Stability and Predictive Validity of the Parent-Child Sleep Interactions Scale: A Longitudinal Study Among Preschoolers.

Little research has examined the processes underlying children's persistent sleep problems and links with later psychopathology. The current study examined the stability of parent-child sleep interactions as assessed with the parent-reported Parent-Child Sleep Interactions Scale (PSIS) and examined whether sleep interactions in preschool-age children predict sleep problems and psychiatric symptoms later in childhood. Participants included 108 preschool-age children (50% female) and their parents. Parents completed the PSIS when children were 3-5 years (T1) and again when they were 6-9 years (T2). The PSIS includes three subscales-Sleep Reinforcement (reassurance of child sleep behaviors), Sleep Conflict (parent-child conflict at bedtime), Sleep Dependence (difficulty going to sleep without parent)-and a total score. Higher scores indicate more problematic bedtime interactions. Children's sleep problems and psychiatric symptoms at T1 and T2 were assessed with a clinical interview. PSIS scores were moderately stable from T1 to T2, and the factor structure of the PSIS remained relatively consistent over time. Higher total PSIS scores at T1 predicted increases in children's sleep problems at T2. Higher PSIS Sleep Conflict scores at T1 predicted increases in oppositional defiant disorder symptoms at T2. Children with more sleep problems and higher PSIS Sleep Reinforcement scores at T1 showed increases in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, depressive, and anxiety symptoms at T2. These findings provide evidence for the predictive validity of the PSIS and highlight the importance of early parent-child sleep interactions in the development of sleep and psychiatric symptoms in childhood. Parent-child sleep interactions may serve as a useful target for interventions.

The interaction between parenting and children's cortisol reactivity at age 3 predicts increases in children's internalizing and externalizing symptoms at age 6.

Little is known about the role of stress reactivity in the emergence of psychopathology across early childhood. In this longitudinal study, we tested the hypothesis that child cortisol reactivity at age 3 moderates associations between early parenting and children's internalizing and externalizing symptoms from age 3 to age 6. One hundred and sixty children were assessed at age 3, and 135 children were reassessed at age 6. At age 3, we exposed children to stress-inducing laboratory tasks, during which we obtained four salivary cortisol samples, and parental hostility was assessed using an observational parent-child interaction task. At ages 3 and 6, child psychiatric symptoms were assessed using a clinical interview with parents. The results indicated that the combination of high child cortisol reactivity and high observed parental hostility at age 3 was associated with greater concurrent externalizing symptoms at age 3 and predicted increases in internalizing and externalizing symptoms from age 3 to age 6. Findings highlight that increased stress reactivity, within the context of hostile parenting, plays a role in the emergence of psychopathology from preschool to school entry.

Predictors of Later Psychopathology in Young Children with Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify childhood factors that predict later psychiatric problems in children with disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD). METHODS: The sample consisted of 36 6-year-old children who met criteria for DMDD who were followed up at 9 years of age. Child psychopathology was assessed at age 6 using the Preschool Age Psychiatric Assessment (PAPA) and at age 9 using the Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia. We compared children with DMDD at age 6 who continued to have a psychiatric diagnosis at age 9 (n = 17) to children with DMDD at age 6 with no psychiatric diagnosis at age 9 (n = 19) across several age 6 predictors: child psychopathology, irritability and temperament, parenting, and maternal psychopathology. In addition, we examined whether children with DMDD at age 6 and no psychiatric diagnosis at age 9 continued to experience elevated psychiatric symptoms and impairment at age 9 compared to children with a non-DMDD diagnosis at age 6 and no psychiatric diagnosis at age 9 (n = 44) and children with no psychiatric diagnosis at age 6 or 9 (n = 266). RESULTS: The following variables predicted which children with DMDD at age 6 would have a psychiatric diagnosis at age 9: higher levels of externalizing symptoms, anger/frustration, headstrong/hurtful behaviors, functional impairment, and temperamental surgency and negative affect; lower levels of effortful control/executive functioning; and maternal depression. However, children with DMDD at age 6 and no psychiatric diagnosis at age 9 continued to demonstrate greater disruptive behavior disorder symptoms and impairment at age 9 compared to children with no psychiatric diagnosis at age 6 or 9. CONCLUSIONS: These findings identify factors predicting later psychopathology in children with DMDD. In addition, we found that the subgroup of children with DMDD at age 6 but no psychiatric diagnosis at age 9 continued to evidence symptomatology and impairment 3 years later.