Evaluation of assays for nucleic acid testing for the prevention of chikungunya and dengue virus transmission by blood transfusion.

BACKGROUND: The large dengue (DENV) and chikungunya (CHIKV) outbreaks observed during the last decade across the world, as well as local transmissions in non-endemic areas are a growing concern for blood safety. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the sensitivity of nucleic acid tests (NAT) detecting DENV and CHIKV RNA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using DENV 1 to 4 International Standards, the limits of detection (LODs) calculated by probit analysis of two NAT assays; the cobas CHIKV/DENV assay (Roche Diagnostics) and the Procleix Dengue Virus Assay (Grifols) were compared. In addition, CHIKV-RNA LOD of the cobas CHIKV/DENV assay was evaluated. RESULTS: For dengue, the 95% LOD of the cobas assay ranged between 4.10 [CI95%: 2.70-8.19] IU/mL (DENV-2) and 7.07 [CI95%: 4.34-14.89] IU/mL (DENV-4), and between 2.19 [CI95%: 1.53-3.83] IU/mL (DENV-3) and 5.84 [CI95%: 3.84-10.77] IU/mL (DENV-1) for Procleix assay. The Procleix assay had a significant lower LOD for DENV-3 (2.19 vs. 5.89 IU/mL) when compared to the cobas assay (p = 0.005). The 95% LOD for CHIKV-RNA detection of the cobas assay was 4.76 [CI95%: 3.08-8.94] IU/mL. DISCUSSION: The two NAT assays developed for blood donor screening evaluated in this study demonstrated high and similar analytical performance. Subject to an appropriate risk-benefit assessment, they can be used to support blood safety during outbreaks in endemic areas or in non-endemic areas as an alternative to deferring blood donors during local transmission likely to affect the blood supply. The development of multiplex assays is expected to optimize laboratory organization.

Exploring cell-free assays for COVID-19 serosurvey.

Serosurveys to monitor immunity toward COVID-19 in the population are primarily performed using an ELISA to screen samples for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, followed by confirmation by a virus neutralization test, which is considered the Gold Standard. However, virus neutralization test may not be feasible for some laboratories because of the requirement for specific facilities and trained personnel. In an attempt to address this limitation, we evaluated three cell-free methods as potential alternatives for assessing SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in human population from plasma. We report the establishment of two inhibition ELISAs designed to detect anti-Spike RBD IgG antibodies and a microsphere quantitative suspension array technology assay, based on the Luminex xMAP platform, to measure the presence of antibodies against various SARS-CoV-2 antigens, including anti-RBD. These methods were also compared to a commercial chemiluminescent immunoassay designed for anti-RBD antibodies detection and to the combined ELISA + virus neutralization test strategy. These cell-free assays performed equally to estimate the percentage of positive and negative samples and could be used to determine the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in human population, at least in cohort with high-expected prevalence, without the use of seroneutralization assay.