Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Dairy Sci ; 2024 Jul 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39067756

RESUMO

This observational study determined the effect of genetic merit for fertility traits on estrous activity and duration and inter-estrous interval in nulliparous dairy heifers. We also compared estrous activity between estrous events with or without conception and determined the effect of genetic merit for fertility traits on age and body weight at time of first detected estrous activity event. Activity monitoring devices (Heatime, SCR Engineers) were fitted to 7-9-mo aged Holstein-Friesian heifers with positive or negative genetic merit for fertility traits (POS FertBV: average +5%, n = 275; NEG FertBV: average -5%, n = 249) and activity data was collected to the end of the first breeding period (15-17-mo). An estrous event was defined as when the activity change index exceeded 19.2 activity units (AU) for ≥6 consecutive h. In total, 2,434 estrous events were identified (POS FertBV: n = 1454; NEG FertBV: n = 980). Estrous event duration was defined as the period when the threshold was first exceeded and when activity dropped below threshold, without another event starting within 24 h of the end of the previous event. This definition included occurrences where activity crossed the threshold multiple times in a day; these were classified as a single estrous event. A second measure, high activity duration, was defined as the total time activity exceeded the threshold. To characterize estrous activity, baseline activity was determined from the previous 7 d of activity. Peak activity and total activity (area under the curve of activity above baseline) were calculated. A fifth variable, inter-estrous interval, was calculated as a proxy for estrous cycle length. Total activity and peak activity were greater in POS than NEG FertBV heifers (total activity: 548 vs 464 AU, SED = 19.6 AU; peak activity: 72 vs 65 AU, standard error of the difference (SED) = 1.5 AU). The POS FertBV group had a mean estrous event duration and high activity duration of 15.1 h and 15.0 h, compared with 14.1 and 14.1 h for the NEG FertBV group (SED = 0.30 and 0.29 h, respectively). Inter-estrous interval did not differ between POS and NEG FertBV heifers (19.5 vs 20.0 d, SED = 0.49). Estrous events associated with conception were shorter than those not associated with conception (mean ± standard error of the mean, high activity duration: 13.0 ± 0.25 h vs 13.9 ± 0.31 h, estrous event duration: 13.1 ± 0.25 h vs 14 ± 0.32 h) and had less total activity (408 ± 15.2 vs 487 ± 18.2 AU). The POS FertBV heifers were more likely to have their first estrous activity event than NEG FertBV heifers by a given age (HR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.0 to 1.6) or body weight (HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.1 to 1.6). The outcomes of this study provide evidence that positive genetic merit for fertility traits is associated with more overt estrous expression. Therefore, estrous expression traits may have potential to be used as earlier-in-life predictors of genetic merit for fertility.

2.
J Dairy Sci ; 107(6): 3700-3715, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38135043

RESUMO

Reproductive performance is a key determinant of cow longevity in a pasture-based, seasonal dairy system. Unfortunately, direct fertility phenotypes such as intercalving interval or pregnancy rate tend to have low heritabilities and occur relatively late in an animal's life. In contrast, age at puberty (AGEP) is a moderately heritable, early-in-life trait that may be estimated using an animal's age at first measured elevation in blood plasma progesterone (AGEP4) concentrations. Understanding the genetic architecture of AGEP4 in addition to genetic relationships between AGEP4 and fertility traits in lactating cows is important, as is its relationship with body size in the growing animal. Thus, the objectives of this research were 3-fold. First, to estimate the genetic and phenotypic (co)variances between AGEP4 and subsequent fertility during first and second lactations. Second, to quantify the associations between AGEP4 and height, length, and BW measured when animals were approximately 11 mo old (standard deviation = 0.5). Third, to identify genomic regions that are likely to be associated with variation in AGEP4. We measured AGEP4, height, length, and BW in approximately 5,000 Holstein-Friesian or Holstein-Friesian × Jersey crossbred yearling heifers across 54 pasture-based herds managed in seasonal calving farm systems. We also obtained calving rate (CR42, success or failure to calve within the first 42 d of the seasonal calving period), breeding rate (PB21, success or failure to be presented for breeding within the first 21 d of the seasonal breeding period) and pregnancy rate (PR42, success or failure to become pregnant within the first 42 d of the seasonal breeding period) phenotypes from their first and second lactations. The animals were genotyped using the Weatherby's Versa 50K SNP array (Illumina, San Diego, CA). The estimated heritabilities of AGEP4, height, length, and BW were 0.34 (90% credibility interval [CRI]: 0.30, 0.37), 0.28 (90% CRI: 0.25, 0.31), 0.21 (90% CRI: 0.18, 0.23), and 0.33 (90% CRI: 0.30, 0.36), respectively. In contrast, the heritabilities of CR42, PB21 and PR42 were all <0.05 in both first and second lactations. The genetic correlations between AGEP4 and these fertility traits were generally moderate, ranging from 0.11 to 0.60, whereas genetic correlations between AGEP4 and yearling body-conformation traits ranged from 0.02 to 0.28. Our GWAS highlighted a genomic window on chromosome 5 that was strongly associated with variation in AGEP4. We also identified 4 regions, located on chromosomes 14, 6, 1, and 11 (in order of decreasing importance), that exhibited suggestive associations with AGEP4. Our results show that AGEP4 is a reasonable predictor of estimated breeding values for fertility traits in lactating cows. Although the GWAS provided insights into genetic mechanisms underpinning AGEP4, further work is required to test genomic predictions of fertility that use this information.


Assuntos
Fertilidade , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla , Lactação , Animais , Bovinos/genética , Fertilidade/genética , Feminino , Lactação/genética , Fenótipo , Maturidade Sexual/genética , Gravidez , Genótipo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA