The role of pancreatic leakage on rising of postoperative complications following pancreatic surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The variations in methods of pancreatic stump management and the volume of literature available on both main pancreatic duct and pancreaticoenetric anastomosis leak indicates the concern associated with the leak and the continuing efforts to prevent it. Herein we analyzed the role of pancreatic leakage followed by pancreatic surgery on the incidence of postoperative morbidity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1989 to 2005, we performed 76 pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and 26 distal pancreatectomy (DP), assumed as control case). During DP the parenchymal transection was performed with a linear stapler. The surgical reconstruction after PD was as follows: 11 manual nonabsorbable stitch closure of the main duct, 24 closure of the main duct with linear stapler, 17 temporary occlusion of the main duct with neoprene glue, and 24 duct-to-mucosa anastomosis. RESULTS: In the PD group, morbidity rate was 60%, caused by pancreatic leakage, with an incidence of 48%, hemorrhagic complication, occurred in 10% of patients following surgical procedure and infectious complication, with an incidence of 15%. After distal pancreatectomy we recorded 80, 7% no complications, 3, 9% leakage, 15, 4% hemoperitoneum. By multivariate analysis bleeding complications, biliary anastomosis leakage, and infectious complications were consequences of pancreatic leakage (P = 0.025, P = 0.025, and P = 0.025, respectively). A significant statistical difference was recorded analyzing re-operation rates between closure of the main duct with linear stapler versus temporary occlusion of the main duct with neoprene glue (t = 0.049) and closure of the main duct with linear stapler versus duct-to-mucosa anastomosis (t = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: On the ground of our results of bleeding complication, biliary anastomosis leakage and infectious complication were consequences of pancreatic leakage: failure of a surgical anastomosis has serious consequences, particularly in case of anastomosis of the pancreas to the small bowel, because of the digestive capacities of activated pancreatic secretions.

Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a comparative study of transhiatal laparoscopic approach versus laparoscopic right transthoracic esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: The development of minimally invasive surgery gave birth to an interest in a mini-invasive approach to esophageal cancer; however, it is still considered to be one of the most complex gastrointestinal surgical operations, and many questions still remain unanswered, regarding the oncologic results of a mini-invasive approach in long-term follow-ups. Here, the authors report on the short-term and long-term results of a series of laparoscopic esophagectomies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2002 to March 2006, 22 nonrandomized patients were recruited to undergo an esophagectomy for neoplastic disease. The esophagectomy and esophagogastroplasty were carried out using the laparoscopic transhiatal technique in 9 patients; whereas, a combined laparoscopic and right-transthoracic incision was performed in the other 13 patients. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 21+/-3.23 months (mean+/-SD); range, 2 to 46 months. The overall survival rate resulted 84.0% at 12 months, 61.3% at 24 months, and 51.0% at 36 months. The proportions of cumulative survival showed significant differences when the following variables were considered: site of neoplasm (lower esophagus), American Society of Anesthesiologists 2, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type of surgical procedure, and inclusion in neoadjuvant protocol and staging. Recurrence rates were 3 (25%) in the radio-chemotherapy-treated group, and 5 (50%) in the primary surgery group (P=n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: The two-year survival rates (61.3%) recorded in our series are comparable with those reported in other series of both laparoscopic and open surgeries. The logical conclusion was that a less invasive procedure did not imply a less curative one.

Liver resection for HCC: analysis of causes and risk factors linked to postoperative complications.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hepatic resection is widely accepted as the best treatment for localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), even in those patients affected by cirrhosis after a sharp selection. Notwithstanding technical advances and high experience of liver resection of specialized centers, the rate of complication after surgical resection could be high. Herein we analyzed causes and foreseeable risk factors on the grounds of data derived from a single center surgical population. METHODOLOGY: From September 1989 to March 2005, 134 consecutive patients had liver resection for HCC on cirrhosis at our department. We performed 54 major liver resections and 80 limited resections. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality rate was 7.4%, about 50% of these cases were Child-Pugh B patients. Morbidity rate was 47.7%, caused by the rising of ascites, hepatic insufficiency, biliary fistula, hepatic abscess, hemoperitoneum and pleural effusion. Intraoperative mortality resulted to be influenced by the amount of resected liver volume (p < 0.05), and the rising of complication (p = 0.006). Some technical aspects of surgical procedure are responsible of the rising of complication as: Pringle maneuver length (p = 0.02), the amount of resected liver volume (p = 0.03) and the request of blood transfusion (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Complications that arise during the postoperative period, although treatable, delay patient's recovery and resumption of liver function; the evaluation of causes and foreseeable risk factors linked to postoperative morbidity during the planning of surgical treatment should play the same role as other factors weighted in the selection of patients eligible for liver resection.

Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of factors associated with improved prognosis. The role of clinical, pathological and surgical related factors.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (Hcc) is the third most common cause of cancer death. The aim of this study is to examine the factors associated with improved prognosis in Hcc after liver resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From September 1989 to March 2005, 134 consecutive patients had liver resection for Hcc on cirrhosis at our department. We performed 54 major liver resections and 80 limited resections. All patients enrolled in the study were followed-up three times during the first year after resection and twice the next years. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality rate was 7.4%, about 50% of these cases were Child-Pugh B patients. Morbidity rate was 47.7%, caused by the rising of ascites, temporary liver impairment function, biliary fistula, hepatic abscess, hemoperitoneum and pleural effusion. Overall survival resulted to be influenced by etiology (P = 0.03), underlying liver disease, in particular Child A vs BC (P = 0.04), Endmondson-Steiner grading (P = 0.01), the absence of a capsule (P = 0.004), the presence of more than one lesion (P = 0.02), lesion's size over 5 cm (P = 0.04), Pringle maneuver length over than 20 minutes (P = 0.03), an amount of resected liver volume lesser than 50% of total liver volume (P = 0.03), and the relapse of Hcc (P= 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma should be both the most radical to obtain the best outcome and to reduce the recurrence's rate, and the most suitable according to the patient's condition, lesion's characteristics and underlying liver disease: because of the large number of factors affecting the outcome of Hcc, unfortunately, we are still far from an agreement upon a group of criteria useful to select the best candidates for liver resection.

Analysis of survival after pancreatic resection for oncological pathologies.

Surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer is to date the only modality that offers a chance of long-term survival. Potentially curative surgery is an option for only about 15% of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The aim of this study was to determine the survival and to assess the association of clinical, pathological, and treatment features with survival of patients who underwent resection of pancreatic cancer at the Department of Surgery of Udine University Hospital. From November 1989 to December 2005, 137 consecutive patients, who underwent surgical procedures for pancreatic cancer, were followed in our department. We performed 76 pancreatico-duodenectomy, 26 distal pancreatectomies and 35 total pancreatectomies. The surgical reconstruction after pancreatico-duodenectomy was as follows: 11 closures of the main duct with manual nonabsorbable stitches, 24 closures of the main duct with a linear stapler, 17 occlusions of the main duct with neoprene glue and 24 duct-to-mucosa anastomoses. Mean survival time was 27.7 +/- 26.93 months (mean +/- SD) and mean disease-free survival time was 25.4 +/- 23.06 months (mean +/- SD). 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9-year survival rates were 63.9, 33.7, 21.17, 12.7 and 10.2%, respectively. Significant differences in survival were recorded by the Log-rank test for age > 70 (p = 0.001), surgical procedures (p = 0.00046) and presence of metastases (p = 0.0055) The treatment of pancreatic cancer is undertaken with two different aims. The first is radical surgery for patients with early-stage disease, mainly stage I and partly stage II. In all other cases, the aim of treatment is the palliation of the several distressing symptoms related to this cancer. The standard treatment option for resectable tumours is radical pancreatic resection according to the Whipple procedure or total pancreatectomy.

Resective surgery for liver tumor: a multivariate analysis of causes and risk factors linked to postoperative complications.

BACKGROUND: In spite of accurate selection of patients eligible for resection, and although advances in surgical techniques and perioperative management have greatly contributed to reducing the rate of perioperative deaths, stress must be placed on reducing the postoperative complication rates reported to be still as high as 50%. This study was designed to analyze the causes and foreseeable risk factors linked to postoperative morbidity on the grounds of data derived from a single-center surgical population. METHODS: From September 1989 to March 2005, 287 consecutive patients, affected either with HCC or liver metastasis, had liver resection at our department. Among the HCC series we recorded 98 patients (73.2%) in Child-Pugh class A, 32 (23.8%) in class B and 4 in class C (3%). In 104 colorectal metastases, 71% were due to colon cancer, 25% rectal, 3% sigmoid, and 1% anorectal. In 49 non-colorectal metastases, 22.4% were derived from breast cancer, 63.2% gastrointestinal tumors (excluding colon) and 14.4% other cancers. We performed 80 wedge resections, 77 bisegmentectomies and/or left lobectomies, 74 segmentectomies, 22 major hepatectomies, 20 left hepatectomies, and 14 trisegmentectomies. RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality rate in this series was 4.5%, and the morbidity rate was 47.7%, because of pleural effusion (30%), hepatic abscess (25%), hepatic insufficiency (19%), ascites (10%), hemoperitoneum (10%), or biliary fistula (6%). The variables associated with the technical aspects of the surgical procedure that were responsible for the complications were: a Pringle maneuver length more than 20 minutes (P=0.001); the type of liver resection procedure, including major hepatectomy (P=0.02), left hepatectomy (P=0.04), trisegmentectomy (P=0.04), bisegmentectomy and/or left lobectomy (P=0.04); and a blood transfusion of more than 600 ml (P=0.04). CONCLUSION: The evaluation of causes and foreseeable risk factors linked to postoperative morbidity during the planning of surgical treatment should play the same role as other factors weighed in the selection of patients eligible for liver resection.

Laparoscopic versus open gastroplasty in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparative study.

How best to approach esophagectomy is a controversial issue. In the last decade, the opportunity to use minimally invasive surgical methods for esophagectomy has been documented, but their real advantages over conventional surgery have yet to be clearly established. The aim of this study was to compare a series of patients who underwent laparoscopic esophagectomy with those who underwent open surgery to ascertain the feasibility, safety, and clinical advantages of the former surgical techniques. Between January 2002 and May 2004, 14 patients with cancer of the esophagus underwent laparoscopic esophagectomy and another 14 had conventional open esophagectomy. Their demographic features, and intraoperative and postoperative data were compared. The 2 groups were comparable in terms of age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and site of the neoplasm. The operating times were the same for transhiatal laparoscopic esophagectomy and conventional surgery, although using the thoraco-laparoscopic access took longer than the thoraco-laparotomic procedure (P<0.05). The hospital stay was shorter after laparoscopy (P<0.05). No differences emerged in terms of morbidity, mortality, number of transfusions, and time in the intensive care. The numbers of lymph nodes removed were comparable. In conclusion, it is feasible and safe to use a laparoscopic approach instead of open surgery for esophagectomy, but the former does not offer very significant clinical advantages in the postoperative stage. A shorter hospital stay seems to be the most significant finding. The minimally invasive procedure would seem to assure oncological radicality because it enables lymphadenectomy to be as thorough as in the conventional surgical approach.

The predictive value of clinical evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Multimodality therapy has become the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced (T3 and T4) rectal carcinoma. Accurate preoperative staging of the patients with rectal cancer has increased in importance because the selection of patients with transmural rectal cancer (T3 or T4) or node-positive disease leads to a previous nonsurgical neoadjuvant treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of the clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy on the basis of pathological results obtained on rectal cancer patients treated by chemoradiotherapy and surgery. METHODS: From 1994 to 2003, 58 patients with a primary diagnosis of rectal cancer were studied at our department and enrolled in a neoadjuvant protocol of chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. All patients were treated by 30 days of chemoradiotherapy. At the end of the chemoradiotherapy, each patient underwent clinical examination, including digital rectal examination, proctoscopy and abdominal-pelvic computerized tomography to define the clinical response to the chemoradiotherapy. Surgical resection was performed in all patients three weeks after the end of chemoradiotherapy, and histological analysis was performed on all resected specimens. RESULTS: The clinical complete response rate corresponded to the pathological complete response rate, whereas the clinical evaluation overestimated partial response and stable disease. The pathologic examination revealed that 3.5% of clinical partial responses and 3.4% of clinical stable disease were really pathological progressive disease. Clinical partial response and clinical stable disease positive predictive values were 92.8% and 90.9%, respectively, whereas the clinical progressive disease negative predictive value was 20%. Then, 6.9% of patients believed to have responded to the therapy, or not to have responded or worsened, actually had worsened by the end of the chemoradiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Positive and negative predictive values, in particular for partial response and stable disease, of clinical evaluation of the response to chemoradiotherapy were not high enough to consider clinical evaluation accurate enough to make treatment decisions.

Schwannoma of the sympathetic cervical chain presenting as a lateral cervical mass.

We discuss about the diagnosis and treatment of Schwannoma arising from the sympathetic cervical chain on the basis of a case report on a patient whose previously diagnosis was paraganglioma.

Laparoscopic reconstruction after esophageal resection for perforation: a new surgical approach.

The authors present 2 cases of esophageal perforation treated using a new 2-step approach, consisting of esophageal resection and delayed reconstruction of the digestive tract after laparoscopic preparation and transposition of the stomach. The method is characterized by the minimally invasive insertion of a gastric tube through the precardial esophageal stump for postoperative enteral nutrition, and by the use of a laparoscopic method in the reconstruction step for gastrolysis and transposition of the stomach. The benefits lie in the opportunity for enteral feeding preparatory to the reconstruction, with no need for any gastrostomy or jejunostomy, and with fewer complications and a better recovery after reconstruction surgery thanks to the use of a laparoscopic method instead of a laparotomy.

Postoperative complications linked to pancreaticoduodenectomy. An analysis of pancreatic stump management.

AIMS: To analyze the role of different procedures in the management of pancreatic stump according to the incidence of postoperative morbidity derived from the data of a single center surgical population. METHODS: From 1989 to 2005 we performed 76 pancreaticoduodenectomies (PD) and 26 distal pancreatectomies (DP). The surgical reconstruction after PD was as follows: 11 manual non-absorbable stitches closure of the main duct, 24 closures of the main duct with linear stapler, 17 occlusions of the main duct with neoprene glue and 24 duct-to-mucosa anastomosis. RESULTS: In the PD group, the morbidity rate was 60%, caused by: pancreatic leakage in 48% of patients, hemorrhagic complications in 10% following surgical procedure and infectious complications in 15%. After DP we recorded: leakage in 3.9%, haemoperitoneum in 15.4% and no complications in 80.7%. The multivariate analysis showed that the in-hospital mortality was linked to the surgical procedure (PD, p=0.003) and to the following complications: pancreatic leakage (p=0.004), haemoperitoneum (p=0.00045) and infectious complications (p=0.0077). Bleeding complications, biliary anastomosis leakage and infectious complications were consequences of pancreatic leakage (p=0.025, p=0.025 and p=0.025 respectively). CONCLUSION: Manual non-absorbable stitch closure of the main duct and occlusion of the main duct with neoprene glue should be avoided in the reconstructive phase.

Superiority of transplantation versus resection for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma.

The best therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still debated. Hepatic resection (HR) is the treatment of choice for single HCC in Child A patients, whereas liver transplantation (LT) is usually reserved for Child B and C patients with single or multiple nodules. The aim of this study was to compare HR and LT for HCC within the Milan criteria on an intention-to-treat basis. Forty-eight patients were treated by LT and 38 by HR. The median time on the waiting list for transplantation was 118 days. The estimated overall survival was significantly higher (P = 0.005) in the LT group than in the HR one. The estimated freedom from recurrence was also significantly higher (P < 0.0001) for LT patients than for HR ones. Indeed, the probability of HCC recurrence after resection was higher than after transplantation achieving 31% and 76% for HR and 2% and 2% for LT at 3 and 5 years after surgery. Multivariate analysis confirmed that transplantation was superior to resection in terms of patient's survival and risk of HCC recurrence. We conclude that LT is superior to HR for small HCC in cirrhotic patients assuming that LT should be performed within 6-10 months after listing to reduce the dropouts for reasons of tumor progression.

A comparative study of the transhiatal laparoscopic approach versus laparoscopic gastric mobilisation and right open transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer management.

AIM: Regarding the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer, a question was raised by the introduction of minimally invasive surgery, because of the technical complexity of the techniques involved and its uncertain benefits. We evaluated the impact of laparoscopic esophagectomy on the surgical approach to esophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2002 to March 2006, 22 non-randomized patients were recruited to undergo esophagectomy for neoplastic disease. The esophagectomy and esophagogastroplasty were performed using the laparoscopic transhiatal technique (THE) in 9 cases, while a combined laparoscopic gastric mobilisation and right transthoracic incision (TT/LE) was performed in the other 13. RESULTS: Mean follow up was 21+/-3.23 months, range 2-46 months. Overall cumulative survival was 84.0% at 12 months, 61.3% at 24 months, 51.0% at 36 months. THE achieved better results than TT/LE on the ground with regard to the time it took to complete the procedure (p=0.046) and the hospital stay times (p=0.039), and the time in ICU, postoperative oral feeding resumption, number of retrieved lymph nodes. CONCLUSION: The clinical benefits of minimally invasive techniques regard the time it takes to complete the procedure, the time in ICU, postoperative oral feeding resumption and the hospital stay times. Minimally invasive surgery might be not less curative and effective than open surgical procedures, as found in our small non-randomzed series of patients. Larger series should confirm these results.

Liver resective surgery: a multivariate analysis of postoperative outcome and complication.

INTRODUCTION: Notwithstanding technical advances and high experience of liver resection of specialized centers, the rate of complications after surgical resection could be high. In this study, we analyzed causes and foreseeable risk factors linked to postoperative morbidity on the ground of data derived from a single center surgical population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 1989 to March 2005, 134 consecutive patients had liver resection for Hcc and 153 consecutive patients with liver metastasis (derived from either colorectal cancer or noncolorectal cancer) at our department. We performed 22 major hepatectomy, 20 left hepatectomy, 14 trisegmentectomy, 77 bisegmentectomy and/or left lobectomy, 74 segmentectomy, and 80 wedge resection. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality rate was 4.5%, about 7% in Hcc cases and 2.6% in liver metastasis. Morbidity rate was 47.7%, caused by the rising of ascites (10%), temporary impairment liver function (19%), biliary fistula (6%), hepatic abscess (25%), hemoperitoneum (10%), and pleural effusion (30%) sometimes combined each other. Some variables, associated with the technical aspects of surgical procedure, are responsible of the rising of complication as: Pringle maneuver length of more than 20 minutes (p=0.001); the type of liver resection procedure [major hepatectomy (p=0.02), left hepatectomy (p=0.04), trisegmentectomy (p=0.04), bisegmentectomy and/or left lobectomy (p=0.04)]; and the request of an amount of blood transfusion of more than 600 cc (p=0.04). Also, both liver dysfunction, in particular Child A vs B and C (p=0.01), and histopathological grading (p=0.01) are associated with a high rate of postsurgical complication in Hcc cases. CONCLUSION: We make the following recommendations: every liver resection should be planned after intraoperative ultrasonography, anatomical surgical procedure should be preferred instead of wedge resection, and modern devices should be used, like Argon Beam and Ligasure dissector, to reduce the incidence of both intraoperative and postoperative bleeding and biliary leakage.

Instrumental clinical restaging, pathological evaluation, and tumor regression grading: how to assess the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The object of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens is a downstaging or downsizing of advanced rectal tumor to increase the rate of curative resection and reduce loco-regional failure. A reliable method of assessing response to adjuvant therapies is required to help standardize the assessments of new multimodality therapies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role played by tumor regression grading on the evaluation of pathological response to chemoradiotherapy, compared with both the predicting value of the clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy and pathologic response evaluation. METHODS: From 1994 to 2003, 58 patients with a primary diagnosis of rectal cancer were studied at our department and enrolled in a single center, not randomized study based on 5-week sessions of radiotherapy associated with a 30-day 5-fluorouracil (FU) infusion, followed by surgical resection. Instrumental restaging and routine histological examination, including tumor regression grading, were performed to asses the response to neoadjuvant therapy. RESULTS: The cCR rate corresponds to pCR rate, while a 3.5% of cPR and a 3.4% of cSD corresponded to a pPD. cPR and cSD show a PPV of 92.8% and 90.9% respectively, while cPD NPV is 20%. No case was found with no regression (grade 0). Tumor regression was defined grade 1 in 24.5% of cases, grade 2 was found in 58.5% of cases, 7.5% were grade 3, and 9.5% showed complete regression (grade 4). Pathologic response resulted to be associated with regression grade (p=0.006). Tumor regression grading is an independent variable for pT (p=0.0002), pN status (p=0.00004), pathologic staging (p=0.000001) and local recurrence (p=0.003). CONCLUSION: Our results lead us to consider only pathologic evaluation to determine the response to neoadjuvant treatment: the application of tumor regression grading on the specimens obtained after combined neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery is useful to plan a better therapeutic strategy on the ground of a quantitative evaluation of the response to neoadjuvant treatment; it shows it is an important comparable pathological feature, useful in comparing different protocols' results and differences between patient's response as well as prognostic factors.