The Short-Term Efficacy of Integrating the Easy-Flex Device with Inpatient Rehabilitation in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients: Insights from a Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of Easy-Flex as an adjunct to standard inpatient rehabilitation on clinical and functional outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial SETTING: Outpatient clinic and research laboratory PARTICIPANTS: A total of 44 patients were randomized to the Easy-Flex Group (EFG) or Control Group (CG). INTERVENTION: A rehabilitation program averaging 50-60 minutes per day was implemented for the CG patients. In the EFG, in addition to 30-40 minutes of exercise with the Easy-Flex, the rehabilitation program applied to the CG was integrated with reduced sets and repetitions, with an average duration of 20 minutes. All interventions were performed under the supervision of a physiotherapist during hospitalization. After discharge, both groups received the same home exercise program. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome is the flexion and extension range of motion (ROM). The secondary outcomes include the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (5TSST), 10-Meter Walking Test (10MWT), Short Form-12v2, and Global Rating of Change score (GRCS). RESULTS: After 6 weeks, the overall group-by-time interaction for the 2 × 3 mixed-model ANOVA was found to be significant for flexion ROM (p=0.005), NPRS-rest (p=0.04), NPRS-activity (p=0.01), 10-MWT (p=0.003), WOMAC (p=0.021) and SF-12-PCS (p=0.032) in favor of EFG exercising with Easy-Flex in addition to standard rehabilitation. The between-group differences in favor of the EFG were -8.0° knee ROM, 1.35 to 1.5 points for pain intensity, and 0.12 m/sec for gait speed. Furthermore, differences favouring EFG in NPRS-rest,10-MWT speed, and SF-12 PCS were greater than the reported MCID. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating Easy-Flex into standard physical therapy can be a beneficial, safe, and effective approach in clinical practice, as patients undergoing TKA typically prioritize improving their quality of life by reducing pain and increasing ROM.

Does the Combination of Platelet-rich Plasma and Supervised Exercise Yield Better Pain Relief and Enhanced Function in Knee Osteoarthritis? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis is a leading cause of disability with substantial healthcare costs, and efficient nonsurgical treatment methods are still needed. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections and exercise therapy are used frequently in clinical practice. Whether PRP or PRP combined with exercise is more effective than exercise alone is unclear. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Which treatment relieves knee osteoarthritis pain better: PRP alone, exercise, or PRP combined with exercise? (2) Does PRP alone, exercise, or PRP combined with exercise yield better results in terms of the WOMAC score, performance on the 40-m fast-paced walk test and stair climbing test, and the SF-12 health-related quality of life score? METHODS: In this randomized, controlled, three-arm clinical trial, we recruited patients with mild-to-moderate (Kellgren-Lawrence Grade II or III) knee osteoarthritis with a minimum of 3 points on the 11-point numeric rating scale for pain. During the study period, 157 patients with a diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis were screened and 84 eligible volunteers were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1:1) into either the exercise group (28), PRP group (28), or PRP + exercise group (28). Follow-up proportions were similar between the groups (exercise: 89% [25], PRP: 86% [24], PRP + exercise: 89% [25]; p = 0.79). All patients were analyzed in an intention-to-treat manner. There were no between-group differences in age, gender, arthritis severity, and baseline clinical scores (pain, WOMAC, functional performance tests, and health-related quality of life). The exercise group underwent a 6-week structured program consisting of 12 supervised individual sessions focused on strengthening and functional exercises. Meanwhile, the PRP group received three weekly injections of fresh, leukocyte-poor PRP. The PRP + exercise group received a combined treatment with both interventions. The primary outcome was knee pain over 24 weeks, measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale for pain (ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst pain, with a minimum clinically important difference [MCID] of 2). The secondary outcome measures included the WOMAC index (ranging from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating a lower level of disability and an MCID of 12), the durations of the 40-meter fast-paced walk test and stair climbing test, and the SF-12 health-related quality of life score. For the a priori sample size calculation, we used the numeric rating scale score for pain at 24 weeks as the primary outcome variable. The MCID for the numeric rating scale was deemed to be 2 points, with an estimated standard deviation of 2.4. Based on sample size calculations, a sample of 24 patients per group would provide 80% power to detect an effect of this size between the groups at the significance level of p = 0.05. RESULTS: We found no clinically important differences in improvements in pain-defined as ≥ 2 points of 10-at 24 weeks when comparing exercise alone to PRP alone to PRP + exercise (1.9 ± 0.7 versus 3.8 ± 1.8 versus 1.4 ± 0.6; mean difference between PRP + exercise group and exercise group -0.5 [95% confidence interval -1.2 to 0.4]; p = 0.69). Likewise, we found no differences in WOMAC scores at 24 weeks of follow-up when comparing exercise alone to PRP alone to PRP + exercise (10 ± 9 versus 26 ± 20 versus 7 ± 6; mean difference between PRP + exercise group and exercise group -3 [95% CI -12 to -5]; p = 0.97). There were no differences in any of the other secondary outcome metrics among the PRP + exercise and exercise groups. CONCLUSION: PRP did not improve pain at 24 weeks of follow-up in patients with mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis compared with exercise alone. Moreover, exercise alone was clinically superior to PRP alone, considering function and the physical component of health-related quality of life. Despite the additional costs and endeavors related to PRP products, the combination of PRP and exercise did not differ from exercise alone. The results of this randomized controlled trial do not support the use of PRP injections in the treatment of patients diagnosed with mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis. Consequently, exercise alone is the recommended treatment for reducing pain and enhancing function throughout this timeframe. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

Oral corticosteroids vs. exercises on treatment of frozen shoulder: a randomized, single-blinded study.

BACKGROUND: Many treatment strategies have been described for the management of frozen shoulder. However, to date no randomized controlled trial has directly compared the efficacy of exercise and oral corticosteroids. The aim of this study was to determine whether pain, range of motion (ROM), and function differ between patients with frozen shoulder randomized to treatment with exercise or oral corticosteroids. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded trial was performed to compare the effectiveness of exercise and oral corticosteroids in patients with frozen shoulder. Overall, 33 patients with frozen shoulder were randomly assigned to receive either exercise (n = 17) or oral corticosteroids (n = 16). The exercise was applied 2 times per week for 6 weeks for 12 visits; patients in the oral corticosteroids group received prednisolone for 4 weeks. Participants were assessed at baseline, after 6 weeks and at the 12-week follow-up. The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and visual analog scale. Secondary outcomes were American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment, ROM, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Repeated-measures analysis of covariance with baseline scores as the covariates was used to determine between-group differences. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed using the multiple imputation method to impute values for all missing data. RESULTS: Planned pairwise comparisons demonstrated significant improvements in pain relief and functional outcomes in both groups at the 6- and 12-week follow-ups compared to baseline. There were no significant time-by-group interactions between-group differences noted for the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (F = 0.470, P = .93), visual analog scale (F = 0.006, P = .94), flexion ROM (F = 2.78, P = .1), internal rotation ROM (F = 3.440, P = .07) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment (F = 0.470, P = .49). The overall group-by-time interaction for the 2 × 3 mixed-model analysis of covariance using baseline scores as a covariate was significant for the abduction range (F = 4.460, P = .04) and external rotation ROM (F = 12.100, P = .002) in favor of the exercise group. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that while both groups achieved significant improvements at the 6-, and 12-week follow-ups, the exercise group was superior in terms of abduction and external rotation ROM. Additionally, even though both groups were improved, the effect sizes were larger in the exercise group. Considering the systemic side effects of oral corticosteroids, even at low doses, a well-planned exercise program that considers pain may be a good option for frozen shoulder.

The clinical efficacy of kinesio taping in shoulder disorders: a systematic review and meta analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of kinesio taping on shoulder disorders, as a single treatment modality or as conjunction to other treatments. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database), The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase and OpenGrey databases were searched for trials published before 5 February 2020. METHODS: This study was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline statement. Randomized controlled trials published in English or Turkish were included. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed with the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. For analysis of continuous data, mean differences (MDs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used. The I2 statistics was used to measure the heterogeneity. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included with 680 participants. Kinesio taping did not produce better results on pain compared to sham (MD by -0.77 (95% CI = -1.77, 0.22), P = 0.13), exercises (MD by -0.51 (95% CI = -1.41, 0.39), P = 0.27), or passive treatments (MD by -0.29 (95% CI = -0.77, 0.19), P = 0.24). Similarly, kinesio taping did not found superior to sham kinesio taping (SMD by -0.01 (95% CI = -0.31, 0.29), P = 0.94), exercises (SMD by 0.41 (95% CI = -0.25, 1.07), P = 0.22), or passive treatments on function (SMD by -0.02 (95% CI = -0.19, 0.15), P = 0.82). There was no significant SMD on range of motion (ROM) by -0.07 (95% CI = -0.47, 0.33, P = 0.74) compared to sham kinesio taping and -0.06 (95% CI = -0.20, 0.09, P = 0.46) compared to passive treatment. Overall, effect size was found small to moderate. CONCLUSION: Despite reported positive effects in some studies, there is no firm evidence of any benefit of kinesio taping on shoulder disorders.

Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for Patients With Chronic Ankle Disability.

The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure is a valid, reliable, and widely used self-reported questionnaire for the foot. It has been adapted and validated for a Turkish-speaking population. The purpose of this study was to provide evidence for validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Foot and Ankle Measure (FAAM-T) in patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI). A total of 316 patients with CAI were enrolled. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were evaluated. Validity was examined using correlations with the Short Form Health Survey version 2.0 (SF-36v2) questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha scores were 0.94 and 0.96 for the the FAAM-T ADL (Activities of Daily Living) and FAAM-T Sports subscales, respectively, indicating high internal consistency. For the second administration, Cronbach's alpha was found to be 0.96 for both subscales of the FAAM-T. The test-retest reliability of the FAAM-T was very high for both subscales with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.97 and 0.94, respectively (p < .001). The standard error of the mean and minimal detectable change were determined to be 2.5 and 6.7 for the FAAM-T ADL and 6.9 and 18.5 for the FAAM-T Sport. The FAAM-T ADL and Sport subscales were strongly correlated with the SF-36v2 PF (physical functioning; r = 0.51, r = 0.40, respectively; p = .001) and SF-36v2 PCS (physical component scale; r = 0.64, r = 0.55, respectively; p = .001). The weakest associations between the FAAM-T ADL and Sport and the SF-36v2 were noted for the mental health subscale (r = 0.08 and r = 0.03) and the SF-36v2 MCS (mental component scale; r = .05 and r = .006, respectively). This study provides evidence for validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability for the FAAM-T to evaluate patients with CAI.

Does the patients' expectations on kinesiotape affect the outcomes of patients with a rotator cuff tear? A randomized controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE:: To investigate the effect of setting expectations verbally on the effectiveness of kinesiotape application in patients with a rotator cuff tear. DESIGN:: Randomized controlled, double-blind study. SETTING:: Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation. SUBJECTS:: Eighty-nine patients with rotator cuff tear. INTERVENTION:: Patients were randomized according to the verbal input given to patients about the effectiveness of kinesiotaping; Group 1 (there is no evidence that kinesiotaping is effective), Group 2 (there is limited evidence that kinesiotaping is effective), and Group 3 (there is evidence that kinesiotaping has an excellent effect). MAIN MEASURES:: Resting pain, activity pain, and night pain were assessed by visual analog scale. Range of motion was assessed by a universal goniometer. Function was evaluated by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form before and 24 hours after kinesiotape application. Only resting pain and activity pain were assessed after 30 minutes. RESULTS:: There were no statistically significant differences (ANOVA) between any groups at the three assessment points. The intragroup assessment showed that in Group 2, only resting pain after 30 minutes improved (3.2 ± 2.9 to 2.6 ± 2.8; P = 0.02 ). An improvement in resting pain both after 30 minutes and after 24 hours was found in the third group (4.1 ± 2.4 to 2.3 ± 2.3, P = 0.001; 4.1 ± 2.4 to 2.2 ± 2.3, P = 0.001, respectively). Activity pain and night pain were improved in all groups after 24 hours. CONCLUSION:: Setting positive expectations verbally about kinesiotaping might be effective in reducing pain in patients with rotator cuff tear.

The effectiveness of Pilates for partial anterior cruciate ligament injury.

PURPOSE: This study explored the effects of Pilates on the muscle strength, function, and instability of patients with partial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in situations in which a non-surgical treatment option is preferred. METHODS: Fifty participants 20-45 years of age who were diagnosed with isolated ACL injuries were included in the study. The participants were randomly assigned to either the Pilates exercise group (n = 24) or the control group (n = 26). The subjects in the Pilates exercise group performed basic mat exercises that focused on the muscle strength and flexibility of the lower limbs and core muscles during each class session, which met three times per week for 12 weeks. The control group did not receive any treatment or home exercise programme. All patients were evaluated using the Lysholm Knee Scale, the Cincinnati Knee Rating System, and isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring strength. Patient satisfaction regarding improvement in knee stability was assessed using the Global Rating of Change scale. RESULTS: The Pilates group experienced significant improvement over the control group as measured by the difference in quadriceps strength at 12 weeks (p = 0.03). Both groups showed some clinical change over time, but the Pilates group improved for all outcome measurements at the 12-week follow-up, and the control group only improved for functional outcomes. Patient satisfaction with the level of knee stability based on the Global Rating of Change scale was higher in the Pilates group than in the control group. CONCLUSION: Although both groups exhibited improvements in knee strength and functional outcomes, the results suggest that Pilates is a superior management approach over a control treatment for increasing quadriceps strength in participants with partial ACL injury. Pilates may provide clinicians a novel option when choosing a treatment for a partial ACL injury. Further study is needed to determine whether certain subgroups of individuals might achieve an added benefit with this approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Evidence for reliability, validity and responsiveness of Turkish Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).

PURPOSE: To translate and culturally adapt the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) into Turkish and assess the psychometric properties of the translated version. METHODS: The FAAM was translated into Turkish according to Beaton's recommendations and it is called FAAM-T. Ninety-eight patients (39 males, mean ± SD age 35.0 ± 14.0 years; range 16-71 years) with different foot and ankle complaints were included, and the score was completed twice by each participant after 7 days of the first assessment to assess test-retest reliability based on the inter-rater correlation coefficient, whereas Cronbach's alpha evaluated internal consistency. External validity was evaluated with correlations between the FAAM-T, Foot Function Index (FFI) and Short Form-36 (SF-36). The distribution of floor and ceiling effects was determined. RESULTS: The test-retest reliability was 0.90 for both FAAM-T subscales. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.95 and 0.91 for FAAM-T activity of daily living (ADL) and FAAM-T Sport subscales, respectively. The FAAM-T ADL and Sport subscales demonstrated very good correlation with the FFI (r = 0.70 and 0.63, respectively). The FAAM-T ADL and Sport subscales had a high level of association with physical functioning and the physical component scale (r = 0.71, r = 0.70 and r = 0.51, r = 0.55, respectively; P = 0.001) of the SF-36. The weakest associations were found between the FAAM-T ADL, FAAM-T Sport subscales and the SF-36 the vitality (r = 0.27, P = 0.008 and r = 0.28, P = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The study provides preliminary evidence that the FAAM-T is reliable, valid and responsive outcome measurement of patients with foot and ankle pathologies.

The Beneficial Effect of Hypnosis in Elective Cardiac Surgery: A Preliminary Study.

Background Single-session hypnosis has never been evaluated as a premedication technique in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the beneficial effects of clinical hypnotherapy on perioperative anxiety, pain perception, sedation, and necessity for ventilator assistance in patients undergoing CABG. Methods Double-blind, randomized, clinical trial was performed. Forty-four patients undergoing CABG surgery were randomized into two groups. The patients in group A received preprocedural hypnosis by an anesthesiologist. Patients in group B (control) had only information on the surgical intervention by the same anesthesiologist. State-Trait-Anxiety Index-I (STAI-I) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were performed preoperatively in both groups. Visual analog scale (VAS) and Ramsay sedation scale (RSS) were evaluated on 0th, 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, 10th, 12th, and 24th hours, postoperatively. Postoperative anxiety level, analgesic drug consumption, and duration of ventilator assistance and intensive care unit (ICU) stay were also documented. Results When anxiety and depression levels were compared, significantly lower STA-I and BDI values were detected in group A after hypnotherapy (p = 0.001, p = 0.001, respectively). Significantly less total doses of remifentanil (34.4 ± 11.4 vs. 50.0 ± 13.6 mg) and morphine (4.9 ± 3.3 vs. 13.6 ± 2.7 mg) were administered in group A in the postoperative period. Ventilator assistance duration (6.8 ± 2.0 vs. 8.9 ± 2.7 hours) was also shorter in group A when compared with that in group B (p = 0.007). Conclusion Hypnosis session prior to surgery was an effective complementary method in decreasing presurgical anxiety, and it resulted in better pain control as well as reduced ventilator assistance following CABG surgery.

Does adding mobilization to stretching improve outcomes for people with frozen shoulder? A randomized controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of joint mobilization combined with stretching exercises in patients with frozen shoulder. DESIGN: A randomized controlled clinical pilot trial. SETTING: Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology. SUBJECTS: Thirty patients with frozen shoulder. INTERVENTION: All participants were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: joint mobilization and stretching versus stretching exercises alone. Both groups performed a home exercise program and were treated for six weeks (18 sessions). MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome measures for functional assessment were the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score and the Constant score. The secondary outcome measures were pain level, as evaluated with a visual analog scale, and range of motion, as measured using a conventional goniometer. Patients were assessed before treatment, at the end of the treatment, and after one year as follow-up. RESULTS: Two-by-two repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni corrections revealed significant increases in abduction (91.9° [CI: 86.1-96.7] to 172.8° [CI: 169.7-175.5]), external rotation (28.1° [CI: 22.2-34.2] to 77.7° [CI: 70.3-83.0]) and Constant score (39.1 [CI: 35.3-42.6] to 80.5 [75.3-86.6]) at the one-year follow-up in the joint mobilization combined with stretching exercise group, whereas the group performing stretching exercise alone did not show such changes. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of patients with frozen shoulder, joint mobilization combined with stretching exercises is better than stretching exercise alone in terms of external rotation, abduction range of motion and function score.

Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of Turkish Version of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale.

We sought to translate and culturally adapt the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scale (AOFAS-AHFS) into Turkish and determine the selected psychometric properties of the translated version. The AOFAS-AHFS is widely used to evaluate disability associated with foot and ankle injuries but has not yet been translated or culturally adapted for Turkish-speaking individuals. The AOFAS-AHFS was translated into Turkish using the Beaton guidelines. The measurement properties of the Turkish AOFAS-AHFS (internal consistency, construct validity, and floor and ceiling effects) were tested in 72 patients (94 feet, 50 [69.4%] females; average ± SD age 44.88 ± 16.30 years) with a variety of foot and ankle pathologic features. Construct validity was analyzed using the Turkish version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and the Medical Outcomes Study short-form 12-item survey (SF-12). The Turkish version of the AOFAS-AHFS showed excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.91). The correlation coefficients between the AOFAS-AHFS and the FAAM activities of daily living and FAAM sport were r = 0.41, p = .01 and r = 0.37, p = .03, respectively. The correlation coefficients between the AOFAS-AHFS and the SF-12 physical component scale was r = 0.27, p = .08. The weakest correlation was found between the AOFAS-AHFS and the SF-12 mental component scale (r = -0.03, p = .73). The Turkish version of the AOFAS-AHFS has sufficient reliability and validity to measure patient-reported outcomes for Turkish-speaking individuals with a variety of foot and ankle disorders.

Psychometric properties of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score.

To translate and culturally adapt the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), a widely used instrument for evaluating disability associated with elbow injuries, into Turkish (MEPS-T) and to determine psychometric properties of the translated version. The MEPS was translated into Turkish using published methodological guidelines. The measurement properties of the MEPS-T (construct validity and floor and ceiling effects) were tested in 91 patients with elbow pathology. The reproducibility of the MEPS-T was tested in 59 patients over 7-14 days. The responsiveness of the MEPS-T was tested in a subgroup of 46 patients diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis and who received conservative treatment for 6 weeks. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to estimate the test-retest reliability. The construct validity was analyzed with the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Short Form 36 (SF-36). Effect size (ES) was used to assess the responsiveness. The distribution of floor and ceiling effects was determined. The MEPS-T showed very good test-retest reliability (ICC 0.89). The correlation coefficients between the MEPS-T and DASH and VAS were -0.61 and -0.53, respectively (p < 0.001). The highest correlations were between the MEPS-T and the mental component summary (r = 0.47, p = 0.001) and role emotional (r = 0.45, p = 0.001). The MEPS-T ES, 0.50, was moderate (95% CI 0.33-0.62). We observed no ceiling or floor effects. The MEPS-T represents a valid, reliable and moderately responsive instrument for evaluating patients with elbow disease.

Turkish version of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Quality of Life questionnaire.

PURPOSE: To test the measurement properties of Turkish version of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Quality of Life (ACL-QOL) questionnaire. METHODS: One hundred and nineteen patients with ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) completed internal consistency, agreement, construct validity, floor and ceiling effect analyses. Eighty out of 119 patients with ACL-R completed Turkish version of the ACL-QOL questionnaire twice for the test-retest reliability. A subgroup of thirty-nine patients undergoing physiotherapy were also asked to answer the ACL-QOL questionnaire, the Lysholm Knee Scale (LKS), Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS) and the short form 36 (SF-36) at pre-operative, 16th week and 2 years post-operatively to assess responsiveness. RESULTS: The questionnaire had high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.95). The paired t test showed no significant difference between the test-retest means. The intraclass correlation was excellent for reliability and agreement in five domains and overall score (ICC 0.95, 0.95, 0.97, 0.95, 0.96 and 0.95; p < 0.001). The standard error of measurement and the minimum detectable change (MDC95) were found to be 3.1 points and 8.7 points, respectively. The questionnaire showed a fair correlation (r = 0.23) with LKS and a poor correlation (r = 0.14) with KOS-ADLS; good and very good construct validity (r = 0.51, r = 0.62) with SF-36 physical component score and mental component score, respectively. No ceiling and floor effects were observed except the subdomain of 'work-related concerns' (22.9 %). A dramatic effect size was demonstrated at the 16th week (2.1) and 2 years (1.1) of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Turkish version of the ACL-QOL questionnaire is a reproducible and responsive instrument that can be used in clinical studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, Level I.

The Turkish version of the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity.

PURPOSE: The Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) is a questionnaire designed to evaluate pain, symptoms, function and physical activity after Achilles tendon rupture. The purpose of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the ATRS into Turkish and to determine its reliability and validity. METHODS: The ATRS was translated into Turkish in accordance with the stages recommended by Beaton. Seventy-four patients (73 male; average age: 42.3 ± 7.6; range 27-63 years) suffering from previous Achilles tendon ruptures were included for the study. The ATRS-Turkish was administered twice at 7-14 days intervals with 52 of the 74 patients (51 male, average age: 41.8 ± 7.8) to assess the test-retest reliability. Cronbach's α was used for internal consistency, and the inter-rater correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to calculate the test-retest reliability. The Turkish Short-Form-12 (SF-12) and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) were employed for validity estimation. RESULTS: The internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.95) and the test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.98) were excellent. The mean interval between the two tests was 7.1 ± 3.1 days. The mean and standard deviation of the first and second assessment of the ATRS were 78.1 ± 23.1 and 79.1 ± 22.5, respectively. The correlation coefficient between the ATRS-Turkish and the FAOS subscales (pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sports and recreational activities, and quality of life) were determined (r = 0.82, r = 0.66, r = 0.79, r = 0.83 and r = 0.60, respectively, p < 0.0001). The ATRS-Turkish displayed good correlation with the SF-12 physical component score (r = 0.63, p < 0.001) and no correlation with the SF-12 mental component score (r = 0.22, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: The ATRS-Turkish was found to be reliable and valid for outcome evaluation after Achilles tendon ruptures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET).

PURPOSE: The Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) is a questionnaire designed to evaluate quality of life related to the health (HRQOL) of patients with meniscus pathology. The purpose of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the WOMET into Turkish, and thereby to determine the reliability and validity of the translated version. METHODS: The WOMET was translated into Turkish in accordance with the stages recommended by Guillemin. Ninety-six patients [35 male, 61 female; mean age: 43.6 ± 11.7 (23-71) years] with meniscal pathology were included in the study. The WOMET was completed twice at 3-7-day intervals. The inter-rater correlation coefficient was used for reliability, and Cronbach's α was used for internal consistency. Patients were asked to answer the Lysholm knee scale and the short form-36 (SF-36) for the validity of the estimation. The distribution of ceiling and floor effects was determined. RESULTS: Mean and standard deviation of the first and second evaluations of the total WOMET were 1,048.9 ± 271.6 and 1,000.4 ± 255.2 (p = 0.03), respectively. The test-retest reliability of the total score, physical function, sports/work/lifestyle and emotion domains were 0.88, 0.78, 0.80 and 0.85, respectively. Cronbach's α was 0.89. WOMET was most strongly related to the physical function scale and the physical component score (ρ 0.54, ρ 0.60, respectively; p < 0.001). The weakest correlations between the WOMET and the SF-36 were for the mental component score and the emotional role functioning (ρ 0.11, ρ 0.03, respectively). We observed no ceiling and floor effects of the overall WOMET score, but 36.5 % of the patients showed floor effect in the question of "numbness", and 40.6 % of the patients showed ceiling effect in the question of "consciousness". CONCLUSION: The Turkish version of the WOMET is valid and reliable. It can therefore be used for HRQOL of patients with meniscal pathology.

The effect of infraspinatus hypotrophy and weakness on the arthroscopic treatment of spinoglenoid notch cyst associated with superior labrum anterior-to-posterior lesions.

PURPOSE: Patients with spinoglenoid notch cyst associated with superior labrum anterior-to-posterior (SLAP) lesions were evaluated. The patients were all treated by arthroscopic cyst decompression combined with SLAP repair. The hypothesis of the study was that the patients who underwent prolonged conservative treatment period prior to surgery would exhibit significant infraspinatus hypotrophy and weakness, and their postoperative clinical and functional outcomes would be less satisfactory. METHODS: Sixteen patients exhibited positive MRI and EMG findings with clinical signs of weakness and pain. The median age was 40.5 years (range 32-52), and the study group consisted of 11 males and 5 females with a median follow-up period of 26 months (12-48). The median duration of symptoms and conservative treatment prior to the surgical intervention was 3.5 months (1-14). Seven patients in group A exhibited infraspinatus hypotrophy. Group B comprised 9 patients without infraspinatus hypotrophy. RESULTS: The results of the pre- and postoperative Constant scores, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, and external rotation strength test rates were compared between groups. They all improved in terms of pain, strength, and function (P < 0.05). Significant differences were observed between the pre- and postoperative external rotation strengths and Constant scores (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed between the pre- and postoperative VAS scores (n.s.). A significant correlation was observed in group A between surgical timing, the preoperative external rotation strength ratio (P = 0.04) and the postoperative VAS scores (P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: The arthroscopic treatment was satisfactory with good clinical outcomes. Infraspinatus hypotrophy occurred in cases of prolonged surgical duration and significantly affected external rotation strength and functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective comparative study, Level III.