SUrgical Access and Pattern of Recurrence of Endometrial Cancer: The SUPeR Study, a Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate recurrence rate and pattern in apparently early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) treated with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and compare it to the "historical" populations treated by laparotomy. Secondary outcomes were to establish if, among MIS recurrent patients, intermediate-high/high-risk patients presented the same recurrence pattern compared to those at low/intermediate-risk and to evaluate time to first recurrence (TTR) of the study population. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective observational study. SETTING: Five Italian Gynecologic Oncology referral centers. PATIENTS: All patients with proven recurrence of apparently early-stage EC treated with MIS from January 2017 to June 2022 . The laparotomic historical cohort was obtained from Laparoscopy Compared With Laparotomy for Comprehensive Surgical Staging of Uterine Cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (LAP2) and Laparoscopic Approach to Cancer of the Endometrium trials. INTERVENTIONS: Evaluation of recurrence rate and pattern. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Seventy-seven recurrences occurred on the total of 1028 patients treated with MIS for apparently early-stage EC during a median follow-up time of 36 months. The rate of recurrence in our cohort did not differ significantly from the rate of the historical cohort (7.4% vs 7.9%, odds ratio 0.9395, 95% CI 0.6901-1.2792). No significant differences were noticed for local, abdominal, nodal, and multiple site recurrence patterns; distant site recurrence appeared more likely in patients from the historical cohort. Postoperative low/intermediate risk patients had a higher likelihood of local recurrence compared to intermediate-high/high risk patients. Mean TTR was 19 months. No significant difference of TTR was observed for each pattern of recurrence compared to others. CONCLUSION: MIS appears to be safe for the treatment of early-stage EC. We did not identify any recurrence pattern specifically associated with MIS in early-stage EC.

Successful laparoscopic surgical removal of a caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) using temporary uterine artery ligation.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate a laparoscopic technique to remove a scar pregnancy. DESIGN: Stepwise demonstration of the surgical technique. SETTING: Santa Croce and Carle Hospital, Cuneo. INTERVENTION: Patient B.B. is a woman referred to our center for a suspected cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) at 9 weeks gestation. CSP occurs approximately in 6% of all ectopic pregnancies. The estimated incidence is reported to be 1:1800 to 1:2500 in cesarean deliveries. Depending on its location, CSP can be categorized as either type 1, if the growth is in the uterine cavity, or type 2, if it expands toward the bladder and the abdominal cavity. If inadequately managed, it can lead to severe complications; most of them are hemorrhagic and can threaten the woman's life. There are several therapeutic approaches: local excision seems to be the most effective choice in type 2 CSP. In expert hands, the laparoscopic approach is perhaps the best surgical choice as tissue dissection, electrosurgical hemostasis, and vascular control can be effectively managed with minimal invasive access. Because severe intraoperative bleeding can occur, retroperitoneal vascular control is mandatory in this surgery. In type 1 CSP curettage, aspiration or hysteroscopic approach can be considered if the CSP is of small dimensions. A hysteroscopic approach can also be helpful in type 2 CSP during the laparoscopic removal, as intrauterine guidance. A potassium chloride local injection can be considered in a preoperative stage in the presence of a fetal heart rate. The systemic administration of methotrexate is usually ineffective as single agent, but it can be useful if administered as adjuvant therapy. Uterine artery embolization can be useful in an emergency setting to manage severe bleeding, but it can lead to complications in subsequent pregnancies and, more rarely, to premature ovarian failure. Considering poor bleeding at presentation, feasible dimensions, and the woman's desire for future pregnancy, ultrasound-guided aspiration and curettage was attempted. Because endouterine removal was incomplete, methotrexate injection was proposed as adjuvant therapy, but the administration was postponed as the patient tested positive for coronavirus disease 2019. A month later, beta-human chorionic gonadotropin level dropped from over 16 000 to 271 mU/mL, so an ultrasound and biochemical follow-up was performed. A month later, despite a low beta-human chorionic gonadotropin value, an increase in dimensions was observed at ultrasound, so surgical laparoscopic removal was offered. In this video article, laparoscopic removal of scar pregnancy is discussed in the following surgical steps: (1) Temporary closure of uterine arteries at the origin, using removable clips. (2) Retroperitoneal dissection to safely manage the scar pregnancy. (3) Dissection of the myometrial-pregnancy interface. (4) Double layer suture on the anterior uterine wall. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgical management is a very effective surgical approach to remove CSP. Knowledge of retroperitoneal dissection and vascular control is necessary to carry out this surgical intervention safely and effectively.

Laparoscopic Treatment of Bulky Nodes in Primary and Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Surgical Technique and Outcomes from Two Specialized Italian Centers.

(1) Background: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) represents a feasible approach in early-stage ovarian cancer, while this question is still unsolved for advanced and recurrent disease. (2) Methods: In this retrospective, multicenter study, we present a series of 21 patients who underwent MIS for primitive or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with bulky nodal metastasis and discuss surgical technique and outcomes in relation to the current literature. (3) Results: Complete cytoreduction at primary debulking surgery was obtained in 86% of cases. No complication occurred in our patients intraoperatively and only 11.1% of our patients experienced grade 2 and 3 postoperative complications. Notably, all the patients with isolated lymph nodal recurrence (ILNR) were successfully treated with a minimally invasive approach with no intra- or postoperative complications. (4) Conclusions: The results of our study are consistent with those reported in the literature, demonstrating that MIS may represent a safe approach in advanced and recurrent EOC with nodal metastasis if performed on selected patients by expert surgeons with an adequate setting and appropriate technique.