RESUMO
This study evaluates the adoption of clinician billing for patient portal messages as e-visits, prompted by significant increases in patient messaging after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Honorários e Preços , Portais do Paciente , Telemedicina , Envio de Mensagens de Texto , Humanos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/economia , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Portais do Paciente/economia , Portais do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Envio de Mensagens de Texto/economia , Envio de Mensagens de Texto/estatística & dados numéricos , Telemedicina/economia , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Honorários e Preços/estatística & dados numéricos , Prática Profissional/economia , Prática Profissional/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Electronic visits (e-visits) are billable, asynchronous patient-initiated messages that require at least five minutes of medical decision-making by a provider. Unequal use of patient portal tools like e-visits by certain patient populations may worsen health disparities. To date, no study has attempted to qualitatively assess perceptions of e-visits in older adults. OBJECTIVE: In this qualitative study, we aimed to understand patient perceptions of e-visits, including their perceived utility, barriers to use, and care implications, with a focus on vulnerable patient groups. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using in-depth structured individual interviews with patients from diverse backgrounds to assess their knowledge and perceptions surrounding e-visits as compared with unbilled portal messages and other visit types. We used content analysis to analyze interview data. RESULTS: We conducted 20 interviews, all in adults older than 65 years. We identified 4 overarching coding categories or themes. First, participants were generally accepting of the concept of e-visits and willing to try them. Second, nearly two-thirds of the participants voiced a preference for synchronous communication. Third, participants had specific concerns about the name "e-visit" and when to choose this type of visit in the patient portal. Fourth, some participants indicated discomfort using or accessing technology for e-visits. Financial barriers to the use of e-visits was not a common theme. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that older adults are generally accepting of the concept of e-visits, but uptake may be limited due to their preference for synchronous communication. We identified several opportunities to improve e-visit implementation.
RESUMO
This cohort study investigates the association of demographic characteristics with changes in patient portal messaging after implementation of e-visit billing.