RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Periampullary carcinomas generally confer a poor outcome. Choosing the most effective treatment regimen for each sub-entity proves challenging and is usually based on experience from pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The long-term follow-up is presented of 472 patients with periampullary tumors [PDAC, distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCC) and ampullary carcinomas (AC)] who underwent radical resection considering clinical characteristics, paraclinical findings and histopathological features in order to define factors of prognostic relevance. RESULTS: Patients with PDACs presented with larger tumor sizes, more frequent R1 resection, higher rate of nodal and perineural invasion, higher tumor stage according to the classification of tumors of the Union Internationale contre le Cancer when compared to those with dCCs and ACs. In a multivariate analysis, age >65 years, postoperative complications and higher grading of the tumor proved to be independent prognostic factors for survival. CONCLUSION: Patients suffering from PDAC have the worst prognosis and greatest benefit from radical resection of all patients with periampullary tumors. More detailed studies are warranted to better distinguish between the different entities.