[An exceptional case of renal angiomyolipoma extended to the inferior vena cava. Successfull surgical management]. / Um caso excepcional de angiomiolipoma renal com extensão à veia cava inferior. Tratamento cirúrgico com êxito.

The clinical case of a 39 years old female is reported, with the diagnosis of tumor of the right kidney extending into the infra-hepatic vena cava, assuming the shape of a floating thrombus. The patient underwent right radical nephrectomy, followed by resection of the intra caval tumor. Both the procedure and post operative course were uneventfull. Histopathological evaluation of the specimens, associated to specific imunohistochemistry studies, confirmed the diagnosis of angiomyolipoma of the kidney. A review of the literature concluded that this is the 27th case published of a kidney angiomyolipoma extending into the inferior vena cava, thus justifying its presentation and divulgation.

Total androgen ablation: European experience. The EORTC GU Group.

Zoladex plus flutamide significantly delays the time to progression (subjective, objective, first progression) compared with orchiectomy, but no difference in survival (death from all causes or from malignant disease) could be detected. Thus, a delay in the appearance of progression has not improved survival. In fact, the duration of survival after progression tends to be shorter on Zoladex plus flutamide. There is thus no evidence to suggest any survival benefit with Zoladex plus flutamide. The quality control of our data revealed acknowledged problems in defining responses in patients with advanced prostate cancer. The review of the Bone Scan Committee provided the data for Tables 5 to 7. These data must provoke some reflections and emphasize once again the heterogeneity of the studied patient population. Table 4 on pain response after 4 weeks is just one of the many items to be analyzed by the committees for response criteria and quality of life. We expect that the other trials face similar problems. More work and patience are needed to obtain a firm answer to this clinical problem. These efforts will never be wasted, however, because the combined results of these trials will increase our knowledge of the treated history of prostate cancer and will, we hope, indicate a net treatment benefit in some subsets of patients. An individually tailored treatment for each patient selected from the anonymous mass of cases of advanced prostate cancer would be the highest reward of our continued collaboration with all the study groups.

Orchidectomy versus goserelin plus flutamide in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (EORTC 30853). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer--Genitourinary Group.

A total of 327 patients with metastatic prostate cancer were randomized to receive bilateral orchiectomy or treatment with Zoladex and flutamide. The trial aimed to evaluate subjective and objective time to progression, survival, and incidence and duration of response. Strict quality control and evaluation by independent ad hoc committees were organized. Progression was assessed for each of 13 parameters. The time to subjective and objective progression was in favor of the combination treatment, with statistical significances of P = 0.009 and P = 0.008, respectively. This delay in objective progression resulted in increased survival in favor of the combination treatment for death by cancer (P = 0.02) or overall survival (P = 0.05). Survival differences were more marked in the patients with better prognostic factors. The clinical significance of these differences for the individual patient requires detailed assessment.