The golden tickets: impact of preference signaling on obstetrics and gynecology residency applicants.

BACKGROUND: With the residency selection process becoming more competitive and programs receiving unprecedented numbers of applications, some specialties have introduced preference signaling in an attempt to help applicants target programs of interest. In the 2022-2023 application cycle, obstetrics and gynecology also introduced a 2-tiered system with a limited number of gold signals (n=3) and silver signals (n=15). OBJECTIVE: Given the novelty of preference signaling in the obstetrics and gynecology residency application process, this study aimed to (1) assess the effect of signals on interview offers and match and (2) discuss applicant attitudes toward this preference signaling system. STUDY DESIGN: This was a voluntary cross-sectional survey study conducted in April 2023 that was open to all fourth-year medical students who applied to an obstetrics and gynecology residency in the United States. Self-reported demographics, signaling, interview, and match data were collected. In addition, students were asked about attitudes toward signaling on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Of the 1507 applicants who entered an obstetrics and gynecology residency via match or Supplemental Offer and Acceptance Program process, 969 (64.3%) completed the survey. Moreover, an additional 22 applicants who did not match responded to the survey. More respondents used all 3 gold tokens (98.3%) and all 15 silver tokens (94.3%). The mean number of applications sent was 74.3±35.1, and the mean number of interviews received per applicant was 12.8±6.6. The interviews or token yields were 64.0%±31.5% for gold tokens, 43.8%±23.1% for silver tokens, and 9.8%±10.0% for no token. Of the survey respondents, 340/951 (35.8%) matched to a gold token program, 338/951 (35.5%) matched to a silver token program, and 244/951 (25.7%) matched to a nontoken program. Furthermore, 499/951 applicants (52.5%) reported feeling slightly positive or very positive about signaling. CONCLUSION: Most obstetrics and gynecology applicants in this survey participated in preference signaling. Gold and silver tokens were associated with high ratios of interview invitations compared with no token. However, the overall number of applications did not decrease in the 2022-2023 cycle, and only half of survey respondents reported feeling positive about the signaling process. These results can inform program directors and students about application number and strategy in upcoming cycles.

Reconsidering Race Adjustment in Prenatal Alpha-Fetoprotein Screening.

OBJECTIVE: Black racial designation is the only race for which adjustment is recommended for maternal prenatal serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) screening. The objective of this study is to reevaluate the relationship between maternal race and maternal serum AFP values in prenatal analyte screening. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective analysis of patients who underwent prenatal analyte screening between January 2007 and December 2020. Nomograms for raw maternal serum AFP values by gestational age were created and compared between patients identified as "Black" and "non-Black" on the laboratory requisition. Multivariable linear regression models were created to evaluate the relationship among gestational age, maternal weight, and maternal race on maternal serum AFP levels. The new models were compared with the laboratory-derived calculations, which used historically determined race adjustments. RESULTS: A total of 43,997 patients underwent analyte screening, and 27,710 patients had complete data for analysis. Of these, 6% were identified as Black. Black patients had laboratory blood draws at a mean gestational age of 123 days, compared with 120 days in non-Black patients ( P <.001), and had higher maternal weight (mean 170 vs 161 lbs, P <.001). Nomograms for raw maternal serum AFP values did not differ between Black and non-Black patients ( P =.065). When adjusted for gestational age and maternal weight, no difference in maternal serum AFP values was identified between Black and non-Black individuals ( P =.81). CONCLUSION: No difference in maternal serum AFP values was identified between Black and non-Black pregnant individuals when adjusted by maternal weight and gestational age at blood draw. These findings suggest that routine race-based adjustment of maternal serum AFP screening should be discontinued.

Volume, Distribution, and Inequities by Race and Gender of Clinical Experiences Reported by Medical Students Entering Obstetrics and Gynecology Residencies.

OBJECTIVE: To assess for inequities by race and gender of fourth year medical students' (MS4s) self-reported clinical experience in obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn). DESIGN: This was a voluntary, cross-sectional survey. Participants provided demographic data, information regarding their preparation for residency, and self-reported numbers of hands-on clinical experiences. Responses were compared across demographic categories to assess for disparity in pre-residency experiences. SETTING: The survey was open to all MS4s matched to Ob/Gyn internships in the United States in 2021. PARTICIPANTS: The survey was distributed primarily via social media. Eligibility was verified by participants supplying the names of their medical school of origin and their matched residency program prior to completing the survey. 1057/1469 (71.9%) MS4s entering Ob/Gyn residencies participated. Respondent characteristics were not different from nationally available data. RESULTS: Median clinical experience numbers were calculated for hysterectomies (10; IQR 5-20), suturing opportunities (15; IQR 8-30), and vaginal deliveries (5.5; IQR 2-12). Non-White students had fewer hands-on experiences with hysterectomy, suturing, and cumulative clinical experiences when compared to White MS4s (p values <0.001). Female students had fewer hands-on experiences with hysterectomies (p < 0.04), vaginal delivery (p < 0.03), and cumulative experiences (p < 0.002) than male students. When assessed by quartiles, non-White students and female students were less likely to be in the top quartile for experience and more likely to be in the bottom quartile for experience than their White and male counterparts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of medical students entering Ob/Gyn residency have minimal hands-on clinical experience with foundational procedures. Additionally, there are racial and gender disparities in clinical experiences of MS4s matching to Ob/Gyn internships. Future work should identify how biases in medical education may affect the access to clinical experience in medical school, and potential interventions to mitigate inequities in procedures and confidence prior to residency.

Does the Degree Matter? MD and DO Students Who Match Into OB/GYN Report Different Experiences in US Undergraduate Medical Education.

Background: Although allopathic (MD) and osteopathic (DO) students have similar curricular requirements, little is known about differences in MD and DO preparedness for obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residency. Objective: To assess differences in experiences and confidence of MD vs DO students who matched to OB/GYN. Methods: This cross-sectional survey study was open to all fourth-year medical students who matched to OB/GYN in the United States in April 2021. The survey included demographic data, clinical experiences, confidence (5-point sliding scale), and a 11-item knowledge test. Survey responses were compared to assess for disparities in experiences and confidence. Results: Survey response rate was 72.0% (1057 of 1469) students matched to OB/GYN postgraduate year 1 positions. Of the 871 MD and 175 DO responding students, MDs were more likely to have clerkships ≥6 weeks (78.1% vs 15.4%; P<.001) and a home sub-internship (92.0% vs 53.4%; P<.001). DOs reported more hands-on experiences with procedures (MD median=35 [20-35] vs DO median=40 [25-65]; P=.002). There was no difference in self-reported confidence in knowledge, technical skills, or having a realistic sense of internship, and no difference in baseline knowledge test scores. DOs felt less confident about their medical school preparation (aOR 0.40; 95% CI 0.25-0.66; P<.001) and were more likely to perceive inequity of residency preparation (aOR 1.88; 95% CI 1.18-3.00; P=.002). Conclusions: MD students matched to US OB/GYN residency programs reported longer clerkship and more home sub-internships, while DO students reported more hands-on experiences. Despite reporting similar confidence in knowledge and skills, DO students felt less prepared for internship.

The #ObGynInternChallenge: Reach, Adoption, Implementation, and Effectiveness of a Microlearning SMS-Distributed Curriculum.

PROBLEM: While many medical schools have implemented bootcamps or specialized curricula to prepare medical students for residency, these programs are neither universal nor consistent in their content. APPROACH: The authors created an electronic, multimodal, short messaging service (SMS)-distributed curriculum, called the #ObGynInternChallenge, to improve learners' medical knowledge, based on the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology educational objectives. The curriculum was open to all fourth-year medical students who matched into obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn). Daily messages were delivered to participants' mobile devices via SMS for 25 consecutive weekdays, May 3-June 4, 2021. Each day's message included an introduction with key facts, an infographic, a website link with a podcast and additional reference materials, and at least one question. The authors assessed its reach, adoption, implementation, and effectiveness. OUTCOMES: For reach and adoption, total enrollment for the curriculum was 1,057 (72.0%) of 1,469 filled Ob/Gyn residency positions in the 2021 Match. The total cost of the intervention was $2,503.20 or $2.37 per participant. For implementation, all participants who signed up for the course received the daily messages, and 858/1,057 (81.2%) completed the course. Participants felt the curriculum was an excellent resource for studying (391/426, 91.8%) and the course was enjoyable to use (395/424, 93.2%). For effectiveness, mean score improvement was 11.6% (pre-test: 62.4%, post-test: 74.0%; P < .001). In the multivariate linear regression analysis, high podcast ( P = .02) and website use ( P = .002) were associated with greater score improvement. High social media use was associated with less improvement ( P = .02). NEXT STEPS: This study suggests promise for a low-cost, largely satisfying SMS-distributed curriculum in terms of offering some benefit for short-term knowledge gain. Next steps include expanding such a curriculum to meet standard learning objectives for all fourth-year medical students entering residency.

CREOGs Over Coffee: Feasibility of an Ob-Gyn Medical Education Podcast by Residents.

BACKGROUND: Podcasts and other digital resources are increasingly popular among medical learners and allow the dissemination of research to larger audiences. Little is known about the feasibility of graduate medical education trainees developing podcasts for their own and others' learning. OBJECTIVE: We described the development and implementation of a medical education podcast series by residents for obstetrics and gynecology (Ob-Gyn) resident learning, and demonstrated feasibility, sustainability, and acceptance of this series. METHODS: We used the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology (CREOG) educational guidelines to create a weekly study podcast for Ob-Gyn residents over 10 months. Costs and donations (for feasibility), downloads over time (for sustainability), and number of reviews on Apple iTunes and followers on Twitter (for acceptability) were measured. RESULTS: Sixty episodes were released from September 30, 2018, to July 28, 2019 (43 weeks). Initial costs included $3,150 startup and $29 monthly. Online donations through Patreon amounted to $200 a month, which covered 58% of startup costs at 10 months and are projected to cover full costs by 1.5 years. The podcast had 173 995 downloads as recorded through Podbean (39 a month in September, increased to 31 206 a month in July). It gained 644 followers on Twitter and 147 ratings on iTunes, with an average of 4.86 out of 5 stars. CONCLUSIONS: Medical podcasts created by Ob-Gyn residents during their training appear feasible and highly acceptable over a sustained period.