RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Schools are an important setting because students spend much of their time in school and engage in physical activity during the school day that could exacerbate asthma symptoms. Our objective is to understand the barriers and facilitators to implementing an experimental community health worker-delivered care coordination program for students with asthma within the context of the West Philadelphia Controls Asthma study. METHODS: Surveys (n = 256) and semi-structured interviews (n = 41) were completed with principals, teachers, nurses, and community health workers from 21 public and charter schools in West Philadelphia between January 2019 and September 2021. Survey participants completed the Evidence Based Practice Attitudes Scale, the Implementation Leadership Scale, and Organizational Climate Index. Semi-structured qualitative interview guides were developed, informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS: Participant responses indicate that they perceived benefits for schools and students related to the community health worker-based care coordination program. Several barriers and facilitators to implementing the program were noted, including challenges associated with incorporating the program into school nurse workflow, environmental triggers in the school environment, and challenges communicating with family members. An important facilitator that was identified was having supportive school administrators and staff who were engaged and saw the benefits of the program. CONCLUSIONS: This work can inform implementation planning for other locales interested in implementing community-based pediatric asthma control programs delivered by community health workers in schools.
Assuntos
Asma , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde , Serviços de Saúde Escolar , Humanos , Asma/terapia , Philadelphia , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde Escolar/organização & administração , Feminino , Masculino , Criança , Instituições Acadêmicas/organização & administração , Adolescente , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de SaúdeRESUMO
The pandemic, political upheavals, and social justice efforts in our society have resulted in attention to persistent health disparities and the urgent need to address them. Using a scoping review, we describe published updates to address disparities and targets for interventions to improve gaps in care within allergy and immunology. These disparities-related studies provide a broad view of our current understanding of how social determinants of health threaten patient outcomes and our ability to advance health equity efforts in our field. We outline next steps to improve access to care and advance health equity for patients with allergic/immunologic diseases through actions taken at the individual, community, and policy levels, which could be applied outside of our field. Key among these are efforts to increase the diversity among our trainees, providers, and scientific teams and enhancing efforts to participate in advocacy work and public health interventions. Addressing health disparities requires advancing our understanding of the interplay between social and structural barriers to care and enacting the needed interventions in various key areas to effect change.
Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade , Justiça Social , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade/terapia , Disparidades em Assistência à SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Low-income and marginalized adults disproportionately bear the burden of poor asthma outcomes. One consequence of the structural racism that preserves these inequities is decreased trust in government and health care institutions. OBJECTIVE: We examined whether such distrust extended to health care providers during the pandemic. METHODS: We enrolled adults living in low-income neighborhoods who had required a hospitalization, an emergency department visit, or a prednisone course for asthma in the prior year. Trust was a dichotomized measure derived from a 5-item questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale response. The items were translated to the binary variable "strong" versus "weak" trust. Communication was measured using a 13-item questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between communication and trust, controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS: We enrolled 102 patients, aged 18 to 78 years; 87% were female, 90% were Black, 60% had some post-high school education, and 57% were receiving Medicaid. Of the 102 patients, 58 were enrolled before the March 12, 2020, pandemic start date, and 70 (69%) named doctors as their most trusted source of health information. Strong trust was associated with a negative response to the statement "It is hard to reach a person in my doctor's office by phone." There was no evidence of an association between the overall communication scores and trust. Satisfaction with virtual messaging was weaker among those with less trust. CONCLUSIONS: These patients trust their physicians, value their advice, and need to have accessible means of communication.
Assuntos
Asma , COVID-19 , Humanos , Adulto , Feminino , Masculino , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Confiança , Comunicação , Asma/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Rationale: For children with asthma, access to quick-relief medications is critical to minimizing morbidity and mortality. An innovative and practical approach to ensure access at school is to maintain a supply of stock albuterol that can be used by any student who experiences respiratory distress. To make this possible, state laws allowing for stock albuterol are needed to improve medication access.Objectives: To provide policy recommendations and outline steps for passing and implementing stock albuterol laws.Methods: We assembled a diverse stakeholder group and reviewed guidelines, literature, statutes, regulations, and implementation documents related to school-based medication access. Stakeholders were divided into two groups-legislation and implementation-on the basis of expertise. Each group met virtually to review documents and draft recommendations. Recommendations were compiled and revised in iterative remote meetings with all stakeholders.Main Results: We offer several recommendations for crafting state legislation and facilitating program implementation. 1) Create a coalition of stakeholders to champion legislation and implement stock albuterol programs. The coalition should include school administrators, school nurses and health personnel, parents, or caregivers of children with asthma, pediatric primary care and subspecialty providers (e.g., pulmonologists/allergists), pharmacists, health department staff, and local/regional/national advocacy organizations. 2) Legislative components critical for effective implementation of stock albuterol programs include specifying that medication can be administered in good faith to any child in respiratory distress, establishing training requirements for school staff, providing immunity from civil liability for staff and prescribers, ensuring pharmacy laws allow prescriptions to be dispensed to schools, and suggesting inhalers with valved holding chambers/spacers for administration. 3) Select an experienced and committed legislator to sponsor legislation and guide revisions as needed during passage and implementation. This person should be from the majority party and serve on the legislature's health or education committee. 4) Develop plans to disseminate legislation and regulations/policies to affected groups, including school administrators, school nurses, pharmacists, emergency responders, and primary/subspecialty clinicians. Periodically evaluate implementation effectiveness and need for adjustments.Conclusions: Stock albuterol in schools is a safe, practical, and potentially life-saving option for children with asthma, whether asthma is diagnosed or undiagnosed, who lack access to their personal quick-relief medication. Legislation is imperative for aiding in the adoption and implementation of school stock albuterol policies, and key policy inclusions can lay the groundwork for success. Future work should focus on passing legislation in all states, implementing policy in schools, and evaluating the impact of such programs on academic and health outcomes.
Assuntos
Albuterol/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Broncodilatadores/normas , Guias como Assunto , Política de Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Serviços de Saúde Escolar/normas , Adolescente , Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The burden of asthma disproportionately affects minority and low-income communities, resulting in racial and socioeconomic disparities in asthma prevalence, asthma exacerbations, and asthma-related death. Social determinants of health are increasingly implicated as root causes of disparities, and healthy housing is perhaps the most critical social determinant in asthma health disparities. In many minority communities, poor housing conditions and value are a legacy of historical policies and practices imbued with structural racism, including redlining, displacement, and exclusionary zoning. As a result, poor-quality, substandard housing is a characteristic feature of many underrepresented minority communities. Consequently, structurally deficient housing stock cultivates home environments rife with indoor asthma triggers. In this review we consider the historical context of urban housing policies and practices and how these policies and practices have contributed to the substandard housing conditions for many minoritized children in the present day. We describe the impact of poor housing quality on asthma and interventions that have attempted to mitigate its influence on asthma symptoms and health care utilization. We discuss the need to promote asthma health equity by reinvesting in these neighborhoods and communities to provide healthy housing.
Assuntos
Asma/epidemiologia , Asma/etiologia , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Habitação/estatística & dados numéricos , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Habitação/legislação & jurisprudência , Habitação/normas , Humanos , Determinantes Sociais da SaúdeRESUMO
The 2020 Focused Updates to the Asthma Management Guidelines: A Report from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Coordinating Committee Expert Panel Working Group was coordinated and supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health. It is designed to improve patient care and support informed decision making about asthma management in the clinical setting. This update addresses six priority topic areas as determined by the state of the science at the time of a needs assessment, and input from multiple stakeholders:A rigorous process was undertaken to develop these evidence-based guidelines. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) Evidence-Based Practice Centers conducted systematic reviews on these topics, which were used by the Expert Panel Working Group as a basis for developing recommendations and guidance. The Expert Panel used GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation), an internationally accepted framework, in consultation with an experienced methodology team for determining the certainty of evidence and the direction and strength of recommendations based on the evidence. Practical implementation guidance for each recommendation incorporates findings from NHLBI-led patient, caregiver, and clinician focus groups. To assist clincians in implementing these recommendations into patient care, the new recommendations have been integrated into the existing Expert Panel Report-3 (EPR-3) asthma management step diagram format.
Assuntos
Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como AssuntoRESUMO
Objective: While reminder-based electronic monitoring systems have shown promise in enhancing inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) adherence in select populations, more engaging strategies may be needed in families of children with high-risk asthma. This study assesses the acceptability and feasibility of gain-framed ICS adherence incentives in families of urban, minority children with frequent asthma hospitalization.Methods: We enrolled children aged 5-11 years with multiple yearly asthma hospitalizations in a 2-month, mixed methods, ICS adherence incentive pilot study. All participants received inhaler sensors and a smartphone app to track ICS use. During month 1, families received daily adherence reminders and weekly feedback, and children earned up to $1/day for complete adherence. No reminders, feedback, or incentives were provided in month 2. We assessed feasibility and acceptability using caregiver surveys and semi-structured interviews and ICS adherence using electronic monitoring data.Results: Of the 29 families approached, 20 enrolled (69%). Participants were primarily Black (95%), publicly insured (75%), and averaged 2.9 asthma hospitalizations in the prior year. Fifteen of the 16 caregivers (94%) surveyed at month 2 liked the idea of receiving adherence incentives. Mean adherence was significantly higher in month 1 compared with month 2 (80% vs. 33%, mean difference = 47%; 95% CI [33, 61], p < 0.001). Caregivers reported that their competing priorities often limited adherence, while incentives helped motivate child adherence.Conclusions: ICS adherence incentives were acceptable and feasible in a high-risk cohort of children with asthma. Future studies should assess the efficacy of adherence incentives in enhancing ICS adherence in high-risk children.
Assuntos
Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Financiamento Pessoal/estatística & dados numéricos , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Adesão à Medicação/psicologia , Recompensa , Administração por Inalação , Asma/psicologia , Cuidadores/psicologia , Cuidadores/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Minoritários/psicologia , Grupos Minoritários/estatística & dados numéricos , Motivação , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistemas de Alerta , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Introduction: Asthma evidence-based interventions (EBI) are implemented in the home, school, community or primary care setting. Although families are engaged in one setting, they often have to navigate challenges in another setting.Objective: Our objective is to design and implement a comprehensive plan which integrates EBI's and connects the four sectors in underserved communities such as Philadelphia.Methods: September 2015-April 2016 we implemented a three-pronged strategy to understand needs and resources of the community including 1) focus groups and key informant interviews, 2) secondary data analysis and 3) pilot testing for implementation to determine gaps in care, and opportunities to overcome those gaps.Results: Analysis of the focus group and key informant responses showed themes: diagnosis fear, clinician time, home and school asthma trigger exposures, school personnel training and communication gaps across all four sectors. EBI's were evaluated and selected to address identified themes. Pilot testing of a community health worker (CHW) intervention to connect home, primary care and school resulted in an efficient transfer of asthma medications and medication administration forms to the school nurse office for students with uncontrolled asthma addressing a common delay leading to poor asthma management in school.Conclusion: Thus far there has been limited success in reducing asthma disparities for low-income minority children. This study offers hope that strategically positioning CHWs may work synergistically to close gaps in care and result in improved asthma control and reduced asthma disparities.
Assuntos
Asma/prevenção & controle , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/organização & administração , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/economia , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Serviços de Saúde Escolar/organização & administração , Adolescente , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/economia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/economia , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/economia , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/organização & administração , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Renda , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Saúde das Minorias/economia , Philadelphia , Projetos Piloto , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Serviços de Saúde Escolar/economiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Asthma disproportionately affects low-income and minority adults. In an era of electronic records and Internet-based digital devices, it is unknown whether portals for patient-provider communication can improve asthma outcomes. OBJECTIVE: We sought to estimate the effect on asthma outcomes of an intervention using home visits (HVs) by community health workers (CHWs) plus training in patient portals compared with usual care and portal training only. METHODS: Three hundred one predominantly African American and Hispanic/Latino adults with uncontrolled asthma were recruited from primary care and asthma specialty practices serving low-income urban neighborhoods, directed to Internet access, and given portal training. Half were randomized to HVs over 6 months by CHWs to facilitate competency in portal use and promote care coordination. RESULTS: One hundred seventy (56%) patients used the portal independently. Rates of portal activity did not differ between randomized groups. Asthma control and asthma-related quality of life improved in both groups over 1 year. Differences in improvements over time were greater for the HV group for all outcomes but reached conventional levels of statistical significance only for the yearly hospitalization rate (-0.53; 95% CI, -1.08 to -0.024). Poor neighborhoods and living conditions plus limited Internet access were barriers for patients to complete the protocol and for CHWs to make HVs. CONCLUSION: For low-income adults with uncontrolled asthma, portal access and CHWs produced small incremental benefits. HVs with emphasis on self-management education might be necessary to facilitate patient-clinician communication and to improve asthma outcomes.
Assuntos
Asma/terapia , Visita Domiciliar , Portais do Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde , Feminino , Educação em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pobreza , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of a mobile health, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) adherence reminder intervention and to characterize adherence trajectories immediately following severe asthma exacerbation in high-risk urban children with persistent asthma. METHODS: Children aged 2-13 with persistent asthma were enrolled in this pilot randomized controlled trial during an asthma emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization. Intervention arm participants received daily text message reminders for 30 days, and both arms received electronic sensors to measure ICS use. Primary outcomes were feasibility of sensor use and text message acceptability. Secondary outcomes included adherence to prescribed ICS regimen and 30-day adherence trajectories. Group-based trajectory modeling was used to examine adherence trajectories. RESULTS: Forty-one participants (mean age 5.9) were randomized to intervention (n = 21) or control (n = 20). Overall, 85% were Black, 88% had public insurance, and 51% of the caregivers had a high school education or less. Thirty-two participant families (78%) transmitted medication adherence data; of caregivers who completed the acceptability survey, 25 (96%) chose to receive daily reminders beyond that study interval. Secondary outcome analyses demonstrated similar average daily adherence between groups (intervention = 36%; control = 32%, P = 0.73). Three adherence trajectories were identified with none ever exceeding 80% adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Within a high-risk pediatric cohort, electronic monitoring of ICS use and adherence reminders delivered via text message were feasible for most participants, but there was no signal of effect. Adherence trajectories following severe exacerbation were suboptimal, demonstrating an important opportunity for asthma care improvement.
Assuntos
Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Alerta , Tecnologia de Sensoriamento Remoto/métodos , Envio de Mensagens de Texto , Administração por Inalação , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Broncodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Cooperação do Paciente , Preferência do Paciente , Projetos Piloto , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This review will inform updated National Asthma Education and Prevention Program clinical practice guidelines. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of allergen reduction interventions on asthma outcomes. METHODS: We systematically searched the "gray literature" and 5 bibliographic databases. Eligible studies included systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and nonrandomized interventional studies. Risk of bias was assessed by using the Cochrane Risk of Bias instrument and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The evidence base was assessed by using the approach of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Evidence-based Practice Center program. RESULTS: Fifty-nine randomized and 8 nonrandomized trials addressed 8 interventions: acaricide, air purification, carpet removal, high-efficiency particulate air filtration (HEPA) vacuums, mattress covers, mold removal, pest control, and pet removal. Thirty-seven studies evaluated single-component interventions, and 30 studies assessed multicomponent interventions. Heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. For most interventions and outcomes, the evidence base was inconclusive or showed no effect. No interventions were associated with improvement in validated asthma control measures or pulmonary physiology. Exacerbations were diminished in multicomponent studies that included HEPA vacuums or pest control (moderate strength of evidence [SOE] for both). Quality of life improved in studies of air purifiers (SOE: low) and in multicomponent studies that included HEPA vacuums (SOE: moderate) or pest control (SOE: low). CONCLUSIONS: Single interventions were generally not associated with improvement in asthma measures, with most strategies showing inconclusive results or no effect. Multicomponent interventions improved various outcomes, but no combination of specific interventions appears to be more effective. The evidence was often inconclusive because of a lack of studies. Further research is needed comparing the effect of indoor allergen reduction interventions on validated asthma measures, with sufficient population sizes to detect clinically meaningful differences.
Assuntos
Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/prevenção & controle , Alérgenos/imunologia , Asma/imunologia , Asma/prevenção & controle , Exposição Ambiental/prevenção & controle , Animais , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Disparities by race and socioeconomic status persist in pediatric asthma morbidity, mortality, and treatment. Improving parent/provider communication and parents' asthma-management confidence may result in better asthma control in vulnerable populations. The Merck Childhood Asthma Network, Inc. funded an initiative to implement medical-social care coordination to improve asthma outcomes at sites in four low-income, urban communities (Los Angeles, CA; Philadelphia, PA; Chicago, IL; and San Juan, PR.) As part of a cross-site evaluation of this effort, pre- post-program changes in parents' reports of asthma care and management were assessed. METHODS: Across sites, 805 parents or other caregivers responded to a baseline survey that was repeated one year later following their child's participation in care coordination. Parents' asthma-management confidence, as well as their perceptions of provider access, trust, and communication, were measured with Likert scales. Linear mixed models were used to assess improvement in these variables, across and within sites, adjusting for sociodemographics. RESULTS: Pooled across sites, the adjusted mean estimate for all outcomes showed a significant improvement (p <.05) from baseline to follow-up. Knowledge and Between-Provider Communication improved significantly (p <.05) within all four sites; Access improved significantly in Chicago, Philadelphia, and Puerto Rico; Trust improved significantly in Chicago, Los Angeles, and Philadelphia; and Patient-Provider Communication improved significantly in Philadelphia only. CONCLUSION: Pediatric asthma care coordination, as implemented variously in diverse settings, was associated with improvement in parents' perceptions of asthma care and self-reported asthma-management knowledge and confidence. This positive impact on parents may help sustain care coordination's impact on children.
Assuntos
Asma/terapia , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Pais/psicologia , Pobreza , População Urbana , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Comunicação , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Relações Interprofissionais , Masculino , Satisfação do Paciente , Percepção , Relações Profissional-Família , Autoeficácia , Confiança , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Research on asthma frequently recruits patients from clinics because the ready pool of patients leads to easy access to patients in office waiting areas, emergency departments, or hospital wards. Patients with other chronic conditions, and with mobility problems, face exposures at home that are not easily identified at the clinic. In this article, we describe the perspective of the community health workers and the challenges they encountered when making home visits while implementing a research intervention in a cohort of low-income, minority patients. From their observations, poor housing, often the result of poverty and lack of social resources, is the real elephant in the chronic asthma room. To achieve a goal of reduced asthma morbidity and mortality will require a first-hand understanding of the real-world social and economic barriers to optimal asthma management and the solutions to those barriers.
Assuntos
Asma/epidemiologia , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde , Visita Domiciliar , Adulto , Redes Comunitárias , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Pobreza , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: African-American and Latino patients are often difficult to recruit for asthma studies. This challenge is a barrier to improving asthma care and outcomes for these populations. OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine the recruitment experiences of 8 asthma comparative effectiveness studies that specifically targeted African-American and Latino patients, and identify the solutions they developed to improve recruitment. METHODS: Case report methodology was used to gather and evaluate information on study design, recruitment procedures and outcomes from study protocols and annual reports, and in-depth interviews with each research team. Data were analyzed for themes, commonalities, and differences. RESULTS: There were 4 domains of recruitment challenges: individual participant, institutional, research team, and study intervention. Participants had competing demands for time and some did not believe they had asthma. Institutional challenges included organizational policies governing monetary incentives and staff hiring. Research team challenges included ongoing training needs of recruitment staff, and intervention designs often were unappealing to participants because of inconveniences. Teams identified a host of strategies to address these challenges, most importantly engagement of patients and other stakeholders in study design and troubleshooting, and flexibility in data collection and intervention application to meet the varied needs of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma researchers may have greater success with recruitment by addressing uncertainty among patients about asthma diagnosis, engaging stakeholders in all aspects of study design and implementation, and maximizing flexibility of study and intervention protocols. However, even with such efforts, engagement of African-American and Latino patients in asthma research may remain low. Greater investment in research on engaging these populations in asthma research may ultimately be needed to improve their asthma care and outcomes.
Assuntos
Asma/epidemiologia , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Hispânico ou Latino , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde , Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of care coordination on asthma outcomes among children in underserved urban communities. METHODS: We enrolled children, most of whom had very poorly or not well-controlled asthma, in medical-social care coordination programs in Los Angeles, California; Chicago, Illinois; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and San Juan, Puerto Rico in 2011 to 2014. Participants (n = 805; mean age = 7 years) were 60% male, 50% African American, and 42% Latino. We assessed asthma symptoms and health care utilization via parent interview at baseline and 12 months. To prevent overestimation of intervention effects, we constructed a comparison group using bootstrap resampling of matched control cases from previous pediatric asthma trials. RESULTS: At follow-up, intervention participants had 2.2 fewer symptom days per month (SD = 0.3; P < .01) and 1.9 fewer symptom nights per month (SD = 0.35; P < .01) than did the comparison group. The relative risk in the past year associated with the intervention was 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.45, 0.89) for an emergency department visit and 0.69 (95% CI = 0.47, 1.01) for hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Care coordination may improve pediatric asthma symptom control and reduce emergency department visits. POLICY IMPLICATIONS: Expanding third-party reimbursement for care coordination services may help reduce pediatric asthma disparities.
Assuntos
Asma/terapia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Área Carente de Assistência Médica , População Urbana , Adolescente , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Asma/etnologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino , Visita Domiciliar , Humanos , Masculino , Educação de Pacientes como AssuntoRESUMO
Adaptation of evidence-based interventions upon implementation into new practice settings is universal, yet poorly understood. During a cross-site evaluation of the implementation of a proven intervention for pediatric asthma care coordination into 4 resource-challenged settings, we conducted in-depth interviews with site representatives, who reported how and why they modified intervention components. Interview notes were coded for themes. We focused on a single theme from a respondent who described the adaptation process as "backing" the intervention into ongoing services; we found evidence of a similar process at other sites. We labeled this process "retrofitting" to signify adaptation that consists of altering existing services to align with intervention components, rather than modifying the intervention to fit a new setting. Advantages of retrofitting may include allowing organizations to keep what works, capitalizing on existing support for program activities, elevating the role of local knowledge, and potentially promoting the sustainability of effective innovations.
Assuntos
Asma , Serviços de Saúde da Criança/organização & administração , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências/educação , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/terapia , Criança , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Avaliação das Necessidades , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Peaks in childhood asthma symptoms and asthma morbidity occur universally in the fall and late winter/early spring. This study examines whether there is a time of the year best suited to implement environmental interventions to attenuate this pattern. METHODS: From September 2006 to June 2010, mid-Atlantic inner-city children asthmatics with 1 asthma-related hospitalization (IP) or 2 emergency (ED) visits the year prior to enrollment received 5 in-home self-management education sessions which included multi-trigger avoidance techniques and supplies. Children's daily asthma symptoms were recorded for 12 months by caregivers. RESULTS: One-hundred and thirty-six children (48%) completed 12 months of symptoms diaries. Symptom days were reduced by 4.5 days at 12 months follow-up (p < 0.001). Symptom severity improved with a decreased severity score of 29.0 to 7.9 at month 12 (p < 0.001). Sixty-one percent of patients with ≥2 ED visits at baseline dropped to 0-1visits (p < 0.001). Eighty percent of patients with ≥1 IP visits dropped to 0 visits at 12 months (p < 0.001). Patients who received intervention in the summer months had half the average monthly symptoms score (10.8) as those who received intervention in the spring months (20.8). When controlling for environment and morbidity, the summer enrolled group had a significantly lower (p = 0.021) symptom score than those in other seasons. CONCLUSION: Home self-management/environmental interventions for this cohort appear to have the greatest effect for those receiving the intervention in the summer and fall. The largest impact occurs in the summer cohort. Further studies with a control group are necessary to confirm these findings.
Assuntos
Asma/terapia , Estações do Ano , Autocuidado/métodos , População Urbana , Adolescente , Alérgenos , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
Asthma affects 7.1 million children in the United States, disproportionately burdening African American and Latino children. Barriers to asthma control include insufficient patient education and fragmented care. Care coordination represents a compelling approach to improve quality of care and address disparities in asthma. The sites of The Merck Childhood Asthma Network Care Coordination Programs implemented different models of care coordination to suit specific settings-school district, clinic or health care system, and community-and organizational structures. A variety of qualitative data sources were analyzed to determine the role setting played in the manifestation of care coordination at each site. There were inherent strengths and challenges of implementing care coordination in each of the settings, and each site used unique strategies to deliver their programs. The relationship between the lead implementing unit and entities that provided (1) access to the priority population and (2) clinical services to program participants played a critical role in the structure of the programs. The level of support and infrastructure provided by these entities to the lead implementing unit influenced how participants were identified and how asthma care coordinators were integrated into the clinical care team.
Assuntos
Asma/terapia , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/organização & administração , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde Escolar/organização & administração , Criança , Comunicação , Meio Ambiente , Educação em Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Serviço Social/organização & administração , Estados Unidos , População UrbanaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Low health literacy is associated with poor outcomes in asthma and other diseases, but the mechanisms governing this relationship are not well defined. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess whether literacy is related to subsequent asthma self-management, measured as adherence to inhaled steroids, and asthma outcomes. METHODS: In a prospective longitudinal cohort study, numeric (Asthma Numeracy Questionnaire) and print literacy (Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults) were assessed at baseline in adults with moderate or severe asthma for their impact on subsequent electronically monitored adherence and asthma outcomes (asthma control, asthma-related quality of life, and FEV1) over 26 weeks, using mixed-effects linear regression models. RESULTS: A total of 284 adults participated: age, 48 ± 14 years, 71% females, 70% African American, 6% Latino, mean FEV1 66% ± 19%, 86 (30%) with hospitalizations, and 148 (52%) with emergency department visits for asthma in the prior year. Mean Asthma Numeracy Questionnaire score was 2.3 ± 1.2 (range, 0-4); mean Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults score was 31 ± 8 (range, 0-36). In unadjusted analyses, numeric and print literacy were associated with better adherence (P = .01 and P = .08, respectively), asthma control (P = .005 and P < .001, respectively), and quality of life (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). After controlling for age, sex, and race/ethnicity, the associations diminished and only quality of life (numeric P = .03, print P = .006) and asthma control (print P = .005) remained significantly associated with literacy. Race/ethnicity, income, and educational attainment were correlated (P < .001). CONCLUSION: While the relationship between literacy and health is complex, interventions that account for and address the literacy needs of patients may improve asthma outcomes.