Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 35
Filtrar
1.
BJU Int ; 125(4): 497-505, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31950596

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To provide a contemporary update and recommendations for the diagnosis and management of low-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (BCa) based on current literature and expert consensus of the International Bladder Cancer Group. METHODS: We reviewed published trials, guidelines, meta-analyses and reviews (up to March 2019) and provide recommendations on baseline evaluations, treatment, endpoints, study design and surveillance protocols. RESULTS: Low-grade Ta BCa poses minimal risk to patients in terms of progression and disease-specific survival. Thus, to minimize patient morbidity, this entity should be managed appropriately. After initial diagnosis of low-grade Ta tumour, subsequent stable, low-grade-appearing recurrences can be managed conservatively with office cystoscopy and fulguration or even followed using an active surveillance protocol. Intravesical therapy other than single-dose peri-operative chemotherapy instillation should be used judiciously, and only after assigning appropriate risk points. Routine use of urinary cytology - other than at initial risk stratification, or for patients on active surveillance without therapy - is not recommended; and surveillance cystoscopy may be discontinued after 5 years. Clinical studies in this group of patients should focus on recurrence rates, and time to recurrence, rather than progression events. CONCLUSIONS: The International Bladder Cancer Group has developed formal recommendations regarding the diagnosis, treatment and surveillance of low-grade non-muscle-invasive BCa to minimize morbidity and encourage uniformity among studies in this disease.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/terapia , Humanos , Gradação de Tumores , Medição de Risco
2.
J Urol ; 201(6): 1121-1126, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30835607

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We report our experience with transperineal prostate biopsy as well as the cancer diagnosis rate, complications and patient tolerability in 1,287 consecutive patients at risk for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Beginning in October 2016 transperineal prostate biopsy was performed using local anesthesia in all patients undergoing prostate biopsy. Data on prebiopsy characteristics and results, including the cancer detection rate, complications and patient tolerability scores, were collected retrospectively from patient records. RESULTS: The cancer detection rate of transperineal prostate biopsy was 49.8% (641 of 1,287 patients). Clinically significant prostate cancer was detected in 385 patients and 62 (9.7%) had exclusively anterior zone pathology findings. Urinary retention developed in 20 patients (1.6%) following transperineal prostate biopsy, requiring temporary catheterization. In 4 patients (0.3%) lower urinary tract symptoms were suggestive of infection but only 1 had a positive urine culture. The only hospital admission was for a patient with persistent hypotension after biopsy. Patients tolerated transperineal prostate biopsy reasonably well and generally reported only mild levels of discomfort on a pain visual analogue scale. Infiltration of the anesthesia was rated more painful than the biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Transperineal prostate biopsy with the patient under local anesthesia is a feasible alternative to transrectal biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer. Transperineal prostate biopsy has an acceptable cancer detection rate with additional detection of anterior zone cancers. It is a safer alternative in patients due to the low risk of complications, in particular urosepsis, and it is well tolerated. Transperineal prostate biopsy using local anesthesia could be considered a standard modality for the initial diagnosis of prostate cancer.


Assuntos
Anestesia Local , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biópsia/efeitos adversos , Biópsia/métodos , Biópsia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Períneo , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Br J Cancer ; 118(10): 1399-1405, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29593338

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Consultation with radiation oncologists, in addition to urologists, is advocated for patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. Treatment patterns for patients receiving consultation from radiation oncologists in addition to urologists have not previously been described. METHODS: We conducted a matched cohort study of men with newly diagnosed non-metastatic prostate cancer in Ontario, Canada. Patients who underwent consultation with a radiation oncologist prior to treatment were matched 1:1 with patients managed by a urologist alone based on tumour and patient characteristics. We examined rates of active treatment (surgery or radiotherapy) within one year following diagnosis. RESULTS: Among 5708 matched pairs (11,416 patients), those who received radiation oncology consultation were more likely to undergo active treatments whether they had intermediate or high-risk disease (88.6% vs. 65.9%, p < 0.0001; adjusted odds ratio 4.0, 95% CI: 3.6-4.4) or low-risk disease (56.1% vs. 13.3%, p < 0.0001; adjusted odds ratio 8.4, 95% CI: 6.7-10.6). This effect persisted after considering age, comorbidity, tumour volume and year of diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients newly diagnosed with prostate cancer who receive radiation oncology consultation are associated with a higher rate of active treatment, compared to patients managed by urologists only. Selection and referral biases, and unmeasured confounding such as patient preference must be considered as important factors attributing this association.


Assuntos
Seleção de Pacientes , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário , Preferência do Paciente , Padrões de Prática Médica , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Risco , Programa de SEER , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Can J Urol ; 24(1): 8646-8650, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28263130

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: There are numerous standard treatment options for men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer. Multidisciplinary consultation before decision-making is a consensus- and quality-based objective in Ontario. With the goals of working together more collaboratively and to provide higher quality information for patients at the time of decision-making, a prostate cancer community partnership consensus (PCPC) panel was formed among six partnering centers in the Greater Toronto Area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five iterative meetings were held among 40 prostate cancer specialists (32 urologists and 8 radiation oncologists) who participate in multidisciplinary clinics. The meetings defined the goals of the partnership as well as the topics and questions the group would address together. Answers to these questions were developed by formal consensus: >= 75% of participants had to agree with wording based on secret ballots to achieve consensus. RESULTS: All six groups wanted to participate to improve patient care/decision-making. Forty-one questions addressing 30 issues were derived from the literature and the group's collective experience. These issues were cross-tabbed against five management options: active surveillance, radical prostatectomy, low dose rate brachytherapy, high dose rate brachytherapy boost and external beam radiation. Answers common to all modalities were coalesced. Eighty-six issues were subjected to formal consensus. After three rounds of secret ballots, consensus was achieved for the answers to all issues. CONCLUSIONS: A formal consensus-based partnership between urology and radiation oncology to support newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients was feasible and resulted in a patient information guide which may improve decision-making.


Assuntos
Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Radioterapia (Especialidade) , Urologia , Braquiterapia , Tomada de Decisões , Humanos , Masculino , Conduta Expectante
5.
J Urol ; 206(6): 1410, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34461739
7.
J Urol ; 192(2): 305-15, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24681333

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Low, intermediate and high risk categories have been defined to help guide the treatment of patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (Ta, T1, CIS). However, while low and high risk disease has been well classified, the intermediate risk category has traditionally comprised a heterogeneous group that does not fit into either of these categories. As a result, many urologists remain uncertain about the categorization of patients as intermediate risk as well as the selection of the most appropriate therapeutic option for this patient population. We review the current literature and clinical practice guidelines on intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer and, based on our findings, provide urologists with a better understanding of this heterogeneous risk group as well as practical recommendations for the treatment of intermediate risk patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The IBCG analyzed published clinical trials, meta-analyses and current clinical practice guidelines on intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer available as of September 2013. The definitions of intermediate risk, patient outcomes and guideline recommendations were considered, as were the limitations of the available literature and additional parameters that may be useful in guiding treatment decisions in intermediate risk patients. RESULTS: Current definitions and management recommendations for intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer vary. The most simple and practical definition is that proposed by the IBCG and the AUA of multiple and/or recurrent low grade Ta tumors. The IBCG suggests that several factors should be considered in clinical decisions in intermediate risk disease, including number (greater than 1) and size (greater than 3 cm) of tumors, timing (recurrence within 1 year) and frequency (more than 1 per year) of recurrence, and previous treatment. In patients without these risk factors a single, immediate instillation of chemotherapy is advised. In those with 1 to 2 risk factors adjuvant intravesical therapy (intravesical chemotherapy or maintenance bacillus Calmette-Guérin) is recommended, and previous intravesical therapy should be considered when choosing between these adjuvant therapies. For those patients with 3 to 4 risk factors, maintenance bacillus Calmette-Guérin is recommended. It is also important that all intermediate risk patients are accurately risk stratified at initial diagnosis and during subsequent followup. This requires appropriate transurethral resection of the bladder tumor, vigilance to rule out carcinoma in situ or other potential high risk tumors, and review of histological material directly with the pathologist. CONCLUSIONS: Intermediate risk disease is a heterogeneous category, and there is a paucity of independent studies comparing therapies and outcomes in subgroups of intermediate risk patients. The IBCG has proposed a management algorithm that considers tumor characteristics, timing and frequency of recurrence, and previous treatment. Subgroup analyses of intermediate risk subjects in pivotal EORTC trials and meta-analyses will be important to validate the proposed algorithm and support clear evidence-based recommendations for subgroups of intermediate risk patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/terapia , Algoritmos , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Medição de Risco , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/classificação
8.
J Urol ; 191(1): 20-7, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23973937

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Despite being one of the most important clinical outcomes in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer, there is currently no standard definition of disease progression. Major clinical trials and meta-analyses have used varying definitions or have failed to define this end point altogether. A standard definition of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer progression as determined by reproducible and reliable procedures is needed. We examine current definitions of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer progression, and propose a new definition that will be more clinically useful in determining patient prognosis and comparing treatment options. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The IBCG (International Bladder Cancer Group) analyzed published clinical trials and meta-analyses that examined nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer progression as of December 2012. The limitations of the definitions of progression used in these trials were considered, as were additional parameters associated with the advancement of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. RESULTS: The most commonly used definition of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer progression is an increase in stage from nonmuscle invasive to muscle invasive disease. Although this definition is clinically important, it fails to include other important parameters of advancing disease such as progression to lamina propria invasion and increase in grade. CONCLUSIONS: The IBCG proposes the definition of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer progression as an increase in T stage from CIS or Ta to T1 (lamina propria invasion), development of T2 or greater or lymph node (N+) disease or distant metastasis (M1), or an increase in grade from low to high. Investigators should consider the use of this new definition to help standardize protocols and improve the reporting of progression.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Invasividade Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico
9.
Eur Urol ; 2024 Aug 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39183090

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There has been a recent surge in the development of agents for bacillus Calmette-Guérin-unresponsive (BCG-U) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Critical assessment of these agents and practical recommendations for optimal selection of patients and therapies are urgently needed, especially in the absence of randomized trials on bladder-sparing treatment (BST) options. METHODS: A global committee of bladder cancer experts was assembled to develop recommendations on BST for BCG-U NMIBC. Working groups reviewed the literature and developed draft recommendations, which were then voted on by International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) members using a modified Delphi process. During a live meeting in August 2023, voting results and supporting evidence were presented, and recommendations were refined on the basis of meeting discussions. Final recommendations achieved >75% agreement during the meeting, and some were further refined via web conferences and e-mail discussions. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: There is currently no single optimal agent for patients with BCG-U disease who seek to avoid radical cystectomy (RC). BST selection should be personalized, taking into account individual patient characteristics and preferences, tumor attributes, and efficacy/toxicity data for the agents available. For patients with BCG-U carcinoma in situ (CIS), gemcitabine/docetaxel (GEM/DOCE), nadofaragene firadenovec (NFF), and nogapendekin alfa inbakicept-pmln (NAI) + BCG are recommended; because of its systemic toxicity, pembrolizumab should only be offered after other options are exhausted. For patients with BCG-U papillary-only tumors, GEM/DOCE, NFF, NAI + BCG, single-agent chemotherapy, hyperthermic mitomycin C, and pembrolizumab are recommended. Given the modest efficacy of available options, clinical trial participation is encouraged. For unapproved agents with reported data, IBCG recommendations await the final results of pivotal trials. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The IBCG consensus recommendations provide practical guidance on BST for BCG-U NMIBC.

10.
BJU Int ; 112(6): 742-50, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23452187

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To examine the management of intermediate- and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), particularly with regard to the use of bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy, in North America and Europe. To compare NMIBC management practices to European Association of Urology (EAU) and American Urological Association (AUA) guideline recommendations for the management of intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 102 urologists from Europe and North America participated in this retrospective on-line chart review, which was conducted between 1 April 2011 and 30 April 2012. Participants selected the charts of the first 10 intermediate- (defined as multiple or recurrent low-grade tumours) or high-risk (defined as any T1 and/or high-grade/G3 tumours and/or carcinoma in situ) patients who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumour in 2009. Physicians retrospectively reviewed the charts and completed an on-line survey consisting of questions related to diagnosis, planned treatment, treatment status and follow-up. In all, 971 patients (197 intermediate-risk; 774 high-risk) were included in the analysis; frequency counts and associated percentages were used to analyse treatment variables. RESULTS: In all, 47% of intermediate-risk patients received EAU or AUA guideline-recommended intravesical therapy: intravesical chemotherapy, BCG induction therapy or BCG induction plus maintenance. Of the high-risk patients, 50% received maintenance BCG as recommended by the EAU and the AUA; although not recommended for high-risk NMIBC, 12.5% received intravesical chemotherapy. Of patients prescribed maintenance BCG, 93% were scheduled for at least 1 year of therapy. Notably, only 15% discontinued BCG maintenance and, of these discontinuations, 65% were due to reasons unrelated to BCG-associated adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant non-adherence to EAU and AUA guideline recommendations for BCG use in intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC. However, most of those patients prescribed BCG maintenance therapy are scheduled for at least 1 year of therapy, as recommended by current guidelines for NMIBC management, and BCG maintenance discontinuation is low.


Assuntos
Vacina BCG/administração & dosagem , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Invasividade Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Vigilância da População/métodos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Administração Intravesical , Adulto , Idoso , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , América do Norte/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia
11.
J Clin Oncol ; 41(35): 5437-5447, 2023 Dec 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37793077

RESUMO

PURPOSE: There is a significant unmet need for new and efficacious therapies in urothelial cancer (UC). To provide recommendations on appropriate clinical trial designs across disease settings in UC, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) and the International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) convened a multidisciplinary, international consensus panel. METHODS: Through open communication and scientific debate in small- and whole-group settings, surveying, and responses to clinical questionnaires, the consensus panel developed recommendations on optimal definitions of the disease state, end points, trial design, evaluations, sample size calculations, and pathology considerations for definitive studies in low- and intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), high-risk NMIBC, muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, and metastatic UC. The expert panel also solicited input on the recommendations through presentations and public discussion during an open session at the 2021 Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network (BCAN) Think Tank (held virtually). RESULTS: The consensus panel developed a set of stage-specific bladder cancer clinical trial design recommendations, which are summarized in the table that accompanies this text. CONCLUSION: These recommendations developed by the SITC-IBCG Bladder Cancer Clinical Trial Design consensus panel will encourage uniformity among studies and facilitate drug development in this disease.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células de Transição , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Imunoterapia
12.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 35(25): 5282-5290, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33541166

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Renal stones are a common cause of non-obstetrical abdominal pain in pregnant women. Though the management of renal stones in pregnancy is challenging, it remains unclear how the incidence of kidney stones may affect the course of pregnancy and delivery. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of renal stones in pregnancy and its impact on adverse obstetrical outcomes. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a systematic literature search of three databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and EBSCO CINAHL Plus. After the selection of articles, an additional hand-search of their citations was completed to maximize sensitivity. Databases were examined from the last four decades (19 March 1970) up to the search date (19 March 2020). STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Articles were excluded if they were not relevant to kidney stones or did not report outcomes related to pregnancy. Case reports, animal studies, and cadaveric studies were excluded. Conference abstracts, gray literature, and unpublished data were not eligible. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: All screening, extraction, and synthesis were completed in duplicate with two independent reviewers. All outcomes reported in the included studies were systematically evaluated to determine suitability for meta-analysis. Random-effects models and sensitivity analyses were used to account for interstudy variation. Renal stone incidence rates were pooled to generate summary proportions. Risk of bias assessment was completed using the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized Studies. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies were included through systematic review and approximately 4.7 million pregnancies across nine studies were included for meta-analysis. There are three major findings of this review regarding renal stone incidence in pregnancy and maternal, child, and birth-related outcomes associated with renal stones. First, we found pooled incidence of renal stones was 0.49%, or one case for every 204 pregnancies. Second, renal stones during pregnancy were significantly associated with the development of preeclampsia and urinary tract infection, as well as increased likelihood of low birth weight, preterm labor, and C-section deliveries. However, renal stones were not significantly associated with premature rupture of membranes or infant mortality. Third, there were limited obstetrical complications reported with either medical or surgical therapies although comparative outcomes were not provided in the majority of studies, precluding formal meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Although renal stones in pregnancy are relatively rare, there may be an associated risk of serious adverse obstetrical outcomes. However, further research is required to understand whether these obstetrical outcomes are causal or due to other confounders. Interdisciplinary care and pregnancy-specific counseling should be advised for pregnant women with kidney stones.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais , Complicações na Gravidez , Nascimento Prematuro , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Incidência , Recém-Nascido de Baixo Peso , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Cálculos Renais/epidemiologia
13.
Can Urol Assoc J ; 16(4): E220-E226, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34812728

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Identifying the optimal management of unfavorable-risk (Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification [ProCaRS] high intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk categories) non-metastatic prostate cancer is an important public health concern given the large burden of this disease. We compared the rate of metastatic progression-free survival among men diagnosed with unfavorable-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer who were initially treated with radiation therapy or radical prostatectomy. METHODS: Information was obtained from medical records at two academic centers in Canada from 333 men diagnosed with unfavorable-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer between 2007 and 2012. Median followup was 90.4 months. Men were eligible for the study if they received either primary radiation therapy (n=164) or radical prostatectomy (n=169), in addition to various adjuvant and salvage therapies when deemed clinically appropriate. Patients were matched on prognostic covariates using two matching techniques. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) and confidence intervals (CI) for metastatic progression-free survival between groups. RESULTS: After matching, treatment groups were balanced on prognostic variables except for percent core positivity. Hazard ratios from all Cox proportional hazards models (i.e., before and after matching, and with and without multivariable adjustment) showed no difference in the rate of metastatic progression-free survival between groups (adjusted unmatched HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.63, 2.13, p=0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Metastatic progression-free survival did not differ between men diagnosed with unfavorable risk non-metastatic prostate cancer who were treated with either radiation therapy or radical prostatectomy.

14.
Eur Urol ; 82(1): 34-46, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34955291

RESUMO

CONTEXT: A large proportion of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) fall in the gap between bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-naïve and BCG-unresponsive disease. As multiple therapeutic agents move into this gray area, there is a critical need to define the disease state and establish recommendations for optimal trial design. OBJECTIVE: To develop a consensus on optimal trial design for patients with BCG-exposed NMIBC, defined as high-grade recurrence after BCG treatment that does not meet the criteria for BCG-unresponsive disease. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We conducted a literature review using the Cochrane Library, Medline, and Embase and a review of clinical trials in ClinicalTrials.gov as a basis to generate consensus recommendations for clinical trial design in BCG-exposed NMIBC. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: BCG-exposed NMIBC encompasses BCG resistance (presence of high-grade Ta or carcinoma in situ [CIS] at 3-mo evaluation after induction BCG) and delayed relapse. Randomized controlled trials are required to compare experimental therapies to a control arm receiving additional BCG, although ongoing BCG shortages may impact our ability to follow an optimal trial design. A placebo should be used in combination with BCG if the treatment arm includes BCG plus a study drug. Trials will either need to separate patients with and without CIS into two cohorts, or stratify by the presence of CIS at the time of randomization. If two cohorts are used, the primary endpoint for CIS patients should be complete response within a predetermined time. The primary endpoint in a cohort with Ta/T1 only, or if a single combined cohort is used, should be the duration of event-free survival. Suggested efficacy thresholds and corresponding sample sizes are provided. CONCLUSIONS: The International Bladder Cancer Group has developed recommendations regarding definitions, endpoints, and clinical trial design for BCG-exposed NMIBC to encourage uniformity among studies in this disease state. PATIENT SUMMARY: Our consensus provides a precise definition of the disease state for bladder cancer not invading the bladder muscle and exposed to bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) treatment. Clear guidance for conducting optimal clinical trials in this disease setting was established and we believe that this will promote further progress in this field.


Assuntos
Carcinoma in Situ , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Administração Intravesical , Vacina BCG/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma in Situ/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma in Situ/patologia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Humanos , Músculos/patologia , Invasividade Neoplásica , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia
15.
J Urol ; 186(6): 2158-67, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22014799

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Although the European Association of Urology, First International Consultation on Bladder Tumors, National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Urological Association guidelines all provide an excellent evidence-based framework for the management of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer, these guidelines vary with respect to important issues such as risk level definitions and management strategies for these risk categories. Therefore, we built on the existing framework provided by current guidelines, and provide consensus on the definitions of low, intermediate and high risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer, as well as practical recommendations for the treatment of patients in each of these risk categories. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An international committee of experts on bladder cancer management identified and analyzed the European Association of Urology, First International Consultation on Bladder Tumors, National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Urological Association guidelines as well as the published English language literature related to the treatment and management of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer available as of April 2010. RESULTS: Based on review of the current guidelines and literature, the International Bladder Cancer Group developed practical recommendations for the management of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Complete transurethral bladder tumor resection is recommended for all patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. For low risk disease a single, immediate chemotherapeutic instillation after transurethral bladder tumor resection is recommended. For intermediate or high risk disease there is no significant benefit from an immediate, postoperative chemotherapeutic instillation. For intermediate risk disease intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin with maintenance or intravesical chemotherapy is recommended. For high risk disease bacillus Calmette-Guérin induction plus maintenance is recommended. The appropriate management of recurrence depends on the patient level of risk as well as previous treatment, while the management of treatment failure depends on the type of failure as well as the level of risk for recurrence and disease progression.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/terapia , Algoritmos , Humanos , Invasividade Neoplásica , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia
16.
Can Urol Assoc J ; 15(3): E169-E174, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32807286

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Fasting is a common cultural practice worldwide for both religious and dietary reasons. However, there is concern that fasting may be a risk factor for the development of renal stones. To date, there has not been a systematic assessment of the literature regarding the association between renal stones and fasting. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines of three databases: Medline-OVID, EMBASE, and CINAHL. All screening and extraction was completed in parallel with two independent reviewers. RESULTS: Of the 1501 database citations, a total of 10 observational studies with a total of 9906 participants were included. Nine of the studies were conducted in the context of Islamic fasting during Ramadan, with the majority (7/9) finding that renal colic incidence was unaffected by the month of fasting. In contrast, two studies noted an increased incidence among fasting populations. Two other studies noted that urine metabolites and density were altered with fasting but did not translate into clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available evidence, it is unlikely that fasting significantly increases the risk of renal stones. Physicians should counsel higher-risk patients on safe fasting practices.

17.
Can Urol Assoc J ; 14(8): 259-264, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32209212

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: We implemented an acute care urology (ACU) model at a large Canadian community hospital to determine the impacts on safe and timely care of patients with renal colic. The model includes a dedicated ACU surgeon, a clinic for emergency department (ED) referrals, and additional daytime operating room (OR) blocks for urgent cases. METHODS: We conducted a chart review of 579 patients presenting to the ED with renal colic. Data was collected before (pre-intervention, September to November 2015) and after (post-intervention, September to November 2016) implementation of the ACU model. Secondary methods of evaluation included surveying patients and 20 ED physicians to capture subjective feedback. RESULTS: Of the 579 patients presenting with renal colic,194 were diagnosed with an obstructing kidney stone and were referred to urology for outpatient care. The ED-to-clinic time was significantly lower for those in the ACU model (p<0.001). Furthermore, the ACU clinic resulted in significantly more patients being referred for outpatient care (p=0.0004). There was also higher likelihood that patients would successfully obtain an appointment post-referral (p=0.0242). The number of after-hours and weekend surgeries decreased significantly after dedicated ACU daytime OR blocks were added in September 2015 (p<0.0001). All surveyed patients rated the care as either "excellent" or "very good," and all physicians believed the ACU model has improved patient care. CONCLUSIONS: The ACU model has shown benefit in ensuring timely followup for ED patients, reducing use of after-hour OR time, and improving patient and physician satisfaction.

18.
Cont Lens Anterior Eye ; 41(1): 34-46, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28958415

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Tear osmolarity (tOsm) is used as a measure of severity in dry eye disease (DED) and has been proposed as an index of body hydration. In DED the level of tear hyperosmolarity is compared with that of a control population. It is proposed here that a better index of body hydration and a more valid reference point in DED can be acquired by measuring the tOsm after a period of evaporative suppression. METHOD: 8 normal and DED subjects were recruited, their tOsm measured in uncontrolled environmental 'clinic conditions'. Then in experiment 1 they entered a controlled environment chamber and had tOsm measured after 45 minutes of eye closure and then, with the eyes open, at 15 minute intervals for a further 45 minutes, at a relative humidity (RH) of 45%. Alternatively, in experiment 2, they had tOsm measured every 15 minutes for 45 minutes during exposure to 70% RH, as a separate measure to suppress evaporation. RESULTS: A significant decrease in tOsm occurred in both normal and DED subjects after lid closure in experiment 1 (normal RE p=0.015; normal LE p=0.006; DED RE p=0.0002; DED LE p=0.01). The tOsm also fell slightly after exposure to 70% RH in experiment 2 significant in the LE of normal group only (normal LE p=0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Suppression of tear evaporation resulted in a fall in tOsm, close to that of plasma osmolarity (285-295mOsm/L). It is proposed that this new measure, termed Basal Tear Osmolarity (BTO), could provide a valuable index of plasma osmolarity and hence of body hydration and in DED, a personal baseline against which to gauge the severity of tear hyperosmolarity.


Assuntos
Síndromes do Olho Seco/metabolismo , Lágrimas/química , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Concentração Osmolar , Adulto Jovem
19.
Ocul Surf ; 5(1): 40-8, 2007 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17252164

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Contrary to popular perception, the large size and scleral bearing surface of scleral contact lenses (ScCLs) can be beneficial in the management of certain ocular surface disorders. They can provide retention of a precorneal tear reservoir for corneal hydration with total protection from the external environment and from the lid margins and lashes. They can relieve pain, prevent exposure keratitis, and enhance epithelial healing. The use of ScCLs is limited in large part by ophthalmologists' perception of excessive complexity. Actually, while some cases are challenging, many are straightforward. This review summarizes indications for therapeutic use of ScCLs and describes techniques and considerations that contribute to their clinical success.


Assuntos
Lentes de Contato , Doenças da Córnea/terapia , Esclera , Desenho de Equipamento , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA