The digital child: A cross-sectional survey study on the access to electronic devices in paediatrics.

AIM: To explore the use of electronic devices in children and possible risk factors for smartphone ownership and cyberbullying. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted involving 62 Italian general paediatricians who administered a close-ended questionnaire about the use of electronic devices to 1732 parents/caregivers. RESULTS: Data of 2563 children aged 0-14 years were collected. Investigating the electronic device use by parents/caregivers of children aged 0-1 years, 72.5% of mothers were revealed to have the habit to use a smartphone during breastfeeding and bottle-feeding. The ownership of a smartphone was found in 29.5% of children aged 2-14 years, 68.1% considering only children aged 10-14. A higher parental degree level was identified as a protective factor for smartphone ownership by children (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.36-0.98; p = 0.04 for father; OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.33-0.78; p = 0.002 for mother). A higher risk of cyberbullying was found when caregivers did not use any restrictions on smartphone use (OR 11.92; 95% CI 3.41-41.68; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The absence of rules for smartphone use represents a risk factor for cyberbullying. In this context, the general paediatrician might play an important role in helping parents/caregivers and their children adopt safer use of electronic devices.

Do the opinions of pediatricians influence their recommendations on complementary feeding? Preliminary results.

Complementary feeding practices are debated among pediatricians, primarily regarding whether nutritional needs or developmental readiness should be prioritized in recommendations for starting complementary feeding. The aim of the present study was to analyze the timing of the start of complementary feeding and the related motivations with an 8-item online survey administered to active members of the Italian Society of Primary Care Pediatricians. The participation rate was 43.3% (350 of 808), and 213 (60.9%) and 137 (39.1%) of the participants chose items related to developmental readiness and nutritional needs, respectively, as the criteria for starting complementary feeding. Approximately 74% of the participants reported that they recommended starting complementary feeding between 5 and 6 months of age, 17% recommended starting before 5 months, and 8% recommended starting after 6 months. Predefined schemes were proposed by 38% of the participants, and a responsive feeding modality was proposed by 13%, while the majority (49%) recommended both modalities depending on family characteristics. Regarding recommendations based on nutritional needs, 89% of pediatricians reported providing indications concerning the quantity of meat consumed during the first year of life, and 91% reported recommending introducing added salt only after 12 months of age. Compared with pediatricians who emphasized developmental readiness, those who prioritized nutritional needs suggested earlier complementary feeding start and a higher use of predefined schemes and were more likely to make recommendations regarding meat quantity and added salt (p < 0.0001).Conclusions: Pediatricians who used a developmental readiness criterion for starting complementary feeding may less frequently provide nutritional advice to parents, even if a trend to harmonize the different positions regarding complementary feeding start time is emerging.What is Known:• Pediatricians make suggestions for introducing complementary feeding based on scientific evidence, local traditions, and personal beliefs.• Either infants' nutritional needs or their developmental readiness currently is used as determinant for the timing of complementary feeding.What is New:• More than 60% of Italian pediatricians consider developmental readiness a priority for introducing complementary feeding.• Pediatricians following the criterion of developmental readiness may less frequently give detailed nutritional advice.

Efficacy of gummy lozenges containing Erysimum as ancillary treatment in children with sore throat.

BACKGROUND: Sore throat frequently occurs in children aged between four and fifteen years and is often associated to inflammation of the upper respiratory tract mucosa. A reliable approach to limit the damage caused by inflammation and, therefore, to alleviate associated symptoms might be the protection of the mucosa. Aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of a medical device, formulated as a gummy lozenge and containing a combination of natural functional components (Erysimum, aloe vera and Xilogel®) able to exert a barrier effect on the mucosa, as ancillary treatment in children with sore throat. METHODS: This was an observational, prospective, parallel-group, multiple-dose trial of a medical device given in association to standard pharmacological prescribed therapy with an open label comparison vs. standard pharmacological prescribed therapy alone. The outcome measures of the study were assessed at baseline and after three days of treatment. RESULTS: One hundred and twelve school children with sore throat symptoms were recruited for this study and 69 were assigned to the group taking the study product. At the end of the treatment a statistically higher reduction in Sore Throat Pain Intensity Score and Pharyngitis Symptom Score was observed in the group taking the medical device. Moreover, the treatment with the medical device is associated to a statistically significant higher improvement of Child's General Conditions. The pediatrician assessed the efficacy and tolerability of the product under study as good/very good in 91% and 94%, respectively, of treated children. The consumer satisfaction questionnaire revealed that most of the children taking the lozenge rated it very positively in regard to its flavor and easiness of administration. CONCLUSIONS: The medical device used in this study may represent a valid choice as an adjuvant treatment in children with sore throat associated to upper respiratory tract infection.

Exploring the variability in antibiotic prescribing profiles among paediatricians from two different areas of Italy.

We carried out a multicentre community-based study in order to describe the antibiotic therapeutic approach of paediatricians from two different areas of Italy in the treatment of respiratory tract infection (RTIs), and to assess which factors are involved in a possible variability of prescribing habits. Forty paediatricians participated in the study between October 1998 and April 1999. They had to complete a questionnaire for each therapeutic intervention resulting in an antibiotic prescription. A logistic regression model was used to identify possible predictors in choosing parenteral antibiotics for the treatment of RTIs. In 2 975 questionnaires of antibiotic treatment, RTIs represented 90.2% of the total antibiotics used. Upper respiratory tract infections were the most commonly treated diagnostic group (59.6%), followed by lower respiratory tract infections (20.4%), and middle ear infections (19.8%). Statistically significant differences between northern and southern Italy were reported in the antibiotic prescription profile and the duration of the therapy. Another marked difference was reported in the frequency of laboratory analysis requests. The logistic regression model indicated that the use of parenteral antibiotics appears significantly related to the type of infections [lower RTIs: (OR: 3.99; 95% CI: 2.49-6.37)], the geographic location [northern Italy: (OR: 0.20; 95% CI: 0.20-0.39)], and the presence of concurrent diseases (OR: 3.21; 95% CI: 1.46-7.02). The lack of adherence to clinical guidelines and the marked variability of antibiotic prescription rates between different areas of the country appear to be related to factors other than bacterial resistance, and highlight the importance of carrying out educational programmes targeted at the national level for improving the antibiotic prescription habits for the treatment of RTIs.