Improving the diagnostic management of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis.

Essentials The Constans score and D-dimer can rule out upper extremity deep vein thrombosis without imaging. We evaluated the performance of an extended Constans score and an age-adjusted D-dimer threshold. The extended Constans score did not increase the efficiency compared to the original score. Age-adjusted D-dimer testing safely increased the efficiency by 4%, but this needs validation. SUMMARY: Background Among patients with clinically suspected upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT), a clinical decision rule based on the Constans score combined with D-dimer testing can safely rule out the diagnosis without imaging in approximately one-fifth of patients. Objectives To evaluate the performance of the original Constans score, an extended Constans score and an age-adjusted D-dimer positivity threshold. Methods Data of 406 patients with suspected UEDVT previously enrolled in a multinational diagnostic management study were used. The discriminatory performance, calibration and diagnostic accuracy of the Constans score were evaluated. The Constans score was extended by selecting clinical variables that may have incremental value in detecting UEDVT, conditional on the original Constans score items. The performance of the Constans rule was evaluated in combination with fixed and age-adjusted D-dimer thresholds. Results The original Constans score showed good discriminatory performance (c-statistic, 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.85). An extended Constans score with five additional clinical items improved discriminatory performance and calibration, but this did not translate into a higher efficiency in avoiding imaging tests. Compared with a fixed threshold, age-adjusted D-dimer testing increased the proportion of patients for whom imaging and anticoagulation could be withheld from 21% to 25% (gain, 3.7%; 95% CI, 2.3-6.0%). Conclusions The Constans score has good discriminatory performance in the diagnosis of UEDVT. Age-adjusted D-dimer testing is likely to safely increase the efficiency of the diagnostic algorithm, but this approach needs prospective validation.

Incidental pulmonary embolism in cancer patients: Interobserver agreement on the diagnosis and extent with a focus on distal clots.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of incidental pulmonary embolism (IPE) in cancer patients is increasing. There is scant information on the interobserver agreement among radiologists about the diagnosis of distal incidental clots and the actual radiologic extension of IPE. METHODS: A total of 88 contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans of cancer patients with IPE were reassessed blindly by two expert thoracic radiologists. First, 62 scans were reassessed and the interobserver agreement on most proximal extent of IPE was calculated between the two expert radiologists as well as between the initial and expert reading, using the kappa statistic. The sample was enriched with 26 additional scans for a total of 30 segmental and 29 subsegmental IPE to determine the interobserver agreement on distal clots. RESULTS: The level of agreement regarding the most proximal extent of IPE between the expert radiologists was very good (kappa 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73-0.95) and poor between the original radiologist and expert radiologists (kappa 0.39; 95% CI, 0.22-0.56). In the patients with segmental or subsegmental IPE on initial reading, the expert radiologists agreed with the segmental location in 12 out of 30 patients (40%) and with the subsegmental location in 17 out of 29 patients (59%). The interobserver agreement between the expert radiologists was good (kappa 0.68; 95% CI, 0.46-0.90) and moderate (kappa 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25-0.71), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: While the interobserver agreement between radiologists on the most proximal location of IPE in cancer patients appears to be fairly good, it decreases significantly for more distally located incidental clots.

Current management strategies and long-term clinical outcomes of upper extremity venous thrombosis.

UNLABELLED: Essentials Few data exist on outcome of upper extremity deep and superficial vein thrombosis (UEDVT and UESVT). We followed 102 and 55 patients with UEDVT or UESVT, respectively, for a median of 3.5 years. Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism was low in both diseases, and the mortality high. Postthrombotic symptoms were infrequent and cancer patients had a higher risk of recurrent VTE. SUMMARY: Background There is scant information on the optimal management and clinical outcome of deep and superficial vein thrombosis of the upper extremity (UEDVT and UESVT). Objectives To explore treatment strategies and the incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), mortality, postthrombotic symptoms, and bleeding in patients with UEDVT and UESVT and to assess the prognosis of cancer patients with UEDVT. Patients/methods Follow-up of patients with UEDVT or UESVT, who were enrolled previously in a diagnostic management study. Results We followed 102 and 55 patients with UEDVT and UESVT, respectively, both for a median of 3.5 years. Anticoagulant treatment was started in 100 patients with UEDVT (98%) and in 40 (73%) with UESVT. Nine patients with UEDVT (9%) developed recurrent VTE, 26 (26%) died, 6 (8%) of 72 patients had moderate postthrombotic symptoms, and 5 (5%) experienced major bleeding. One patient with UESVT had a recurrent VTE, 18 (33%) died, none had moderate postthrombotic symptoms, and none had major bleeding. Of the cancer patients with UEDVT, 18% had recurrent VTE vs. 7.5% in non-cancer patients (adjusted hazard ratio 2.2, 95%CI 0.6-8.2). The survival rate was 50% in cancer patients with UEDVT vs. 60% in those without (adjusted HR 0.8, 95%CI 0.4-1.4). Conclusions The risk of recurrent VTE was low in patients with UEDVT, and negligible for UESVT. Mortality was high for both diseases. Postthrombotic symptoms were infrequent and mild. Anticoagulant therapy of UEDVT carried a substantial risk of major bleeding. Cancer patients had a significant risk of recurrent VTE.