The role of obesity in treatment planning for early-stage cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Optimal management of obese patients with early-stage cervical cancer is debated despite evidence of non-inferior survival in obese patients undergoing radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy (RH) compared to primary radiation with or without radiosensitizing chemotherapy (RT). Objectives included describing patient factors affecting disposition to RH versus RT; comparing RH outcomes for obese (BMI >30 mg/m2) and non-obese patients; and comparing differences in recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: This was a single institution cohort study of all cervical cancer patients who underwent RH or were candidates for RH based on clinical stage. Demographic, clinicopathologic and treatment outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: RT patients (n = 39, 15%) had a higher BMI (p = 0.004), older age (p < 0.001), more life-limiting comorbidities (LLC) (p < 0.001), larger tumor size (p = 0.001), and higher clinical stage (p = 0.013) compared to RH patients (n = 221, 85%). On multivariable survival analysis there was no difference in OS based on treatment modality; significant predictors of worse OS were larger tumor size, higher number of LLC and recurrence. Among the RH group, obese patients had a longer operative time (p = 0.01) and more LLC (p = 0.02); there were no differences in demographic or clinicopathologic characteristics, operative outcomes, RFS or OS compared to non-obese patients. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of RH-eligible cervical cancer patients, BMI was independently associated with disposition to RT. Studies demonstrate that RH is feasible and safe in obese patients with no difference in RFS or OS when compared to non-obese patients. Thus, the decision for disposition to RT should not be based on obesity alone.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of tumor molecular testing in stage III endometrial cancer.

BACKGROUND: Standard of care for adjuvant treatment of stage III endometrial cancer includes chemotherapy and radiation. In addition to stage, tumor molecular profiles may predict treatment outcomes, and prospective clinical trials are ongoing. However, tumor molecular testing is costly and time-consuming. Our objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tumor molecular testing in stage III endometrial cancer. METHODS: A Markov decision model compared two strategies for stage III endometrial cancer: Tumor Molecular Testing (TMT) versus No TMT. TMT included sequential POLE next generation sequencing, mismatch repair immunohistochemistry (IHC), and p53 IHC. POLE-mutated patients were assigned to adjuvant radiation therapy; all others including controls were assigned to adjuvant chemoradiation. First recurrences were treated with 6 cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel. Second recurrences were treated with pembrolizumab alone for mismatch repair deficient patients and both pembrolizumab and lenvatinib for other patients. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test model robustness. RESULTS: Compared to No TMT, TMT was cost saving with equivalent effectiveness. On one-way sensitivity analysis, TMT remained cost saving over all parameter ranges. TMT was also favored on probabilistic sensitivity analysis in 80% of iterations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/quality adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. However, when TMT was compared to mismatch repair IHC alone, TMT cost $182,798/QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: In this model of patients with stage III endometrial cancer, TMT was cost saving compared to No TMT. However, when compared to mismatch repair IHC alone, TMT was economically unfavorable.

Cost effectiveness of treatment strategies for high risk prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC) have multiple accepted treatment options. Because there is no overall survival benefit of one option over another, appropriate treatment must consider patient life expectancy, quality of life, and cost. METHODS: The authors compared quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and cost effectiveness among treatment options for HRPC using a Markov model with three treatment arms: (1) external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) delivered with 20 fractions, (2) EBRT with 23 fractions followed by low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy boost, or (3) radical prostatectomy alone. An exploratory analysis considered a simultaneous integrated boost according to the FLAME trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01168479). RESULTS: Treatment strategies were compared using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). EBRT with LDR brachytherapy boost was a cost-effective strategy (ICER, $20,929 per QALY gained). These results were most sensitive to variations in the biochemical failure rate. However, the results still demonstrated cost effectiveness for the brachytherapy boost paradigm, regardless of any tested parameter ranges. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that EBRT with LDR brachytherapy was favored in 52% of 100,000 Monte Carlo iterations. In an exploratory analysis, EBRT with a simultaneous integrated boost was also a cost-effective strategy, resulting in an ICER of $62,607 per QALY gained; however, it was not cost effective compared with EBRT plus LDR brachytherapy boost. CONCLUSIONS: EBRT with LDR brachytherapy boost may be a cost-effective treatment strategy compared with EBRT alone and radical prostatectomy for HRPC, demonstrating high-value care. The current analysis suggests that a reduction in biochemical failure alone can result in cost-effective care, despite no change in overall survival.

Definitive chemoradiation or radiation therapy alone for the management of vulvar cancer.

Vulvar cancer is rare, and unresectable disease provides a therapeutic conundrum. Although definitive surgery remains the mainstay for curative treatment of vulvar cancer, a minority of patients present with advanced disease for which surgical resection would be extraordinarily morbid. Pre-operative and definitive radiation with radiosensitizing systemic therapy allows such patients an opportunity for cure. In this review, we explore the origins of pre-operative radiation, current treatment standards for pre-operative and definitive chemoradiation, and future directions.

Optimal overall treatment time for adjuvant therapy for women with completely resected, node-positive vulvar cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal overall treatment time (OTT) from radical surgery to the end of adjuvant radiation therapy for some squamous cell carcinomas has been found to impact treatment outcomes. This study aims to identify the impact of OTT on overall survival (OS) for women with completely resected, node-positive squamous cell carcinomas of the vulva. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was queried for women with surgically resected, node-positive vulvar squamous cell carcinomas between 2004 and 2016 who were treated with adjuvant radiation therapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards tests were utilized for OS calculations. RESULTS: A total of 1500 women met inclusion criteria. The median OTT was 104 days. Shorter OTT was associated with age, facility volume, private insurance, and duration of post-operative hospitalization. Median OS with OTT ≤ 104 days was 56.1 months vs 45.4 months if ≥105 days (p = 0.015). On multivariable Cox analysis, OTT was independently associated with an increased risk of death of 0.4% per additional day (95%CI 1.001-1.007, p = 0.003), as were age at diagnosis (HR 1.031 [95%CI 1.024-1.037], p < 0.001), number of nodes positive (HR 1.031 [95%CI 1.024-1.037], p = 0.006), the use of concurrent chemotherapy (HR 0.815 [95%CI 0.693-0.960], p = 0.014) and increasing pT/pN stage. After propensity adjustment for factors predicting a shorter OTT, OTT continued to be associated with an increased risk of death per additional day (HR 1.004 [95%CI 1.001-1.007], p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Overall treatment time is an independent risk factor for death in women being treated with adjuvant radiation therapy following complete resection of node-positive squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva.

Advances in management of locally advanced cervical cancer.

Globally, cervical cancer has the fourth highest cancer incidence and mortality in women. Cervical cancer is unique because it has effective prevention, screening, and treatment options. This review discusses the current cervical cancer advances with a focus on locally advanced cervical cancer. Topics discussed include diagnostic imaging principles, surgical management with adjuvant therapy and definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Emphasis is given on current advances and future research directions in radiation therapy (RT) with an emphasis on three-dimensional brachytherapy, intensity-modulated RT, image-guided RT, proton RT and hyperthermia.

Patient treatment and outcome after breast cancer orbital and periorbital metastases: a comprehensive case series including analysis of lobular versus ductal tumor histology.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy to spread to the orbit and periorbit, and the invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) histologic subtype of breast cancer has been reported to form these ophthalmic metastases (OM) more frequently than invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC). We herein report our single academic institution experience with breast cancer OM with respect to anatomical presentation, histology (lobular vs. ductal), treatment, and survival. METHODS: We employed the natural language processing platform, TIES (Text Information Extraction System), to search 2.3 million de-identified patient pathology and radiology records at our institution in order to identify patients with OM secondary to breast cancer. We then compared the resultant cohort, the "OM cohort," to two other representative metastatic breast cancer patient (MBC) databases from our institution. Histological analysis of selected patients was performed. RESULTS: Our TIES search and manual refinement ultimately identified 28 patients who were diagnosed with breast cancer between 1995 and 2016 that subsequently developed OM. Median age at diagnosis was 54 (range 28-77) years of age. ER, PR, and HER2 status from the 28 patients with OM did not differ from other patients with MBC from our institution. The relative proportion of patients with ILC was significantly higher in the OM cohort (32.1%) than in other MBC patients in our institution (11.3%, p = 0.007). Median time to first OM in the OM cohort was 46.7 months, and OM were the second most frequent first metastases after bony metastases. After diagnosis of the first distant metastasis of any kind, median survival of patients with ILC (21.4 months) was significantly shorter than that of patients with IDC (55.3 months, p = 0.03). Nine patients developed bilateral OM. We observed a significant co-occurrence of OM and central nervous system metastases (p = 0.0053). The histological analysis revealed an interesting case in which the primary tumor was of a mixed ILC/IDC subtype, while only ILC was present in the OM. CONCLUSIONS: OM from breast cancer are illustrative of the difference in metastatic behavior of ILC versus IDC and should be considered when treating patients with ILC, especially in those with complaints of visual acuity changes.

Declining brachytherapy utilization for cervical cancer patients - Have we reversed the trend?

OBJECTIVE: Studies examining temporal trends in cervical brachytherapy use are conflicting and examined different health insurance populations. This study examined brachytherapy utilization over time by health insurance type and whether reported declines in brachytherapy have reversed. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients with FIGO IIB-IVA cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy between 2004 and 2014, identifying 17,442 patients. Brachytherapy utilization over time and by insurance type and other sociodemographic factors were compared using binary logistic regression. A sensitivity analysis was done in a sub-cohort of patients using the boost modality variable in the NCDB. RESULTS: Brachytherapy utilization declined during 2008-10 (52.6%) compared to 2004-2007 (54.4%; odds ratio [OR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-1.01) and declines were disproportionately larger for patients with government insurance (49.4% vs 52.3%, respectively) than privately-insured patients (57.6% vs 58.9%, respectively). However, rates of brachytherapy use subsequently recovered during 2011-14 in all insurance groups (58.0%, OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.16-1.34) and was especially improved for Medicaid (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.26-1.65) and uninsured patients (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.03-1.57). Sensitivity analysis using the boost modality variable confirmed these trends. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with FIGO IIB-IVA cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy from 2004 to 2014, brachytherapy utilization declined during the late 2000s and disproportionately affected patients with government insurance, but subsequently recovered in the early 2010s. Since government insurance covers vulnerable patient populations at-risk for future declines in brachytherapy use, proposed alternative payment models should incentivize cervical brachytherapy to solidify gains in brachytherapy utilization.

Radiation therapy for gynecologic malignancies during the COVID-19 pandemic: International expert consensus recommendations.

OBJECTIVE: To develop expert consensus recommendations regarding radiation therapy for gynecologic malignancies during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: An international committee of ten experts in gynecologic radiation oncology convened to provide consensus recommendations for patients with gynecologic malignancies referred for radiation therapy. Treatment priority groups were established. A review of the relevant literature was performed and different clinical scenarios were categorized into three priority groups. For each stage and clinical scenario in cervical, endometrial, vulvar, vaginal and ovarian cancer, specific recommendations regarding dose, technique, and timing were provided by the panel. RESULTS: Expert review and discussion generated consensus recommendations to guide radiation oncologists treating gynecologic malignancies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Priority scales for cervical, endometrial, vulvar, vaginal, and ovarian cancers are presented. Both radical and palliative treatments are discussed. Management of COVID-19 positive patients is considered. Hypofractionated radiation therapy should be used when feasible and recommendations regarding radiation dose, timing, and technique have been provided for external beam and brachytherapy treatments. Concurrent chemotherapy may be limited in some countries, and consideration of radiation alone is recommended. CONCLUSIONS: The expert consensus recommendations provide guidance for delivering radiation therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Specific recommendations have been provided for common clinical scenarios encountered in gynecologic radiation oncology with a focus on strategies to reduce patient and staff exposure to COVID-19.

Dose-escalated intensity modulated radiation therapy in patients with locally-advanced vulvar cancer - does it increase response rate?

PURPOSE: GOG 205 safely increased clinical (cCR) and pathologic complete response (pCR) in locally-advanced vulvar cancer through dose escalation using three-dimensional radiotherapy (RT). The aim of this study is to assess the response of dose-escalated intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in locally-advanced vulvar cancer. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients treated with dose-escalated (≥ 55Gy) IMRT from 2012 to 2018 for locally-advanced vulvar cancer was performed. Patients treated with preoperative or definitive intent were included. Rates of cCR and pCR were assessed, and predictors of disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan Meier method with log rank test between groups and a parsimonious multivariate Cox model. RESULTS: Median dose to the vulva was 66.0 Gy (Interquartile Range [IQR]: 66.0-68.0) for definitive and 59.4 Gy (IQR: 58.0-59.4) for preoperative IMRT. The overall rates of cCR and pCR were 76% and 70%, respectively. DFS at two years was 65% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 50-80%) for all patients, 81% (95% CI 63% - 98%) for definitive IMRT, and 55% (95% CI 35% - 76%) for preoperative IMRT. On multivariate analysis, cCR predicted for disease-free survival (HR 0.21; 95% CI 0.06-0.76; p = 0.02), and pCR predicted for OS (HR 0.12; 95% CI 0.02-0.60; p = 0.01). Grade 3 acute and late RT toxicity was seen in 14 (29%) and 3 (6%) of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Dose-escalated IMRT for locally-advanced vulvar cancer is well tolerated, with rates of cCR and pCR that compare favorably with published data.

Race-driven survival differential in women diagnosed with endometrial cancers in the USA.

OBJECTIVE: African American women are increasingly being diagnosed with advanced and type II histology endometrial cancers. Outcomes have been observed to be worse in African American women, but whether or not race itself is a factor is unclear. We sought to evaluate the rates of diagnosis and outcomes on a stage-by-stage basis with respect to race using a large national cancer registry database. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was searched for patients with surgically staged non-metastatic endometrial cancer between 2004 and 2015. Women were excluded if surgical stage/histology was unknown, there was no follow-up, or no information on subsequent treatment. Pairwise comparison was used to determine temporal trends and Cox hazards tests with Bonferroni correction were used to determine overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 286 920 women were diagnosed with endometrial cancer and met the criteria for analysis. Median follow-up was 51 months (IQR 25.7-85.3). In multivariable models, in women with stage I disease, African American women had a higher risk of death than Caucasian women (HR 1.262, 95% CI 1.191 to 1.338, p<0.001) and Asian/Pacific Islander women had a lower risk of death than Caucasian women (HR 0.742, 95% CI 0.689 to 0.801, p<0.001). This held for African American women with stage II type I and type II disease (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.109 to 1.444, p<0.001 and HR 1.235, 95% CI 1.098 to 1.388, p<0.001) but not for Asian/Pacific Islander women. African American women with stage IIIA-B disease also had a higher risk of death for type I and type II disease versus Caucasian women (HR 1.221, 95% CI 1.045 to 1.422, p=0.010 and HR 1.295, 95% CI 1.155 to 1.452, p<0.001). Asian/Pacific Islander women had a lower risk of death than Caucasian women with type I disease (HR 0.783, 95% CI 0.638 to 0.960, p=0.019) and type II disease (HR 0.790, 95% CI 0.624 to 0.999, p=0.05). African American women with stage IIIC1-2 had a higher risk of death with type I disease (HR 1.343, 95% CI 1.207 to 1.494, p<0.001) and type II disease (HR 1.141, 95% CI 1.055 to 1.233, p=0.001) whereas there was no significant difference between Caucasian women and Asian/Pacific Islander women. CONCLUSION: Race appears to play an independent role in survival from endometrial cancer in the USA, with African American women having worse survival on a stage-for-stage basis compared with Caucasian women.

Patterns of care and outcomes in small cell carcinoma of the prostate: A national cancer database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Small cell carcinoma (SCC) of the prostate is a rare, aggressive disease. Evidence is limited; however, the current standard of care is chemotherapy. The benefit of local treatment modalities is unknown. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database identifying all SCC/neuroendocrine cases of the prostate, excluding those with unknown nodal or metastatic status, unknown treatment, or those not receiving chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors associated with survival. A further subgroup analysis was performed on the utility of local therapy on survival in the nonmetastatic setting. RESULTS: Our final cohort included 657 patients with a median age of 68. Most patients had positive lymph nodes (60.1%) and metastatic disease (70.0%). Median survival was 12 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 11.1-13.3 months) with a median follow-up of 11.8 months. Metastatic disease, age greater than or equal to 70, omission of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and lower income (P < .05 for all) were all associated with reduced OS. Patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) greater than or equal to 33 ng/mL and those receiving ADT had better survival (P < .05). Those with nonmetastatic disease were more likely to undergo prostatectomy and/or prostatic/pelvic radiation (P < .0001). Prostatic/pelvic radiation in the nonmetastatic setting was associated with longer survival (P = .02). Though well powered, our study is limited by the selection bias inherent to all observational studies, despite the statistical methods utilized to reduce this effect. CONCLUSIONS: Although chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment, radiation to the prostate/pelvis may be beneficial in the nonmetastatic setting. In addition to chemotherapy, ADT may benefit patients with an elevated PSA.

Digital Era of Mobile Communications and Smartphones: A Novel Analysis of Patient Comprehension of Cancer-Related Information Available Through Mobile Applications.

Many Americans use smartphone-based mobile applications to acquire health information. Our study evaluated the readability of mobile application-based patient educational materials (PEMs) about five prevalent cancers in the United States. The Apple and Google mobile application marketplaces were queried for breast, colon, lung, prostate, and stomach cancer-related applications, which were subsequently screened for PEMs and assessed with 10 validated readability assessments. Twenty-one pertinent applications yielded 249 articles that were written at an 11.8 ± 2.3 grade level; only 12 (4.8%) articles were written below an eighth grade level. The majority of cancer-related PEMs were written at too difficult reading levels for American patients.

Outcomes after definitive re-irradiation with 3D brachytherapy with or without external beam radiation therapy for vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer.

BACKGROUND: Limited outcome data exists on salvage re-irradiation for vaginal relapse of previously-irradiated endometrial cancer. We report our 10-year experience with management of vaginal recurrence using definitive intent re-irradiation brachytherapy with or without EBRT. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on 22 patients treated with definitive-intent re-irradiation brachytherapy ±â€¯EBRT for vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer. The cumulative rectosigmoid and bladder D2cc (EQD2) were limited to <75 Gy and <90 Gy, respectively. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to estimate survival. Severe (grade 3 or higher) radiation-related toxicities, defined according to CTCAE v4, were recorded. RESULTS: Prior radiation therapy consisted of vaginal brachytherapy (54.5%), pelvic EBRT (22.7%), or combination pelvic EBRT and brachytherapy (22.7%). Median re-irradiation interval was 26.6 months. Salvage re-irradiation consisted of EBRT with brachytherapy in 50.0% and brachytherapy alone in 50.0%. Median HR-CTV D90 (EQD2) was 64.5 Gy (IQR: 49.6-75.8). Median cumulative D2cc for bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were 72.1 Gy (range: 30.3-81.8), 70.6 Gy (range: 32.0-80.5), and 52.7 Gy (range: 29.6-75.3), respectively. At a median follow-up of 27.6 months, 3-year local control, regional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 65.8%, 76.6%, 40.8%, and 68.1%, respectively. There were no grade ≥ 3 acute or late rectosigmoid or bladder toxicities. CONCLUSION: Re-irradiation with 3D conformal brachytherapy for vaginal recurrence is feasible and safe as long as cumulative dose to surrounding normal organs is limited, and offers a chance to potentially salvage 40% of patients presenting with vaginal recurrence in the setting of prior pelvic radiation.

Role of Locoregional Treatment in Vulvar Cancer With Pelvic Lymph Node Metastases: Time to Reconsider FIGO Staging?

BACKGROUND: Vulvar cancer with pelvic nodal involvement is considered metastatic (M1) disease per AJCC staging. The role of definitive therapy and its resulting impact on survival have not been defined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with pelvic lymph node-positive vulvar cancer diagnosed in 2009 through 2015 were evaluated from the National Cancer Database. Patients with known distant metastatic disease were excluded. Logistic regression was used to evaluate use of surgery and radiation therapy (RT). Overall survival (OS) was evaluated with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards modeling (multivariate analysis [MVA]). A 2-month conditional landmark analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 1,304 women met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 38 months for survivors. Chemotherapy, RT, and surgery were used in 54%, 74%, and 62% of patients, respectively. Surgery was associated with prolonged OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; P<.001) but had multiple significant differences in baseline characteristics compared with nonsurgical patients. In patients managed nonsurgically, RT was associated with prolonged OS (HR, 0.66; P=.019) in MVA. In patients undergoing surgery, RT was associated with better OS (3-year OS, 55% vs 48%; P=.033). Factors predicting use of RT were identified. MVA revealed that RT was associated with prolonged OS (HR, 0.75; P=.004). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of women with vulvar cancer and positive pelvic lymph nodes, use of RT was associated with prolonged survival in those who did not undergo surgery. Surgery followed by adjuvant RT was associated with prolonged survival compared with surgery alone.

A proposal for a new classification of "unfavorable risk criteria" in patients with stage I endometrial cancer.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials describe differing sets of high-intermediate risk criteria. OBJECTIVE: To use the National Cancer Database to compare the impact of radiation therapy in patients with stage I endometrial cancer meeting different criteria, and define a classification of "unfavorable risk." METHODS: Patients with stage I endometrial cancer between January 2010 and December 2014 were identified in the National Cancer Database and stratified into two cohorts: (1) patients meeting Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG)-99 criteria only for high-intermediate risk, but not Post-Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma (PORTEC)-1 criteria and (2) those meeting PORTEC-1 criteria only. High-risk stage I patients with both FIGO stage IB (under FIGO 2009 staging) and grade 3 disease were excluded. In each cohort, propensity score-matched survival analyses were performed. Based on these analyses, we propose a new classification of unfavorable risk. We then analyzed the association of adjuvant radiation with survival, stratified by this classification. RESULTS: We identified 117,272 patients with stage I endometrial cancer. Of these, 11,207 patients met GOG-99 criteria only and 5,920 patients met PORTEC-1 criteria only. After propensity score matching, adjuvant radiation therapy improved survival (HR=0.73; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.89; p=0.002) in the GOG-99 only cohort. However, there was no benefit of adjuvant radiation (HR=0.89; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.14; p=0.355) in the PORTEC-1 only cohort. We, therefore, defined unfavorable risk stage I endometrial cancer as two or more of the following risk factors: lymphovascular invasion, age ≥70, grade 2-3 disease, and FIGO stage IB. Adjuvant radiation improved survival in stage I patients with adverse risk factors (HR=0.74; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.80; p<0.001), but not in other stage I patients (HR=1.02; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.15; p=0.710; p interaction <0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that adjuvant radiation was associated with an overall survival benefit in patients meeting GOG-99 criteria only; however, no survival benefit was seen in patients meeting PORTEC-1 criteria only. We propose a definition of unfavorable risk stage I endometrial cancer: ≥2 risk factors from among lymphovascular invasion, age ≥70, grade 2-3 disease, and FIGO stage IB disease.

Impact of histological grade on oncologic outcomes in clinical stage I patients with endometrial carcinoma patients after definitive primary radiation therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of histological grade on overall survival in patients with clinical stage I endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma when radiation therapy is used as primary definitive treatment. METHODS: Patients with stage I endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinomas who underwent definitive radiation therapy with brachytherapy ± external beam radiation therapy were identified from the National Cancer Database. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine factors affecting overall survival. Inverse probability of treatment weights were also used in multivariable analysis to estimate casual effects of external beam radiation therapy. RESULTS: A total of 947 patients were identified. Median overall survival for grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 tumors was 62 months (95% CI 53.8 to 70.2), 48.5 months (95% CI 38.2 to 58.8), and 33.5 months (95% CI: 23.1 to 43.8), respectively. Grade, age, and insurance status were associated with overall survival in univariate analysis with only grade and age remaining significant in multivariate analysis. Brachytherapy with external beam radiation therapy was not associated with survival in comparison with brachytherapy alone. Compared with grade 1 tumors, patients with grade 3 (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.89), but not grade 2 (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.26), had an increased risk of death, which persisted in an inverse probability of treatment weights-adjusted model (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.93). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with grade 3 stage I endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma treated with primary definitive radiation therapy have worse survival than those with lower grade tumors. Addition of external beam radiation therapy to brachytherapy did not affect survival.

Early clinical experience with varian halcyon V2 linear accelerator: Dual-isocenter IMRT planning and delivery with portal dosimetry for gynecological cancer treatments.

PURPOSE: Varian Halcyon linear accelerator version 2 (The Halcyon 2.0) was recently released with new upgraded features. The aim of this study was to report our clinical experience with Halcyon 2.0 for a dual-isocenter intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning and delivery for gynecological cancer patients and examine the feasibility of in vivo portal dosimetry. METHODS: Twelve gynecological cancer patients were treated with extended-field IMRT technique using two isocenters on Halcyon 2.0 to treat pelvis and pelvic/or para-aortic nodes region. The prescription dose was 45 Gy in 25 fractions (fxs) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) dose of 55 or 57.5 Gy in 25 fxs to involved nodes. All treatment plans, pretreatment patient-specific QA and treatment delivery records including daily in vivo portal dosimetry were retrospectively reviewed. For in vivo daily portal dosimetry analysis, each fraction was compared to the reference baseline (1st fraction) using gamma analysis criteria of 4 %/4 mm with 90% of total pixels in the portal image planar dose. RESULTS: All 12 extended-field IMRT plans met the planning criteria and delivered as planned (a total of 300 fractions). Conformity Index (CI) for the primary target was achieved with the range of 0.99-1.14. For organs at risks, most were well within the dose volume criteria. Treatment delivery time was from 5.0 to 6.5 min. Interfractional in vivo dose variation exceeded gamma analysis threshold for 8 fractions out of total 300 (2.7%). These eight fractions were found to have a relatively large difference in small bowel filling and SSD change at the isocenter compared to the baseline. CONCLUSION: Halcyon 2.0 is effective to create complex extended-field IMRT plans using two isocenters with efficient delivery. Also Halcyon in vivo dosimetry is feasible for daily treatment monitoring for organ motion, internal or external anatomy, and body weight which could further lead to adaptive radiation therapy.

Improved survival with adjuvant brachytherapy in stage IA endometrial cancer of unfavorable histology.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the utilization of vaginal brachytherapy (BT) and the resulting impact on survival in stage IA endometrial cancer of clear cell (CC), papillary serous (PS), and carcinosarcoma (CS) histology. METHODS: Patients with uterine cancer diagnosed from 2004 to 2015 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Patients underwent hysterectomy, showing FIGO stage IA disease with CC, PS, or CS histology. Logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of BT utilization and to generate propensity scores. Survival was compared using log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards modeling, with propensity score adjustment. RESULTS: We identified 5711 patients who underwent hysterectomy showing FIGO pT1a, N0 or NX endometrial cancer with CC, PS, or CS histology, of which 29.5% received BT. Multivariate predictors of increased receipt of BT were identified. With a median follow-up of 3.3 years, 3-year overall survival (OS) was 87% for those receiving BT versus 78% for those without (p < 0.001). A survival benefit to BT was maintained across histologies. Similar results were seen whether tumor was confined to endometrium or had <50% myometrial invasion. On multivariate analysis, receipt of BT was associated with increased survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.65-0.87, p < 0.001). The benefit of BT persisted after propensity score adjustment (HR 0.76, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of women with stage IA endometrial cancer of unfavorable histology, the use of BT was associated with improved survival. In this study, 29.5% of patients in our cohort received BT.

Image-based multichannel vaginal cylinder brachytherapy for the definitive treatment of gynecologic malignancies in the vagina.

PURPOSE: Brachytherapy is integral to vaginal cancer treatment and is typically delivered using an intracavitary single-channel vaginal cylinder (SCVC) or an interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) applicator. Multi-channel vaginal cylinder (MCVC) applicators allow for improved organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing compared to SCVC while maintaining target coverage. We present clinical outcomes of patients treated with image-based high dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy using a MCVC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty patients with vaginal cancer (27% primary vaginal and 73% recurrence from other primaries) were treated with combination external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and image-based HDR brachytherapy utilizing a MCVC if residual disease thickness was 7 mm or less after EBRT. All pts received 3D image-based BT to a total equivalent dose of 70-80 Gy. RESULTS: The median high-risk clinical target volume was 24.4 cm3 (interquartile range [IQR], 14.1), with a median dose to 90% of 77.2 Gy (IQR, 2.8). After a median follow-up of 45 months (range, 11-78), the 4-year local-regional control, distant control, DFS, and OS rates were 92.6%, 76.1%, 64.0%, and 67.2%, respectively. The 4-year LRC rates were similar between the primary vaginal (92%) and recurrent (93%) groups (p = 0.290). Pts with lymph node positive disease had a lower rate of distant control at 4 years (22.7% vs. 89.0%, p < 0.001). There were no Grade 3 or higher acute complications. The 4-year rate of late Grade 3 or higher toxicity was 2.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes of pts with primary and recurrent vaginal cancer treated definitively in a systematic manner with combination EBRT with image-guided HDR BT utilizing a MCVC applicator demonstrate high rates of local control and low rates of severe morbidity. The MCVC technique allows interstitial implantation to be avoided in select pts with ≤7 mm residual disease thickness following EBRT while maintaining excellent clinical outcomes with extended 4-year follow-up in this rare malignancy.