Evaluation of modified C-palatal plates on speech articulation using acoustic analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess speech perturbation and adaptation for patients wearing modified C-palatal plates (MCPPs) over time. METHODS: The sample consisted of 40 patients, 20 wearing MCPPs as the experimental group (age: 20.7 ± 5.8 years) and 20 patients wearing a transpalatal arch (TPA) as the control group (age: 21.5 ± 6.4 years). The sounds /t/, /d/, /s/, /n/, /r/, /tʃ/. and /j/ were recorded for each patient at six time points: immediately before (T0) and after (T1) appliance placement; then 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks after placement (T2-T5). Acoustic analysis of pitch and voice onset time (VOT) was performed by Praat software. Repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) was used to assess changes in the pitch and VOT over time and the difference between the appliances. RESULTS: With the MCPP appliance, /n/, /r/, /tʃ/ and /j/ decreased in VOT starting in the first week while /t/ and /s/ almost returned to pre-treatment levels after 2 weeks. VOT for the /d/ sound did not change between T0 and T3, but it decreased after 3 weeks. There were no significant differences in pitch and VOT between the two groups at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: Wearing an MCPP device caused patients to initially distort the articulation of several sounds, but the distortion dissipated within 1 to 2 weeks. It is recommended that patients and/or their parents be advised during pre-treatment counselling of the possibility of temporary speech changes with MCPP placement.

A 3-dimensional evaluation of available retromolar space for the application of ramal plates.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the available retromolar space for ramal plates in patients with Class I and III malocclusions and compare that space with and without third molars using cone-beam computed tomography. METHODS: Cone-beam computed tomography images of 30 patients (17 males, 13 females; mean age, 22.2 ± 4.5 years) with Class III malocclusion and 29 subjects (18 males, 11 females; mean age, 24.3 ± 3.7 years) with Class I malocclusion were analyzed. Available retromolar space at 4 axial levels of the second molar root and the volume of the retromolar bone were evaluated. Two-way repeated measures analysis of covariance (repeated measures analysis of covariance) was applied to compare the variables between Class I and III malocclusions and the presence of third molars. RESULTS: Patients with Class I and III relationships showed up to 12.7 mm of available retromolar space at 2 mm apical from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). At 8 mm apical from CEJ, patients with Class III malocclusion had 11.1 mm of space, whereas those with a Class I relationship showed 9.8 mm of available space. When patients had third molars, the amount of available retromolar space was significantly greater in patients with a Class I and III relationship. However, patients with Class III malocclusion exhibited greater available retromolar space than those with a Class I relationship (P = 0.028). In addition, the bone volume was significantly greater in patients with Class III malocclusion than in patients with a Class I relationship and those with third molars than in those without them (P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Class I and III groups showed the availability of at least 10.0 mm of retromolar space 2 mm apical to the CEJ for molar distalization. Based on this information, it is suggested that clinicians consider available retromolar space for molar distalization in diagnosing and planning treatment for patients with Class I and III malocclusion.

Comparison of treatment effects from total arch distalization using modified C-palatal plates versus maxillary premolar extraction in Class II patients with severe overjet.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare the skeletodental and soft tissue changes with total arch distalization using a modified C-palatal plate (MCPP) and maxillary first premolar extraction treatment in Class II malocclusion patients with severe overjet. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: The sample consisted of 46 adult patients who had Class II Division 1 malocclusion with severe overjet; 25 of them received non-extraction treatment with MCPPs (age, 22.5 ± 7.2 years), and 21 received maxillary first premolar extraction treatment (age 23.4 ± 6.5 years). METHOD: A total of 26 variables were measured on pre- and post-treatment lateral cephalograms. To evaluate the differences between pretreatment and post-treatment in each group, t tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used. To compare the amount of change between the two groups, MANOVA test was used. RESULTS: The overjet was significantly reduced in the MCPP and extraction groups by 4.8 mm and 5.4 mm, respectively. However, the two groups had no significant difference in the sagittal, vertical and angular changes of the maxillary incisors. In addition, regarding soft tissue changes, the MCPP and extraction groups showed an increased nasolabial angle of 7.5° and 9.4°, decreased upper lip to the true vertical line of 1.8 mm and 2.2 mm, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the skeletal changes between the MCPP and extraction groups, and the reduction in overjet was similar in the groups. These results suggest that MCPP might be a viable treatment option for total arch distalization in Class II malocclusion patients with severe overjet.

A 3D finite element analysis of maxillary molar distalization using unilateral zygoma gear and asymmetric headgear.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were (a) to evaluate the displacement and stress distribution in the maxillary dentition associated with the use of two different unilateral distalization appliances-unilateral zygoma gear (UZG) appliance and asymmetric headgear (AHG)-in non-growing patients; and (b) to assess the effects of fully erupted maxillary third molars on the distalization of the first molar with both appliances by using three-dimensional finite element analysis. SETTINGS AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Two 3D models of the maxilla were created: one with third molars and one without. Next, two distalizing appliances (UZG and AHG) were added to each model to create four models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Distalization forces were applied, and the resultant displacements were recorded at the mesiobuccal and distolingual cusps and palatal root apex of each molar and the incisal edge root apex of the central incisors. The resulting von Mises stress distributions were evaluated. RESULTS: With the UZG, the first molar showed greater root distalization than the crown in the model with the third molar, whereas the model without the third molar showed distalization and distal tipping of the first molar. With the AHG, the first molar showed a large amount of distal tipping in the model without a third molar. However, this tipping was less than that in the model with third molars. CONCLUSION: The presence of completely erupted third molars decreased the amount of uncontrolled distal tipping in both appliances. UZG can be considered as an effective option for maxillary molar distalization.

Distalization of maxillary molars using temporary skeletal anchorage devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review is to assess the treatment effects (amount of distalization, distal tipping and vertical movement) of buccally versus palatally placed temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs) on maxillary first molars during distalization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medline and Scopus databases were searched up to September 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized prospective cohort studies on maxillary molar distalization using TSADs in patients with Class II malocclusion. After study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment, meta-analyses were performed for the amount of distalization, distal tipping and intrusion of first molars. RESULTS: Nine studies (2 RCTs and 7 prospective studies) were included. The risk of bias of the RCTs was low to unclear. The non-randomized studies were of moderate quality. In five studies, the TSADs were placed in the infrazygomatic process while in two studies, they were placed in the buccal inter-radicular spaces, and in two studies, they were placed in the midpalatal region. The first molar distalization was 2.75 mm when buccal inter-radicular TSADs were used, but 4.07 and 4.17 mm with palatal and infrazgomatic TSADs. The palatal appliances were associated with 11.17° of distal tipping of the first molar while infrazygomatic and buccal inter-radicular TSADs resulted in 3.99° and 1.70° of tipping, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Inter-radicular TSADs resulted in less distal tipping but also in less distalization. Palatal TSAD-supported appliances showed the greatest amount of distal tipping. Further RCTs or prospective studies on the effect of various designs of TSAD-supported distalization are warranted.

Comparison of Treatment Effects with Modified C-Palatal Plates vs Greenfield Molar Distalizer Appliances in Adolescents.

Objectives: The aim of study was to evaluate skeletodental and soft tissue treatment effects and the amount of maxillary molar distalization with modified C-palatal plates vs. Greenfield molar distalizer appliances in adolescents. Study design: The samples consisted of pre- and posttreatment lateral cephalograms collected from 39 patients with Class II malocclusion. The MCPP group was comprised of 21 patients (mean age: 11.7 ± 1.3 years) treated with MCPP appliances while the GMD group included 18 patients (mean age: 11.2 ± 0.9 years) treated with GMD. Fixed orthodontic treatment started with the distalization process in both groups. From each cephalograpm, twenty-nine variables were measured for analysis and then the two groups were compared. Descriptive statistics, a paired t-test, and multivariate analysis of variance were performed to compare the treatment effects within and between the groups. Results: There was significant treatmentrelated change in the sagittal position of the maxilla and the mandible within each group. However, there were no statistically significant inter-group differences. The mean maxillary first molar distalization was 3.96 mm in the MCPP group vs. 2.85 mm in the GMD group. Both groups showed minimal distal tipping, but the maxillary incisors were significantly extruded by 3.04 ± 0.89 mm (P < .001) in GMD group. There was no significant difference in treatment duration between the groups. Conclusions: The maxillary first molars of both the MCPP and GMD groups were effectively distalized and there were significant skeletal changes in the maxilla. However, the maxillary incisors were significantly extruded in the GMD group.

Displacement of mandibular dentition during total arch distalization according to locations and types of TSADs: 3D Finite element analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical effects of temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs) on the mandibular dentition and mandible during total arch distalization according to locations and types of the TSADs using finite element (FE) analysis. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: A model of the mandible and teeth was used to build an FE analysis model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four FE models were constructed: Ramal plate (Type A), Sugawara plate (Type B), buccal shelf miniscrew (Type C) and interradicular miniscrew (Type D). A retraction force of 300 g per side was applied to the mandibular archwire. RESULTS: In the sagittal plane, the plates Type A and B showed more distal displacement than the miniscrew Types C and D, especially in the posterior teeth. Type A presented the greatest amount of distal displacement, followed by Types B, C and D. Type A was closest to the line of occlusion, which showed the lowest degree of buccolingual angulations of the molar crowns. Vertically, Type A showed a greater amount of extrusive displacement of the posterior teeth than the other types of TSADs, while Type B showed intrusive displacement of the molars. CONCLUSIONS: The ramal plate showed a greater amount of distal and extrusive displacement of the posterior teeth than the miniscrews. Therefore, clinicians should consider the displacement of mandibular dentition during total arch distalization according to types of the TSADs.

Treatment stability after total maxillary arch distalization with modified C-palatal plates in adults.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue changes at 3 years posttreatment in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated with modified C-palatal plates (MCPPs). METHODS: The sample consisted of 69 lateral cephalograms of 23 patients Class II Division 1 malocclusion (9 men, 14 women; average age, 20.1 years) who underwent bilateral distalization of their maxillary dentition. The lateral cephalograms were taken immediately before the placement of the MCPPs (T1); at the end of orthodontic fixed appliance therapy (T2); and at the posttreatment observation period (3 years posttreatment; T3). Twenty-three variables were measured. Repeated measures ANOVA followed by post hoc analysis using Bonferroni test was used to identify significant differences between time points. RESULTS: Maxillary first molars showed a distal movement of 3.44 ± 1.08 mm (P <0.001) distal crown tipping of 2.35° ± 6.74°, and intrusion of 1.42 ± 1.12 mm from T1 to T2. However, from T2 to T3, there was an average of 0.41 ± 0.25 mm of mesial movement, 0.50 ± 0.46 mm of extrusion, and insignificant mesial crown tipping (0.92° ± 2.46°; P = 0.06). The nasolabial angle increased 9.36° ± 6.04° from T1 to T2 (P <0.001) but then decreased 1.55° ± 1.54° from T2 to T3. CONCLUSIONS: MCPPs are a viable treatment option for maxillary total arch distalization with minimal changes in treatment effects 3 years posttreatment.

Factors associated with spontaneous angular changes of impacted mandibular third molars as a result of second molar protraction.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to identify significant factors affecting the spontaneous angular changes of impacted mandibular third molars as a result of second molar protraction. Temporary skeletal anchorage devices in the missing mandibular first molar (ML-6) or missing deciduous mandibular second molar (ML-E) with missing succedaneous premolar spaces provided traction. METHODS: Forty-one mandibular third molars of 34 patients (10 male and 24 female; mean age 18.3 ± 3.7 years) that erupted after second molar protraction were included in this study. They were classified into upright (U) and tilted (T) groups. Linear and angular measurements were performed at the time of treatment initiation (T1) and of ML-6 or ML-E space closure (T2). Regression analyses were used to identify significant factors related to third molar uprighting. RESULTS: Nolla stage (odds ratio [OR] 4.1), sex (OR 0.003 for male), third molar angulation at T1 (OR 1.1), missing tooth space (OR 0.006), rate of third molar eruption (OR 23.3), and rate of second molar protraction (OR 0.2) significantly affected third molar uprighting. Age, third molar angulation at T1, rate of third molar eruption, and rate of second molar protraction were significant factors for predicting third molar angulation at T2. CONCLUSIONS: Available space for third molar eruption before and after second molar protraction is not associated with uprighting of erupting third molars. Older patients whose third molars are in greater Nolla stage, are in a more upright position at T1, and have a greater eruption rate have a greater chance for third molar uprighting. Alternatively, an increase in second molar protraction rate results in mesial tipping of the third molars.

Short-term cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of maxillary third molar changes after total arch distalization in adolescents.

INTRODUCTION: Our objectives were to evaluate changes in the position of maxillary third molars with cone-beam computed tomography images in adolescents after total arch distalization using a modified C-palatal plate (MCPP) and to compare them with the changes in a matched control group. METHODS: We included 68 maxillary third molars of 40 adolescent patients (mean age, 12.6 years). They were divided into MCPP and control groups. Cone-beam computed tomography images were taken before and after molar distalization (mean duration, 14.4 months) in the MCPP group and also in the control group (mean duration, 12.9 months). The changes in the position, angulation, and rotation of the third molars were assessed, and the volumes of maxillary tuberosity were measured. RESULTS: After distalization, the third molars moved backward (1.2 mm) and upward (0.5 mm) in the MCPP group with a significant difference (P <0.003), and they moved downward and forward in the control group. The changes in rotation and angulation were insignificant. The volumes of maxillary tuberosity increased in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Maxillary total arch distalization caused unerupted third molars to move backward and upward, with an insignificant difference in the posttreatment volume of maxillary tuberosity. Therefore, it may be possible to perform maxillary total arch distalization in adolescents with unerupted third molars without a germectomy, at least in the short term.

Displacement and stress distribution by different bone-borne palatal expanders with facemask: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to analyze displacement and stress distribution in the maxilla during maxillary expansion followed by protraction using bone-borne and conventional tooth-borne palatal expanders and a facemask via 3-dimensional finite element analysis. METHODS: A finite element model of an adolescent skull was created, and 4 different types of appliances were integrated into it: facemask (type A); facemask with paramedian bone-borne expander (type B), facemask with palatal-slope bone-borne expander (type C), and facemask with conventional expander (type D). Expansion of 0.25 mm followed by 500 g of force per side was applied. RESULTS: Type A showed anterior displacement of the dentition combined with downward displacement of posterior teeth and upward displacement of anterior teeth. The combination of protraction and expansion in type D showed the greatest anterior displacement. In types B and C, the expansion forces resulted in posterior displacement decreasing the net displacement of the combination. Stresses concentrated around the miniscrews in types B and C. In types A and D, stresses concentrated at the first premolar and first molar. Type B had the highest stresses followed by type C and then D. CONCLUSIONS: The conventional tooth-borne expander (type D) enhanced the effect of maxillary protraction. Facemask alone (type A) resulted in more anterior displacement of the maxilla than the combination of facemask and bone-borne expanders (types B and C). The clinician should be aware of the initial stresses and movements from different expanders with facemask found in this study and confirm the movements in future clinical Class III studies.

Application of palatal plate for nonextraction treatment in an adolescent boy with severe overjet.

A modified C-palatal plate (MCPP) is introduced as a treatment option for adolescent patients with Class I malocclusion and severe overjet. A boy, 10 years 11 months old, was successfully treated without extractions in 22 months. Indications for clinical application of the MCPP as well as procedures and biomechanical analysis of the treatment effects are described in detail. The MCPP was used to distalize the maxillary dentition. The results were stable 1 year after retention. Clinicians should consider the application of MCPP as a nonextraction treatment option for adolescents with Class I malocclusion and severe overjet when the patient or parent refuses extractions.

Stability After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy With Rigid Internal Fixation in Surgery-First Approach.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stability of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSO) setback with rigid internal fixation in a surgery-first approach (SFA) for patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion treated with BSSO with the SFA were included in the study. Lateral cephalograms were taken and traced before surgery and 1 and 6 months after surgery. Cephalometric measurements were compared using repeated-measures analysis of variance. A P value less than or equal to .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The study included 9 men (age, 25.7 ± 2.9 yr) and 18 women (age, 26.6 ± 4.2 yr). Treatment time was 8.4 ± 1.5 months. Horizontally, there were no meaningful anteroposterior changes of the pogonion and B point during the postsurgical period (0.9 and 0.6 mm, respectively). Vertically, the pogonion showed superior movement after surgery (2.4 mm) without major postsurgical change (0.6 mm). The B point showed major superior movement after surgery (2.3 mm) and during the postsurgical period (1.2 mm). The inclination of the lower incisor was increased labially during the postsurgical period (2.4°), although this was not statistically important. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, there was no major horizontal relapse for any variable (<1 mm). Vertically, all variables showed no meaningful changes during the postsurgical period except the B point showed 1.2 mm of superior displacement. BSSO with rigid fixation using the SFA seems to be an effective and predictable procedure in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion.

Distalization of the mandibular dentition with a ramal plate for skeletal Class III malocclusion correction.

The retromolar fossa is an anatomically suitable skeletal anchorage site. The aim of this report was to introduce a novel appliance for the correction of skeletal Class III malocclusions with mandibular dentition distalization. The placement site and the procedure of the ramal plate are described. The resulting force vectors are parallel to the functional occlusal plane leading to efficient molar distalization. This approach is demonstrated with 2 adult patients who refused a surgical treatment option. This ramal plate may be indicated for total arch distalization for nonextraction and nonsurgical cases.

Sagittal correction of adolescent patients with modified palatal anchorage plate appliances.

The palate has been reported to be a suitable skeletal anchorage site in adolescents and adults. This article introduces new treatment modalities for correction of sagittal discrepancies by molar protraction and distalization with a modified palatal anchorage plate appliance. The effectiveness and versatility of this method are demonstrated in 2 adolescent patients.

Correction of severe bimaxillary protrusion with first premolar extractions and total arch distalization with palatal anchorage plates.

Correction of a severe protrusive soft tissue profile without orthognathic surgery can be challenging. This case report describes the treatment of a young woman with a severe bimaxillary protrusion. Orthodontic treatment included extraction of her 4 first premolars and total arch distalization of both arches using a palatal plate appliance. The total treatment time was 24 months. Her occlusion and facial appearance were significantly improved.

Displacement and stress distribution of the maxillofacial complex during maxillary protraction with buccal versus palatal plates: finite element analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyse the displacement and stress distribution in the maxillofacial complex during maxillary protraction with buccal and palatal plates using three-dimensional finite element analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three anchorage appliance models-palatal plate (Type A), miniplate at the infrazygomatic crest (Type B), and conventional tooth-borne appliance (Type C)-were designed and integrated into a skull model. Protraction force was 500 g per side and force direction was forward and 30 degree downward to the maxillary occlusal plane. The stress distribution around the circum-maxillary sutures and the displacement of the surface landmarks were analysed. RESULTS: All models showed forward and upward displacement at anterior nasal spine, Point A, and prosthion and forward and downward displacement at posterior nasal spine resulting in a counter-clockwise rotation. This anterior displacement was greatest in Type A. At the maxillary process of the zygoma, upward movement was shown only in Type A, whereas downward movement was observed in Types B and C. The greatest stresses in Type A were at the pterygomaxillary and the zygomaticotemporal sutures. Type B showed the greatest stress at the frontomaxillary suture. LIMITATIONS: Type A showed asymmetric results; however, it was not of clinical significance. CONCLUSION: The palatal plate resulted in wider stress distribution and more forward displacement compared to miniplate at the infrazygomatic crest area and conventional tooth-borne appliances. It might be recommended to consider the application of the palatal plate for maxillary protraction in Class III patients.

Effect of frequent application of low-level laser therapy on corticotomized tooth movement in dogs: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: The purposes of the present study were to evaluate the effects of frequent applications of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on corticotomy-assisted tooth movement in a beagle dog model and to compare the effects in the mandible and maxilla. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 4 male beagles, the maxillary and mandibular second premolars were extracted. The third premolars were corticotomized and then protracted from the canines with a continuous force of 200 g. Daily LLLT (using an aluminum gallium indium phosphide [AlGaInP] diode) was applied at the buccal mucosa of the corticotomized premolars on 1 side only. The tooth movement was measured for 8 weeks. Fluorochromes were injected intravenously at the start of the experiment (T0) and after 2 (T2), 4 (T4), and 8 (T8) weeks to evaluate new bone formation on the tension sides. Histomorphometric and immunohistologic evaluations were performed. RESULTS: In the mandible, the movement of the corticotomized premolars in the LLLT plus corticotomy group was less than that in the corticotomy-only group, although the difference was not statistically significant. In the maxilla, no significant differences between the 2 groups were found. Osteoclastic and proliferating cell activities and the amount of new bone formation were greater in the mandibular LLLT plus corticotomy group than in the corticotomy-only group. CONCLUSIONS: The frequent application of LLLT showed no significant effect on the corticotomized tooth movement.

Effect of bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders with and without surgical assistance on the craniofacial structures using finite element analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to analyze stress distribution and displacement of the craniofacial structures resulting from bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders with and without surgical assistance using finite element analysis. METHODS: Five designs of rapid maxillary expanders were made: a tooth-borne hyrax expander (type A); a bone-borne expander (type B); and 3 bone-borne surgically assisted modalities: separation of the midpalatal suture (type C), added separation of the pterygomaxillary sutures (type D), and added LeFort I corticotomy (type E). The geometric nonlinear theory was applied to evaluate the Von Mises stress distribution and displacement. RESULTS: The surgical types C, D, and E demonstrated more transverse movement than did the nonsurgical types A and B. The amounts of expansion were greater in the posterior teeth in types A and B, but in types C, D, and E, the amounts of expansion were greater in the anterior teeth. At the midpalatal suture, the nonsurgical types showed more anterior expansion than did the posterior region, and higher stresses than with the surgical types. Type B showed the highest stresses at the infraorbital margin, anterior and posterior nasal spines, maxillary tuberosity, and pterygoid plate and hamulus. CONCLUSIONS: The 3 surgical models showed similar amounts of stress and displacement along the teeth, midpalatal sutures, and craniofacial sutures. Therefore, when using a bone-borne rapid maxillary expander in an adult, it is recommended to assist it with midpalatal suture separation, which requires minimal surgical intervention.

Treatment effects of a modified palatal anchorage plate for distalization evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the treatment effects of maxillary posterior tooth distalization performed by a modified palatal anchorage plate appliance with cephalograms derived from cone-beam computed tomography. METHODS: The sample consisted of 40 lateral cephalograms obtained from the cone-beam computed tomography images of 20 Class II patients (7 men, 13 women; average age, 22.9 years) who underwent bilateral distalization of their maxillary dentition. The lateral cephalograms were derived from the cone-beam computed tomography images taken immediately before placement of a modified palatal anchorage plate appliance and at the end of distalization. Paired t tests were used for comparisons of the changes. RESULTS: The distal movement of the maxillary first molar was 3.3 ± 1.8 mm, with distal tipping of 3.4° ± 5.8° and intrusion of 1.8 ± 1.4 mm. Moreover, the maxillary incisors moved 3.0 ± 2.7 mm lingually, with lingual tipping of 6.2° ± 7.6° and insignificant extrusion (1.1 mm; P = 0.06). The occlusal plane angle was increased significantly (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The maxillary first molar was distalized by 3.3 mm at the crown and 2.2 mm at root levels, with distal tipping of 3.4°. It is recommended that clinicians should consider using the modified palatal anchorage plate appliance in treatment planning for patients who require maxillary total arch distalization.