RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The long-term pulmonary sequelae of mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unknown. In this study, we aimed to characterize lung function trajectories in individuals with mild COVID-19 from preinfection to 2 years postinfection. METHODS: We reinvited participants 2 years after infection from our matched cohort study of the Copenhagen General Population who had initially been examined 5.4 months after infection. We repeated lung tests and questionnaires. Linear mixed models were used to estimate dynamics in lung volumes in individuals with COVID-19 patients versus uninfected controls over two intervals: from pre-infection to 6 months postinfection and 6 months postinfection to 2 years postinfection. RESULTS: 52 individuals (48.6%) attended the 2-year examination at median 1.9 years (interquartile range, 1.8-2.4) after COVID-19, all with mild infection. Individuals with COVID-19 had an adjusted excess decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 13.0â mL per year (95% confidence interval [CI], -23.5 to -2.5; P = .02) from before infection to 6 months after infection compared to uninfected controls. From 6 to 24 months after infection, they had an excess decline of 7.5â mL per year (95% CI, -25.6-9.6; P = .40). A similar pattern was observed for forced vital capacity (FVC). Participants had a mean increase in diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) of 3.33 (SD 7.97) between the 6- and 24-month examination. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that mild COVID-19 infection affects lung function at the time of infection with limited recovery 2 years after infection.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pulmão , Testes de Função Respiratória , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Seguimentos , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Capacidade Vital/fisiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The impact of gut microbiota and its metabolites on coronary artery disease (CAD) in people with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH) is unknown. Emerging evidence suggests that imidazole propionate (ImP), a microbial metabolite, is linked with cardiometabolic diseases. METHODS: Fecal samples from participants of the Copenhagen Comorbidity in HIV infection (COCOMO) study were processed for 16S rRNA sequencing and ImP measured with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. CAD severity was investigated by coronary computed tomography-angiography, and participants grouped according to obstructive CAD (n = 60), nonobstructive CAD (n = 80), or no CAD (n = 114). RESULTS: Participants with obstructive CAD had a gut microbiota with lower diversity and distinct compositional shift, with increased abundance of Rumiococcus gnavus and Veillonella, known producers of ImP. ImP plasma levels were associated with this dysbiosis, and significantly elevated in participants with obstructive CAD. However, gut dysbiosis but not plasma ImP was independently associated with obstructive CAD after adjustment for traditional and HIV-related risk factors (adjusted odds ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-7.2; P = .048). CONCLUSIONS: PWH with obstructive CAD displays a distinct gut microbiota profile and increased circulating ImP plasma levels. Future studies should determine whether gut dysbiosis and related metabolites such as ImP are predictive of incident cardiovascular events.
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Infecções por HIV , Imidazóis , Humanos , HIV , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Disbiose , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genéticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The BCG (Bacillus Calmette-Guérin) vaccine can induce nonspecific protection against unrelated infections. We aimed to test the effect of BCG on absenteeism and health of Danish health care workers (HCWs) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial included 1221 HCWs from 9 Danish hospitals. Participants were randomized 1:1 to standard dose BCG or placebo. Primary outcome was days of unplanned absenteeism. Main secondary outcomes were incidence of COVID-19, all-cause hospitalization, and infectious disease episodes. RESULTS: There was no significant effect of BCG on unplanned absenteeism. Mean number of days absent per 1000 workdays was 20 in the BCG group and 17 in the placebo group (risk ratio, 1.23; 95% credibility interval, 0.98-1.53). BCG had no effect on incidence of COVID-19 or all-cause hospitalization overall. In secondary analyses BCG revaccination was associated with higher COVID-19 incidence (hazard ratio [HR], 2.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-5.71), but also reduced risk of hospitalization (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, .09-.86). The incidence of infectious disease episodes was similar between randomization groups (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, .96-1.24). CONCLUSIONS: In this relatively healthy cohort of HCWs, there was no overall effect of BCG on any of the study outcomes. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT0437329 and EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT number 2020-001888-90).
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças Transmissíveis , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacina BCG , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Pessoal de SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Within a year of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, vaccines inducing a robust humoral and cellular immune response were implemented worldwide. However, emergence of novel variants and waning vaccine-induced immunity led to implementation of additional vaccine boosters. METHODS: This prospective study evaluated the temporal profile of cellular and serological responses in a cohort of 639 SARS-CoV-2-vaccinated participants, of whom a large proportion experienced a SARS-CoV-2 infection. All participants were infection naïve at the time of their first vaccine dose. Proportions of SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific T cells were determined after each vaccine dose using the activation-induced marker assay, while levels of circulating SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were determined by the Meso Scale serology assay. RESULTS: We found a significant increase in SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses following the third dose of a SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA vaccine as well as enhanced CD8+ T-cell responses after the fourth dose. Furthermore, increased age was associated with a poorer response. Finally, we observed that SARS-CoV-2 infection boosts both the cellular and humoral immune response, relative to vaccine-induced immunity alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the boosting effect on T-cell immunity of repeated vaccine administration. The combination of multiple vaccine doses and SARS-CoV-2 infections maintains population T-cell immunity, although with reduced levels in the elderly.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais , Linfócitos T CD4-Positivos , Linfócitos T CD8-Positivos , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus , Humanos , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Masculino , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Linfócitos T CD8-Positivos/imunologia , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/imunologia , Estudos Longitudinais , Linfócitos T CD4-Positivos/imunologia , Imunidade Celular , Idoso , Vacinação , Imunização Secundária , Linfócitos T/imunologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of antimicrobial therapies, gram-negative bacteremia remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality on a global level. Recent randomized controlled trials support shorter antibiotic treatment duration for individuals with uncomplicated gram-negative bacteremia. The target trial framework using the cloning approach utilizes real-world data but eliminates the issue of immortal time bias seen in observational studies by emulating the analysis of randomized trials with full adherence. METHOD: A hypothetical target trial allocating individuals with gram-negative bacteremia to either short antibiotic treatment duration (5-7 days) or longer antibiotic treatment duration (8-14 days) was specified and emulated using the cloning, censoring, and weighting approach. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcome was a composite endpoint of clinical and microbiological relapse. The emulated trial included individuals from four hospitals in Copenhagen from 2018 through 2021. RESULTS: In sum, 1040 individuals were included. The median age of the cohort was 76 years, the majority were male (54%), had community-acquired gram-negative bacteremia (86%), urinary tract infection as the source of the infection (78%), and Escherichia coli as the pathogen of the infection (73%). The adjusted 90-day risk difference in all-cause mortality was 1.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -.7, 3.3), and the risk ratio was 1.12 (95% CI: .89, 1.37). The adjusted 90-day risk difference in relapse was 0.7% (95% CI: -2.3, 3.8), and the risk ratio was 1.07 (95% CI: .71, 1.45). CONCLUSIONS: We found comparative outcomes for shorter treatment duration compared to longer treatment duration in patients with gram-negative bacteremia.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Resultado do Tratamento , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Duração da Terapia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Escherichia coli , Recidiva , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ethnic minorities living in high-income countries have been disproportionately affected by Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in terms of infection rates, hospitalisations, and deaths; however, less is known about long COVID in these populations. Our aim was to examine the risk of long COVID and associated symptoms among ethnic minorities. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We used nationwide register-based cohort data on individuals diagnosed with COVID-19 aged ≥18 years (n = 2,287,175) between January 2020 and August 2022 in Denmark. We calculated the risk of long COVID diagnosis and long COVID symptoms among ethnic minorities compared with native Danes using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression and logistic regression, respectively. Among individuals who were first time diagnosed with COVID-19 during the study period, 39,876 (1.7%) were hospitalised and 2,247,299 (98.3%) were nonhospitalised individuals. Of the diagnosed COVID-19 cases, 1,952,021 (85.3%) were native Danes and 335,154 (14.7%) were ethnic minorities. After adjustment for age, sex, civil status, education, family income, and Charlson comorbidity index, ethnic minorities from North Africa (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.12,1.79], p = 0.003), Middle East (aHR 1.38, 95% CI [1.24,1.55], p < 0.001), Eastern Europe (aHR 1.35, 95% CI [1.22,1.49], p < 0.001), and Asia (aHR 1.23, 95% CI [1.09,1.40], p = 0.001) had significantly greater risk of long COVID diagnosis than native Danes. In the analysis by largest countries of origin, the greater risks of long COVID diagnosis were found in people of Iraqi origin (aHR 1.56, 95% CI [1.30,1.88], p < 0.001), people of Turkish origin (aHR 1.42, 95% CI [1.24,1.63], p < 0.001), and people of Somali origin (aHR 1.42, 95% CI [1.07,1.91], p = 0.016). A significant factor associated with an increased risk of long COVID diagnosis was COVID-19 hospitalisation. The risk of long COVID diagnosis among ethnic minorities was more pronounced between January 2020 and June 2021. Furthermore, the odds of reporting cardiopulmonary symptoms (including dyspnoea, cough, and chest pain) and any long COVID symptoms were higher among people of North African, Middle Eastern, Eastern European, and Asian origins than among native Danes in both unadjusted and adjusted models. Despite including the nationwide sample of individuals diagnosed with COVID-19, the precision of our estimates on long COVID was limited to the sample of patients with symptoms who had contacted the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Belonging to an ethnic minority group was significantly associated with an increased risk of long COVID, indicating the need to better understand long COVID drivers and address care and treatment strategies in these populations.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Populações Escandinavas e Nórdicas , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Estudos de Coortes , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Minorias Étnicas e Raciais , Etnicidade , Grupos Minoritários , Síndrome de COVID-19 Pós-Aguda , SARS-CoV-2 , População do Norte da África , População do Oriente Médio , População do Leste Europeu , Povo AsiáticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: LY-CoV555, a neutralizing monoclonal antibody, has been associated with a decrease in viral load and the frequency of hospitalizations or emergency department visits among outpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). Data are needed on the effect of this antibody in patients who are hospitalized with Covid-19. METHODS: In this platform trial of therapeutic agents, we randomly assigned hospitalized patients who had Covid-19 without end-organ failure in a 1:1 ratio to receive either LY-CoV555 or matching placebo. In addition, all the patients received high-quality supportive care as background therapy, including the antiviral drug remdesivir and, when indicated, supplemental oxygen and glucocorticoids. LY-CoV555 (at a dose of 7000 mg) or placebo was administered as a single intravenous infusion over a 1-hour period. The primary outcome was a sustained recovery during a 90-day period, as assessed in a time-to-event analysis. An interim futility assessment was performed on the basis of a seven-category ordinal scale for pulmonary function on day 5. RESULTS: On October 26, 2020, the data and safety monitoring board recommended stopping enrollment for futility after 314 patients (163 in the LY-CoV555 group and 151 in the placebo group) had undergone randomization and infusion. The median interval since the onset of symptoms was 7 days (interquartile range, 5 to 9). At day 5, a total of 81 patients (50%) in the LY-CoV555 group and 81 (54%) in the placebo group were in one of the two most favorable categories of the pulmonary outcome. Across the seven categories, the odds ratio of being in a more favorable category in the LY-CoV555 group than in the placebo group was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 1.29; P = 0.45). The percentage of patients with the primary safety outcome (a composite of death, serious adverse events, or clinical grade 3 or 4 adverse events through day 5) was similar in the LY-CoV555 group and the placebo group (19% and 14%, respectively; odds ratio, 1.56; 95% CI, 0.78 to 3.10; P = 0.20). The rate ratio for a sustained recovery was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.77 to 1.47). CONCLUSIONS: Monoclonal antibody LY-CoV555, when coadministered with remdesivir, did not demonstrate efficacy among hospitalized patients who had Covid-19 without end-organ failure. (Funded by Operation Warp Speed and others; TICO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04501978.).
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Monofosfato de Adenosina/análogos & derivados , Monofosfato de Adenosina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Alanina/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/efeitos adversos , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , COVID-19/mortalidade , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Hospitalização , Humanos , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Falha de TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Halm's clinical stability criteria have long guided antibiotic treatment and hospital discharge decisions for patients hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Originally introduced in 1998, these criteria were established based on a relatively small and select patient population. Consequently, our study aims to reassess their applicability in management of CAP in a contemporary real-world setting. METHODS: This cohort study included 2918 immunocompetent patients hospitalised with CAP from three hospitals in Denmark between 2017-2020. The primary outcome was time to achieve clinical stability as defined by Halm's criteria. Additionally, we examined recurrence of clinical instability and severe complications. Cumulative incidence function or Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to analyse these outcomes, considering competing risks. FINDINGS: The study population primarily comprised elderly individuals (median age: 75â years) with significant comorbidities. The median time to clinical stability according to Halm's criteria was 4â days, with one-fifth experiencing recurrence of instability after early clinical response (stability within 3â days). Severe complications within 30â days mainly comprised mortality, with rates of 5.1% (64/1257) overall in those with early clinical response, 1.7% (18/1045) in the subgroup without do-not-resuscitate orders, and 17.3% (276/1595) among the rest. INTERPRETATION: Halm's clinical stability criteria effectively classify CAP patients with different disease courses, yet achieving stability required more time in this aging population with substantial comorbidities and more severe disease. Early clinical response indicates reduced risk of complications, especially in those without do-not-resuscitate orders.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Osteoarticular infection (OAI) is a feared complication of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) and is associated with poor outcomes. We aimed to explore risk of OAI and death following SAB in patients with and without rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to identify risk factors for OAI in patients with RA. METHODS: Danish nationwide cohort study of all patients with microbiologically verified first-time SAB between 2006-2018. We identified RA, SAB, comorbidities, and RA-related characteristics (e.g. orthopaedic implants, antirheumatic treatment) in national registries including the rheumatology registry DANBIO. We estimated cumulative incidence of OAI and death and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs, multivariate Cox regression). RESULTS: We identified 18 274 patients with SAB (n = 367 with RA). The 90-day cumulative incidence of OAI was 23.1%(95%CI 18.8; 27.6) for patients with RA and 12.5%(12.1; 13.0) for patients without RA (non-RA) (HR 1.93(1.54; 2.41)). For RA patients with orthopaedic implants cumulative incidence was 29.4%(22.9; 36.2) (HR 1.75(1.08; 2.85), and for current users of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) it was 41.9%(27.0; 56.1) (HR 2.27(1.29; 3.98) compared with non-users). All-cause 90-day mortality following SAB was similar in RA (35.4%(30.6; 40.3)) and non-RA (33.9%(33.2; 34.5), HR 1.04(0.87; 1.24)). CONCLUSION: Following SAB, almost one in four patients with RA contracted OAI corresponding to a doubled risk compared with non-RA. In RA, orthopaedic implants and current TNFi use were associated with approximately doubled OAI risk. One in three died within 90 days in both RA and non-RA. These findings encourage vigilance in RA patients with SAB to avoid treatment delay of OAI.
RESUMO
Weight gain effects of Nucleoside/Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors in people with HIV (PWH) have been sparsely studied.Participants were enrolled in the Copenhagen Comorbidity in HIV Infection (COCOMO) study. PWH receiving a backbone of emtricitabine, or lamivudine combined with abacavir, tenofovir disoproxil, or tenofovir alafenamide were analysed. Weight gain according to ART backbone and to the third drug was analysed using a multiple linear regression model. Non-ART risk factors were also determined using multiple linear regression.A total of 591 participants were included in the analysis. The majority were middle-aged, virally suppressed males with a mean BMI just above the normal range. Both tenofovir disoproxil/emtricitabine or lamivudine and abacavir /emtricitabine or lamivudine, but not tenofovir alafenamide /emtricitabine or lamivudine were associated with weight gain over two years (0.6â kg, p = 0.025; 1.0â kg, p = 0.005). The third drugs associated with weight increase were non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) (p = 0.035), dolutegravir (p = 0.008) and atazanavir (p = 0.040). Non-ART risk factors for gaining weight were low or normal BMI, age <40 years, underweight, inactivity or highly active at baseline.Tenofovir disoproxil and abacavir-based ART regimens were associated with a small weight gain. Third drug NNRTI, dolutegravir and atazanavir were associated with an increase in weight.
Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV , Didesoxinucleosídeos , Infecções por HIV , Inibidores da Transcriptase Reversa , Tenofovir , Aumento de Peso , Humanos , Masculino , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Aumento de Peso/efeitos dos fármacos , Inibidores da Transcriptase Reversa/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Transcriptase Reversa/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Anti-HIV/efeitos adversos , Tenofovir/uso terapêutico , Tenofovir/efeitos adversos , Tenofovir/análogos & derivados , Didesoxinucleosídeos/efeitos adversos , Didesoxinucleosídeos/uso terapêutico , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Emtricitabina/uso terapêutico , Emtricitabina/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Piridonas/efeitos adversos , Comorbidade , Lamivudina/uso terapêutico , Lamivudina/efeitos adversos , Compostos Heterocíclicos com 3 Anéis/efeitos adversos , Compostos Heterocíclicos com 3 Anéis/uso terapêutico , Piperazinas/efeitos adversos , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Adenina/uso terapêutico , Adenina/efeitos adversos , Alanina/uso terapêutico , Ciclopropanos , Oxazinas , Didesoxiadenosina/análogos & derivadosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) in blood has demonstrated its capability to predict bacteremia in emergency departments, and its association with mortality has been established in patients with sepsis in intensive care units. However, its potential concerning mortality and readmission in patients with Gram-negative bacteremia (GNB) is unexplored. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with GNB between 2018 and 2022 from six hospitals in the Capital Region of Denmark. Patients who were immunosuppressed or had missing NLR values on the day of blood culture were excluded. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the association between NLR levels and 90-day all-cause mortality, while the logit link interpretation of the cumulative incidence function was used to assess the association between NLR levels and 60-day readmission. Associations were quantified as odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: The study included 1763 patients with a median age was 76.8 years and 51.3% were female. The median NLR was 17.3 and 15.8% of patients had a quick sequential organ failure assessment score of two or three. Urinary tract infection (UTI) was the most frequent focus and Escherichia coli the most frequent pathogen. Statistically significant differences in median NLR were found by age group and pathogen, and for patients with or without hypertension, liver disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, and alcohol abuse. 378 patients (21.4%) died before 90 days. 526 (29.8%) patients were readmitted to the hospital within 60 days. For each doubling of the NLR, the OR for all-cause 90-day mortality was 1.15 (95% CI, 1.04-1.27) and 1.12 (95% CI, 1.02-1.24) for 60-day readmission. Analysis of subgroups did not show statistically significant differences between groups in relation to the association between NLR and mortality. The discriminatory ability of NLR for mortality was limited and comparable to blood neutrophil or lymphocyte count, producing receiver operating characteristic curves with an area under the curve of 0.59 (95% CI, 0.56-0.63), 0.60 (95% CI, 0.56-0.65) and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.49-0.56), respectively. CONCLUSION: Blood neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio was associated with 90-day all-cause mortality and 60-day readmission in patients with GNB. However, the ratio has limited ability in predicting mortality or readmission.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Neutrófilos , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Masculino , Contagem de Leucócitos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Readmissão do Paciente , Linfócitos , Prognóstico , Curva ROCRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) may be a particular concern in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to determine the prevalence and etiology of VAP in critically ill COVID-19 patients in a Danish intensive care unit (ICU) during the first three waves of the COVID-19 pandemic and to study associations between dexamethasone (DXM) use and development of VAP. METHODS: In an observational single-center study patients were retrospectively screened for VAP including causative pathogens, use of DXM and commonly used antibiotics. Diagnosis of VAP required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) >48 h with presence of a new bacterial agent and clinical signs of infection. For analysis, common descriptive statistics were applied. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the association between DXM use and VAP. RESULTS: VAP was detected in 53/119 (44.5%) mechanically ventilated patients across all three COVID-19 waves. Median length of IMV for VAP patients was 24 [15-41] days, and 3 out of 4 were males. VAP was most prevalent (47.0%) during the second wave. Common pathogens included Klebsiella pneumoniae (24.5%), Enterobacter aerogenes (17.0%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13.2%), Staphylococcus aureus (13.2%), and Escherichia coli (13.2%). A change from Gram-negative bacteria only to a combination of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria was observed in the second wave compared to first. Use of DXM was not associated with VAP (adjusted hazard ratio 1.63 95% CI: 0.84-3.17). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of VAP was high across all three COVID-19 waves and showed a different distribution of pathogens between the first and second wave. Use of DXM was not associated with VAP development. Further and larger studies are needed to understand the risk factors associated with VAP in patients with COVID-19.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Humanos , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/microbiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Pandemias , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estado Terminal , AdultoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: People with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH) have an increased risk of chronic lung diseases and chronic inflammation. We aimed to investigate if inflammatory markers and monocyte activation are associated with faster lung function decline in PWH. METHODS: We included 655 PWH from the Copenhagen Comorbidity in HIV Infection (COCOMO) Study. Eligible participants were aged ≥25 years and had 2 spirometries separated by >2 years. Inflammatory markers (interleukin [IL]-1ß, IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor-α, and interferon-γ) were measured at baseline by Luminex, and soluble CD14 and soluble CD163 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Using linear mixed models, we investigated whether elevated cytokine levels were associated with faster lung function decline. RESULTS: The majority of PWH were males (85.2%) with undetectable viral replication (95.3%). We found a faster decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) in PWH with elevated IL-1ß and IL-10, with an additional decline of 10.3 mL/year (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1-18.6; P = .014) and 10.0 mL/year (95% CI, 1.8-18.2; P = .017), respectively. We found no interaction between smoking and IL-1ß or IL-10 on FEV1 decline. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated IL-1ß and IL-10 were independently associated with faster lung function decline in PWH, suggesting that dysregulated systemic inflammation may play a role in the pathogenesis of chronic lung diseases.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Pneumopatias , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Interleucina-10 , Infecções por HIV/complicações , HIV , Interleucina-1beta , Inflamação , PulmãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Little data exist on the risk and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in people with HIV (PWH). We aimed to describe OHCA in PWH as compared with the general population in terms of incidence, characteristics, and survival. METHODS: This nationwide study assessed all individuals aged 18-85 years between 2001 and 2019 in Denmark. The cumulative incidence of OHCA was computed using cause-specific Cox models accounting for competing risk of death. RESULTS: Among 6 565 309 individuals, 6 925 (median age: 36; interquartile range [IQR]: 28-44 y; 74% males) were infected at some point with HIV. The incidence of OHCA was 149 (95% CI: 123-180)/100 000 person-years in PWH versus 64 (95% CI: 64-65)/100 000 person-years in people without HIV (P < .001). Age at the time of cardiac arrest was 52 (IQR: 44-61) years in PWH versus 69 (IQR: 59-77) years in individuals without HIV (P < .001). In a multivariable model adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, and renal failure, PWH had a 2-fold higher risk of OHCA (hazard ratio: 2.84; 95% CI: 2.36-3.43; P < .001). Thirty-day mortality (89% vs 88%; P = .80) was comparable to individuals without HIV. CONCLUSIONS: HIV is an independent risk factor for OHCA, and those who experience OHCA with HIV are much younger than those without HIV. Almost 90% of PWH died 1 month after OHCA. Further research should strive to find out how to reduce OHCA occurrence in this population.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Feminino , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , HIV , Fatores de Risco , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Continuous evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outpaces monovalent vaccine cross-protection to new viral variants. Consequently, bivalent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines including Omicron antigens were developed. The contrasting immunogenicity of the bivalent vaccines and the impact of prior antigenic exposure on new immune imprinting remains to be clarified. METHODS: In the large prospective ENFORCE cohort, we quantified spike-specific antibodies to 5 Omicron variants (BA.1 to BA.5) before and after BA.1 or BA.4/5 bivalent booster vaccination to compare Omicron variant-specific antibody inductions. We evaluated the impact of previous infection and characterized the dominant antibody responses. RESULTS: Prior to the bivalent fourth vaccine, all participants (N = 1697) had high levels of Omicron-specific antibodies. Antibody levels were significantly higher in individuals with a previous polymerase chain reaction positive (PCR+) infection, particularly for BA.2-specific antibodies (geometric mean ratio [GMR] 6.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.05-7.62). Antibody levels were further significantly boosted in all individuals by receiving either of the bivalent vaccines, but greater fold inductions to all Omicron variants were observed in individuals with no prior infection. The BA.1 bivalent vaccine generated a dominant response toward BA.1 (adjusted GMR 1.31, 95% CI 1.09-1.57) and BA.3 (1.32, 1.09-1.59) antigens in individuals with no prior infection, whereas the BA.4/5 bivalent vaccine generated a dominant response toward BA.2 (0.87, 0.76-0.98), BA.4 (0.85, 0.75-0.97), and BA.5 (0.87, 0.76-0.99) antigens in individuals with a prior infection. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination and previous infection leave a clear serological imprint that is focused on the variant-specific antigen. Importantly, both bivalent vaccines induce high levels of Omicron variant-specific antibodies, suggesting broad cross-protection of Omicron variants.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Prospectivos , Vacinação , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Vacinas Combinadas , Anticorpos Antivirais , Anticorpos NeutralizantesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although several therapeutic agents have been evaluated for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), no antiviral agents have yet been shown to be efficacious. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous remdesivir in adults who were hospitalized with Covid-19 and had evidence of lower respiratory tract infection. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either remdesivir (200 mg loading dose on day 1, followed by 100 mg daily for up to 9 additional days) or placebo for up to 10 days. The primary outcome was the time to recovery, defined by either discharge from the hospital or hospitalization for infection-control purposes only. RESULTS: A total of 1062 patients underwent randomization (with 541 assigned to remdesivir and 521 to placebo). Those who received remdesivir had a median recovery time of 10 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 9 to 11), as compared with 15 days (95% CI, 13 to 18) among those who received placebo (rate ratio for recovery, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.49; P<0.001, by a log-rank test). In an analysis that used a proportional-odds model with an eight-category ordinal scale, the patients who received remdesivir were found to be more likely than those who received placebo to have clinical improvement at day 15 (odds ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.9, after adjustment for actual disease severity). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of mortality were 6.7% with remdesivir and 11.9% with placebo by day 15 and 11.4% with remdesivir and 15.2% with placebo by day 29 (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.03). Serious adverse events were reported in 131 of the 532 patients who received remdesivir (24.6%) and in 163 of the 516 patients who received placebo (31.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that remdesivir was superior to placebo in shortening the time to recovery in adults who were hospitalized with Covid-19 and had evidence of lower respiratory tract infection. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; ACTT-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04280705.).
Assuntos
Monofosfato de Adenosina/análogos & derivados , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Coronavirus/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Viral/tratamento farmacológico , Monofosfato de Adenosina/administração & dosagem , Monofosfato de Adenosina/efeitos adversos , Monofosfato de Adenosina/uso terapêutico , Administração Intravenosa , Adulto , Idoso , Alanina/administração & dosagem , Alanina/efeitos adversos , Alanina/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/mortalidade , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Método Duplo-Cego , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oxigenoterapia , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/mortalidade , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Respiração Artificial , SARS-CoV-2 , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Testing is critical for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection, but the best sampling method remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether nasopharyngeal swab (NPS), oropharyngeal swab (OPS) or saliva specimen collection has the highest detection rate for SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing. METHODS: We conducted a randomised clinical trial at two COVID-19 outpatient test centres where NPS, OPS and saliva specimens were collected by healthcare workers in different orders for reverse transcriptase PCR testing. The SARS-CoV-2 detection rate was calculated as the number positive by a specific sampling method divided by the number in which any of the three sampling methods was positive. As secondary outcomes, test-related discomfort was measured with an 11-point numeric scale and cost-effectiveness was calculated. RESULTS: Among 23 102 adults completing the trial, 381 (1.65%) were SARS-CoV-2 positive. The SARS-CoV-2 detection rate was higher for OPSs, 78.7% (95% CI 74.3 to 82.7), compared with NPSs, 72.7% (95% CI 67.9 to 77.1) (p=0.049) and compared with saliva sampling, 61.9% (95% CI 56.9 to 66.8) (p<0.001). The discomfort score was highest for NPSs, at 5.76 (SD, 2.52), followed by OPSs, at 3.16 (SD 3.16) and saliva samples, at 1.03 (SD 18.8), p<0.001 between all measurements. Saliva specimens were associated with the lowest cost, and the incremental costs per detected SARS-CoV-2 infection for NPSs and OPSs were US$3258 and US$1832, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: OPSs were associated with higher SARS-CoV-2 detection and lower test-related discomfort than NPSs for SARS-CoV-2 testing. Saliva sampling had the lowest SARS-CoV-2 detection but was the least costly strategy for mass testing. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04715607.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Teste para COVID-19 , Saliva , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/métodos , Nasofaringe , Manejo de Espécimes/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Age-related comorbidities, polypharmacy and thereby the risk of potential drug-drug interactions (PDDIs) among people living with HIV (PLWH) have increased over the years. We estimated the prevalence of comedications, including dietary supplements, and evaluated PDDIs among PLWH receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Denmark in an outpatient setting. METHODS: Information on prescription medication, over-the-counter medication and dietary supplements was obtained from adult PLWH receiving ART attending two outpatient clinics in Denmark. The PDDIs were identified using the University of Liverpool's drug interaction database. Associations between PDDIs and relevant variables were compared using logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 337 PLWH receiving ART with a median age of 53 years (interquartile range: 45-61) were included; 77% were male and 96% had a HIV-RNA viral load < 50 copies/mL. Twenty-six per cent of participants received five or more comedications and 56% consumed dietary supplements. Co-administration of drugs requiring dose adjustment or monitoring was identified in the medication lists of 52% of participants, and 4.5% were on drugs that should not be co-administered. Male sex [odds ratio (OR) = 1.9, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0-3.4], being on a protease inhibitor (OR = 4.3, 95% CI: 1.9-9.7), receiving five or more comedications (OR = 3.3, 95% CI: 1.5-7.2), taking over-the-counter medications (OR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.1-3.3) and dietary supplements (OR = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.2-3.3) were independent predictors of PDDIs. CONCLUSION: Potential drug-drug interactions were common among our study population Our study confirms that polypharmacy and being on a protease inhibitor-based regimen increase the risk of PDDIs considerably and highlights the importance of questioning PLWH about dietary supplement intake.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Antirretrovirais/uso terapêutico , Polimedicação , Interações Medicamentosas , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Proteases/uso terapêutico , Suplementos NutricionaisRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to determine whether antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) were used according to the European AIDS Clinical Society (EACS) guidelines for people with HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) between 30 November 2014 and 31 December 2019 in the pan-European EuroSIDA study. METHODS: At each publication date of the EACS guidelines, plus 3 and 6 months, we calculated the number of people receiving DAAs with potential and actual ARV contraindications ('red shading' in the EACS guidelines). We used logistic regression to investigate factors associated with using contraindicated ARVs. RESULTS: Among 1406 people starting DAAs, the median age was 51 years, 75% were male, 57% reported injected drug use as an HIV risk, and 76% were from western Europe. Of 1624 treatment episodes, 609 (37.5%) occurred while the patient was receiving ARVs with potential contraindications; among them, 38 (6.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.3-8.2) involved a contraindicated ARV (18 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors), 16 involved protease inhibitors, and four involved integrase strand transfer inhibitors. The adjusted odds of receiving a contraindicated ARV were higher (3.25; 95% CI 1.40-7.57) among participants from east/central east Europe (vs. south) and lower (0.22; 95% CI 0.08-0.65) for 2015-2018 guidelines (vs. 2014). In total, 29 of the 32 (90.6%) patients receiving a contraindicated ARV and 441 of the 461 (95.7%) with potential ARV contraindications experienced a sustained virological response ≥12 weeks after stopping treatment (SVR12; p = 0.55). CONCLUSION: In this large heterogenous European cohort, more than one-third of people with HIV/HCV coinfection received DAAs with potential ARV contraindications, but few received a contraindicated ARV. Use of contraindicated ARVs declined over time, corresponding to the increased availability of ARV therapy regimens without interactions with DAA across Europe. Participants who received a contraindicated DAA and ARV combination still had a high rate of SVR12.
Assuntos
Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida , Coinfecção , Infecções por HIV , Hepatite C Crônica , Hepatite C , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Hepacivirus , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Coinfecção/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C Crônica/complicações , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Antirretrovirais/uso terapêutico , Hepatite C/complicações , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
AIMS: To evaluate the experience with use of sotrovimab following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in high-risk groups. METHODS: In a nationwide, population-based cohort study, we identified all individuals treated with sotrovimab (N = 2933) and stratified them by 4 high-risk groups: (A) malignant haematological disease, (B) solid organ transplantation, (C) anti-CD20 therapy ≤1 year and (D) other risks. Cox regression analysis was used to calculate hazard ratios for hospitalization, death and associated prognostic factors. RESULTS: Of 2933 sotrovimab-treated individuals, 83% belonged to high-risk groups (37.6% haematological malignancy, 27.4% solid organ transplantation and 17.5% treatment with anti-CD20 ≤1 year). Only 17.8% had other risks (11.8% were pregnant, 10.7% primary immunodeficiency, 21.2% other malignancy, 4.3% received anti-CD20 >1 year and 52.0% other/unknown causes). Within 90 days of infusion, 30.2% were hospitalized and 5.3% died. The main prognostic factors were the predefined high-risk groups, mainly malignant haematological disease and age ≥65 years. Number of COVID-19 vaccines (≥3) was associated with a decreased risk of hospitalization. The Delta but not the Omicron BA.2 variant was associated with a higher risk of death compared to the BA.1 variant. CONCLUSION: More than 90% of the patients treated with sotrovimab belonged to the very high-risk groups as described in the Danish guidelines. Sotrovimab-treated individuals remained at a high risk of hospitalization and death which was strongly associated with the underlying immunocompromised state and age. Having received >3 COVID-19 vaccines was association with decreased risk of death and hospitalization.