Features of breast cancer in developing countries, examples from North-Africa.

Epidemiological features of breast cancer appear to be different in developing countries compared to Western countries, with notably large proportions of young patients, male patients and aggressive forms of the disease. Using North-Africa (Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya and Egypt) as an example, we document the magnitude and explore possible explanations for such patterns. Articles and reports published since the seventies were reviewed. Results show that breast cancer incidence in females is 2-4 times lower in North-Africa than in Western countries while incidence in males is similar. Consequently, the relative proportion of male breast cancer is high (≈2% of all breast cancers). Similarly, the incidence of aggressive forms of the disease, like inflammatory or triple negative breast cancer (in females), is not higher in North Africa than in Western countries, but their relative proportion in case series (up to 10% for inflammatory and 15-25% for triple negative) is significantly higher because of low incidence of other forms of the disease. In North Africa, the incidence among women aged 15-49 is lower than in Western countries, but the very low incidence among women aged more than 50, combined to the young age pyramid of North-Africa, makes the relative proportions of young patients substantially higher (50-60% versus 20% in France). Such epidemiological features result mainly from peculiar risk factor profiles, which are typical for many developing countries and include notably rapid changes in reproductive behaviours. These features have important implications for breast cancer control and treatment.

Prevalence of papillomaviruses, polyomaviruses, and herpesviruses in triple-negative and inflammatory breast tumors from algeria compared with other types of breast cancer tumors.

BACKGROUND: The possible role of viruses in breast cancer etiology remains an unresolved question. We hypothesized that if some viruses are involved, it may be in a subgroup of breast cancers only. Epidemiological arguments drove our interest in breast cancer subgroups that are more frequent in Africa, namely inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) and triple-negative breast cancer. We tested whether viral prevalence was significantly higher in these subgroups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-five paraffin-embedded malignant breast tumors were randomly selected at the pathology laboratory of the University Hospital of Annaba (Algeria) to include one third of IBC and two thirds of non-IBC. They were tested for the presence of DNA from 61 viral agents (46 human papillomaviruses, 10 polyomaviruses, and 5 herpesviruses) using type-specific multiplex genotyping assays, which combine multiplex PCR and bead-based Luminex technology. RESULTS: Viral DNA was found in 22 (17.9%) of 123 tumors. The most prevalent viruses were EBV1 and HPV16. IBC tumors carried significantly more viruses (any type) than non-IBC tumors (30% vs. 13%, p<0.04). Similarly, triple-negative tumors displayed higher virus-positivity than non-triple-negative tumors (44% vs. 14%, p<0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest an association between the presence of viral DNA and aggressive breast cancer phenotypes (IBC, triple-negative). While preliminary, they underline the importance of focusing on subgroups when studying viral etiology in breast cancer. Further studies on viruses in breast cancer should be conducted in much larger samples to confirm these initial findings.

French claims data as a source of information to describe cancer incidence: predictive values of two identification methods of incident prostate cancers.

Claims data from the "Programme de Médicalisation du Système d'Information" (PMSI) have been commonly used for several years to complement cancer registries and describe cancer incidence in France. It is less clear whether or not it is possible to use these data as an independent source of information to assess cancer incidence, in the absence of a regional cancer registry. Following a similar study on breast cancer, we present a study which aimed to evaluate two methods of identifying incident prostate cancer using claims data. These methods were developed using claims data from the Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL) and their validity was tested against medical records. The first method (M1) identified incident patients as those who had at least one stay with a principal diagnosis of prostate cancer. The second method (M2) had a prostate cancer treatment code in addition to the criteria for the first method. Both methods of identification had similar results, indicating a low rate of false negatives (negative predictive values: M1 = 100 [CI95: 93.8-100], M2 = 98.6 [CI95: 90.1-99.6]) and a high rate of false positives (positive predictive values: M1 = 33.3 [CI95: 23.2-42.1], M2 = 33.7 [CI95: 24.2-43.2]). The sample size did not allow us to produce consistent estimates of sensitivity and specificity. Our results showed that an estimation of the number of incident cases of prostate cancer using both methods of identification would be biased because of the high rate of false positives. Statistical methods that correct identification errors should be used.