RESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of the equivalent keratometry reading (EKR) from a color LED corneal topographer (Cassini) with that of other no-history formulas for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in eyes with previous myopic excimer laser surgery. SETTING: Centro de Oftalmología Barraquer, Barcelona, Spain. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: The refractive outcomes of the Cassini EKR entered into the Haigis formula were compared with those of the Barrett True-K, Haigis-L, and Shammas-PL formulas and the Triple-S method combined with the Haigis formula. Optimized lens constants for virgin eyes were used. The mean prediction error (PE), the median absolute error (MedAE), and the percentage of eyes with a PE within ±0.25 diopter (D), ±0.50 D, ±0.75 D, and ±1.00 D were calculated. RESULTS: The study comprised 37 patients (37 eyes). The Haigis-L, Shammas-PL, and Barrett True-K no-history methods produced a myopic mean PE that was significantly different from zero (P < .001, P < .001 and P = .004, respectively), whereas the mean PEs of Cassini EKR and the Triple-S combined with the Haigis formula were not different from zero (P > .05). Repeated-measures analysis of variance disclosed a significant difference among the PE of all methods (P < .0001). The MedAE of the Cassini EKR, Barrett True-K, Haigis-L, Shammas-PL, and Triple-S was, respectively, 0.34 D, 0.34 D, 0.49 D, 0.48 D, and 0.31 D (P = .0026). CONCLUSIONS: The performance of the combination of standard Haigis formula with Cassini EKR was comparable to other no-history formulas in eyes with previous myopic excimer laser surgery.