U.S. laboratory and field trials of metofluthrin (SumiOne) emanators for reducing mosquito biting outdoors.

Metofluthrin (SumiOne is a novel, vapor-active pyrethroid that is highly effective against mosquitoes. Laboratory and field trials were conducted in the United States to evaluate the mosquito repellent activity of metofluthrin-treated paper substrates ("emanators"). Initial studies were conducted to evaluate the field performance of 900-cm(2) paper fan emanators impregnated with 160 mg metofluthrin, where Aedes canadensis was the predominant species. Emanators reduced landing rates on human volunteers by between 85% and 100% compared to untreated controls. Subsequent tests with 4,000-cm(2) paper strip emanators impregnated with 200 mg metofluthrin were conducted in a wind tunnel as a precursor to conducting field trials using human bait and laboratory-reared Aedes aegypti. Paper strips, which were pre-aged in a fume hood to determine duration of protection, gave 89-91% reductions in landing rates compared with controls. Similar reductions in biting activity were also noted. Following these tests, field trials to assess effect on landing rates were conducted with emanators positioned 1.22 m on either side of volunteers protected from biting by Tyvek suits, with pre- and posttreatment counts being made. In Florida (predominantly Ochlerotatus spp.) 91-95% reductions were noted 10-30 min after emanators were deployed, while in Washington State (mostly Aedes vexans) 95-97% reductions were observed. These results demonstrate that metofluthrin-treated emanators are highly effective at repelling mosquitoes.

Factors affecting oviposition site preference by Toxorhynchites splendens in the laboratory.

In a series of laboratory oviposition assays, gravid Toxorhynchites splendens exhibited a preference for cups containing Aedes aegypti larval rearing water, but not for cups containing liquid cultures of bacteria, live Ae. aegypti in distilled water, Ae. aegypti larval holding water with reduced bacterial contamination, or methyl propionate at 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% in distilled water. Preoviposition flight behavior was elicited by dark-colored containers, but few eggs were deposited if they contained no water. An invisible source of humidity placed in cups enhanced oviposition, but a reflective surface placed in dry cups did not. It is concluded that this species is strongly influenced by humidity and visual stimuli in the acceptance of a site for oviposition.

Potency of products based on Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis: interlaboratory variations.

Six quality-control laboratories in 4 countries independently bioassayed aliquots of a flowable formulation of Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis (B.t.i.) against the international standard powder IPS-82. All laboratories substantially followed World Health Organization or U.S. Department of Agriculture standard protocols. Significant differences were found in resulting potency values between laboratories. Factors that may have influenced results, such as age, stage, and strain of larvae used, amount and type of food provided to larvae, and processing of samples were examined. Use of different rearing temperatures, different strains of Aedes aegypti L., or late 3rd instars vs. the recommended early 4th instars did not explain the inconsistencies. The slope of the dose-response curve of the IPS-82 powder was influenced by particle size, which varied with the nature and duration of sample homogenization. Laboratories using low-intensity processing obtained a greater slope in the dose-response curve for the flowable product than for the powder standard. The type and quantity of food provided to larvae affected susceptibility. Larvae fed an excess of protein-rich food became 4th instars in 3 days and were less susceptible to B.t.i. than those fed smaller quantities of carbohydrate-rich food that became 4th instars in 5-7 days. Overall, deviations from standard protocols with regard to larval stage, holding temperature, and lighting regime may not be as important as differences in sample processing and pretest rearing conditions. The need to improve standardization in these areas, which are not clearly specified in current protocols, is discussed.