RESUMO
The American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) gathers extensive background information on emergency medicine-sponsored residency and fellowship programs, as well as the residents and fellows training in those programs. We present the 2018 annual report on the status of US emergency medicine training programs.
Assuntos
Medicina de Emergência/educação , Bolsas de Estudo , Internato e Residência , Medicina de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Bolsas de Estudo/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Conselhos de Especialidade Profissional , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) gathers extensive background information on emergency medicine residency programs and the residents training in those programs. We present the 2017 annual report on the status of US emergency medicine training programs.
Assuntos
Medicina de Emergência/educação , Bolsas de Estudo , Internato e Residência , Adulto , Certificação/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Bolsas de Estudo/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that patients are generally accepting of their enrollment in trials for emergency care conducted under exception from informed consent. It is unknown whether individuals with more severe initial injuries or worse clinical outcomes have different perspectives. Determining whether these differences exist may help to structure post-enrollment interactions. METHODS: Primary clinical data from the Progesterone for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury trial were matched to interview data from the Patients' Experiences in Emergency Research-Progesterone for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury study. Answers to three key questions from Patients' Experiences in Emergency Research-Progesterone for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury study were analyzed in the context of enrolled patients' initial injury severity (initial Glasgow Coma Scale and Injury Severity Score) and principal clinical outcomes (Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale and Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale relative to initial injury severity). The three key questions from Patients' Experiences in Emergency Research-Progesterone for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury study addressed participants' general attitude toward inclusion in the Progesterone for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury trial (general trial inclusion), their specific attitude toward being included in Progesterone for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury trial under the exception from informed consent (personal exception from informed consent enrollment), and their attitude toward the use of exception from informed consent in the Progesterone for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury trial in general (general exception from informed consent enrollment). Qualitative analysis of interview transcripts was performed to provide contextualization and to determine the extent to which respondents framed their attitudes in terms of clinical experience. RESULTS: Clinical data from Progesterone for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury trial were available for all 74 patients represented in the Patients' Experiences in Emergency Research-Progesterone for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury study (including 46 patients for whom the surrogate was interviewed due to the patient's cognitive status or death). No significant difference was observed regarding acceptance of general trial inclusion or acceptance of general exception from informed consent enrollment between participants with favorable neurological outcomes and those with unfavorable outcomes relative to initial injury. Agreement with personal enrollment in Progesterone for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury trial under exception from informed consent, however, was significantly higher among participants with favorable outcomes compared to those with unfavorable outcomes (89% vs 59%, p = 0.003). There was also a statistically significant relationship between more severe initial injury and increased acceptance of personal exception from informed consent enrollment ( p = 0.040) or general exception from informed consent use ( p = 0.034) in Progesterone for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury trial. Many individuals referenced personal experience as a basis for their attitudes, but these references were not used to support negative views. CONCLUSION: Patients and surrogates of patients with unfavorable clinical outcomes were somewhat less accepting of their own inclusion in the Progesterone for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury trial under exception from informed consent than were patients or surrogates of patients with favorable clinical outcomes. These findings suggest a need to identify optimal strategies for communicating with patients and their surrogates regarding exception from informed consent enrollment when clinical outcomes are poor.
Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Pesquisa Biomédica , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Emergências , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Progesterona/uso terapêutico , Progestinas/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Escala de Resultado de Glasgow , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Procurador , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) gathers extensive background information on emergency medicine residency programs and the residents training in those programs. We present the 2016 annual report on the status of US emergency medicine training programs.
Assuntos
Medicina de Emergência/educação , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Conselhos de Especialidade Profissional , Adulto , Medicina de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Research in acute illness often requires an exception from informed consent. Few studies have assessed the views of patients enrolled in exception from informed consent trials. This study was designed to assess the views of patients and their surrogates of exception from informed consent enrollment within the context of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of an investigational agent for traumatic brain injury. DESIGN: Interactive interview study. SETTING: Nested within the Progesterone for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury trial, a Phase III randomized controlled trial in acute traumatic brain injury. SUBJECTS: Patients and surrogates (for patients incapable of being interviewed) enrolled in Progesterone for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury under exception from informed consent at 12 sites. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Interviews focused on respondents' acceptance of exception from informed consent enrollment in Progesterone for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury, use of placebo and randomization, understanding of major study elements, and views regarding regulatory protections. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed; textual data were analyzed thematically. Eighty-five individuals were interviewed. Eighty-four percent had positive attitudes toward Progesterone for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury inclusion. Seventy-eight percent found their inclusion under exception from informed consent acceptable, and 72% found use of exception from informed consent in Progesterone for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury acceptable in general. Only two respondents clearly disagreed with both personal and general exception from informed consent enrollment. The most common concerns (26%) related to absence of consent. Eighty percent and 92% were accepting of placebo use and randomization, respectively. Although there were few black respondents (n = 11), they were less accepting of personal exception from informed consent enrollment than white respondents (55% vs 83%; p = 0.0494). CONCLUSIONS: Acceptance of exception from informed consent in this placebo-controlled trial of an investigational agent was high and exceeded acceptance among community consultation participants. Exception from informed consent enrollment appears generally consistent with patients' preferences.
Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/métodos , Lesões Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Emergências , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/psicologia , Pacientes/psicologia , Progesterona/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Percepção , Placebos , Grupos Raciais , Sujeitos da Pesquisa/psicologia , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
The American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) gathers extensive background information on emergency medicine residency programs and the residents in those programs. We present the 2015 annual report on the status of US emergency medicine training programs.
Assuntos
Medicina de Emergência/educação , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Conselhos de Especialidade Profissional , Estudantes de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Avaliação Educacional , Medicina de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Bolsas de Estudo/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estados UnidosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To survey emergency medicine (EM) residency and hand surgery fellowship program directors (PDs) to identify consensus in their perceptions of appropriate emergency care of upper extremity emergencies. METHODS: We created a framework to group common upper extremity emergency diagnoses and surveyed PDs to evaluate the training background--EM, general orthopedic or plastic surgery, or hand fellowship--most appropriate to provide acute, point-of-care management for each of these diagnostic groupings. Responses were pooled and consensus was established with greater than 75% agreement between groups. RESULTS: We received 79 responses from hand fellowship PDs (90% response rate) and 151 responses from EM PDs (49% response rate). We identified consensus for the training background that PDs in both specialties felt was appropriate to care for 17 of 21 diagnostic groupings in the framework. CONCLUSIONS: There was a high level of consensus between EM and hand surgery PDs regarding diagnoses that acutely require training in hand surgery versus those that can be managed by an EM physician. Our diagnostic framework may help reduce unnecessary hand surgery consultation and may help to identify patients who do not require more specialized acute care and thus decrease unnecessary transfers. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and Decision Analyses IV.
Assuntos
Medicina de Emergência/educação , Ortopedia/educação , Cirurgia Plástica/educação , Extremidade Superior/cirurgia , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Emergências , Bolsas de Estudo , Feminino , Humanos , Internato e Residência , Masculino , Diretores Médicos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The American Board of Emergency Medicine gathers extensive background information on emergency medicine residency programs and the residents in them. We present the 2014 annual report on the status of US emergency medicine training programs.
Assuntos
Medicina de Emergência/educação , Internato e Residência , Adulto , Coleta de Dados , Medicina de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Internato e Residência/organização & administração , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Sociedades Médicas , Conselhos de Especialidade Profissional , Estados Unidos , Recursos Humanos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) gathers extensive background information on emergency medicine residency programs and the residents in those programs. We present the 2013 annual report on the status of US emergency medicine training programs.
Assuntos
Medicina de Emergência/educação , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Conselhos de Especialidade Profissional , Medicina de Emergência/métodos , Medicina de Emergência/organização & administração , Medicina de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Bolsas de Estudo/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Internato e Residência/métodos , Internato e Residência/organização & administração , Masculino , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the single dose pharmacokinetics of an intravenous dose of lorazepam in pediatric patients treated for status epilepticus (SE) or with a history of SE. STUDY DESIGN: Ten hospitals in the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network enlisted patients 3 months to 17 years with convulsive SE (status cohort) or for a traditional pharmacokinetics study (elective cohort). Sparse sampling was used for the status cohort, and intensive sampling was used for the elective cohort. Non-compartmental analyses were performed on the elective cohort, and served to nest compartmental population pharmacokinetics analysis for both cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients in the status cohort and 15 patients in the elective cohort were enrolled. Median age was 7 years, 2 months. The population pharmacokinetics parameters were: clearance, 1.2 mL/min/kg; half-life, 16.8 hours; and volume of distribution, 1.5 L/kg. On the basis of the pharmacokinetics model, a 0.1 mg/kg dose is expected to achieve concentrations of approximately 100 ng/mL and maintain concentrations >30 to 50 ng/mL for 6 to 12 hours. A second dose of 0.05 mg/kg would achieve desired therapeutic serum levels for approximately 12 hours without excessive sedation. Age-dependent dosing is not necessary beyond using a maximum initial dose of 4 mg. CONCLUSIONS: Lorazepam pharmacokinetics in convulsive SE is similar to earlier pharmacokinetics measured in pediatric patients with cancer, except for longer half-life, and similar to adult pharmacokinetics parameters except for increased clearance.
Assuntos
Lorazepam/farmacocinética , Estado Epiléptico/metabolismo , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Infusões Intravenosas , Lorazepam/administração & dosagem , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to formulate a clinical decision rule (CDR) to identify infants with apparent-life threatening event (ALTE) who are at low risk of adverse outcome and can be discharged home safely from the emergency department (ED). METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of infants with an ED diagnosis of ALTE at an urban children's hospital. Admission was considered warranted if the infant required significant intervention during the hospital stay. Logistic regression and recursive partitioning were used to develop a CDR identifying patients at low risk of significant intervention and thus suitable for discharge from the ED. RESULTS: A total of 300 infants were enrolled; 228 (76%) were admitted; 37 (12%) required significant intervention. None died during hospital stay or within 72 hours of discharge or were diagnosed with serious bacterial infection. Logistic regression identified prematurity, abnormal result in the physical examination, color change to cyanosis, absence of symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection, and absence of choking as predictors for significant intervention. These variables were used to create a CDR, based on which, 184 infants (64%) could be discharged home safely from the ED, reducing the hospitalization rate to 102 (36%). The model has a negative predictive value of 96.2% (92%-98.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Only 12% of infants presenting to the ED with ALTE had a significant intervention warranting hospital admission. We created a CDR that would have decreased the admission rate safely by 40%.
Assuntos
Estado Terminal , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Alta do Paciente/normas , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Hospitalização , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We improve our understanding of the community consultation process for acute neurologic emergency trials conducted under the federal regulations for Exception From Informed Consent (EFIC) for emergency research. METHODS: We performed a qualitative study using focus groups to collect data from patients with a previous stroke or brain injury and their families and from young men at risk for traumatic brain injury. Discussions were transcribed, coded, and analyzed for major themes and subthemes. RESULTS: Five focus groups, involving 40 participants, were convened. Major themes included the awareness and understanding of key clinical trial concepts, including prominent concerns about placebo and therapeutic misconception; inability to obtain informed consent and acceptable surrogate decision-making; EFIC in emergency research and whether existing regulations are acceptable; specific trial design problems, including comparison to standard of care versus 2 competing active therapies; and community consultation and representation. CONCLUSION: In this study sample, EFIC trials were deemed appropriate and acceptable for acute neurologic emergency research. Education, along with open discussion about basic clinical research concepts, disease- and trial-specific information, and potential surrogate decision-making, was essential to determine the acceptability of an EFIC trial. Approval by institutional review boards was highly regarded as a means of human protection and effective community consultation for such trials. A data repository of information gained from similar qualitative research may help investigators and regulators who wish to plan, conduct, review, and provide oversight for acute neurologic emergency trials under EFIC regulations.
Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas/terapia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Participação da Comunidade , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/legislação & jurisprudência , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/métodos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/legislação & jurisprudência , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/organização & administração , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Professional satisfaction is associated with career longevity, individual well-being, and patient care and safety. Lack of physician engagement promotes the opposite. This study sought to identify important facets contributing to decreased career satisfaction using a large national data set of practicing emergency physicians. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of the national Longitudinal Study of Emergency Physicians survey conducted by the American Board of Emergency Medicine. The survey was composed of 57 variables including career satisfaction as well as occupational and psychological variables potentially associated with career satisfaction. Factor analysis was used to determine the important latent variables. Ordinal logistic regression was performed to determine statistical significance among the latent variables with overall career satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 863 participants were recorded. The overall mean career satisfaction rate was 3.9 on a 5-point Likert scale with 1 and 5 indicating "least satisfied" and "most satisfied," respectively. Our analysis revealed 9 factors related to job satisfaction. Two latent factors, exhaustion/stress and administration/respect, were statistically significant. When comparing satisfaction scores between sex, there was a statistically significant difference with men reporting a higher satisfaction rate (P = 0.0092). Age was also statistically significant with overall satisfaction lower for younger physicians than older physicians. CONCLUSION: Our study found that emergency physicians are overall satisfied with emergency medicine, although with variability depending on sex and age. In addition, we characterized job satisfaction into 9 factors that significantly contribute to job satisfaction. Future work exploring these factors may help elucidate the development of targeted interventions to improve professional well-being in the emergency medicine workforce.
RESUMO
Importance: The prevalence of workplace mistreatment and its association with the well-being of emergency medicine (EM) residents is unclear. More information about the sources of mistreatment might encourage residency leadership to develop and implement more effective strategies to improve professional well-being not only during residency but also throughout the physician's career. Objective: To examine the prevalence, types, and sources of perceived workplace mistreatment during training among EM residents in the US and the association between mistreatment and suicidal ideation. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this survey study conducted from February 25 to 29, 2020, all residents enrolled in EM residencies accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) who participated in the 2020 American Board of Emergency Medicine computer-based In-training Examination were invited to participate. A multiple-choice, 35-item survey was administered after the examination asking residents to self-report the frequency, sources, and types of mistreatment experienced during residency training and whether they had suicidal thoughts. Main Outcomes and Measures: The types and frequency of workplace mistreatment and the sources of the mistreatment were identified, and rates of self-reported suicidality were obtained. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine resident and program characteristics associated with suicidal thoughts. Results: Of 8162 eligible EM residents, 7680 (94.1%) responded to at least 1 question on the survey; 6503 (79.7%) completed the survey in its entirety. A total of 243 ACGME-accredited residency programs participated, and 1 did not. The study cohort included 4768 male residents (62.1%), 2698 female residents (35.1%), 4919 non-Hispanic White residents (64.0%), 2620 residents from other racial/ethnic groups (Alaska Native, American Indian, Asian or Pacific Islander, African American, Mexican American, Native Hawaiian, Puerto Rican, other Hispanic, or mixed or other race) (34.1%), 483 residents who identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or other (LGBTQ+) (6.3%), and 5951 residents who were married or in a relationship (77.5%). Of the total participants, 3463 (45.1%) reported exposure to some type of workplace mistreatment (eg, discrimination, abuse, or harassment) during the most recent academic year. A frequent source of mistreatment was identified as patients and/or patients' families; 1234 respondents (58.7%) reported gender discrimination, 867 (67.5%) racial discrimination, 282 (85.2%) physical abuse, and 723 (69.1%) sexual harassment from patients and/or family members. Suicidal thoughts occurring during the past year were reported by 178 residents (2.5%), with similar prevalence by gender (108 men [2.4%]; 59 women [2.4%]) and race/ethnicity (113 non-Hispanic White residents [2.4%]; 65 residents from other racial/ethnic groups [2.7%]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study, EM residents reported that workplace mistreatment occurred frequently. The findings suggest common sources of mistreatment for which educational interventions may be developed to help ensure resident wellness and career satisfaction.
Assuntos
Medicina de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Estresse Ocupacional/psicologia , Racismo/psicologia , Sexismo/psicologia , Assédio Sexual/psicologia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Estresse Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Racismo/estatística & dados numéricos , Sexismo/estatística & dados numéricos , Assédio Sexual/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Burnout is prevalent among emergency physicians and may cause physicians to consider leaving the practice of emergency medicine (EM). This study sought to determine whether there is a gender difference in reporting burnout and seriously considering leaving the specialty of EM, and secondarily to explore the factors reported as contributing to burnout. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the 2014 American Board of Emergency Medicine Longitudinal Survey of Emergency Physicians. We used multiple logistic regression to determine which factors were associated with reporting serious consideration of leaving EM, when stratified by years in practice and adjusting for individual, departmental, and institutional factors. RESULTS: The response rate was 82%, (n = 868); 22.6% (194) were female and 77.4% (664) were males; and 83.9% (733) White. The mean age of men responding was significantly higher than women (52.7±11.9 vs. 44.9±10.4, p<0.001). Overall, there were no significant gender differences in reporting having had serious thoughts of leaving EM in either unmatched or age-matched analyses. More women reported that burnout was a significant problem, while men more often were equivocal as to whether it was a problem. When stratified by years in practice, mid-career women had a seven-fold increase in the odds ratio (OR) of seriously considered leaving EM, compared to men of similar years in practice (OR 7.07, 95% confidence interval, 2.45-20.39). Autonomy at work, control over working conditions, fair compensation, personal reward, and a sense of ownership were factors associated with a lower rate of reporting considering leaving EM. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the intention to leave EM is not more prevalent in women. However, mid-career women more often reported seriously considering leaving the specialty than mid-career men. Further research on the factors behind this finding in mid-career women in EM is needed.
Assuntos
Medicina de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Esgotamento Profissional/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Intenção , Satisfação no Emprego , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação Pessoal , Autonomia Profissional , Salários e Benefícios , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We determine the incidence of serious bacterial infection in infants presenting to the emergency department (ED) with an apparent life-threatening event. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of infants younger than 12 months who were treated at an urban children's hospital ED during 1 year and who met standard criteria for an apparent life-threatening event. Sociodemographic data, presenting features, diagnostic testing, hospital course, and final diagnosis were collected. Follow-up information was obtained 4 weeks after the visit. RESULTS: Of the 198 infants enrolled, 44 (22.2%) had evaluation for serious bacterial infection: urine culture 36 (18%), blood culture 38 (19%) and cerebrospinal fluid culture 18 (9%). No infant (0/198; 95% confidence interval 0% to 1.8%) was found to have bacteremia, urinary tract infection, or bacterial meningitis, which was confirmed at the 4-week interview (99% ascertainment). Two infants were found to have enteroviral meningitis. CONCLUSION: The incidence of serious bacterial infection in this cohort was extremely low. Infants presenting with an apparent life-threatening event need not be subjected to a full serious bacterial infection evaluation routinely.
Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Estado Terminal/epidemiologia , Apneia/epidemiologia , Bronquiolite/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Meningite Viral/epidemiologia , Philadelphia/epidemiologia , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To identify characteristics of adolescents who access health care in a children's hospital emergency department (ED) compared with a general ED. METHODS: We performed a retrospective comparative study of an urban children's ED and the adjacent general ED. Participants included randomly selected ED visits of adolescents aged 15 to 19 years who presented during a 1-year period. Demographic data, triage category, chief complaint, and comorbid conditions were collected and analyzed by site of care. RESULTS: Ten percent of visits to each location was reviewed. Adolescents in the general ED were more often female (72% vs 60%), uninsured (32% vs 12%), and presented with abdominal pain (46% vs 17%). Adolescents in the children's ED more frequently identified a primary care provider (94% vs 58%) and were triaged as non-urgent (40% vs 22%). In the children's ED, more complaints were injury-related (30% vs 19%). The prevalence of complaints related to violence or chronic diseases did not vary. Through logistic regression analysis, adolescents using the general ED were more likely to be older (odds ratio [OR], 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2-5.3) and to complain of abdominal pain (OR, 5.0; 95% CI, 2.8-8.8); those using the children's ED were more likely to present with a non-urgent complaint (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.5-4.9) and identify a primary care provider (OR, 16.6; 95% CI, 17.6-36.4). CONCLUSIONS: When a children's and general ED are in close proximity, there are unique characteristics of the adolescents at each site. Understanding the differences can assist clinicians to provide care tailored to meet the needs of each group.
Assuntos
Comportamento do Adolescente , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Gerais/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Pediátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Urbanos/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Dor Abdominal/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Philadelphia/epidemiologia , Médicos de Família , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Amostragem , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Graduates of emergency medicine residency programs can seek certification from the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM), yet the costs and perceived value by residents is not clear. OBJECTIVE: This report sought to better define the value of board certification by asking physicians taking the ABEM Oral Certification Examination (OCE) to describe its costs (eg, time, money) and perceived benefits. METHODS: A descriptive, cross-sectional, voluntary, anonymous survey was administered to physicians taking the 2018 spring and fall ABEM OCEs. Response frequencies were used to report response rates. RESULTS: There were 2016 physicians who participated in the 2018 OCEs, of whom 1565 (78%) completed a survey. With respect to preparation, 38% (599 of 1565 responses) spent more than 30 hours preparing for the examination. Regarding the expense of preparing for the examination, 21% (328) spent nothing, 50% (776) spent less than $1,000, and 2% (38) spent more than $3,000. Most physicians (80%, 1254) reported a learning benefit to preparing for and taking the OCE. There were 49% (765) of respondents who reported that preparing for the examination reinforced their knowledge of emergency medicine; 20% (311) reported no learning benefit. Most physicians (92%, 1442) reported that ABEM certification provided a career benefit, the most common of which was more career opportunities (69%, 1076). CONCLUSIONS: Initial certification requires a considerable investment of time and money. Physicians seeking initial ABEM certification found both learning and professional benefits, with the most frequently reported being reinforcement of medical knowledge and more career opportunities.
Assuntos
Certificação/economia , Medicina de Emergência/educação , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Resuscitation with crystalloid fluid is a cornerstone of pediatric septic shock treatment. However, the optimal type of crystalloid fluid is unknown. We aimed to determine the feasibility of conducting a pragmatic randomized trial to compare balanced (lactated Ringer's [LR]) with 0.9% normal saline (NS) fluid resuscitation in children with suspected septic shock. METHODS: Open-label pragmatic randomized controlled trial at a single academic children's hospital from January to August 2018. Eligible patients were >6 months to <18 years old who were treated in the emergency department for suspected septic shock, operationalized as blood culture, parenteral antibiotics, and fluid resuscitation for abnormal perfusion. Screening, enrollment, and randomization were carried out by the clinical team as part of routine care. Patients were randomized to receive either LR or NS for up to 48 hours following randomization. Other than fluid type, all treatment decisions were at the clinical team's discretion. Feasibility outcomes included proportion of eligible patients enrolled, acceptability of enrollment via the U.S. federal exception from informed consent (EFIC) regulations, and adherence to randomized study fluid administration. RESULTS: Of 59 eligible patients, 50 (85%) were enrolled and randomized. Twenty-four were randomized to LR and 26 to NS. Only one (2%) of 44 patients enrolled using EFIC withdrew before study completion. Total median (interquartile range [IQR]) crystalloid fluid volume received during the intervention window was 107 (60 to 155) mL/kg and 98 (63 to 128) mL/kg in the LR and NS arms, respectively (p = 0.50). Patients randomized to LR received a median (IQR) of only 20% (13 to 32) of all study fluid as NS compared to 99% (64% to 100%) of study fluid as NS in the NS arm (absolute difference = 79%, 95% CI = 48% to 85%). CONCLUSIONS: A pragmatic study design proved feasible to study comparative effectiveness of LR versus NS fluid resuscitation for pediatric septic shock.