An exception-reporting approach for wound swab culture: effect on post-report antibiotic initiation.

A prior analysis suggested that wound swab culture (WSC) results were driving unnecessary antibiotic use in patients who were not already receiving treatment. As a quality-improvement initiative, our laboratory introduced an "exception-reporting" protocol on 1 March 2023, whereby typical wound pathogens susceptible to recommended empiric therapy (flucloxacillin/cefalexin) were not reported, and a comment was provided, stating no significant resistant organisms had been detected. Full results were available to clinicians on request. Cultures falling outside protocol criteria were reported in the standard fashion. This analysis sought to assess the effect of exception-reporting on post-report antibiotic initiation (PRAI). All community WSC results were matched to antibiotic dispensing records from October 2021 to December 2023. Sampling without treatment pre-report was termed "test and wait" (TaW). Following TaW, PRAI was identified if antibiotics were started within 5 days post-report. There were 1,819 and 764 WSCs received in the pre-change and post-change periods, respectively, where an initial TaW approach had been taken and an organism eligible for exception-reporting had been isolated. In the post-change period, 407 (53.3%) met the criteria and were exception-reported. PRAI occurred in 901 (49.5%) pre-change samples, compared to 102 (25.1%, P < 0.01) with exception-reporting. There was no detectable increase in hospitalization or repeat WSC collection in the 30 days following exception-reporting. Exception-reporting was associated with a markedly reduced proportion of patients being initiated on antibiotics following WSC where an organism had been isolated. The naming of organisms in reports appears to drive unnecessary antibiotic prescribing in many patients. These results require confirmation in other jurisdictions. IMPORTANCE: Wound swab culture is a high-volume test performed in clinical microbiology laboratories. In this analysis, we have shown that an alternative approach to reporting positive wound swab cultures has resulted in a large reduction in post-report antibiotic initiation, suggesting that the current standard method of reporting generates considerable unnecessary antibiotic use. If these findings are replicated elsewhere, wider adoption of this reporting would represent an opportunity for many clinical microbiology laboratories to have a significant impact on community antimicrobial stewardship.

Effect of directive laboratory comments on prescribing response to positive throat swab cultures.

BACKGROUND: In patients without ethnicity risk factors for acute rheumatic fever (ARF), our local guidelines recommend limiting antibiotic use following a positive throat swab culture (TSC). If symptoms are severe, a 5-7 day course is recommended. Despite this, most local patients with a positive TSC for group A Streptococcus (GAS) or Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis (SDSE) were being prescribed 10 days of antibiotics. In response, we added comments to positive TSC reports recommending shorter treatment durations in those without ARF risk factors. No other antimicrobial stewardship initiatives were implemented. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of these comments on antibiotic course duration after positive TSC. METHODS: All community TSC results from 1 October 2021 to 31 March 2023 (1 year pre- to 6 months post-change) were matched to antibiotic dispensing data. Patients who had been empirically dispensed an antibiotic prior to the culture report were excluded. The outcome of interest was the antibiotic duration dispensed in the 5 day period after the TSC report. RESULTS: Following introduction of the comments, median course duration reduced from 10 (IQR 5-10) to 7 days (IQR 0-10; P < 0.01) and from 7 (IQR 0-10) to 0 days (IQR 0-5; P < 0.01) following GAS- and SDSE-positive TSC, respectively, in those without ARF risk factors. The percentage of people receiving 10 days of antibiotics decreased from 63.0% to 37.0% (P < 0.01) and 41.2% to 14.6% (P < 0.01) for GAS and SDSE, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of comments providing direct prescribing advice to requestors appears to have been highly effective at improving guideline-compliant prescribing following positive TSC report.

Early oral antibiotic switch in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: The Staphylococcus aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) Trial Early Oral Switch Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (bacteraemia) is traditionally treated with at least two weeks of IV antibiotics in adults, 3-7 days in children, and often longer for those with complicated disease. The current practice of treating S. aureus bacteraemia (SAB) with prolonged IV antibiotics (rather than oral antibiotics) is based on historical observational research and expert opinion. Prolonged IV antibiotic therapy has significant disadvantages for patients and healthcare systems, and there is growing interest in whether a switch to oral antibiotics following an initial period of IV therapy is a safe alternative for clinically stable patients. PROTOCOL: The early oral switch (EOS) domain of the S. aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) trial will assess early switch to oral antibiotics compared with continued IV treatment in clinically stable patients with SAB. The primary endpoint is 90-day all-cause mortality. Hospitalised SAB patients are assessed at platform day 7 +/- 2 (uncomplicated SAB) and day 14 +/-2 (complicated SAB) to determine their eligibility for randomisation to EOS (intervention) or continued IV treatment (current standard of care). DISCUSSION: Recruitment is occurring to the EOS domain of the SNAP trial. As of August 2023, 21% of all SNAP participants had been randomised to the EOS domain, a total of 264 participants across 77 centres, with an aim to recruit at least 1000 participants. We describe challenges and facilitators to enrolment in this domain to aid those planning similar trials.

Post-report antibiotic initiation following community non-sterile-site microbiology results: an opportunity for labs to lead stewardship?

OBJECTIVES: Positive culture results from non-sterile sites (NSSs) are poorly predictive of clinical infection. Despite this, these results are often interpreted as an indication for antibiotics, even in patients with limited signs of infection. We sought to quantify the influence of NSS culture results on post-report antibiotic initiation (PRAI) in patients who had not been started on antibiotics pre-report. METHODS: All community wound/skin swab and sputum cultures were matched to antibiotic dispensing records from February 2017 to July 2022. Prescribing behaviour was assessed pre- and post-report. Sampling without treatment pre-report was termed 'test-and-wait' (TaW). Following TaW, PRAI was identified if antibiotics were started within 5 days post-report. RESULTS: There were 65 480 wound/skin swabs and 8126 sputum samples, with TaW occurring in 21 740 (35.1%) and 4185 (54.4%), respectively. Following a TaW approach PRAI occurred in 43.3% when an organism was reported, versus 10.8% (P < 0.01) for a 'no growth' report for wound/skin swabs. For the same comparison with sputum, PRAI occurred in 47.9% versus 10.8% (P < 0.01). On multivariate analysis reporting an organism remained strongly associated with PRAI. CONCLUSIONS: Reporting an organism in those not already on antibiotics was strongly associated with PRAI. We hypothesize that for many patients TaW suggests limited evidence of infection (i.e. insufficient to justify antibiotic treatment at time of sampling), meaning positive NSS results may be driving a considerable volume of potentially unnecessary antibiotic use. Further study on this topic is required, but strategies to reduce PRAI may offer laboratories an opportunity to meaningfully impact antimicrobial stewardship efforts.

Efficacy of Early Oral Switch with ß-Lactams for Low-Risk Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

The aim of this study was to assess the safety of early oral switch (EOS) prior to 14 days for low-risk Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (LR-SAB), which is the primary treatment strategy used at our institution. The usual recommended therapy is 14 days of intravenous (i.v.) antibiotics. All patients with SAB at our hospital were identified between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2018. Those meeting low-risk criteria (health care-associated, no evidence of deep infection or demonstrated involvement of prosthetic material, and no further positive blood cultures after 72 h) were included in the study. The primary outcome was occurrence of a SAB-related complication within 90 days. There were 469 SAB episodes during the study period, 100 (21%) of whom met inclusion criteria. EOS was performed in 84 patients. In this group, line infection was the source in 79%, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus caused 95% of SABs and 74% of patients received i.v. flucloxacillin. The median durations of i.v. and oral antibiotics in the EOS group were 5 days (interquartile range [IQR], 4 to 6) and 10 days (IQR, 9 to 14), respectively. A total of 71% of patients received flucloxacillin as their EOS agent. Overall, 86% of oral step-down therapy was with beta-lactams. One patient (1%) undergoing EOS had SAB relapse within 90 days. No deaths attributable to SAB occurred within 90 days. In this low-MRSA-prevalence LR-SAB cohort, EOS was associated with a low incidence of SAB-related complications. This was achieved with oral beta-lactam therapy in most patients. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Incorporating patient, nursing and environmental factors into antimicrobial stewardship: effects of simplifying treatment from cefuroxime to ceftriaxone.

AIM: Our antimicrobial guidelines (AGs) were changed in 2021 to recommend once-daily ceftriaxone in place of three-times-daily cefuroxime as preferred cephalosporin. This analysis sought to assess the effects of this on incidence of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCR-E) and resource utilisation. METHOD: Before and after analysis of 30-day CDI and 3GCR-E incidence following receipt of cefuroxime/ceftriaxone pre- and post-AG change. Total nursing time and waste production relating to cefuroxime/ceftriaxone delivery were calculated pre- and post-change. RESULTS: CDI incidence was 0.6% pre- and 1.0% post-change (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.44, p=0.07) and 3GCR-E incidence 3.5% and 3.1% (aOR 0.90, p=0.33). Mean per-quarter estimated nursing administration time decreased from 2,065 to 1,163 hours (902 nurse-hour reduction) and antibiotic-related waste generation from 1,131kg to 748kg (383kg reduction). Overall days of therapy per-quarter of cefuroxime/ceftriaxone were unchanged between periods. CONCLUSION: This simplification of our AG from a three-times-daily to a once-daily antibiotic resulted in considerable savings for our hospital (roughly 1.7 full-time equivalent nurses and over a tonne of waste yearly), with no significant increases in CDI or 3GCR-E. The impact of dosing schedules on non-antibiotic-spectrum factors, such as nursing time and resource usage, is worthy of consideration when designing AGs.

Early identification of a ward-based outbreak of Clostridioides difficile using prospective multilocus sequence type-based Oxford Nanopore genomic surveillance.

OBJECTIVE: To describe an outbreak of sequence type (ST)2 Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) detected by a recently implemented multilocus sequence type (MLST)-based prospective genomic surveillance system using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing. SETTING: Hemato-oncology ward of a public tertiary referral centre. METHODS: From February 2022, we began prospectively sequencing all C. difficile isolated from inpatients at our institution on the ONT MinION device, with the output being an MLST. Bed-movement data are used to construct real-time ST-specific incidence charts based on ward exposures over the preceding three months. RESULTS: Between February and October 2022, 76 of 118 (64.4%) CDI cases were successfully sequenced. There was wide ST variation across cases and the hospital, with only four different STs being seen in >4 patients. A clear predominance of ST2 CDI cases emerged among patients with exposure to our hemato-oncology ward between May and October 2022, which totalled ten patients. There was no detectable rise in overall CDI incidence for the ward or hospital due to the outbreak. Following a change in cleaning product to an accelerated hydrogen peroxide wipe and several other interventions, no further outbreak-associated ST2 cases were detected. A retrospective phylogenetic analysis using original sequence data showed clustering of the suspected outbreak cases, with the exception of two cases that were retrospectively excluded from the outbreak. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective genomic surveillance of C. difficile using ONT sequencing permitted the identification of an outbreak of ST2 CDI that would have otherwise gone undetected.

Rapid identification and subsequent contextualization of an outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a neonatal intensive care unit using nanopore sequencing.

Outbreaks of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are well described in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) setting. Genomics has revolutionized the investigation of such outbreaks; however, to date, this has largely been completed retrospectively and has typically relied on short-read platforms. In 2022, our laboratory established a prospective genomic surveillance system using Oxford Nanopore Technologies sequencing for rapid outbreak detection. Herein, using this system, we describe the detection and control of an outbreak of sequence-type (ST)97 MRSA in our NICU. The outbreak was identified 13 days after the first MRSA-positive culture and at a point where there were only two known cases. Ward screening rapidly defined the extent of the outbreak, with six other infants found to be colonized. There was minimal transmission once the outbreak had been detected and appropriate infection control measures had been instituted; only two further ST97 cases were detected, along with three unrelated non-ST97 MRSA cases. To contextualize the outbreak, core-genome single-nucleotide variants were identified for phylogenetic analysis after de novo assembly of nanopore data. Comparisons with global (n=45) and national surveillance (n=35) ST97 genomes revealed the stepwise evolution of methicillin resistance within this ST97 subset. A distinct cluster comprising nine of the ten ST97-IVa genomes from the NICU was identified, with strains from 2020 to 2022 national surveillance serving as outgroups to this cluster. One ST97-IVa genome presumed to be part of the outbreak formed an outgroup and was retrospectively excluded. A second phylogeny was created using Illumina sequencing, which considerably reduced the branch lengths of the NICU isolates on the phylogenetic tree. However, the overall tree topology and conclusions were unchanged, with the exception of the NICU outbreak cluster, where differences in branch lengths were observed. This analysis demonstrated the ability of a nanopore-only prospective genomic surveillance system to rapidly identify and contextualize an outbreak of MRSA in a NICU.

Effect of Blood Culture Contamination on Antibiotic Use in an Institution With Rapid Laboratory Methods and Phone-Based Clinical Follow-up of Blood Culture Results.

In a multivariate analysis of 30 574 blood culture (BC) results, BC contamination was associated with only a small increase in antibiotic length of therapy compared to no-growth BCs (difference, 0.36 days [95% confidence interval, .05-.67]; P = .02). Stewardship processes at our institution appear to be effective in reducing the impact of BC contamination.

Benzoyl peroxide + chlorhexidine versus chlorhexidine alone skin preparation to reduce Propionibacterium acnes: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Traditional skin preparation for shoulder surgery is not specific for Propionibacterium acnes. Topical benzoyl peroxide for 48 h preoperatively has been shown to reduce the bacterial load of P. acnes on the skin. Our aim was to investigate whether skin preparation with a single application of benzoyl peroxide combined with 2% chlorhexidine/alcohol immediately prior to surgery was superior to 2% chlorhexidine/alcohol alone at inhibiting P. acnes. METHODS: We conducted a single-blinded interventional study. Each shoulder of the participant was assigned a different preparation through a randomization process. Two sites were assessed per shoulder. The intervention was the application of benzoyl peroxide followed by chlorhexidine/alcohol to the shoulder. The control was two applications of 2% chlorhexidine/alcohol. Superficial skin swabs for semi-quantitative culture were taken pre- and post-skin preparation. RESULTS: A total of 22 male participants were randomized. All participants were colonized with P. acnes on baseline swabs. We found complete inhibition of P. acnes at 14 days at 80% of sites prepared with benzoyl peroxide + chlorhexidine/alcohol compared with 86% inhibition at shoulder sites prepared with chlorhexidine alone. CONCLUSION: There was no reduction in the growth of P. acnes over 14 days with chlorhexidine/alcohol and benzoyl peroxide compared with chlorhexidine alone. On the basis of these results, the addition of benzoyl peroxide at the time of surgery does not appear to increase the efficacy of the surgical preparation for inhibiting P. acnes growth.