RESUMO
The implications of previous central nervous system (CNS) involvement in children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remain inadequately understood. Patients with CNS disease require more upfront CNS-directed intrathecal therapy, but little is known about whether transplant conditioning regimens should be intensified or if previous CNS involvement impacts post-HCT outcomes. While total body irradiation (TBI) remains standard for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia myeloablative conditioning, it has been largely replaced with chemotherapy-only myeloablation in pediatric AML, primarily due to toxicity and late effects associated with TBI. In the setting of previous CNS involvement, it has been suggested that TBI-based myeloablation may have advantages due to superior CNS tissue penetration and thus decreased rates of AML relapse post-HCT. We analyzed a publicly available dataset derived from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplantation Research (CIBMTR) registry to characterize the impact of TBI in HCT preparative regimens in pediatric AML patients with a history of CNS involvement. The study dataset was obtained from the CIBMTR data repository. The study cohort included patients aged ≤21 years who underwent initial allogeneic HCT with myeloablative conditioning for de novo AML in the first or second complete remission (CR) between 2008 and 2016, who provided consent for research. Patients with mismatched related donor transplants and noncalcineurin inhibitor graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis were excluded. The dataset was further modified by excluding patients with missing disease site data or those with non-CNS extramedullary disease. Patients were categorized as CNS-positive or -negative AML (AML-CNS(+) and AML-CNS(-), respectively) based on the disease status at diagnosis. The Cox regression model and Fine-Grey methods were employed to delineate the effects of TBI and CNS disease on key HCT outcomes. The study cohort comprised 550 pediatric AML patients, of which 25% (n = 136) were AML-CNS(+). CNS involvement was more prevalent in patients aged 0 to 3 years, patients who were in the second CR, and those with a mismatched unrelated donor or umbilical cord blood. AML-CNS(+) patients demonstrated a lower relapse rate (hazard ratio: 0.50, 95% confidence interval: 0.33 to 0.76) compared to AML-CNS(-) patients, with comparable disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (P = .10 and 0.20, respectively) in the two cohorts. The entire TBI-treated cohort showed an association with increased risks of grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD, bloodstream infections, and endocrine dysfunction. TBI use within the AML-CNS(+) cohort was associated with a lower relapse rate but increased risks of nonrelapse mortality and a trend of higher grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD. In this population-based analysis of pediatric patients with de novo AML undergoing HCT, TBI-based conditioning regimens did not confer an advantage in DFS or OS compared to non-TBI regimens, irrespective of CNS disease status. However, TBI use was associated with increased risks of short- and long-term comorbidities. These findings underscore the need for careful consideration of TBI in pediatric AML.