Septic patients without obvious signs of infection at baseline are more likely to die in the ICU.

OBJECTIVE: Early identification of sepsis is mandatory. However, clinical presentation is sometimes misleading given the lack of infection signs. The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact on the 28-day mortality of the so-called "vague" presentation of sepsis. DESIGN: Single centre retrospective observational study. SETTING: One teaching hospital Intensive Care Unit. SUBJECTS: All the patients who presented at the Emergency Department (ED) and were thereafter admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with a final diagnosis of sepsis were included in this retrospective observational three-year study. They were classified as having exhibited either "vague" or explicit presentation at the ED according to previously suggested criteria. Baseline characteristics, infection main features and sepsis management were compared. The impact of a vague presentation on 28-day mortality was then evaluated. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among the 348 included patients, 103 (29.6%) had a vague sepsis presentation. Underlying chronic diseases were more likely in those patients [e.g., peripheral arterial occlusive disease: adjusted odd ratio (aOR) = 2.01, (1.08-3.77) 95% confidence interval (CI); p = 0.028], but organ failure was less likely at the ED [SOFA score value: 4.7 (3.2) vs. 5.2 (3.1), p = 0.09]. In contrast, 28-day mortality was higher in the vague presentation group (40.8% vs. 26.9%, p = 0.011), along with longer time-to-diagnosis [18 (31) vs. 4 (11) h, p < 0.001], time-to-antibiotics [20 (32) vs. 7 (12) h, p < 0.001] and time to ICU admission [71 (159) vs. 24 (69) h, p < 0.001]. Whatever, such a vague presentation independently predicted 28-day mortality [aOR = 2.14 (1.24-3.68) 95% CI; p = 0.006]. CONCLUSIONS: Almost one third of septic patient requiring ICU had a vague presentation at the ED. Despite an apparent lower level of severity when initially assessed, those patients had an increased risk of mortality that could not be fully explained by delayed diagnosis and management of sepsis.

Exaggerated Placental Site as a Cause of Hysterectomy for Massive Bleeding After First Trimester Voluntary Abortion.

Objectives: Placental implantation anomalies in first-trimester abortions may determine severe bleeding leading to hysterectomy. There are very few cases of urgent hysterectomy post-abortion reported in the literature, related to placenta accreta spectrum, but in any of them is considered association with benign trophoblastic lesions. Methods: We report the case of a woman, who underwent surgical voluntary abortion by vacuum aspiration during first trimester, without any apparent surgical complications. Immediately, after this procedure, the patient had massive vaginal bleeding; an emergency hysterectomy was performed. Histological examination showed an exaggerated placental site (EPS). Results: Morphological findings describe a trophoblastic tumor-like lesion, which differs from placenta accreta and often considered an asymptomatic occasional feature. Proliferative index, evaluated by double immunostain for CK8-18 and Ki-67, was unremarkable (<1%). Conclusions: Only a single report in the literature describes a case of symptomatic EPS 65 after first-trimester abortion. Major attention should be paid to trophoblastic pathology in order to understand a possible relationship with uterine bleeding and to find a clinical, ultrasound or chemical indicator.

Gender differences in septic intensive care unit patients.

INTRODUCTION: The world population is mostly male at birth, although there is a shift in predominance over 55 years of age with more females than males. Male gender was recently hypothesized to be a risk factor for sepsis and septic shock; the reasons and the consequences of this odd discrepancy are yet a matter of debate. We investigated the percentage of males and females in a large number of trials performed on septic adult patients admitted to Intensive Care Units. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We analyzed all the multicenter randomized controlled trials ever published in peer-reviewed Journals reporting a significant effect on mortality in intensive care unit septic adult patients; furthermore, we retrieved all the manuscripts dealing with sepsis or septic shock patients published in the last 3 years in the three medical Journals with the highest impact factor. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We analyzed data from 12 multicenter randomized controlled trials (for a total of 5080 patients, 61% males) and from further 22 trials published in the New England Journal of Medicine, the Lancet, and the Journal of the American Medical Association (for a total of 493,066 patients, 54% males). Data on gender ratio in survivors were not available. CONCLUSIONS: Data from 34 large studies on 498,146 septic adult patients clearly showed a prevalence of males despite the expected female predominance. Further studies are required to explain the reasons, to evaluate if a difference is present in survival rate, and to identify gender-tailored preventive measures and treatments.