Penile Prosthesis Placement by a Dedicated Transgender Surgery Unit: A Retrospective Analysis of Complications.

BACKGROUND: Penile prostheses may be used as a component of genital gender affirmation surgery for the purpose of achieving penile rigidity after phalloplasty, and transgender individuals experience higher complication rates than cisgender individuals. AIM: To observe complications with transmasculine penile prosthesis surgery over time and across surgical conditions. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all transmasculine patients with phalloplasty undergoing penile prosthesis placement between 4/14/2017 and 2/11/2020 (80 patients). OUTCOMES: Independent variables include implant type, previous genital surgeries, and simultaneous genital surgeries. Dependent variables include prosthesis infection and mechanical complication (device malfunction, dislodgement, erosion). RESULTS: There was an overall complication requiring surgery rate of 36% and infection rate of 20% (15/67 for inflatable prostheses and 1/13 for semirigid), with 14% (11/80) experiencing infection requiring removal. Differences in infection rates appeared insignificant across categories of previous surgery or with simultaneous surgery, but we did notice a markedly lower rate for semirigid prostheses compared to inflatable. There was a significant relationship between infection and case number, with the probability of infection decreasing over time. Device loss at 9 months was 21% overall. Preoperative conditions of the neophallus such as prior stricture correction and perioperative factors such as simultaneous clean and clean-contaminated procedures seemed to pose no additional increase in complication rates. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Type and number of prior and simultaneous non-prosthetic surgeries should not be considered as a risk factor for penile prosthesis after phalloplasty for transmasculine patients, even those that are clean-contaminated STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Our cohort size is large compared to currently available studies, although not large enough to generate sufficient power for group comparisons. We have reported every genital surgical step between phalloplasty and penile prosthesis placement and recorded complications with subsequent devices after failure. Patient-reported outcomes were not collected. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that preoperative conditions of the neophallus, such as prior stricture correction, and perioperative factors, such as simultaneous clean and clean-contaminated procedures, seem to pose no additional increase in complication rates. Our data suggest that surgical experience may further decrease complications over time. B. L. Briles, R. Y. Middleton, K. E. Celtik, et al. Penile Prosthesis Placement by a Dedicated Transgender Surgery Unit: A Retrospective Analysis of Complications. J Sex Med 2022;19:641-649.

Active surveillance for incidental renal mass in the octogenarian.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the oncologic outcomes among a large cohort of octogenarian patients placed on active surveillance for a localized renal mass. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients ≥80 years of age presenting for asymptomatic, incidentally detected clinically localized stage T1 renal mass between 2006 and 2013 who were followed by active surveillance (AS). The primary endpoint was development of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Secondary outcomes included intervention-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival. RESULTS: Eighty-nine octogenarians (median age = 83.4 years) were placed on AS for a median 29.9 months. Median Charlson Comorbidity Index and Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living scores were 2 and 5, respectively. For all comers, median initial tumor size was 2.4 cm with median growth rate of 0.20 cm/year. Eight (9.0%) patients failed AS due to delayed intervention and three (1.1%) due to systemic progression after median follow-up of 27.8 and 39.9 months, respectively. Two (2.2%) patients in the delayed intervention cohort developed metastasis after treatment. Tumor growth rate was significantly higher among those undergoing intervention versus no intervention (0.60 vs. 0.15 cm/year, P = 0.05) and among patients with systemic progression versus no metastasis (1.28 vs. 0.18 cm/year, P = 0.001). Five-year intervention-free, metastasis-free, cancer-specific, and overall survivals were 90.6, 95.6, 95.6, and 85.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: AS represents an effective management strategy in octogenarians given low overall risk of metastasis. Tumor growth kinetics may identify patients at risk of systemic progression in whom treatment should be considered.

A multi-institutional update on surgical outcomes after penile silicone sleeve implantation.

Background: The increasing popularity of the silicone sleeve penile implant has been accompanied by concerns over potential risks and adverse events. Objectives: To provide multi-institutional data on safety outcomes in patients undergoing silicone sleeve penile implant surgery across high-volume implant surgeons. In addition, we discuss preventative techniques to minimize postoperative complications and the management of these events. Design and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of men undergoing penile silicone sleeve implants between November 2020 and November 2022 with four surgeons, each from a separate institution. Perioperative and postoperative adverse events, including unsatisfactory cosmetic outcomes requiring revision, were determined by physician follow-up. Flaccid penile length and girth were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. Results: A total of 299 male patients underwent silicone sleeve implant surgery, with an average age of 42.5 ± 10.5 years and an average body mass index of 28.5 ± 4.0. The patient cohort exhibited minimal comorbidities, with 5% having hyperlipidemia, 2% being smokers, 2% having cardiovascular disease, and 1% having diabetes. Patients experienced an average increase of 4.1 ± 1.5 cm in their flaccid penile length (a 50% increase) and an average increase of 3.4 ± 1.5 cm in their flaccid girth (a 37% increase) (p < 0.01). Complication rates included new-onset postoperative erectile dysfunction (0%), infection (1.3%), seroma (2.0%), and erosion (5.0%). The average follow-up time was 11.6 months. Notably, our rates of infection and seroma were lower than those reported in a previous single-center review, while erosion rates were higher. Conclusion: This is the largest study to characterize the safety of the penile silicone sleeve implant across multiple institutions. In men who desire cosmetic size augmentation, silicone sleeve implant surgery is associated with significantly increased flaccid penile length and girth. Complications are mainly cosmetic and may be corrected; however, patients should be appropriately counseled on the risk of erosion, which appears to be higher than previously reported.

Outcomes for penile silicone sleeve surgery This is the largest study to characterize the safety of the penile silicone sleeve implant across multiple institutions. In men who desire cosmetic penile size improvement, the silicone sleeve implant surgery is associated with significantly increased flaccid penile length and girth. Complications are mainly cosmetic and may be corrected, however, patients should be appropriately counseled on the risk of erosion, which appears to be higher than previously reported.

Three piece penile prosthesis salvage with chlorhexidine gluconate and length preservation: our technique and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Since the advent of the Mulcahy technique of three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) salvage, there have been multiple iterations of salvage prosthesis procedures reported in the literature. All of these techniques employ traditional antibiotic irrigation with or without rechanneling. We present our technique of salvage IPP using 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate (Irrisept®) with corporal rechanneling for length preservation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our technique of IPP salvage begins with access via a 5 cm vertical midline scrotal incision. Dissection down to the corpora is performed with a combination of blunt dissection and dissection with fine tipped Metzenbaum scissors. Each component of the prior IPP is sequentially removed starting with the cylinders, followed by the pump, and finally the reservoir. Irrisept® is used to copiously irrigate out both cavernosal bodies as well as the scrotal compartment and prior reservoir location. A two minute dwell time of the Irrisept® is employed after mechanical irrigation. A penrose drain is placed from the space of Retzius through a separate stab incision in the scrotum. Corporotomies are closed, followed by Dartos fascia and scrotal skin. A complete change in gown and gloves of all members of the surgical team and a new set of drapes and instruments is performed. Through a separate subcoronal incision, two new corporotomies are made and separate channels created using nine inch Metzenbaum scissors. These channels are irrigated with Irrisept®. A 9 mm malleable penile prosthesis (MPP) is inserted and corporotomies and skin incision are closed. RESULTS: A total of four men with prior penoscrotal IPP placement underwent salvage IPP with MPP from January 2022 to October 2022. Median operative time was 165 minutes. Median preoperative cylinder size was 23.5 cm. Median postoperative malleable cylinder size was 23 cm. Median length of follow up was 4.8 months. There were no cases of MPP erosion or infection. Two patients elected to undergo repeat IPP insertion after 6 months with same cylinder size. CONCLUSION: IPP salvage with chlorhexidine irrigation and soak as well as separate corporal channeling in a noninfected field for MPP insertion is a viable strategy for infected prostheses given the ease of performance, low risk of repeat infection of the malleable device, and maintenance of corporal length of any subsequent prostheses.