Dynamic changes in TP53 mutated circulating tumor DNA predicts outcome of patients with high-grade ovarian carcinomas.

There is a lack of biomarkers to predict outcome following initial treatment in patients with high-grade ovarian cancer. We hypothesized that monitoring TP53 mutation (TP53m) in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could be a tumor-specific biomarker. Patients enrolled in a prospective study (NCT03010124) consented to analysis of biological samples through the disease course. ctDNA was extracted and analyzed to detect the presence of TP53m Next-generation sequencing was performed on tumor tissue to detect TP53m and on whole blood to detect clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP).A total of 102 samples were sequentially collected from 26 patients. ctDNA was detected in all patients at diagnosis. The same TP53m was found in ctDNA and tumor tissue in 77% of patients. TP53m in ctDNA was not CHIP related. During neoadjuvant chemotherapy, increasing ctDNA was associated with failure to achieve complete interval cytoreductive surgery in 60% of patients. Rising ctDNA or de novo TP53m seemed to be associated with a trend for worst survival compared with decrease or complete clearance: progression-free survival 10 versus 26.5 months, HR 3.2. Despite macroscopically complete surgery, 30% of patients had detectable ctDNA post-operatively and had worse survival than those with undetectable ctDNA. Monitoring TP53m in ctDNA during chemotherapy or after surgery could help guide the best adjuvant therapy.

MDM4 amplification in atypical lipomatous tumors/well-differentiated liposarcoma: Private event or alternative oncogenic mechanism?

Adipocytic tumors are the most common mesenchymal tumors in soft tissues. Among them, a diagnostic challenge relies in the distinction between lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT)/well differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS), as both entities are often undistinguishable not only from a radiological point of view, but also at the microscopic level and particularly when dealing with small tumor specimen. Thus, detection of recurrent MDM2 amplifications may be the only criteria to discriminate malignant tumors from lipomas. In this study, we report the case of a patient diagnosed with a well differentiated, adipocytic tumor located in the inferior limb and lacking MDM2 amplification, whose diagnosis was reclassified for ALT/WDLPS after identification of an alternative MDM4 amplification by comparative genomic hybridization profiling, whole exome sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Screening of a cohort of 37 large, deep-seated, well-differentiated adipocytic tumors previously classified as lipomas using RT-qPCR and FISH failed to detect other cases of MDM4-amplified ALT/WDLPS. This report shows that MDM4 amplification is an exceptional molecular event alternative to MDM2 amplification in ALT/WDLPS. This alteration should be considered and looked for in suspicious adipocytic tumors to optimize their surgical management.

Copper at the crossroads: Assessment of the interactions between low-carbon energy transition and supply limitations.

This article aims to assess the impact of copper availability on the energy transition and to determine whether copper could become critical due to the high copper content of low-carbon technologies compared to conventional technologies. In assessing copper availability through to 2050, we rely on our linear programming world energy-transport model, TIAM-IFPEN. We examine two climate scenarios (2 °C and 4 °C) with two mobility shape, implemented with a recycling chain. The penetration of low-carbon technologies in the transport and energy sectors (electric vehicles and low-carbon power generation technologies) is likely to significantly increase copper demand by 2050. To investigate how tension over copper resources can be reduced in the energy transition context, we consider two public policy drivers: sustainable mobility and recycling practices. Results show that in the most stringent scenario, the cumulative primary copper demand between 2010 and 2050 is found to be 89.4% of the copper resources known in 2010. They also pinpoint the importance of China and Chile in the future evolution of the copper market.

Outcomes and prognostic factors for relapsed or refractory lymphoma patients in phase I clinical trials.

Background Although safety and prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) have been extensively studied in Phase I clinical trials on patients with solid tumours, data on lymphoma trials are scarce. Here, we investigated safety, outcomes and prognostic factors in relapsed or refractory lymphoma patients included in a series of Phase I trials. Method and patients All consecutive adult patients with recurrent/refractory lymphoma enrolled in 26 Phase I trials at a single cancer centre in France between January 2008 and June 2016 were retrospectively assessed. Results 133 patients (males: 65%) were included in the analysis. The median (range) age was 65 (23-86). Aggressive non-Hodgkin, indolent non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin types accounted for 64%, 25% and 11% of the patients, respectively. The patients had received a median (range) of 3 (1-13) lines of treatment prior to trial entry. The median [95% confidence interval] progression-free survival and OS times were 3.0 [1.8-3.6] and 17.8 [12.7-30.4] months, respectively. High-grade toxicity (grade 3 or higher, according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events classification) was experienced by 56 of the 133 patients (42%) and was related to the investigational drug in 44 of these cases (79%). No toxicity-related deaths occurred. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was encountered in 11 (9%) of the 116 evaluable patients. High-grade toxicity occurred during the DLT period for 34 of the 56 patients (61%) and after the DLT period in the remaining 22 (39%). The main prognostic factors for poor OS were the histological type (i.e. tumour aggressiveness), an elevated serum LDH level, and a low serum albumin level. Early withdrawal from a trial was correlated with the performance status score, the histological type and the serum LDH level. The overall objective response and disease control rates were 24% and 57%, respectively. Conclusion Performance status, LDH, albumin and histological type (tumour aggressiveness) appear to be the most relevant prognostic factors for enrolling Phase I participants with relapsed or refractory lymphoma. 39% of the patients experienced a first high-grade toxic event after the dose-limiting toxicity period, suggesting that the conventional concept of dose-limiting toxicity (designed for chemotherapy) should be redefined in the era of modern cancer therapies.

[Management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors]. / Prise en charge des tumeurs stromales gastro-intestinales.

MANAGEMENT OF GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMORS. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most frequent sarcoma subtype. More than 80% of GIST are characterized by activating mutations in KIT or PDGFRA genes, but rare molecular subtypes exist. Localized GIST can be cured by surgery. Adjuvant treatment with imatinib is the gold standard in high-risk GIST presenting mutations sensitive to this tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting KIT and PDGFRA has revolutionized the prognosis of metastatic GIST, by increasing the median overall survival: from less than 18 months to more than 70 months within 20 years. Similary to other histological subtypes, the diagnostic and therapeutic management of GIST must be referred to sarcoma reference centers.

PRISE EN CHARGE DES TUMEURS STROMALES GASTRO-INTESTINALES. Les tumeurs stromales gastro-intestinales (GIST) représentent le sous-type de sarcomes le plus fréquent. Plus de 80 % des GIST sont caractérisées par des mutations activatrices des gènes KIT ou PDGFRA, mais des soustypes moléculaires plus rares existent. Au stade localisé, les GIST sont des maladies curables par exérèse chirurgicale. Le traitement adjuvant par imatinib est un standard thérapeutique dans les GIST associées à un haut risque de récidive et présentant des mutations sensibles au traitement. Au stade métastatique, le développement des inhibiteurs de tyrosine kinase ciblant KIT et PDGFRA a bouleversé la prise en charge et le pronostic des patients, en augmentant la survie globale : de moins de dix-huit mois il y a une vingtaine d'années à plus de soixante-dix mois aujourd'hui. Comme pour les autres sous-types histologiques, la prise en charge diagnostique et thérapeutique des GIST doit être réalisée dans des centres experts pour la prise en charge des sarcomes.

No Geographical Inequalities in Survival for Sarcoma Patients in France: A Reference Networks' Outcome?

The national reference network NETSARC+ provides remote access to specialized diagnosis and the Multidisciplinary Tumour Board (MTB) to improve the management and survival of sarcoma patients in France. The IGéAS research program aims to assess the potential of this innovative organization to address geographical inequalities in cancer management. Using the IGéAS cohort built from the nationwide NETSARC+ database, the individual, clinical, and geographical determinants of the 3-year overall survival of sarcoma patients in France were analyzed. The survival analysis was focused on patients diagnosed in 2013 (n = 2281) to ensure sufficient hindsight to collect patient follow-up. Our study included patients with bone (16.8%), soft-tissue (69%), and visceral (14.2%) sarcomas, with a median age of 61.8 years. The overall survival was not associated with geographical variables after adjustment for individual and clinical factors. The lower survival in precarious population districts [HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.48] in comparison to wealthy metropolitan areas (HR = 1) found in univariable analysis was due to the worst clinical presentation at diagnosis of patients. The place of residence had no impact on sarcoma patients' survival, in the context of the national organization driven by the reference network. Following previous findings, this suggests the ability of this organization to go through geographical barriers usually impeding the optimal management of cancer patients.

Survival of Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated beyond the Second Line in the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Era.

BACKGROUND: The identification of activating mutations in specific genes led to the development of targeted therapies for NSCLC. TKI directed against EGFR-mutations were the first to prove their major efficacy. Medical associations recommend their use as first and second-line metastatic treatments in EGFR-mutated patients. Our objective was to analyze the survival of EGFR-mutated patients treated beyond the second line of treatment. METHODS: We performed a longitudinal, retrospective and analytical study at APHP (Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris) Saint Louis, Paris, France, from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2020 (11 years), on EGFR-mutated patients with metastatic NSCLC which received TKI or chemotherapy (CT) in third-line. RESULTS: Out of about 107 EGFR-mutated patients, 31 patients who benefited from TKI or CT in the third line of treatment were retained for this study. The mean age was 60.03 ± 11.93 years and the sex ratio male/female was 0.24. Mutations of exon 19, 21 and 20 were found in 21 (67.7%), 7 (22.6%) and 7 (22.6%) patients, respectively. Third-line treatment was CT for 16 patients (51.6%) and TKI for the 15 remaining patients (48.4%). Osimertinib was the most used TKI in third-line (n = 10/15; 66.67%). The median duration of third-line treatment was 5.37 months (range 0.53-37.6) and the median follow-up duration was 40.83 months (range 11.33-88.57). There was a significant difference in PFS between patients treated with TKI and CT in third-line (p = 0.028). For patients treated with CT in second-line, there was a significant difference of PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.014) in favor of the use of TKI in third-line. CONCLUSIONS: For patients receiving CT in second-line, TKI appears to be a better alternative in third-line compared to CT. Osimertinib may be used in third line treatment if not used before.

[Atezolizumab (Tecentriq®): Activity, indication and modality of use in advanced or metastatic urinary bladder carcinoma]. / Atézolizumab (Tecentriq®) : activité, indication et modalités d'utilisation dans les carcinomes urothéliaux localement avancés ou métastatiques.

Treatments for patients with metastatic or advanced urothelial carcinomas on progression after first line chemotherapy or unfit for cisplatin are currently limited. Atezolizumab (Tecentriq®) is a monoclonal antibody targeting PD-L1. The first of IMVIGOR 210 phase II trial (NCT02951767) investigated atezolizumab as front line treatment among 119 patients with metastatic urothelial cancer unfit for cisplatin. Response rate was 23% and median overall survival 15.9 months. The second cohort (NCT02108652) included 310 patients whose tumors were progressing after first line platinum-based chemotherapy. Response rate was 15% and median overall survival 7.9 months. Among patients with high PD-L1 expression on infiltrating immune cells (ICs), response rate was 26% and median overall survival 11 months. Atezolizumab was well-tolerated in both cohorts with 66% of treatment-related toxicities including 12% (cohort 1) and 7% (cohort 2) of grade 3-4 adverse events. These results led to an approval by the FDA in United States and the EMA in Europe. In France, atezolizumab was available through an early access agreement by the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products (ANSM) for patients with metastatic or advanced urothelial carcinomas on progression after first line chemotherapy or unfit for cisplatin. So far, its avaibility in France within the EMA approval is pending its pricing.

[Immunotherapy for the treatment of patients with genitourinary cancers: Review and perspectives]. / Les avancées de l'immunothérapie dans la prise en charge des patients atteints de tumeurs génito-urinaires.

Management of genitourinary (GU) cancers is improving rapidly with the development of immunotherapy agents, especially anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapies. Large studies have shown better outcomes for the treatment of these patients, leading to new drug approvals and recent changes in standards of care in renal, prostate and bladder cancer. We performed a review of recent studies assessing efficacy of immuno-oncology therapies in GU cancers. New results are summarized and next ways of development of clinical research are discussed as the use of such therapies will soon be assessed in first-line or adjuvant settings.

Potential drug-drug interactions with abiraterone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: a prevalence study in France.

PURPOSE: Abiraterone acetate combined with prednisone improves survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. This oral anticancer agent may result in drug-drug interactions (DDI). We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of DDI with abiraterone and the possible determinants for the occurrence of these DDI. METHODS: We performed a single centre retrospective review from electronic medical records of mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone from 2011 to 2015. Potential DDI with abiraterone were identified using Micromedex and were categorized by a 4-point scale severity. RESULTS: Seventy-two out of ninety-five mCRPC pts (median age: 77 years [68-82]) had comorbidities. The median number of drugs used per patient was 7 [5-9]. 66 potential DDI with abiraterone were detected in 49 patients (52%): 39 and 61% were classified as major and moderate DDI, respectively. In the univariate analysis, pain (p < 0.0001), hypo-albuminemia (p = 0.032), and higher ECOG performance status (PS) (p = 0.013) were significantly associated with a higher risk of DDI with abiraterone. Pain (p < 0.0001) and PS (p = 0.018) remained significant in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Polypharmacy is an issue among mCRPC patients. In our study, half of the patients have potential DDI with abiraterone. Patients with pain and poor PS are at higher risk of DDI with abiraterone. A medication review by a pharmacist is of crucial importance to prevent DDI with abiraterone.

Mobile applications in oncology: is it possible for patients and healthcare professionals to easily identify relevant tools?

AIM: Mobile applications represent promising tools in management of chronic diseases, both for patients and healthcare professionals, and especially in oncology. Among the large number of mobile health (mhealth) applications available in mobile stores, it could be difficult for users to identify the most relevant ones. This study evaluated the business model and the scientific validation for mobile applications related to oncology. METHODS: A systematic review was performed over the two major marketplaces. Purpose, scientific validation, and source of funding were evaluated according to the description of applications in stores. Results were stratified according to targeted audience (general population/patients/healthcare professionals). RESULTS: Five hundred and thirty-nine applications related to oncology were identified: 46.8% dedicated to healthcare professionals, 31.5% to general population, and 21.7% to patients. A lack of information about healthcare professionals' involvement in the development process was noted since only 36.5% of applications mentioned an obvious scientific validation. Most apps were free (72.2%) and without explicit support by industry (94.2%). CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to enforce independent review of mhealth applications in oncology. The economic model could be questioned and the source of funding should be clarified. Meanwhile, patients and healthcare professionals should remain cautious about applications' contents. Key messages A systematic review was performed to describe the mobile applications related to oncology and it revealed a lack of information on scientific validation and funding. Independent scientific review and the reporting of conflicts of interest should be encouraged. Users, and all health professionals, should be aware that health applications, whatever the quality of their content, do not actually embrace such an approach.

[ESMO ECCO 2015: The highlights of immunotherapy and targeted therapies]. / ESMO ECCO 2015 : les temps forts de l'immunothérapie et des thérapies ciblées.

The ESMO/ECC congress (European Society for Medical Oncology/European Cancer Congress) took place in Vienna, Austria, September 25-29. The main topic of the conference was immunotherapies especially in advanced kidney cancer with nivolumab in phase III and in metastatic lung cancer with atezolizumab in phase II. Targeted therapies were also highlighted with cabozantinib proposed in advanced renal cancer or everolimus in differenciated neuroendocrine tumors grade 1 or 2. Furthermore the current challenges remain unchanged: improving patients' care through better selection and finding biomarkers using simple samples (blood or urine). Also early phases and personalized medicine found their place in the different presentations and were highlighted largely bringing new approaches in the treatment of metastatic patients.

[eHealth and mHealth: current developments in 2014 and perspectives in oncology]. / E-santé et m-santé : état des lieux en 2014 et apports potentiels en oncologie.

New information technologies and communication in health or "eHealth" is a way of improvement for management of chronic diseases. EHealth can improve patient care and care coordination especially in cancer patients who require a multidisciplinary approach. Treatments in oncology are complex and can result in new toxicities. Information of patients and of caregivers is a crucial issue. The patients require to be monitored and the caregivers need up-to-date information. The mobile component of eHealth: the mobile health or "mHealth" could provide to this need. This paper proposes to expose the principles of eHealth and its mobile component mHealth then to discuss their place in the management of cancer, for patients and caregivers.