RESUMO
This study aimed to generate evidence to support psychometric validity of the modified functional Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (f-SARA) among patients with spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA). Psychometric measurement properties and minimal change thresholds of the f-SARA were evaluated using data from a cohort of SCA subjects (recruited at Massachusetts General Hospital [MGH]; n = 33) and data from a phase 3 trial of troriluzole in adults with SCA (NCT03701399 [Study 206]; n = 217), including a subset of patients with the SCA3 genotype (n = 89). f-SARA item ceiling effects were absent within the MGH cohort, while floor effects were present. Excellent internal consistency reliability was demonstrated (αtotal = 0.90; αitems-removed = 0.86-0.90), and item-to-total correlations were strong (r = 0.82-0.91, per item). High test-retest reliability was demonstrated with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.91 (total) and 0.73-0.92 (items). Convergent and divergent validity was supported, with strong correlations observed between the f-SARA and similarly constructed scales (FARS-FUNC, BARS, PROM-ADL, and FARS-ADL; all p < 0.001) and weaker correlations observed among measures of differing constructs. Mean item and total scores increased with disease severity (by FARS-FUNC quartile; p < 0.001). A 1-point threshold for meaningful changes was supported as 0.5 × SD = 0.89, SEM = 1.12, and mean changes from baseline for patients classified as "improved," "no change," or "deteriorated" were -0.68, 0.02, and 0.58, respectively. Similar trends were observed in Study 206 all-SCA and SCA3 cohorts. The measurement properties of the f-SARA provide evidence of its psychometric validity, responsiveness, and suitability as a clinical outcome measure in patients with SCA, including those with SCA3.
RESUMO
The functional Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (f-SARA) assesses Gait, Stance, Sitting, and Speech. It was developed as a potentially clinically meaningful measure of spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) progression for clinical trial use. Here, we evaluated content validity of the f-SARA. Qualitative interviews were conducted among individuals with SCA1 (n = 1) and SCA3 (n = 6) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) with SCA expertise (USA, n = 5; Europe, n = 3). Interviews evaluated symptoms and signs of SCA and relevance of f-SARA concepts for SCA. HCP cognitive debriefing was conducted. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed by ATLAS.TI software. Individuals with SCA1 and 3 reported 85 symptoms, signs, and impacts of SCA. All indicated difficulties with walking, stance, balance, speech, fatigue, emotions, and work. All individuals with SCA1 and 3 considered Gait, Stance, and Speech relevant f-SARA concepts; 3 considered Sitting relevant (42.9%). All HCPs considered Gait and Speech relevant; 5 (62.5%) indicated Stance was relevant. Sitting was considered a late-stage disease indicator. Most HCPs suggested inclusion of appendicular items would enhance clinical relevance. Cognitive debriefing supported clarity and comprehension of f-SARA. Maintaining current abilities on f-SARA items for 1 year was considered meaningful for most individuals with SCA1 and 3. All HCPs considered meaningful changes as stability in f-SARA score over 1-2 years, 1-2-point change in total f-SARA score, and deviation from natural history. These results support content validity of f-SARA for assessing SCA disease progression in clinical trials.