECs (mean, 70copies/µl) and subnormal CD3 counts (mean, 1150/cubicmm). Over time absolute CD3 counts increased in 17 and decreased in 9; 22 (85%) have done well clinically regardless of absolute T cell values. Additional infants with TCL will continue to be identified in newborn screening panels. While most patients seem to do well clinically, parameters for diagnosis and monitoring have yet to be formalized, and additional information needs to be collected, causes and outcomes reported.
Assuntos
DNA/sangue , Linfopenia/diagnóstico , Imunodeficiência Combinada Severa/diagnóstico , Linfócitos T/citologia , Complexo CD3/imunologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Rearranjo Gênico do Linfócito T , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Contagem de Linfócitos , Linfopenia/sangue , Linfopenia/imunologia , Masculino , Triagem Neonatal , New York , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfócitos T/genética , Estudos Retrospectivos , Imunodeficiência Combinada Severa/sangue , Imunodeficiência Combinada Severa/imunologia , Linfócitos T/imunologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: The previous studies with Flebogamma(®) 5 % DIF intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) contained insufficient numbers of pediatric subjects to fully warrant a pediatric indication by the FDA. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of Flebogamma® 5 % DIF for replacement therapy in children (age 2-16) with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDD). METHODS: IVIG was administered at eight clinical sites to 24 subjects with well-defined PIDD at a dose of 300-800 mg/kg every 21-28 days for 12 months. The pharmacokinetics endpoint in this study was the dose-adjusted increment of the serum IgG trough levels. RESULTS: The calculated serious bacterial infection rate was 0.05/subject/year. The incidence of adverse events considered potentially related to IVIG during or within 72 h after completing an infusion was within the FDA guidance threshold of <40 % at each time point. Dose-adjusted incremental IgG levels remained approximately equal to or slightly greater than pre-study IgG levels (between 800 and 1000 mg/dL throughout) when the subjects were treated with IVIG therapy other than Flebogamma(®) DIF 5 % indicating no evidence of a different pharmacokinetic profile in this pediatric population if compared to those profiles in previous Flebogamma studies in predominately adult populations. CONCLUSIONS: Flebogamma(®) 5 % DIF is efficacious and safe, has adequate pharmacokinetic properties, is well-tolerated, and maintains the profile of Flebogamma(®) 5 % for the treatment of children with primary humoral immunodeficiency diseases.
Assuntos
Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/administração & dosagem , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Infecções Bacterianas/etiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/efeitos adversos , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/farmacocinética , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/diagnóstico , Masculino , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The present uncertainty of which live viral or bacterial vaccines can be given to immunodeficient patients and the growing neglect of societal adherence to routine immunizations has prompted the Medical Advisory Committee of the Immune Deficiency Foundation to issue recommendations based on published literature and the collective experience of the committee members. These recommendations address the concern for immunodeficient patients acquiring infections from healthy subjects who have not been immunized or who are shedding live vaccine-derived viral or bacterial organisms. Such transmission of infectious agents can occur within the hospital, clinic, or home or at any public gathering. Collectively, we define this type of transmission as close-contact spread of infectious disease that is particularly relevant in patients with impaired immunity who might have an infection when exposed to subjects carrying vaccine-preventable infectious diseases or who have recently received a live vaccine. Immunodeficient patients who have received therapeutic hematopoietic stem transplantation are also at risk during the time when immune reconstitution is incomplete or while they are receiving immunosuppressive agents to prevent or treat graft-versus-host disease. This review recommends the general education of what is known about vaccine-preventable or vaccine-derived diseases being spread to immunodeficient patients at risk for close-contact spread of infection and describes the relative risks for a child with severe immunodeficiency. The review also recommends a balance between the need to protect vulnerable subjects and their social needs to integrate into society, attend school, and benefit from peer education.
Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/transmissão , Vacinas Bacterianas/efeitos adversos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Vacinas Vivas não Atenuadas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Virais/efeitos adversos , Viroses/transmissão , Infecções Bacterianas/imunologia , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Bacterianas/imunologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência , Vacinas Vivas não Atenuadas/imunologia , Vacinas Virais/imunologia , Viroses/imunologia , Viroses/prevenção & controleRESUMO
PURPOSE: To describe the process and assess outcomes for the first 2 years of newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID NBS) in New York State (NYS). METHODS: The NYS algorithm utilizes a first-tier molecular screen for TRECs (T-cell receptor excision circles), the absence of which is indicative of increased risk of immunodeficiency. RESULTS: During the first 2 years, 485,912 infants were screened for SCID. Repeat specimens were requested from 561 premature and 746 non-premature infants with low or borderline TRECs. A total of 531 infants were referred for diagnostic evaluation leading to identification of 10 infants with SCID and 87 with a clinically significant non-SCID abnormality based on flow cytometry or CBC results (positive predictive value 20.3 %). Nine infants were diagnosed with typical SCID and one with leaky SCID. SCID diagnoses included two patients with adenosine deaminase deficiency, three patients with typical and one with leaky IL2RG-related SCID, one patient with IL7Rα-related SCID, and three cases of typical SCID, etiology unknown. TRECs were undetectable in eight of the nine babies with typical SCID. Infants with other non-SCID conditions included 27 patients with a syndrome that included T-cell impairment, 18 of which had DiGeorge syndrome. Seventeen infants had T-cell impairment secondary to another clinically significant condition, and 13 were classified as 'other'. Among 30 infants classified as idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia, 11 have since resolved, and the remainder continues to be followed. One infant with undetectable TRECs had normal follow-up studies. Molecular studies revealed the presence of two changes in the infant's DNA. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, ten infants with SCID were identified during the first 2 years of screening in NYS, yielding an incidence of approximately 1 in 48,500 live births, which is consistent with the incidence observed by other states screening for SCID. The incidence of any clinically significant laboratory abnormality was approximately 1 in 5,000; both estimates are higher than estimates prior to the onset of newborn screening for SCID. Improvements to the NYS algorithm included the addition of a borderline category that reduced the proportion of infants referred for flow cytometric analysis, without decreasing sensitivity. We identified a large number of infants with abnormal TRECs and subsequent idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia. Long-term follow-up studies are needed to determine the prognosis and optimal treatment for this group of patients, some of whom may present with previously unrecognized, transient lymphopenia of infancy.
Assuntos
Triagem Neonatal , Imunodeficiência Combinada Severa/diagnóstico , Algoritmos , Feminino , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Humanos , Imunofenotipagem/métodos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Triagem Neonatal/métodos , New York , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Imunodeficiência Combinada Severa/etiologia , Imunodeficiência Combinada Severa/terapiaRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) using assays to detect T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs) began in Wisconsin in 2008, and SCID was added to the national recommended uniform panel for newborn screened disorders in 2010. Currently 23 states, the District of Columbia, and the Navajo Nation conduct population-wide newborn screening for SCID. The incidence of SCID is estimated at 1 in 100,000 births. OBJECTIVES: To present data from a spectrum of SCID newborn screening programs, establish population-based incidence for SCID and other conditions with T-cell lymphopenia, and document early institution of effective treatments. DESIGN: Epidemiological and retrospective observational study. SETTING: Representatives in states conducting SCID newborn screening were invited to submit their SCID screening algorithms, test performance data, and deidentified clinical and laboratory information regarding infants screened and cases with nonnormal results. Infants born from the start of each participating program from January 2008 through the most recent evaluable date prior to July 2013 were included. Representatives from 10 states plus the Navajo Area Indian Health Service contributed data from 3,030,083 newborns screened with a TREC test. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Infants with SCID and other diagnoses of T-cell lymphopenia were classified. Incidence and, where possible, etiologies were determined. Interventions and survival were tracked. RESULTS: Screening detected 52 cases of typical SCID, leaky SCID, and Omenn syndrome, affecting 1 in 58,000 infants (95% CI, 1/46,000-1/80,000). Survival of SCID-affected infants through their diagnosis and immune reconstitution was 87% (45/52), 92% (45/49) for infants who received transplantation, enzyme replacement, and/or gene therapy. Additional interventions for SCID and non-SCID T-cell lymphopenia included immunoglobulin infusions, preventive antibiotics, and avoidance of live vaccines. Variations in definitions and follow-up practices influenced the rates of detection of non-SCID T-cell lymphopenia. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Newborn screening in 11 programs in the United States identified SCID in 1 in 58,000 infants, with high survival. The usefulness of detection of non-SCID T-cell lymphopenias by the same screening remains to be determined.
Assuntos
Linfopenia/diagnóstico , Triagem Neonatal/métodos , Imunodeficiência Combinada Severa/diagnóstico , Imunodeficiência Combinada Severa/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Prognóstico , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfócitos T/genética , Estudos Retrospectivos , Imunodeficiência Combinada Severa/terapia , Análise de Sobrevida , Linfócitos T/imunologia , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: An increasing body of evidence suggests that the optimal dose for IgG replacement therapy is the dose that keeps the patient as free from infection as possible by either intravenous or subcutaneous delivery. OBJECTIVE: To review the current evidence on optimizing IgG therapy in patients with primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD). METHODS: Surveys conducted among physicians who treat patients with PIDD indicate that most practitioners follow existing data and guidelines on the use and dosage of immunoglobulin therapy. On the basis of the current guidelines, most use intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy at a starting dose of 400 mg/kg every 4 weeks to treat a number of primary PIDDs with humoral immune deficiencies. However, for the optimal treatment of PIDDs, therapy needs to be tailored. RESULTS: Among the issues is the assessment of IgG trough levels or steady-state levels with subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) therapy needed to reduce or prevent infection in patients with PIDD. Increasing evidence suggests that optimization of treatment can be based on identifying the dosage of IVIG or SCIG for each patient needed to reduce infection. CONCLUSION: More studies are needed to better clarify the optimal dose, IgG trough level, or IgG steady-state level necessary to reduce infection and optimize treatment for patients with PIDD treated with IVIG or SCIG.
Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Imunoglobulina G/uso terapêutico , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/terapia , Pneumonia/prevenção & controle , Viroses/prevenção & controle , HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To review the literature related to the identification and treatment of secondary complications associated with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID). DATA SOURCES: The databases of PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE were searched for articles pertaining to comorbid conditions occurring in patients with CVID and effective treatment for or management of those conditions. STUDY SELECTIONS: Articles were selected based on their relevance to the focus of this review, with an emphasis on clinical phenotypes and biomarkers that can help identify patients with CVID and a secondary complication and issues related to their clinical management. RESULTS: Noninfective complications have generated a better understanding of the pathogenesis and treatment of CVID by helping to define clinical and immunologic phenotypes of this disease. These clinical phenotypes have been correlated with different survival risks. CONCLUSION: Emerging and ongoing research on clinical phenotypes and biomarkers of CVID may help identify and better target treatment for patients with CVID who will develop secondary complications. It is hoped that through this improved knowledge of outcomes, more appropriate treatment for patients can be targeted.
Assuntos
Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum/complicações , Gastroenteropatias/complicações , Gastroenteropatias/terapia , Pneumopatias/complicações , Pneumopatias/terapia , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum/terapia , Comorbidade , HumanosAssuntos
Agamaglobulinemia/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Agamaglobulinemia/diagnóstico , Agamaglobulinemia/etiologia , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum , Doenças Genéticas Ligadas ao Cromossomo X/diagnóstico , Doenças Genéticas Ligadas ao Cromossomo X/epidemiologia , Doenças Genéticas Ligadas ao Cromossomo X/etiologia , Humanos , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
A major diagnostic intervention in the consideration of many patients suspected to have primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDDs) is the application and interpretation of vaccination. Specifically, the antibody response to antigenic challenge with vaccines can provide substantive insight into the status of human immune function. There are numerous vaccines that are commonly used in healthy individuals, as well as others that are available for specialized applications. Both can potentially be used to facilitate consideration of PIDD. However, the application of vaccines and interpretation of antibody responses in this context are complex. These rely on consideration of numerous existing specific studies, interpolation of data from healthy populations, current diagnostic guidelines, and expert subspecialist practice. This document represents an attempt of a working group of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology to provide further guidance and synthesis in this use of vaccination for diagnostic purposes in consideration of PIDD, as well as to identify key areas for further research.
Assuntos
Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/imunologia , Vacinação , Cápsulas Bacterianas/imunologia , Bacteriófago phi X 174/imunologia , Vacinas Anti-Haemophilus/imunologia , Humanos , Imunidade Humoral , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/diagnóstico , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/imunologia , Vacina Antirrábica/imunologia , Vacinas contra Salmonella/imunologiaRESUMO
In the past 10 years, we have witnessed major advances in clinical immunology. Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency has become universal in the United States and screening programs are being extended to severe combined immunodeficiency and other inborn errors of immunity globally. Early genetic testing is becoming the norm for many of our patients and allows for informed selection of targeted therapies including biologics repurposed from other specialties. During the COVID-19 pandemic, our understanding of essential immune responses expanded and the discovery of immune gene defects continued. Immunoglobulin products, the backbone of protection for antibody deficiency syndromes, came into use to minimize side effects. New polyclonal and monoclonal antibody products emerged with increasing options to manage respiratory viral agents such as SARS-CoV-2 and respiratory syncytial virus. Against these advances, we still face major challenges. Atypical is becoming typical as phenotypes of distinct genetic disease overlap whereas the clinical spectrum of the same genetic defect widens. Therefore, clinical judgment needs to be paired with repeated deep immune phenotyping and upfront genetic testing, as technologies rapidly evolve, and clinical disease often progresses with age. Managing patients with organ damage resulting from immune dysregulation poses a special major clinical challenge and management often lacks standardization, from autoimmune cytopenias, granulomatous interstitial lung disease, enteropathy, and liver disease to endocrine, rheumatologic, and neurologic complications. Clinical, translational, and basic science networks will continue to advance the field; however, cross-talk and education with practicing allergists/immunologists are essential to keep up with the ever-changing clinical and genetic landscape of inborn errors of immunity.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência , Imunodeficiência Combinada Severa , Humanos , Pandemias , COVID-19/complicações , SARS-CoV-2 , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/genéticaRESUMO
Treatment decisions made in clinical practice, based on current guidelines, often conflict with decisions by third-party payors that restrict the ability of patients with primary immunodeficiency disease (PI) to adhere to appropriate treatment. This is seen by many physicians as potentially placing the health of patients at risk. Key treatment decisions challenged by third-party payors and discussed here include dosing, product safety, and routes of administration. Data on safety issues emphasize that IgG products are not generic drugs and each of the products currently licensed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) must be regarded as an individual therapy, given the products' different manufacturing processes and stabilizing ingredients. The issue of switching patients to a different product needs careful consideration as evidence shows that infusion-related adverse events in many patients are frequently related to this activity. Decisions regarding the route of therapy should also be individualized to the patient, weighing such factors as side effects, adherence with therapy, and lifestyle.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões Gerenciais , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/administração & dosagem , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/economia , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/terapia , Vias de Administração de Medicamentos , Cálculos da Dosagem de Medicamento , Substituição de Medicamentos , Humanos , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/economia , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Adesão à Medicação , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Medicina de PrecisãoAssuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Imunoglobulina G/uso terapêutico , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/tratamento farmacológico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Humanos , Injeções Subcutâneas , América do Norte , Projetos de PesquisaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: An investigational 10% liquid intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was studied in 63 patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) at 15 study sites. METHODS: Patients were treated every 3 or 4 weeks with 254-1029 mg/kg/infusion of IVIG. RESULTS: Overall, Biotest-IVIG infusions were well tolerated. The proportion of infusions that were associated with adverse events during infusion, and up to 72 h after infusion, including those unrelated to study product, was 27.7% with an upper 95% confidence limit ≤30.6%. Two serious bacterial infections (SBIs) were observed resulting in a serious bacterial infection rate of 0.035 per person per year and an upper one-sided 99% confidence limit of ≤0.136 SBI/patient/year. The number of days of work or school missed due to infection were relatively low at 2.28 days/patient/year. Two patients were hospitalized for infection producing a rate of 0.21 hospitalization days/patient/year. The IgG half-life was approximately 30 days with variation among individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacokinetic parameters of specific antibody activities were essentially the same as those of total IgG. Biotest-IVIG is safe and effective in the treatment of PID.
Assuntos
Agamaglobulinemia/terapia , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum/terapia , Doenças Genéticas Ligadas ao Cromossomo X/terapia , Deficiência de IgG/terapia , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Infecções Bacterianas/imunologia , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Deficiência de IgG/genética , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/administração & dosagem , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/efeitos adversos , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/farmacocinética , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum/tratamento farmacológico , Cefaleia/diagnóstico , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/administração & dosagem , Mialgia/diagnóstico , Adulto , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum/sangue , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum/imunologia , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum/patologia , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Cefaleia/induzido quimicamente , Cefaleia/fisiopatologia , Cefaleia/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/efeitos adversos , Infusões Intravenosas , Injeções Subcutâneas , Mialgia/induzido quimicamente , Mialgia/fisiopatologia , Mialgia/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) is an important treatment modality in patients with humoral or B-cell immune deficiency as replacement therapy. Soon after its introduction in the early 1980s for the treatment of patients with immune deficiency, IVIG was used in the treatment of children with idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura. Presently, more commercial IVIG is used for the treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders than as replacement therapy in patients with immune deficiency. Understanding the mechanisms of action of IVIG in these autoimmune and inflammatory disorders has occupied investigators over the past 3 decades. A number of mechanisms for the immune modulation and anti-inflammatory actions of IVIG have been described, including Fc receptor blockade, inhibition of complement deposition, enhancement of regulatory T cells, inhibition or neutralization of cytokines and growth factors, accelerated clearance of autoantibodies, modulation of adhesion molecules and cell receptors, and activation of regulatory macrophages through the FcγRIIb receptor. It can now be appreciated that IVIG affects many different pathways to modulate the immune and inflammatory response. Further delineation of these pathways might lead to new treatment strategies.