RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Epidermal necrolysis (EN), comprising Stevens Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis is a rare and severe blistering reaction, mainly induced by drugs. Differences have been discussed between pediatric and adult patients regarding incidence, causes, and outcomes, but only based on a limited number of patients, in small case-series. OBJECTIVES: To directly compare incidence, causes and prognosis between adult and pediatric EN patients. METHODS: We used the French Health System Database from January 1st 2013 to December 31st 2022. We included adult and pediatric patients hospitalized for EN using the international classification of diseases, 10th revision codes combined with validated algorithms. The outcomes were incidence of EN; presence of a suspected drug before EN onset, defined by a new drug dispensation from 5 to 56â days before hospitalization; and in-hospital mortality. To estimate the association between pediatric EN and the presence of a suspected drug, we computed a multivariable logistic regression with odd ratios (OR). To estimate the association with mortality, we computed a multivariable Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) model. RESULTS: A total of 1440 EN patients were included, with 799 (55.5%) females, comprising 219 children and 1221 adults. Among children, EN incidence was 1.5 cases (95%CI: 1.3-1.7) per million people year compared with 2.6 cases (95%CI: 2.5-2.7) in adults. Moreover, children had less chances to have a culprit drug before EN onset (93/219 (42.5%) versus 829/1221 (67.9%)), with an adjusted OR of 0.43 (95%CI: 0.32-0.59), p < 0.0001, together with a better prognosis, with death rates of 1.4% (95%CI: 0.4%-3.7%) in pediatric patients compared with 19.4% (95%CI: 17.3%-21.7%) in adult patients, and an adjusted HR of 0.12 (95%CI: 0.04-0.38), p = 0.0003 for in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Pediatric EN seems to be rarer, with less chances to be caused by drugs, together with a better prognosis than adult EN. These results suggest the existence of different underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical particularities between adult and pediatric patients.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare life-threatening mucocutaneous reactions most often induced by drugs. To date, no large pharmacovigilance study has been conducted in the paediatric population. OBJECTIVES: To describe the spectrum of drugs associated with SJS-TEN in children through the analysis of cases reported in the WHO pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase). METHODS: Disproportionality study using data from VigiBase. All paediatric (age under 18 years) cases reported between January 1, 1967, and July 6, 2022, were included. For each molecule, a case-non-case study was performed to assess a potential pharmacovigilance signal by computing the lower end of the 95% credibility interval for the information component (IC025). We performed sensitivity analyses, (i) taking into account only cases reported by physicians and (ii) taking into account only cases reported in the last 10 years. RESULTS: Among 31,376,783 adverse drug reactions reported in VigiBase, 2,248,727 were paediatric cases and 7342 were encoded as paediatric SJS-TEN. Significant statistical pharmacovigilance signals were observed for 165 drugs. The two most represented drug classes were antiepileptics and anti-infectious drugs. The five drugs with the highest IC025 were lamotrigine (IC025 4.99), carbamazepine (IC025 4.88), phenobarbital (IC025 4.67), phenytoin (IC025 4.52) and nimesulide (IC025 4.23). Acetaminophen was significantly associated with paediatric SJS-TEN (IC025 2.85) and we also described various new suspected drugs. Vaccines had no significant pharmacovigilance signal. These results were confirmed with the sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This study updates the spectrum of drugs potentially associated with paediatric SJS-TEN.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patch tests (PTs) are recommended to identify the culprit drug in non-immediate cutaneous adverse drug reactions (NICADRs). We recently reported that, in patients with NICADRs, a unique reading of PTs at day (D)2 compared with an additional second late reading at D4 missed almost half (45.3%) of the positive PTs. OBJECTIVES: To assess the change in sensitivity of the PT reading on D4 compared with the reading on D3. METHODS: We performed a retrospective (July 2020-June 2023) monocentric study of patients who had PTs with two readings for a NICADR. We compared reading on D3 and the second reading on D4 for the suspected drug (primary outcome) and for the related drugs tested simultaneously (secondary outcome). RESULTS: During the study period, 249 patients underwent patch testing with D3 and D4 readings. Regarding the primary outcome, the first reading at D3 was positive for 13.7% of patients, and the reading at D4 for 24.9% of patients (p < 0.0001). Regarding the secondary outcome, only 9.6% of patients had all their positive PT at D3 compared with 24.9% of patients at D4 (p < 0.0001). Considering the evaluated drug classes, no statistical difference was observed. However, we highlight that D3 reading detected all positive carbamazepine PTs (n = 3) while positive clindamycin PTs (n = 4) were identified only with the help of the second reading on D4. CONCLUSION: This study showed that, an additional D4 reading compared with a single D3 reading enhanced the sensitivity of PTs to identify culprit drugs and related. Further studies should replicate these findings and evaluate the medico-economic balance and safety of a single reading of PTs on D4.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Network meta-analyses (NMAs) have become successful in addressing gaps in the comparative effectiveness of systemic treatments in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. However, their increasing number carries both a risk of overlap and reproducibility issues that can hamper clinical decision-making. OBJECTIVES: In this overview, we aimed to assess redundancy across these NMAs and to describe their characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We considered all systematic reviews with NMAs of randomized controlled trials that included adult patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and that evaluated the efficacy and/or safety of systemic treatments compared with placebo or with an active comparator. PubMed/MEDLINE, Epistemonikos, PROSPERO and the Evidence update of the Centre of Evidence-Based Dermatology of the University of Nottingham were searched up to 25 February 2021. Our main outcome was the number per year of redundant NMAs and the extent of their overlap. We also described their features, especially, the confidence in the results of the reviews, the funding of the studies and the presence of spin (a description that overstates efficacy and/or understates harm), reporting issues and methodological characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 47 redundant NMAs were included. Only two of 47 (4%) included all available treatments. Both efficacy and safety were evaluated in 14 of 47 (30%) NMAs and both short- and long-term evaluations were assessed in five of 47 (11%). Confidence in the results was critically low for 39 of 47 (83%) NMAs and only 10 of 47 (21·3%) registered a protocol. Twenty-six of 47 NMAs (55%) received pharmaceutical funding. Contract research organizations were involved in 19 of 47 (40%) NMAs. Reporting was poor across most of the NMA abstracts and spin was present in all of the abstracts. Almost half of the NMAs failed to consider important limitations such as heterogeneity (considered in 32%) or consistency (considered in 66%). CONCLUSIONS: In addition to a duplication of efforts, our overview showed heterogeneous methods and poor confidence in the results in a majority of the included NMAs, further distorted by reporting issues and spin. Clinicians need to interpret NMAs with caution when looking for the most reliable and comprehensive evidence.
Assuntos
Psoríase , Adulto , Humanos , Imunoterapia , Metanálise em Rede , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune blistering disorder. Its presentation is polymorphic. OBJECTIVE: To investigate different clinical and biological profiles of BP. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective 2-center study including all BP patients seen between January 1, 2015, and February 28, 2021. We performed hierarchical clustering on principal components. RESULTS: Three clusters were identified. Patients in cluster 1 (n = 155) were older than those in clusters 2 (n = 89) and 3 (n = 35; P < .0001), more frequently presented pauci-bullous BP (n = 63 [41%] vs 14 [16%] and 2 [6%], respectively; P < .0001) and had anti-BP230 antibodies in 87% of cases. More than 100 blisters were observed in 14 patients (40%) from cluster 3, versus 3 (2%) from cluster 1 and 0 (0%) from cluster 2 (P < .0001). Frequency of mucosal involvement was higher in cluster 3 (n = 32 [91%, including epiglottis in 40%] vs 11 [7%] and 34 [38%]; P < .0001). In clusters 2 and 3, 70% and 74% of patients had antibodies targeting only BP180. Those in cluster 3 received more lines of systemic treatment and experienced more relapses. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study without immunoelectron microscopy. CONCLUSION: We identified 3 different BP clusters, including one corresponding to severe BP180+ BP230- BP with features common to mucous membrane pemphigoid.
Assuntos
Penfigoide Bolhoso , Autoanticorpos , Autoantígenos , Vesícula , Distonina , Humanos , Colágenos não Fibrilares , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa is a form of medium-sized vessel vasculitis. Despite a disabling and prolonged course, data on treatment efficacy and safety remain scarce. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to describe treatment efficacy and safety in patients with cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective, observational study, recorded clinical and biologic data together with treatments received. The primary outcome was the rate of complete response at month 3. Secondary outcomes assessed drug survival and safety. RESULTS: We included 68 patients who received a median of 2 therapeutic lines (interquartile range, 1-3). Overall, complete response was achieved in 13 of 42 (31%) patients with colchicine, 4 of 17 (23%) with dapsone, 11 of 25 (44%) with glucocorticoids (GCs) alone, 1 of 9 (11%) with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 11 of 13 (84%) with GCs+azathioprine, and 7 of 15 (47%) with GCs+methotrexate. GCs+azathioprine had the best drug survival (median duration, 29.5 months; interquartile range, 19.5-36.0). Response at month 3 was decreased with peripheral neurologic involvement (odds ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.81; P = .04). Overall, the rate of treatment-related adverse events was 18%, which led to the discontinuation of treatment in 7% of patients. LIMITATION: Retrospective study. CONCLUSION: Colchicine seems to confer good benefit-risk balance in cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa without peripheral sensory neuropathy. GCs+azathioprine seem the best treatment in the event of relapse.
Assuntos
Poliarterite Nodosa , Azatioprina/uso terapêutico , Colchicina/efeitos adversos , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Poliarterite Nodosa/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Possible biases in pharmacovigilance reporting may impact epidermal necrolysis (EN) and drugs associations. OBJECTIVES: To assess biases associated with EN-reporting. METHODS: Using VigiBase, the World Health Organization-pharmacovigilance database, among drugs associated with EN between 2016 and 2020, we used an unsupervised clustering including reports characteristics, that is, reporter quality, time from drug intake to EN onset, and only one suspected drug in the report. RESULTS: Among 152 drugs, three clusters were identified. Cluster 1 (n = 41) exhibited drugs frequently reported within a time from intake to onset longer than 4 days, in 57 ± 13% of reports. It corresponded to well-reported drugs and was composed mainly of antivirals and antiepileptics. Cluster 2 (n = 42) exhibited drugs frequently reported within a time from drug intake to onset shorter than 4 days, in 31 ± 12% of reports. It corresponded to drugs with a high risk of protopathic bias and was composed of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), analgesics, and antibiotics. Cluster 3 (n = 69) exhibited drugs frequently reported with an unavailable time from drug intake to reaction, in 66 ± 11% of reports, and reported by a high frequency of consumers (9 ± 9%). It corresponded to drugs reported with a high risk of classification bias, and was composed of anticancer therapies and cardiovascular drugs. CONCLUSION: Protopathic and classification biases impact EN-reporting and should be considered regarding associations with antibiotics, NSAIDs, analgesics, anticancer therapies, and cardiovascular drugs.
Assuntos
Farmacovigilância , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson , Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Anticonvulsivantes , Viés , Humanos , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/epidemiologia , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/etiologia , Organização Mundial da SaúdeRESUMO
Drug survival reflects treatment effectiveness and safety in real life. There is limited data on the variation of drug survival with the availability of systemic treatments with additional biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) or synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (sDMARDs). The aim of this study was to determine whether the increasing number of available systemic treatments for psoriasis affects drug survival over time. Patients were selected from the PsoBioTeq cohort, a French prospective observational cohort enrolling patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. All patients initiating a first bDMARD or sDMARD were included. The primary outcome was comparison of drug survival over time. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard ratio model was computed. A total of 1,866 patients were included; 739 females (39%), median age 47 years. In the multivariate Cox model, no association was found between the calendar year of initiation and drug survival (hazard ratio) overlapping from 0.80 (0.42-1.52) to 1.17 (0.64-2.17), p = 0.633). In conclusion, drug survival in psoriasis is not affected by the year of initiation.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos , Produtos Biológicos , Psoríase , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Fatores Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Produtos Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Psoríase/diagnóstico , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Talidomida/efeitos adversos , Talidomida/análogos & derivadosAssuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Farmacovigilância , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/etiologia , Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/epidemiologia , Organização Mundial da SaúdeAssuntos
Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Interleucina-1/antagonistas & inibidores , Urticária/tratamento farmacológico , Vasculite/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Feminino , França , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) represent a heterogeneous field including various clinical patterns without specific features suggesting drug causality. Maculopapular exanthema and urticaria are the most common types of cutaneous ADR. Serious cutaneous ADRs, which may cause permanent sequelae or have fatal outcome, may represent 2% of all cutaneous ADR and must be quickly identified to guide their management. These serious reactions include bullous manifestations (epidermal necrolysis i.e. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP). Some risk factors for developing cutaneous ADRs have been identified, including immunosuppression, autoimmunity or genetic variants. All drugs can cause cutaneous ADRs, the most commonly implicated being antibiotics (especially aminopenicillins and sulfonamides), anticonvulsants, allopurinol, antineoplastic drugs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and iodinated contrast media. Pathophysiology is related to immediate or delayed "idiosyncratic" immunologic mechanisms, i.e., usually not related to dose, and pharmacologic/toxic mechanisms, commonly dose-dependent and/or time-dependent. If an immuno-allergic mechanism is suspected, allergological explorations (including epicutaneous patch testing and/or intradermal test) are often possible to clarify drug causality, however these have a variable sensitivity according to the drug and to the ADR type. No in vivo or in vitro test can consistently confirm the drug causality. To determine the origin of a rash, a logical approach based on clinical characteristics, chronologic factors and elimination of differential diagnosis (especially infectious etiologies) is required, completed with a literature search. Reporting to pharmacovigilance system is therefore essential both to analyze drug causality at individual level, and to contribute to knowledge of the drug at population level, especially for serious cutaneous ADRs or in cases involving newly marketed drugs.
Assuntos
Pustulose Exantematosa Aguda Generalizada , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson , Humanos , Pele , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/epidemiologia , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/etiologia , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/diagnóstico , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Pustulose Exantematosa Aguda Generalizada/diagnóstico , Pustulose Exantematosa Aguda Generalizada/epidemiologia , Pustulose Exantematosa Aguda Generalizada/etiologia , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To explore the association between industry funding and network meta-analyses' (NMAs) conclusion, and the use in Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) of NMAs. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: This was an overview of NMAs and CPGs. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Epistemonikos, and several guideline databases up to February 18th 2023. We included CPGs from the last 5 years and NMAs of randomized controlled trials that evaluated targeted therapies in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Data extraction and outcome assessments were done in duplicate by independent authors. RESULTS: We included 216 NMAs and 99 CPGs. 31% (67/216) were industry-funded. The proportion of industry-funded NMAs that cited one treatment as being best was 44% (25/57) compared to 26% (30/116) for nonindustry-funded (OR = 2.24 [1.15-4.39]; aOR = 1.76 [0.81-3.81]). The abstract's conclusion of 39/67 (58%) industry-funded and 69/149 (46%) nonindustry-funded NMAs were considered unsupported by the results (OR = 1.61 [0.90-2.89]; aOR = 1.40 [0.71-2.78]). All industry-funded NMAs that cited one treatment as best cited their own sponsored drug. 59/99 (60%) CPGs included at least one NMA, with 23/59 (39%) of them citing industry-funded NMAs. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find evidence that industry-funded NMAs were more likely to have unsupported conclusions or to cite only one treatment as being best in their conclusions compared to non-industry-funded NMAs. However, almost all industry-funded NMAs favored their own treatments. Even though 40% of the CPGs did not rely on NMA, over a third of those who did used industry-funded NMAs. Limitations include the possible misclassification due to undisclosed funding and potential confounders that have not been accounted for.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Since the 2002 SCAR study, erythema multiforme (EM), a post-infectious disease, has been distinguished from Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), drug-induced. Nevertheless, EM cases are still reported in the French pharmacovigilance database (FPDB). OBJECTIVES: To describe EM reported in the FPDB and to compare the quality and the characteristics of the reports. METHODS: This retrospective observational study selected all EM cases reported in the FPDB over two periods: period 1 (P1, 2008-2009) and period 2 (P2, 2018-2019). Inclusion criteria were 1) a diagnosis of clinically typical EM and/or validated by a dermatologist; 2) a reported date of onset of the reaction; and 3) a precise chronology of drug exposure. Cases were classified confirmed EM (typical acral target lesions and/or validation by a dermatologist) and possible EM (not-otherwise-specified target lesions, isolated mucosal involvement, doubtful with SJS). We concluded possible drug-induced EM when EM was confirmed, with onset ranging from 5 to 28 days without an alternative cause. RESULTS: Among 182 selected reports, 140 (77%) were analyzed. Of these, 67 (48%) presented a more likely alternative diagnosis than EM. Of the 73 reports of EM cases finally included (P1, n=41; P2, n=32), 36 (49%) had a probable non-drug cause and 28 (38%) were associated with only drugs with an onset time ≤4 days and/or ≥29 days. Possible drug-induced EM was retained in 9 cases (6% of evaluable reports). Etiological work-up was more often performed in period 2 than 1 (53.1% vs 29.3%, P=0.04), and the time to onset from 5 to 28 days was more frequent in period 2 (59.2% vs 40%, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that possible drug-induced EM is rare. Many reports describe "polymorphic" rashes inappropriately concluded as EM or post-infectious EM with unsuitable drug accountability subject to protopathic bias.
Assuntos
Eritema Multiforme , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson , Humanos , Farmacovigilância , Eritema Multiforme/induzido quimicamente , Eritema Multiforme/epidemiologia , Eritema Multiforme/complicações , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/epidemiologia , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/etiologia , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/diagnóstico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The worldwide coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination campaign triggered several autoimmune diseases. We hereby aimed to describe IgA vasculitis (IgAV) following COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS: We conducted a national, multicenter, retrospective study in France of new-onset adult IgAV diagnosis following COVID-19 vaccination. RESULTS: In total, 12 patients with new-onset IgAV were included. Of these, 5 (41.7%) were women, and the median age was 52.5 (IQR 30.75-60.5) years. Of the 12 patients, 10 had received an mRNA vaccine and 2 had received a viral vector vaccine. The median time from vaccination to onset of symptoms was 11.5 (IQR 4.25-21.25) days. Vasculitis occurred after the first vaccine dose in most patients (n = 8). All patients had skin involvement, with skin necrosis in 4 patients. In total, 7 patients had joint involvement and 2 had arthritis. A total of 4 patients had nonsevere gastrointestinal involvement and 2 had nonsevere renal involvement. The median C-reactive protein level was 26 (IQR 10-66.75) mg/L, the median creatininemia level was 72 (IQR 65-81) µmol/L, and 1 patient had an estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 60 mL/min at management. All patients received treatment, including 9 patients (75%) who received glucocorticoids. In total, 5 patients received a vaccine dose after developing IgAV, 1 of whom experienced a minor cutaneous relapse. CONCLUSION: The baseline presentation of IgAV following COVID-19 vaccination was mild to moderate, and outcomes were favorable. Thus, a complete COVID-19 vaccination regimen should be completed in this population. Of note, a fortuitous link cannot be ruled out, requiring a worldwide pharmacovigilance search to confirm these findings.