Association of Medicaid Expansion with Reduction in Racial Disparities in the Timely Delivery of Upfront Surgical Care for Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the association between Medicaid expansion and time to surgery among patients with early-stage breast cancer (BC). BACKGROUND: Delays in surgery are associated with adverse outcomes. It is known that underrepresented minorities are more likely to experience treatment delays. Understanding the impact of Medicaid expansion on reducing racial and ethnic disparities in health care delivery is critical. METHODS: This was a population-based study including women ages 40 to 64 with stage I-II BC who underwent upfront surgery identified in the National Cancer Database (2010-2017) residing in states that expanded Medicaid on January 1, 2014. Difference-in-difference analysis compared rates of delayed surgery (>90 d from pathological diagnosis) according to time period (preexpansion [2010-2013] and postexpansion [2014-2017]) and race/ethnicity (White vs. racial and ethnic minority), stratified by insurance type (private vs. Medicaid/uninsured). Secondary analyses included logistic and Cox proportional hazards (PH) regression. All analyses were conducted among a cohort of patients in the nonexpansion states as a falsification analysis. Finally, a triple-differences approach compared preexpansion with the postexpansion trend between expansion and nonexpansion states. RESULTS: Among Medicaid expansion states, 104,569 patients were included (50,048 preexpansion and 54,521 postexpansion). In the Medicaid/uninsured subgroup, Medicaid expansion was associated with a -1.8% point (95% CI: -3.5% to -0.1, P =0.04) reduction of racial disparity in delayed surgery. Cox regression models demonstrated similar findings (adjusted difference-in-difference hazard ratio 1.12 [95% CI: 1.05 to 1.21]). The falsification analysis showed a significant racial disparity reduction among expansion states but not among nonexpansion states, resulting in a triple-difference estimate of -2.5% points (95% CI: -4.9% to -0.1%, P =0.04) in this subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: As continued efforts are being made to increase access to health care, our study demonstrates a positive association between Medicaid expansion and a reduction in the delivery of upfront surgical care, reducing racial disparities among patients with early-stage BC.

Lobular Neoplasia Diagnosed by MRI-Guided Breast Biopsy: Identifying Upgrade Rate to Malignancy and Outcomes of Clinical and Surgical Management.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine surgical and clinical outcomes of lobular neoplasia (LN) diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biopsy, including upgrade to malignancy, and to assess for characteristics associated with upgrade. METHOD: A single-institution retrospective study, between 2013 and 2022, of patients with histopathological findings of LN via MRI-guided biopsy was performed using an institutional database and review of the electronic medical records. Decision for excision or surveillance was made by a multidisciplinary team per institutional practice. Patient demographics and imaging characteristics were summarized using descriptive analyses. Upgrade was defined as upgrade to cancer on surgical pathology for patients treated with excision or the development of cancer at the biopsy site during surveillance. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare features of the upgraded cohort with the remainder of the group. RESULTS: Ninety-four MRI biopsies diagnosing LN were included. Median age was 57 years (range 37-78 years). Forty-six lesions underwent excision while 48 lesions were surveilled. The upgrade rate was 7.4% (7/94). Upgrades in the excised cohort consisted of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS; n = 1), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS; n = 3) and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC; n = 2), while one interval development of DCIS was observed at the site of biopsy in the surveillance cohort. No MRI or patient variables were associated with upgrade. CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary cohort of MRI-detected LNs, the upgrade rate was low. Omission of surgery for MRI-detected LNs in carefully selected patients may be considered in a shared decision-making capacity between the patient and the treatment team. Larger cohorts are needed to determine factors predictive of upgrade risk.

Margin Width and Local Recurrence in Patients with Phyllodes Tumors of the Breast.

BACKGROUND: Optimal surgical margin width for patients with phyllodes tumors (PTs) of the breast remains debated. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of margin width on long-term local recurrence risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single-institution retrospective review of patients with confirmed PT treated from 2008-2015. Margins were defined as positive (ink on tumor), narrow (no tumor at inked margin but < 10mm), or widely free (>/= 10mm). LR rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Among 117 female patients, histology included 55 (47%) benign, 29 (25%) borderline, and 33 (28%) malignant PT. Final margins were positive in 16 (14%), narrow in 32 (27%), widely free in 64 (55%), and unknown in 5 (4%) patients. Compared with margins > 10 mm, patients with positive and narrow margins had a higher LR risk [HR 10.57 (95% CI 2.48-45.02) and HR 5.66 (95% CI 1.19-26.99), respectively]. Among benign PTs, the 10-year LR-free rates were 100%, 94%, and 66% for widely negative, narrow, and positive margins, respectively (p = 0.056). For borderline/malignant PT, the 10-year LR-free rates were 93% and 57% for widely negative and narrow margins, respectively (p = 0.02), with no difference in LR between narrow and positive margin groups (p = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: For benign PTs, a margin of no ink on tumor appears sufficient to optimize local control. In patients with borderline or malignant PTs, achieving a wide surgical margin may remain important as narrower margins were associated with LR rates comparable to those with positive margins.

Germline Testing in Patients With Breast Cancer: ASCO-Society of Surgical Oncology Guideline.

PURPOSE: To develop recommendations for germline mutation testing for patients with breast cancer. METHODS: An ASCO-Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) panel convened to develop recommendations based on a systematic review and formal consensus process. RESULTS: Forty-seven articles met eligibility criteria for the germline mutation testing recommendations; 18 for the genetic counseling recommendations. RECOMMENDATIONS: BRCA1/2 mutation testing should be offered to all newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer ≤65 years and select patients >65 years based on personal history, family history, ancestry, or eligibility for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapy. All patients with recurrent breast cancer who are candidates for PARP inhibitor therapy should be offered BRCA1/2 testing, regardless of family history. BRCA1/2 testing should be offered to women who develop a second primary cancer in the ipsilateral or contralateral breast. For patients with prior history of breast cancer and without active disease, testing should be offered to patients diagnosed ≤65 years and selectively in patients diagnosed after 65 years, if it will inform personal and family risk. Testing for high-penetrance cancer susceptibility genes beyond BRCA1/2 should be offered to those with supportive family histories; testing for moderate-penetrance genes may be offered if necessary to inform personal and family cancer risk. Patients should be provided enough pretest information for informed consent; those with pathogenic variants should receive individualized post-test counseling. Variants of uncertain significance should not impact management, and patients with such variants should be followed for reclassification. Referral to providers experienced in clinical cancer genetics may help facilitate patient selection and interpretation of expanded testing, and provide counseling of individuals without pathogenic germline variants but with significant family history.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines.

PRECISE: Preoperative Radiotherapy to Elicit Critical Immune Stimulating Effects - A Phase II Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy is an under-investigated tool for priming the immune system in intact human breast cancers. We sought here to investigate if a preoperative radiotherapy boost delivered was associated with a significant change in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in the tumor in estrogen receptor positive, HER2Neu non-amplified breast cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 20 patients were enrolled in a phase II clinical trial and received either 7.5Gy x 1 fraction or 2Gy x 5 fractions, completed 6-8 days prior to surgery. Percent stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) were evaluated on hematoxylin and eosin-stained samples. Short-term safety was assessed based on time to surgery, toxicities, and cosmesis up to 6 months following boost. RESULTS: Stromal TIL increased 6-8 days following completion of boost radiotherapy (median 3.0 (IQR 1.0-6.5) prior to radiotherapy vs. median 5.0 (IQR 1.5-8.0) post radiotherapy, p=0.0037. Zero grade ≥ 3 toxicities up to 6 months following boost were experienced. 94% (16/17) patients with 6 month follow-up cosmetic assessment following breast conservation had good-excellent cosmesis by physician assessment. CONCLUSION: In this phase II trial, preoperative radiotherapy boost resulted in a short-term increase in stromal TIL with minimal toxicities. Preoperative breast radiotherapy appears to be safe and may be a feasible means for priming the tumor microenvironment.