Impact of hormone receptor status and tumor subtypes of breast cancer in young BRCA carriers.

BACKGROUND: Hormone receptor expression is a known positive prognostic and predictive factor in breast cancer; however, limited evidence exists on its prognostic impact on prognosis of young patients harboring a pathogenic variant (PV) in the BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 genes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study included young patients (aged ≤40 years) diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and harboring germline PVs in BRCA genes. We investigated the impact of hormone receptor status on clinical behavior and outcomes of breast cancer. Outcomes of interest [disease-free survival (DFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS)] were first investigated according to hormone receptor expression (positive versus negative), and then according to breast cancer subtype [luminal A-like versus luminal B-like versus triple-negative versus human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer]. RESULTS: From 78 centers worldwide, 4709 BRCA carriers were included, of whom 2143 (45.5%) had hormone receptor-positive and 2566 (54.5%) hormone receptor-negative breast cancer. Median follow-up was 7.9 years. The rate of distant recurrences was higher in patients with hormone receptor-positive disease (13.1% versus 9.6%, P < 0.001), while the rate of second primary breast cancer was lower (9.1% versus 14.7%, P < 0.001) compared to patients with hormone receptor-negative disease. The 8-year DFS was 65.8% and 63.4% in patients with hormone receptor-positive and negative disease, respectively. The hazard ratio of hormone receptor-positive versus negative disease changed over time for DFS, BCSS, and OS (P < 0.05 for interaction of hormone receptor status and survival time). Patients with luminal A-like breast cancer had the worst long-term prognosis in terms of DFS compared to all the other subgroups (8-year DFS: 60.8% in luminal A-like versus 63.5% in triple-negative versus 65.5% in HER2-positive and 69.7% in luminal B-like subtype). CONCLUSIONS: In young BRCA carriers, differences in recurrence pattern and second primary breast cancer among hormone receptor-positive versus negative disease warrant consideration in counseling patients on treatment, follow-up, and risk-reducing surgery.

Common founder BRCA2 pathogenic variants and breast cancer characteristics in Ethiopian Jews.

PURPOSE: BRCA1/2 founder pathogenic variants (PVs) occur in various populations, but data on the mutational spectrum in Africans are limited. We examined BRCA1/2 PVs in breast cancer patients of Ethiopian Jewish (EJ) origin. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed BRCA1/2 test results and clinical features of EJ breast cancer patients from seven medical institutions. We obtained heterozygote carrier rates in affected individuals from the laboratories of the largest Israeli HMO (Clalit). Population carrier frequency was determined in EJ controls. RESULTS: We identified three recurrent BRCA2 PVs in 11 EJ breast cancer patients (9 females, 2 males): c.7579delG, c.5159C > A, and c.9693delA. Only c.5159C > A was previously reported in Africans. In women, mean age at diagnosis was 35.7y; 8/9 were diagnosed with advanced disease. All tumors were invasive, 4/9 were triple negative. Only 3/11 carriers had relevant family history. Carrier rate in high-risk breast cancer patients was 11% (3/28; 95%CI [2.3%, 28.2%]). Combined carrier rate among controls was 1.8% (5/280; 95%CI [0.6%, 4.1%]). CONCLUSION: EJs harbor 3 recurrent BRCA2 PVs presenting with relatively severe breast cancer morbidity. Combined with the high BRCA2 carrier rate in the EJ population, these findings merit increasing awareness in this community and suggest that a culturally adapted population screening approach may be warranted.

A feasibility study of weekly docetaxel with capecitabine in ovarian cancer: a promising combination of two active drugs with a potential for synergism.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of weekly docetaxel with capecitabine in patients with recurrent/persistent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women treated for recurrent/persistent EOC in our department (January 2004 through December 2005) were recruited into this feasibility study. They received 35 mg/m(2) docetaxel on days 1 and 8 and 1,000 mg/m(2) capecitabine twice daily on days 1-14 in a 21-day cycle. RESULTS: Nine patients were enrolled. The median age was 64 years (37-80). Time to progression ranged from 1.67 to 11.27 months: 1 had complete response, 3 had partial responses, 4 had stable disease and 1 had disease progression. There was no grade 3 or 4 bone marrow toxicity. Nonhematological toxicity included partial hair loss (n = 4), fatigue (n = 7), hand and foot syndrome (n = 2), diarrhea (n = 5) and fluid retention syndrome (n = 1). CONCLUSION: There was good antitumor activity but frequent moderate-to-severe nonhematological toxicities when weekly docetaxel and capecitabine were used as second-line therapy for recurrent EOC. Further investigation of this combination is warranted.