Molecular diagnosis of Cytomegalovirus infection: clinical performance of the Aptima transcription-mediated amplification assay toward conventional qPCR chemistry on whole blood samples.

Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection is life-threatening for immunocompromised patients. Quantitative molecular assays on whole blood or plasma are the gold standard for the diagnosis of invasive HCMV infection and for monitoring antiviral treatment in individuals at risk of HCMV disease. For these reasons, an accurate standardization toward the WHO 1st International Standard among different centers and diagnostic kits represents an effort for better clinical management of HCMV-positive patients. Herein, we evaluate, for the first time, the performance of a new transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assay versus quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) chemistry, used as a routine method, on whole blood samples. A total of 755 clinical whole blood specimens were collected and tested simultaneously with TMA and qPCR assays. The data showed a qualitative agreement of 99.27% for positive quantified samples and 89.39% for those undetected between the two tested methods. Evaluation of viremia in positive samples highlighted a good correlation between TMA and qPCR chemistries in terms of International Units (ΔLog10 IU/mL: -0.29 ± 0.40). The TMA assay showed a significant correlation with qPCR in patients monitored for up to 3 months, thus allowing an accurate assessment of viremia in transplant patients. Therefore, TMA chemistry showed good agreement with qPCR testing, used as a current diagnostic routine. It also offers important advantages, such as FDA approval on plasma and In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) on both plasma and whole blood, automated workflow with minimal hands-on time, and random access loading, thus enabling a rapid and reliable diagnostic in HCMV-infected patients. IMPORTANCE: In this paper, we describe the clinical performance of a novel transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assay for the detection and quantification of human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) DNA from whole blood samples. This is a pivotal analysis in immunocompromised patients [transplanted, HIV-positive, and Hematopoietic Stem Cell (HSC) recipients], and molecular tests with high sensitivity and specificity are necessary to evaluate the HCMV viral load in these patients. To our knowledge, this is the first in-depth evaluation of TMA chemistry for HCMV diagnosis on whole blood samples. Moreover, also technical aspects of this assay make it suitable for clinical diagnostics.

Detection of volatile organic compounds as new paradigm to accelerate antimicrobial susceptibility testing: performance evaluation of VITEK® REVEAL™.

OBJECTIVES: The measurement of VOCs release in the headspace of a bacterial culture represents a new approach to rapidly assess antimicrobial susceptibility. Herein, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of the VITEK® REVEAL™ system directly from a collection of Gram-negative positive blood cultures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty-eight positive blood cultures were included in the analysis (Enterobacterales, n = 95; Pseudomonas aeruginosa, n = 21; Acinetobacter baumannii complex, n = 12). Samples were processed using VITEK® REVEAL™ according to the manufacturer's recommendations, and MICs of 22 antimicrobials were compared with those obtained using reference methods. Categorical agreement (CA), essential agreement (EA) and categorical errors were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 2220 strain/antibiotic pair combinations were analysed. Of these, most were classified as resistant by reference antimicrobial susceptibility testing (1091/2220; 48.7%). The overall CA and EA were 97.6% and 97.7%, respectively. CA ranged from 97.5% in Enterobacterales to 97.9% in both P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii complex. The overall number of categorical discrepancies were: 18 very major errors (1.6%), 13 major errors (1.2%) and 22 minor errors (2.4%). EA ranged from 95.2% in P. aeruginosa to 98.1% in Enterobacterales. Screening test for ESBL phenotype was positive, indeterminate and negative in 13.7%, 32.6% and 27.4% of Enterobacterales isolates tested by both VITEK® REVEAL™ and the reference method, showing 100% CA. CONCLUSIONS: VITEK® REVEAL™ represents a reliable tool to obtain antimicrobial susceptibility results of the main Gram-negative species directly from positive blood cultures with time to results of less than 8 h.

Performance evaluation of Bruker UMIC® microdilution panel and disc diffusion to determine cefiderocol susceptibility in Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Achromobacter xylosoxidans and Burkolderia species.

PURPOSE: Cefiderocol susceptibility testing (AST) represents an open challenge for clinical microbiology. Herein, we evaluated the performance of the UMIC® Cefiderocol broth microdilution (BMD) test and disc diffusion on Gram-negative species. METHODS: UMIC® Cefiderocol BMD test, disc diffusion and reference BMD were in parallel performed on a collection of 256 clinical isolates. Categorical agreement (CA), essential agreement (EA), bias, major errors (MEs) and very major errors (VMEs) were calculated for both AST methods. RESULTS: The UMIC® Cefiderocol BMD strip exhibited an EA < 90% (85.5%), a CA higher than 90% (93.7%) and a low number of VMEs (n = 4, 4.2%) and MEs (n = 12, 7.4%). UMIC® Cefiderocol identified 96.2% of the resistant isolates [Enterobacterales, (39/40); P. aeruginosa (19/19); A. xylosoxidans (5/6); S. maltophilia (5/6); Burkholderia spp. (8/8)]. Disc diffusion showed a high CA (from 94.9 to 100%) regardless of disc manufacturer in Enterobacterales, P. aeuroginosa, A. baumannii and S. maltophilia. However, high rates of results falling in the area of technical uncertainty (ATU) were observed in Enterobacterales (34/90, 37.8%) and P. aeruginosa (16/40, 40%). Disc diffusion showed a poor performance in A. xylosoxidans and Burkholderia spp. if PK/PD breakpoint was used (overall, 5/9 VMEs; in contrast, the use of P. aeruginosa-specific breakpoints resulted in 100% of CA with 24.6% of results in the ATU). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, disc diffusion and UMIC® Cefiderocol are valid methods for the determination of cefiderocol susceptibility. Given the high number of results in the ATU by disc diffusion, a combined use of both AST methods may represent a solution to overcome the challenge of cefiderocol susceptibility testing in routine microbiology laboratories.

Prevalence and mortality of ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections (2018-2022).

INTRODUCTION: Ceftazidime/avibactam-resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) is a topic of great interest for epidemiological, diagnostic, and therapeutical reasons. However, data on its prevalence and burden on mortality in patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) are lacking. This study was aimed at identifying risk factors for mortality in patients suffering from ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-Kp BSI. METHODS: An observational retrospective study (January 2018-December 2022) was conducted at a tertiary hospital including all consecutive hospitalized adult patients with a ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-Kp BSI. Data on baseline clinical features, management, and admission outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Over the study period, among all the KPC-Kp BSI events recorded, 38 (10.5%) were caused by ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-Kp strains, 37 events being finally included. The ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-Kp strains revealed susceptibility restoration to at least one carbapenem in more than 60% of cases. In-hospital and 30-day all-cause mortality rates were 22% and 16.2%, respectively. Non-survivors suffered from more baseline comorbidities and experienced a more severe ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-Kp BSI presentation (i.e., both the Pitt Bacteremia and INCREMENT-CPE scores were significantly higher). Presenting with a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, chronic kidney disease-KDIGO stage 3A or worse-having recently gone through renal replacement therapy, having suffered from an acute kidney injury following the ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-Kp BSI, and being admitted for cardiac surgery were the strongest predictors of mortality. CONCLUSION: Ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in KPC-Kp BSI easily emerged in our highly KPC-Kp endemic area with remarkable mortality rates. Our findings might provide physicians possibly actionable information when managing patients with a ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-Kp BSI.

First case of Chryseobacterium gallinarum bloodstream infection: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for an emerging pathogen.

Chryseobacterium spp. belongs to the Flavobacteriaceae family and is a rod-shaped gram-negative, glucose non-fermenting, non-motile bacterium ubiquitous in the environment. In humans, Chryseobacterium may be responsible for infections such as urinary tract infections (UTI) and ventriculitis with a pathogenic burden increasing in recent years. Chryseobacterium gallinarum was isolated for the first time in 2014 in a pharyngeal scrape sample of chicken and, until now, only one case of human UTI has been described in a pregnant 20-year-old Indian patient. Herein, we report the first case of bloodstream infection caused by C. gallinarum in a 67-year-old female burn patient, correctly identified by 16S-rRNA sequencing and successfully treated with cefepime and fosfomycin.

Rapid diagnostics and ceftazidime/avibactam for KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections: impact on mortality and role of combination therapy.

This study was aimed at investigating risk factors for mortality in patients suffering from KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) bloodstream infections (BSIs), evaluating the impact of rapid diagnostics and ceftazidime/avibactam use. This observational retrospective study (January 2017-May 2021) included all patients with a KPC-Kp BSI. Uni-multivariable analyses were carried out to evaluate the effect of clinical variables on both in-hospital death (IHD) and 30-day all-cause mortality, and the role of the combination of ceftazidime/avibactam plus polymyxin. One hundred and ninety-six patients met the study's inclusion criteria. Older age, having undergone renal replacement therapy during the 30 days preceding the KPC-Kp BSI onset, having an INCREMENT-CPE score ≥ 8, and having suffered from a superimposed and/or following KPC-Kp BSI treatment candidemia were found to be the main factors associated with both mortality rates. Among protective factors, the centrality of ceftazidime/avibactam in monotherapy (IHD: OR: 0.34; CI 95%: 0.11-1.00-30-day all-cause mortality: OR: 0.18; CI 95%: 0.04-0.77) or combination (IHD: OR: 0.51; CI 95%: 0.22-1.19-30-day all-cause mortality: OR: 0.62; CI 95%: 0.21-1.84) emerged and became even more evident once the effect of ceftazidime/avibactam plus polymyxin was removed. Rapid diagnostics may be useful to adopt more effective strategies for the treatment of KPC-Kp BSI patients and implement infection control measures, even if not associated with higher patient survival. Ceftazidime/avibactam, even when used alone, represents an important option against KPC-Kp, while combined use with polymyxin might not have altered its efficacy. Patient comorbidities, severity of BSI, and complications such as candidemia were confirmed to have a significant burden on survival.

Burden of primary influenza and respiratory syncytial virus pneumonia in hospitalised adults: insights from a 2-year multi-centre cohort study (2017-2018).

BACKGROUND: Viral community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a potentially serious illness, particularly in adult patients with underlying chronic conditions. In addition to the most recent SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) are considered the most relevant causes of viral CAP. AIMS: To describe the clinical features of hospitalised adults admitted for influenza-A/B and RSV pneumonia and analyse, according to aetiology, factors associated with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) failure and in-hospital death (IHD). METHODS: This was a retrospective and multi-centre study of all adults who were admitted for laboratory-confirmed influenza-A/B or RSV pneumonia, during two consecutive winter seasons (October-April 2017-2018 and 2018-2019) in three tertiary hospitals in Portugal, Italy and Cyprus. RESULTS: A total of 356 adults were included in the study. Influenza-A, influenza-B and RSV were deemed to cause pneumonia in 197 (55.3%), 85 (23.9%) and 74 (20.8%) patients, respectively. Patients with both obstructive sleep apnoea or obesity hypoventilation syndrome and influenza-A virus pneumonia showed a higher risk for NIV failure (odds ratio (OR) 4.66; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.42-15.30). Patients submitted to NIV showed a higher risk for IHD, regardless of comorbidities (influenza-A OR 3.00; 95% CI 1.35-6.65, influenza-B OR 4.52; 95% CI 1.13-18.01, RSV OR 5.61; 95% CI 1.26-24.93). CONCLUSION: The increased knowledge of influenza-A/B and RSV pneumonia burden may contribute to a better management of patients with viral CAP.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam (C/A) Resistant, Meropenem Sensitive KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in ICU Setting: We Are What We Are Treated with?

The continuous spread of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CP-Kp) strains presents a severe challenge to the healthcare system due to limited therapeutic options and high mortality. Since its availability, ceftazidime/avibactam (C/A) has become a first-line option against KPC-Kp, but C/A-resistant strains have been reported increasingly, especially with pneumonia or prior suboptimal blood exposure to C/A treatment. A retrospective, observational study was conducted with all patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) dedicated to COVID-19 patients at the City of Health & Sciences in Turin, between 1 May 2021 and 31 January 2022, with the primary endpoint to study strains with resistance to C/A, and secondly to describe the characteristics of this population, with or without previous exposure to C/A. Seventeen patients with colonization or invasive infection due to Klebsiella pneumoniae, C/A resistance, and susceptibility to meropenem (MIC = 2 µg/L) were included; the blaKPC genotype was detected in all isolates revealing D179Y mutation in the blaKPC-2 (blaKPC-33) gene. Cluster analysis showed that 16 out of the 17 C/A-resistant KPC-Kp isolates belonged to a single clone. Thirteen strains (76.5%) were isolated in a 60-day period. Only some patients had a previous infection with non-mutant KPC at other sites (5; 29.4%). Eight patients (47.1%) underwent previous large-spectrum antibiotic treatment, and four patients (23.5%) had prior treatment with C/A. The secondary spread of the D179Y mutation in the blaKPC-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic needs to be addressed constantly by an interdisciplinary interaction between microbiologists, infection control personnel, clinicians, and infectious diseases consultants to properly diagnose and treat patients.

Rapid determination of ceftazidime/avibactam susceptibility of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales directly from blood cultures: a comparative evaluation of EUCAST disc diffusion RAST and direct Etest® RAST.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of two rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) methods to determine ceftazidime/avibactam susceptibility directly from blood cultures (BCs). METHODS: A total of 246 Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were tested for ceftazidime/avibactam susceptibility directly from BC bottles using EUCAST RAST and Etest® RAST. Results obtained after 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation were compared with those obtained by reference broth microdilution on pure overnight subcultures. RESULTS: In total, the proportion of readable zones after 4 h of incubation was 96.7% and reached 100% after 6 and 8 h of incubation. EUCAST RAST yielded >98% of categorical agreement (CA) with all reading times. Major error (ME) and very major error (VME) rates were inferior to 3%, for each of the reading times. The proportion of results in the area of technical uncertainty (ATU) was almost similar (3.8%-4.1%) at the different reading times. DET-RAST yielded 97.5%, 98% and 99.6% of CA with readings at 4, 6 and 8 h, respectively. One (0.6%) ME was observed at each reading time, whereas five (5.9%) and four (4.5%) VMEs were observed analysing readings at 4 and 6 h, respectively. No VME was observed with readings at 8 h. CONCLUSIONS: EUCAST RAST was accurate to determine ceftazidime/avibactam susceptibility of carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae and E. coli directly from BC bottles. DET-RAST has the advantage of determining MIC values and avoiding ATU results but showed to be an accurate method only with reading at 8 h.

Evaluation of a diagnostic algorithm for rapid identification of Gram-negative species and detection of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase and carbapenemase directly from blood cultures.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a rapid diagnostic algorithm based on MALDI-TOF MS, lateral flow immunoassays (LFIAs) and molecular testing performed directly from positive blood cultures (BCs) for Gram-negative species identification and detection of CTX-M extended-spectrum ß-lactamases and main carbapenemases. METHODS: Non-duplicate BCs positive to Gram-negative bacteria at microscope examination were subjected to species identification by direct MALDI-TOF MS following recovery of bacterial pellet by Rapid MBT Sepsityper® kit. Subsequently, NG-Test® CARBA 5 and NG-Test® CTX-M MULTI LFIAs were performed according to identified microbial species. Eazyplex® SuperBug CRE molecular assay was performed in cases of NG-Test® CARBA 5 negative results in patients with documented carbapenemase-producers carriage. Results of rapid diagnostic workflow were compared with those obtained by conventional diagnostic routine. RESULTS: Overall, the direct MALDI-TOF MS protocol allowed reliable identification to the species level of 92.1% of the 2133 monomicrobial BCs. Rate of matched identification was significantly higher for Enterobacterales (97.3%) in comparison to non-fermenting Gram-negative species (80.2%), obligate anaerobic bacteria (42.1%) and fastidious Gram-negative species (41.5%). The overall sensitivity of NG-Test® CARBA 5 and NG-Test® CTX-M MULTI was 92.2% and 91.6%, respectively. Integration of Easyplex® SuperBug CRE allowed the detection of blaKPC mutants associated with ceftazidime/avibactam resistance, reaching 100% sensitivity in carbapenemase detection. Both LFIAs and molecular testing showed no false-positive results. CONCLUSIONS: Algorithms based on MALDI-TOF MS, LFIAs and molecular testing may represent a cost-effective tool to timely identify Gram-negative species and detect resistance markers directly from BCs. According to local epidemiology, these results may allow antimicrobial stewardship interventions including prompt use of new approved drugs.

Seroconversion After Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination in Patients Awaiting Liver Transplantation: Fact or Fancy?

Chronic liver disease increased the risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Trials to assess efficacy/safety of COVID-19 vaccines in liver disease are underway. We evaluated the humoral immune response and safety of anti-COVID-19 vaccination among patients waiting liver transplantation (LT). We enrolled all pre-LT adults who completed anti-COVID-19 vaccination between January 2021-August 2021 as study group. Patients with histories of COVID-19 received 1 vaccine dose, and all others received 2 doses. Patients were tested for COVID-19 immunoglobulin G (IgG) within 1 and 2 months after vaccination. Safety was evaluated with telephone interviews/outpatient visits. A control group of 30 healthcare workers who underwent vaccination in January 2021 and tested for IgG after 4 months was included. In the 89 pre-LT patients, at T1 (23 days after vaccination), seroconversion rate was 94.4%, and median IgG value was 1980 binding antibody units/mL (interquartile range 646-2080), and at T2 (68 days after vaccination) was 92.0%, with IgG value of 1450 (577-2080); (T1 versus T2, P = 0.38). In the 10/89 patients who received 1 vaccine dose, the median IgG value was 274 (68-548) before vaccine (T0), 2080 (1165-2080) at T1, and 2030 (964-2080) at T2 (T0 versus T1, P = 0.03; T1 versus T2, P = 0.99). All controls tested positive at 4 months after vaccination, with a median value of 847 (509-1165; P < 0.001 versus T1 and P = 0.04 versus T2 in the study group). No serious adverse event was reported in both groups. Our data from 89 pre-LT patients suggest a high rate of immunization (94.4%) after a median time of 23 days from safe COVID-19 vaccine. None of the patients developed COVID-19.

Direct detection of extended-spectrum-ß-lactamase-producers in Enterobacterales from blood cultures: a comparative analysis.

Accurate detection of extended-spectrum-ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales from bloodstream infection (BSI) is of paramount importance for both epidemiological and clinical purposes, especially for optimization of antibiotic stewardship interventions. Three phenotypic methods for the detection of ESBL phenotype in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli BSI were compared over a 4-month period (May-August 2021) in a main University Hospital from Northern Italy. The methods were the biochemical Rapid ESBL NP®, the immunological NG-Test CTX-M MULTI®, and the E-test technique based on ESBL E-test®. One hundred forty-two blood cultures (BCs) positive for K. pneumoniae or E. coli were included. ESBL and carbapenemase phenotype were detected in 26.1% (n = 37) and 16.9% (n = 24), respectively. The Rapid ESBL NP®, NG-Test CTX-M MULTI®, and direct ESBL E-test® positive and negative predictive values with 95% confidence intervals were 1 (0.87-1) and 0.97 (0.92-0.99), 1 (0.87-1) and 0.97 (0.92-0.99), and 1 (0.88-1) and 1 (0.96-1), respectively. The three phenotypic methods evaluated showed good performance in the detection of ESBL phenotype from K. pneumoniae- or E. coli-positive BCs. Rapid ESBL NP® and NG-test CTX-M® offer the important advantage of a turnaround time of 15 to 45 min, and the Rapid ESBL NP test in addition detects any type of ESBL producers.

Occurrence of multi-carbapenemases producers among carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and in vitro activity of combinations including cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and aztreonam in the COVID-19 era.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence of multi-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (EB) and the activity of cefiderocol (CFDC), meropenem-vaborbactam (MEV), ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), and combinations of CZA plus aztreonam (ATM), MEV plus ATM and CFDC plus CZA against them. METHODS: A collection of carbapenemase-producing EB clinical isolates (n = 1242) was investigated by lateral flow immunoassay NG-Test CARBA-5 and molecular testing. Cefiderocol MICs were determined using broth microdilution SensititreTM panel. MICs of CZA and MEV were determined by the gradient diffusion method. Antimicrobial synergy testing was performed using gradient diffusion strip crossing. RESULTS: KPC were the most frequent carbapenemases (83.2%), followed by VIM (9.2 %), OXA-48-like (4.3 %) and NDM enzymes (4.1%). Multi-carbapenemase producers were found in 10 (0.8%) isolates. Three combinations of two different carbapenemases were observed: KPC+VIM (n = 4), NDM+OXA-48-like (n = 4), and VIM+OXA-48-like (n = 2). CFDC showed potent activity against eight out of ten dual-carbapenemases producers, while resistance or reduced susceptibility was shown towards CZA and MEV. CFDC in combination with CZA showed no synergistic effects and only two additive effects on seven (87.5%) of the CFDC-susceptible strains. Conversely, CZA plus ATM and MEV plus ATM combinations were synergistic against all ATM-resistant strains regardless of dual-carbapenemases phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of multi-carbapenemase producers is not uncommon in Northern Italy area. MEV in combination with ATM might be considered as a potential therapeutic option, alternative to CZA plus ATM. CFDC susceptibility testing and synergy evaluation of ATM-based combinations should be performed in the lab routine to evaluate the most in vitro active antimicrobial regimen.

Implementation of Chromatic Super CAZ/AVI® medium for active surveillance of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance: preventing the loop from becoming a spiral.

Acquired resistance towards ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is increasingly reported. Several mechanisms can be involved, but mutations in the Ω-loop region of ß-lactamases are the most described. Herein, we assessed the implementation of Chromatic Super CAZ/AVI® medium in rectal swab surveillance cultures in a geographic area with endemic distribution of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Routine rectal swabs collected from the intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients were screened for carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE), carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative organisms (CR-GN) and CAZ-AVI-resistant organisms by Chromatic CRE and Super CAZ/AVI® media. Among the 1839 patients screened, 146 (7.9%) were found to be colonized by one or more CPE and/or CR-GN isolates during hospitalization. Overall, among colonized patients the most common bacteria encountered were KPC-producing Enterobacterales (n = 60; 41.1%), carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 41; 28.1%) and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (n = 34; 23.3%). Among patients colonized by KPC-producing Enterobacterales, thirty-five (58.3%) had CAZ-AVI-resistant strains. A 30.5% rate of faecal carriage of CAZ-AVI-resistant KPC-producing K. pneumoniae, substantially higher than that of susceptible isolates (2.8%), was observed in the COVID-19 ICU. Prevalence of faecal carriage of metallo-ß-lactamase-producing organisms was low (0.5% and 0.2% for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa, respectively). Chromatic Super CAZ/AVI® medium showed 100% sensitivity in detecting CPE or CR-GN isolates resistant to CAZ-AVI regardless of both MIC values and carbapenemase content. Specificity was 86.8%. The Chromatic Super CAZ/AVI® medium might be implemented in rectal swab surveillance cultures for identification of patients carrying CAZ-AVI-resistant organisms to contain the spread of these difficult-to-treat pathogens.

In vitro activity of cefiderocol against ceftazidime-avibactam susceptible and resistant KPC-producing Enterobacterales: cross-resistance and synergistic effects.

PURPOSE: To assess the in vitro activity of cefiderocol (CFDC) against a collection of both ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) susceptible and resistant KPC-producing Enterobacterales (KPC-EB) isolates. Secondly, to assess its synergistic activity in combination with different antibiotics. METHODS: One hundred KPC-EB isolates were tested: 60 CZA susceptible and 40 CZA resistant. Among them, 17 pairs of CZA susceptible and resistant KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) isolates were collected from 17 distinct patients before and after CZA treatment, respectively. CFDC susceptibility was evaluated by both broth microdilution (lyophilized panels; Sensititre; Thermo Fisher) and disk diffusion testing. Results were interpreted using EUCAST breakpoints. Synergistic activity of CFDC in combination with CZA, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem, and amikacin against six characterized KPC-Kp strains, before and after acquisition of CZA resistance, was evaluated using gradient diffusion strip crossing method. RESULTS: CFDC resistance rate was significantly higher in CZA resistant EB subset than in the susceptible one (p < 0.001): 82.5% vs 6.7%. MIC50 and MIC90 values were 0.25 and 2 mg/L, 8 and 64 mg/L in CZA-susceptible and CZA-resistant subset, respectively. KPC-Kp isolates harboring KPC-D179Y or KPC-Δ242-GT-243 variants showed CFDC MICs ranging from 4 to 64 mg/L. CFDC showed in vitro synergistic effect mostly with CZA, against both CZA susceptible and resistant isolates, resulting in a synergy rate of 66.7%. CONCLUSIONS: CZA resistance mechanisms in KPC-EB impair the in vitro activity of CFDC, often leading to co-resistance. CFDC in combination with the new ß-lactamases inhibitors might represent a strategy to enhance its activity.

Convalescent or standard plasma versus standard of care in the treatment of COVID-19 patients with respiratory impairment: short and long-term effects. A three-arm randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of early treatment with convalescent plasma in patients with COVID-19 is debated. Nothing is known about the potential effect of other plasma components other than anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. METHODS: To determine whether convalescent or standard plasma would improve outcomes for adults in early phase of Covid19 respiratory impairment we designed this randomized, three-arms, clinical trial (PLACO COVID) blinded on interventional arms that was conducted from June 2020 to August 2021. It was a multicentric trial at 19 Italian hospitals. We enrolled 180 hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 pneumonia within 5 days from the onset of respiratory distress. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to standard of care (n = 60) or standard of care + three units of standard plasma (n = 60) or standard of care + three units of high-titre convalescent plasma (n = 60) administered on days 1, 3, 5 after randomization. Primary outcome was 30-days mortality. Secondary outcomes were: incidence of mechanical ventilation or death at day 30, 6-month mortality, proportion of days with mechanical ventilation on total length of hospital stay, IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion, viral clearance from plasma and respiratory tract samples, and variations in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. The trial was analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: 180 patients (133/180 [73.9%] males, mean age 66.6 years [IQR 57-73]) were enrolled a median of 8 days from onset of symptoms. At enrollment, 88.9% of patients showed moderate/severe respiratory failure. 30-days mortality was 20% in Control arm, 23% in Convalescent (risk ratio [RR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-2.13, P = 0.694) and 25% in Standard plasma (RR 1.23; 95%CI, 0.63-2.37, P = 0.544). Time to viral clearance from respiratory tract was 21 days for Convalescent, 28 for Standard plasma and 23 in Control arm but differences were not statistically significant. No differences for other secondary endpoints were seen in the three arms. Serious adverse events were reported in 1.7%, 3.3% and 5% of patients in Control, Standard and Convalescent plasma arms respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Neither high-titer Convalescent nor Standard plasma improve outcomes of COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04428021. First posted: 11/06/2020.

Liver transplantation from active COVID-19 donors: A lifesaving opportunity worth grasping?

COVID-19 pandemic dramatically impacted transplantation landscape. Scientific societies recommend against the use of donors with active SARS-CoV-2 infection. Italian Transplant Authority recommended to test recipients/donors for SARS-CoV-2-RNA immediately before liver transplant (LT) and, starting from November 2020, grafts from deceased donors with active SARS-CoV-2 infection were allowed to be considered for urgent-need transplant candidates with active/resolved COVID-19. We present the results of the first 10 LTs with active COVID-19 donors within an Italian multicenter series. Only two recipients had a positive molecular test at LT and one of them remained positive up to 21 days post-LT. None of the other eight recipients was found to be SARS-CoV-2 positive during follow-up. IgG against SARS-CoV-2 at LT were positive in 80% (8/10) of recipients, and 71% (5/7) showed neutralizing antibodies, expression of protective immunity related to recent COVID-19. In addition, testing for SARS-CoV-2 RNA on donors' liver biopsy at transplantation was negative in 100% (9/9), suggesting a very low risk of transmission with LT. Immunosuppression regimen remained unchanged, according to standard protocol. Despite the small number of cases, these data suggest that transplanting livers from donors with active COVID-19 in informed candidates with SARS-CoV-2 immunity, might contribute to safely increase the donor pool.

Severity of RSV infection in Southern European elderly patients during two consecutive winter seasons (2017-2018).

In Europe, the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) surveillance system is very heterogeneous and there is growing evidence of the importance of RSV infections resulting in hospitalization of elderly patients. The aim of this study was to assess the severity of RSV infection in the elderly living in the aged Southern European countries. We conducted a retrospective study of elderly patients ( ≥65-year old) admitted for laboratory-confirmed RSV infection in three tertiary hospitals in Portugal, Italy, and Cyprus over two consecutive winter seasons (2017-2018). Uni-multivariable analyses were carried out to evaluate the effect of clinical variables on radiologically confirmed pneumonia, use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV), and in-hospital death (IHD). A total of 166 elderly patients were included. Pneumonia was evident in 29.5%. NIV was implemented in 16.3%, length of stay was 11.8 ± 12.2 days, and IHD occurred in 12.1%. Multivariable analyses revealed that the risk of pneumonia was higher in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (odds ratio [OR]: 2.57; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-5.91); the use of NIV was higher in patients with obstructive sleep apnea or obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OSA or OHS) (OR: 5.38; 95% CI: 1.67-17.35) and CKD (OR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.01-6.23); the risk of IHD was higher in males (OR: 3.30; 95% CI: 1.07-10.10) and in patients with solid neoplasm (OR: 9.06; 95% CI: 2.44-33.54) and OSA or OHS (OR: 8.39; 95% CI: 2.14-32.89). Knowledge of factors associated with RSV infection severity may aid clinicians to set priorities and reduce disease burden. Development of effective antiviral treatment and vaccine against RSV is highly desirable.

Fast-track identification of CTX-M-extended-spectrum-ß-lactamase- and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in bloodstream infections: implications on the likelihood of deduction of antibiotic susceptibility in emergency and internal medicine departments.

This study aims at presenting a reliable fast-track diagnostics for the detection of CTX-M ESBL- (CTX-M-p) and carbapenemase-producers (CA-p) directly from blood cultures (BCs) of patients with Enterobacterales (EB) bloodstream infections (BSIs) admitted in emergency and internal medicine departments and its contribution in estimation of in vitro antibiotic susceptibility. A fast-track workflow including MALDI-TOF species identification and two lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for the detection of CTX-M-p and CA-p directly from BCs was performed in parallel with conventional routine, and results were compared. A total of 236 BCs of patients suffering from EB BSI were included. Accuracy of the fast-track workflow ranged from 99.6 to 100%. Among E. coli isolates, CTX-M-p (20.5%) were susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T, 97%), ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA, 100%), and piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP, 84.8%), whereas CTX-M-and-main-carbapenemases-non-producer (CTX-M-CA-np, 79.5%) isolates were susceptible to all the antibiotics tested. Among K. pneumoniae isolates, CTX-M-p (23.3%) were poorly susceptible to TZP (40%) but widely susceptible to C/T (90%), CZA (100%), and amikacin (90%), whereas CTX-M-CA-np (55.8%) were also susceptible to cefepime. CA-p K. pneumoniae (20.9%) were susceptible to CZA (88.9%). All the species other than E. coli and K. pneumoniae were CTX-M-CA-np and were widely susceptible to the antibiotics tested except for isolates of the inducible and derepressed AmpC- or AmpC/ESBL-p species. Rapid identification of species and phenotype together with knowledge of local epidemiology may be crucial to determine the likelihood of deduction of in vitro antibiotic susceptibility on the same day of positive BC processing.

Rescue Therapies for Helicobacter pylori Infection in Foreign Patients Treated in Italy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive foreigner patients with H. pylori infection following at least one therapy failure were enrolled. All patients underwent upper endoscopy with gastric biopsies used for both histologic examination and culture/susceptibility test. Rescue therapies administered accordingly to susceptibility testing were rifabutin-based therapy, levofloxacin-based therapy, sequential. Pylera was prescribed regardless the resistance pattern. RESULTS: A total of 103 (M/F: 27/76, mean age: 41.9 y, range: 18 to 85) were enrolled. The overall resistance rates toward clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin were 76.7%, 66%, and 42.7%, respectively, with triple resistance present in 33.9% of bacterial isolates. Eradication rates were 71.4% on 40 patients for rifabutin-based therapy, 82.8% on 42 cases for levofloxacin-based therapy, 75% on 11 patients treated with sequential therapy, and 100% on 10 cases who received Pylera regimen. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study assessing H. pylori eradication rates in foreigner patients, who failed at least one therapeutic attempt, managed in Italy. Even by using a culture-based approach, the infection was not cured in a definite number of patients.