Proprioceptive intervention improves reading performance in developmental dyslexia: An eye-tracking study.

Developmental dyslexia is characterized by difficulties in learning to read, affecting cognition and causing failure at school. Interventions for children with developmental dyslexia have focused on improving linguistic capabilities (phonics, orthographic and morphological instructions), but developmental dyslexia is accompanied by a wide variety of sensorimotor impairments. The goal of this study was to examine the effects of a proprioceptive intervention on reading performance and eye movement in children with developmental dyslexia. Nineteen children diagnosed with developmental dyslexia were randomly assigned to a regular Speech Therapy (ST) or to a Proprioceptive and Speech Intervention (PSI), in which they received both the usual speech therapy and a proprioceptive intervention aimed to correct their sensorimotor impairments (prism glasses, oral neurostimulation, insoles and breathing instructions). Silent reading performance and eye movements were measured pre- and post-intervention (after nine months). In the PSI group, reading performance improved and eye movements were smoother and faster, reaching values similar to those of children with typical reading performance. The recognition of written words also improved, indicating better lexical access. These results show that PSI might constitute a valuable tool for reading improvement children with developmental dyslexia.

Distinct attentional and executive profiles in neurofibromatosis type 1: Is there difference with primary attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder?

PURPOSE: Attentional and executive dysfunctions are the most frequent cognitive disorders in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), with a high prevalence of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We (i) compared attentional profiles between NF1 children with and without ADHD and children with primary ADHD criteria and (ii) investigated the possible relationship between attentional disorders and "unidentified bright objects" (UBOs) in NF1. METHODS: This retrospective study included 47 NF1 children, 25 with ADHD criteria (NF1+adhd group), matched for age, sex, and cognitive level with 47 children with primary ADHD (ADHD group). We collected computer task (sustained-attention, visuomotor-decision, inhibition, and cognitive-flexibility tasks) scores normalized for age and sex, and brain magnetic resonance imaging data. RESULTS: (i) Working memory was impaired in all groups. (ii) Omissions (p < 0.002) and response-time variability (p < 0.05) in sustained-attention and visuomotor-decision tasks and errors (p < 0.02) in the cognitive-flexibility task were lower for the NFI+adhd and ADHD groups than for the NF1-no-adhd group. (iii) The NF1+adhd group had slower response times (p ≤ 0.02) for inhibition and visuomotor-decision tasks than the other groups. (iv) We found no relevant association between cognitive performance and UBOs. CONCLUSIONS: NF1 children with ADHD have an attentional and executive functions deficit profile similar to that of children with primary ADHD, but with a slower response-time, increasing learning difficulties. The atypical connectivity of fronto-striatal pathways, poorer dopamine homeostasis, and increased GABA inhibition observed in NF1 renders vulnerable the development of the widely distributed neural networks that support attentional, working-memory, and executive functions.

Phosphatidylserine enriched with polyunsaturated n-3 fatty acid supplementation for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents with epilepsy: A randomized placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a frequent comorbidity in children with epilepsy, which management mostly relies on the usual treatments of ADHD, especially methylphenidate. Supplementation with polyunsaturated n-3 Fatty Acid (PUFA) has been proposed as an alternative therapeutic approach in ADHD without epilepsy but has never been evaluated in epilepsy-associated ADHD. METHODS: A multicenter double blind randomized placebo-controlled trial evaluating supplementation with PUFA, in eicosapentaenoic- and docosahexaenoic-acid form, conjugated to a phospholipid vector (PS-Omega3) in children aged >6 and <16-years old, and suffering from any type of epilepsy and ADHD (inattentive or combined type) according to DSM-V. After a 4-week baseline period, patients were allocated (1:1) either to placebo group or to PS-Omega 3 group and entered a 12 week-double-blind treatment period which was followed by a 12 week-open-label treatment period. The primary outcome was the reduction of the ADHD-rating scale IV attention-deficit subscore after 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: The study was stopped early because of lack of eligible participants and the expected sample size was not reached. Seventy-four patients were randomized, 44 in PS-Omega3, and 30 in the placebo group. The reduction after 12 weeks of treatment in the inattention subscore of the ADHD-IV scale was -1.57 in the PS-Omega3 group, and -2.90 in the placebo group (p = 0.33, α = 5%). Results were similar after 24 weeks of treatment and for all other ADHD-related secondary outcomes, with no difference between placebo and PS-Omega3. CONCLUSION: Our study remaining underpowered, no formal conclusion about the effect of Ps-Omega3 could be drawn. However, our data strongly suggested that the PS-Omega 3 formulation used in the current study did not improve ADHD symptoms in children with epilepsy. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Supplementation with polyunsaturated n-3 Fatty Acid (PUFA) has been proposed in ADHD but has never been evaluated in patients with both epilepsy and ADHD. To address this issue, we conducted a multicenter double blind randomized placebo-controlled trial evaluating supplementation with PUFA in children with epilepsy and ADHD. The study was stopped early because of lack of eligible participants, hampering formal conclusion. However, the evolution of the ADHD symptoms at 12 and 24 weeks did not differ between placebo and PUFA supplementation, strongly suggesting that PUFA did not improve ADHD symptoms in children with epilepsy.