Clinical mimickers of calciphylaxis: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Calciphylaxis is an ischemic vasculopathy with high morbidity and mortality. Early and accurate diagnosis is critical to management of calciphylaxis. Clinical mimickers may contribute to delayed or misdiagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To assess the rate and risk factors for misdiagnosis and to identify clinical mimickers of calciphylaxis. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review was conducted of patients with calciphylaxis at a large urban tertiary care hospital between 2006 and 2018. RESULTS: Of 119 patients diagnosed with calciphylaxis, 73.1% were initially misdiagnosed. Of patients not initially misdiagnosed, median time to diagnosis from initial presentation was 4.5 days (interquartile range, 1.0-23.3), compared to 33 days (interquartile range, 13.0-68.8) in patients who were initially misdiagnosed (P = .0002). The most common misdiagnoses were cellulitis (31.0%), unspecified skin infection (8.0%), and peripheral vascular disease (6.9%). Patients who were misdiagnosed frequently received at least 1 course of antibiotics. Patients with end-stage renal disease were less likely to be misdiagnosed than those without this disease (P = .001). LIMITATIONS: Single-center, retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the risk factors for misdiagnosis of calciphylaxis is an opportunity for further education concerning this rare disease.

Assessment of outcomes of calciphylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Calciphylaxis is a rare thrombotic vasculopathy characterized by high morbidity and mortality. There is a paucity of studies examining longitudinal outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To assess mortality, days spent in the hospital, and amputations in patients with calciphylaxis. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review was conducted in 145 patients diagnosed with calciphylaxis at an urban tertiary care hospital from January 2006 to December 2018. RESULTS: Six-month mortality was 37.2%, and 1-year mortality was 44.1%. Patients with nephrogenic calciphylaxis had worse survival than those with nonnephrogenic calciphylaxis (P = .007). This difference in survival disappeared when limiting mortality to deaths due to calciphylaxis. Age (P = .003) and end-stage renal disease (P = .01) were risk factors associated with 1-year mortality. Diabetes mellitus was associated with greater total hospitalization days (coefficient, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.4); bedside debridement was associated with fewer hospitalization days (coefficient, 0.8; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-0.9). Amputations were not associated with any of the examined risk factors. The use of warfarin followed by a transition to nonwarfarin anticoagulation was associated with decreased hazard of death (P = .01). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS: Calciphylaxis remains a complex, heterogeneous disease. Mortality is lower in patients with nonnephrogenic disease. These findings may be incorporated during discussions regarding the goals of care to facilitate informed shared decision making.

Digital dermatopathology: The time is now.

To continue to provide expert specialized care during the COVID-19 pandemic, our dermatopathology service transitioned to a secure virtual microscopy platform. In our experience, this digitally-enabled dermatopathology practice revealed myriad benefits, including an improved diagnostic workflow and increased access to teaching. Whole slide imaging (WSI) is a related system that digitizes glass slides with high resolution and has been clinically validated for primary diagnosis. While WSI requires an initial institutional investment, its benefits include expanded access to subspecialized expertise and collaborations, digital histopathologic data generation for research, unification of patient clinical and pathologic information, and archiving of educational resources. The switch to digitally-enabled remote dermatopathology at our institution and across the United States presents a rare opportunity to critically examine newly implemented systems and to develop permanent digital solutions, thereby taking a leap forward for the benefit of patient care, research, and medical education.

Hydroxyurea-induced genital ulcers and erosions: Two case reports.

Hydroxyurea is a chemotherapeutic agent used for myeloproliferative disorders and sickle cell anemia that is well known to cause painful mucocutaneous ulcers, typically involving the legs or mouth. However, genital ulcerations due to hydroxyurea therapy are a rare, and likely underrecognized, adverse effect with only a few cases reported in the literature to date. Ulcers of the lower legs caused by hydroxyurea are associated with a diagnostic delay, and this is likely exacerbated in cases of genital ulceration due to a lack of awareness. Herein we present two cases of painful genital ulceration in patients on hydroxyurea therapy. In the first Case, an 87 year-old male with polycythemia vera developed an ulcer on the scrotum, which was assessed initially through virtual visits during the COVID-19 pandemic, and was refractory to topical and oral antibiotic treatments. The second case was a 79 year-old male with essential thrombocythemia and a history of persistent leg ulcers who developed erosions of the glans penis. Both patients experienced complete resolution within weeks of discontinuing hydroxyurea therapy. In conclusion, genital ulcers and erosions induced by hydroxyrea may be underrecognized in clinical practice, but if identified, withdrawal of hydroxyurea leads to quick resolution of these lesions and the associated pain.

Eczematous Drug Eruptions.

Eczematous drug eruptions are a heterogenous group of skin reactions that resemble eczema both clinically and histologically. We reviewed the literature and cataloged the systemically administered medications that cause these eruptions, along with their characteristic clinical presentations. We identified three primary pathophysiologic etiologies: (1) cutaneous immunomodulation, (2) skin dehydration, and (3) delayed hypersensitivity. Notably, eczematous eruptions caused by altered immunity in the skin may be increasing in incidence as some responsible drugs, in particular biologic therapies (such as tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-17 inhibitors) and targeted cancer treatments (including immune checkpoint inhibitors and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors), become more commonly employed in clinical practice. Other notable causes of eczematous eruptions include antiviral agents for hepatitis C virus and cardiovascular medications in elderly individuals, and notable subtypes of eczematous reactions include systemic contact dermatitis and photoallergic reactions, which are also discussed. The diagnostic gold standard is drug rechallenge and most reactions may be treated effectively with emollients, topical corticosteroids, and oral antihistamines.