Practice guidelines for the supervising professional: intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

The American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring (ASNM) was founded in 1989 as the American Society of Evoked Potential Monitoring. From the beginning, the Society has been made up of physicians, doctoral degree holders, Technologists, and all those interested in furthering the profession. The Society changed its name to the ASNM and held its first Annual Meeting in 1990. It remains the largest worldwide organization dedicated solely to the scientifically-based advancement of intraoperative neurophysiology. The primary goal of the ASNM is to assure the quality of patient care during procedures monitoring the nervous system. This goal is accomplished primarily through programs in education, advocacy of basic and clinical research, and publication of guidelines, among other endeavors. The ASNM is committed to the development of medically sound and clinically relevant guidelines for the performance of intraoperative neurophysiology. Guidelines are formulated based on exhaustive literature review, recruitment of expert opinion, and broad consensus among ASNM membership. Input is likewise sought from sister societies and related constituencies. Adherence to a literature-based, formalized process characterizes the construction of all ASNM guidelines. The guidelines covering the Professional Practice of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring were initially published January 24th, 2013, and subsequently that document has undergone review and revision to accommodate broad inter- and intra-societal feedback. This current version of the ASNM Professional Practice Guideline was fully approved for publication according to ASNM bylaws on February 22nd, 2018, and thus overwrites and supersedes the initial guideline.

Multimodal nerve monitoring during periacetabular osteotomy identifies surgical steps associated with risk of injury.

PURPOSE: Sciatic nerve palsy after periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a serious complication. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a multimodal sciatic monitoring technique allows for identification of surgical steps that place the sciatic nerve at risk. METHODS: Transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), and spontaneous electromyography (EMG) were monitored in a consecutive series of 34 patients (40 hips) who underwent PAO for the treatment of symptomatic hip dysplasia between January 2012 and November 2014. There were 29 females (85%) and five males (15%) with an average age of 19 years (range, 12-36 years) at the time of surgery. RESULTS: We detected eight temporary sciatic nerve monitoring alerts in six patients (incidence of 15%). The events included decrease in amplitude of the TcMEPs related to the position of the hip during incomplete ischium osteotomy and placement of a retractor in the sciatic notch during the posterior column osteotomy (N = 3), generalized bilateral decrease in TcMEPs during fragment manipulation and fixation in association with acute blood loss (N = 2), and a change in SSEPs during a superior pubic osteotomy and supra-acetabular osteotomy (N = 1). At the end of the procedure, TcMEPs and SSEPs were at baseline and there was no abnormal pattern on EMG in all patients. Post-operatively, at two, six, 12 weeks, and six and 12 months, no motor weakness or sensory deficits were noted. CONCLUSION: Multimodal neuromonitoring allowed for identification of intra-operative steps and maneuvers that potentially place the sciatic nerve at higher risk of injury.

A paradigm for awake intraoperative memory mapping during forniceal stimulation.

A case report is presented detailing the successful use of awake intraoperative memory testing while using white matter stimulation in order to isolate the fornix tracks involved in memory function. The identification of the white matter tracks of the fornix that were involved in memory function was used to tailor the neurosurgical resection of a third ventricle tumor that was impinging on the fornix in order to successfully preserve memory functioning in the patient.

Triggered EMG (T-EMG) Values of Pedicle Screws with a Powered Screwdriver vs A Standard Probe in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Do Not Agree: A Prospective Validation Study.

Triggered electromyography (t-EMG) is a common technique used during spinal instrumentation in surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. This study tests the validity of t-EMG values obtained with a standard ball-tipped probe after completion of screw placement versus t-EMG values obtained during screw insertion with a powered screwdriver. t-EMG values were collected for screws spanning T7-L5 using both a standard probe and a powered screwdriver. A power analysis determined that a sample size of 300 screws would provide enough precision to estimate limits of agreement within ±2 mA. A monopolar constant current stimulation technique (0.2 ms duration and 3.11 Hz stimulation rate) was used at each level. EMG was acquired with placement of bipolar pairs of subdermal needle electrodes. A Bland-Altman plot was used to assess agreement between threshold readings from the two techniques. Twenty-nine patients were enrolled in this study with 305 screws. t-EMG values measured using a powered screwdriver were on average 1 mA lower than values from a standard probe. When readings less than or equal to 20 mA were considered, the limits of agreement were approximately 4 and 7 mA overall. In total, 28/305 (9%) screws were removed and reinserted, 9/305 (3%) screws were redirected, and 3/305 (1%) screws were aborted based on t-EMG readings. Despite a small overall difference in t-EMG value between the standard probe and screwdriver, there was still large variability in agreement between the two techniques. t-EMG values obtained with a powered screwdriver during screw insertion are not interchangeable with values measured by a probe.