Adolescent substance use screening in primary care: Validity of computer self-administered versus clinician-administered screening.

BACKGROUND: Computer self-administration may help busy pediatricians' offices increase adolescent substance use screening rates efficiently and effectively, if proven to yield valid responses. The CRAFFT screening protocol for adolescents has demonstrated validity as an interview, but a computer self-entry approach needs validity testing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the criterion validity and time efficiency of a computerized adolescent substance use screening protocol implemented by self-administration or clinician-administration. METHODS: Twelve- to 17-year-old patients coming for routine care at 3 primary care clinics completed the computerized screen by both self-administration and clinician-administration during their visit. To account for order effects, we randomly assigned participants to self-administer the screen either before or after seeing their clinician. Both were conducted using a tablet computer and included identical items (any past-12-month use of tobacco, alcohol, drugs; past-3-month frequency of each; and 6 CRAFFT items). The criterion measure for substance use was the Timeline Follow-Back, and for alcohol/drug use disorder, the Adolescent Diagnostic Interview, both conducted by confidential research assistant interview after the visit. Tobacco dependence risk was assessed with the self-administered Hooked on Nicotine Checklist (HONC). Analyses accounted for the multisite cluster sampling design. RESULTS: Among 136 participants, mean age was 15.0 ± 1.5 years, 54% were girls, 53% were black or Hispanic, and 67% had ≥3 prior visits with their clinician. Twenty-seven percent reported any substance use (including tobacco) in the past 12 months, 7% met criteria for an alcohol or cannabis use disorder, and 4% were HONC positive. Sensitivity/specificity of the screener were high for detecting past-12-month use or disorder and did not differ between computer and clinician. Mean completion time was 49 seconds (95% confidence interval [CI]: 44-54) for computer and 74 seconds (95% CI: 68-87) for clinician (paired comparison, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Substance use screening by computer self-entry is a valid and time-efficient alternative to clinician-administered screening.

Trauma-Informed Care for Hospitalized Adolescents.

Purpose of Review: Exposure to trauma accelerates during the adolescence, and due to increased behavioral and psychiatric vulnerability during this developmental period, traumatic events during this time are more likely to cause a lasting impact. In this article, we use three case studies of hospitalized adolescents to illustrate the application of trauma-informed principles of care with this unique population. Recent Findings: Adolescents today are caught in the crosshairs of two syndemics-racism and other structural inequities and the COVID-19 pandemic. Increased hospitalizations and mental health diagnoses during the past two years signal toxic levels of stress affecting this group. Trauma-informed care promotes health, healing, and equity. Summary: This concept of the "trauma-informed approach" is still novel; through examples and practice, providers can learn to universally apply the trauma-informed care framework to every patient encounter to address the harmful effects of trauma and promote recovery and resilience.

Body modification and substance use in adolescents: is there a link?

PURPOSE: To describe the characteristics of body modification among adolescents and to determine whether adolescents who engage in body modification are more likely to screen positive for alcohol and other drug problems than those who do not. METHODS: Adolescents aged 14 to 18 years presenting to an urban adolescent clinic for routine health care completed a questionnaire about body modification and a substance use assessment battery that included the 17-item Problem Oriented Screening Instrument for Teenagers Alcohol/Drug Use and Abuse Scale (POSIT-ADS). Body modification was defined as piercings (other than one pair of bilateral earlobe piercings in females), tattoos, scarification, and branding. Problem substance use was defined as a POSIT-ADS score > or =1. Data were analyzed using logistic regression to determine whether the presence of body modification was an independent predictor of problem substance use. RESULTS: The 210 participants had a mean (+/- SD) age of 16.0 (+/- 1.4) years and 63% were female. One hundred adolescents (48%) reported at least one body modification; girls were more likely than boys to have body modification (59% vs. 28%, p < or = .0005). Ninety (42%) reported piercings, 22 (10%) tattoos, 9 (4%) scarification, and 1 (< 1%) branding; 21 (10%) had more than one type of body modification. These were in a variety of locations, most commonly the ear and the nose (piercings) or the extremities (tattoos). One-third of the sample (33%) screened positive for problem substance use on the POSIT-ADS questionnaire. Controlling for age, adolescents with body modification had 3.1 times greater odds of problem substance use than those without body modification (95% CI 1.7, 5.8). CONCLUSIONS: Body modification was associated with self-reported problem alcohol and other drug use among middle adolescents presenting for primary care. More research is needed to determine the clinical and sociocultural significance of body modification and its relationship to substance use in this population.

Association of adolescent risk behaviors with mental health symptoms in high school students.

PURPOSE: To examine the hypothesis that self-reported symptoms of depression and stress may be associated with other risk behaviors. METHODS: A secondary data analysis of the 1992 Massachusetts Adolescent Health Survey involving a representative sample of 2,224 ninth and twelfth grade students was performed. The dichotomous dependent variable was positive if the adolescent reported feeling depressed or stressed for 10 or more days in the past month. Potential independent variables examined were age, gender, race/ethnicity, and 14 risk or protective behaviors: each scored on a seven point scale representing increasing frequency of a behavior in the past month. A four-level sexual risk variable was constructed as well. Associations were assessed using Chi-square, and phi/contingency coefficients, and logistic regression analyses to predict the odds of reporting depression/stress. RESULTS: The mean age of the sample was 16.2 +/- 1.6 years; 52% males; 78% were white, 9% black, 6% Latino, 2% Asian, and 4% other racial/ethnic heritage; 35% reported feeling depressed/stressed > or = 10 days in the past month. A logistic regression model found that feelings of depression/stress were associated with increasing age (OR = 1.09 with each additional year [95% CI, 1.02-1.18]), female gender (3.28 [2.62-4.12]); increasing levels of tobacco use (1.07 [1.01-1.12]), physical fights (1.19 [1.11-1.28]); and non-use of birth control compared with never having been sexually active (1.81 [1.31-2.49]). Independent variables of reporting depression/stress for males included increasing age (1.15 [1.03-1.28]), and physical fights (1.20 [1.10-1.30]), and non-use of birth control compared with never sexually active (1.91 [1.28-2.92]). Independent risk and protective factors for females included tobacco use (1.10 [1.02-1.19]), healthy diet (0.89 [0.83- 0.96]), and always (1.49 [1.03-2.28]) or sometimes used birth control (1.56 [1.03-1.28]) compared with never sexually active. CONCLUSIONS: Female gender had greater than threefold increased odds of reporting depression/stress. Other associations, with some gender differences, include older age, physical fights, non-use of birth control, lack of a healthy diet, and use of tobacco.