Phosphorylation of sst2 receptors in neuroendocrine tumors after octreotide treatment of patients.

Somatostatin analogues, which are used to treat neuroendocrine tumors, target the high levels of somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR1; alias sst2) expressed in these cancers. However, some tumors are resistant to somatostatin analogues, and it is unknown whether the defect lies in sst2 activation or downstream signaling events. Because sst2 phosphorylation occurs rapidly after receptor activation, we examined whether sst2 is phosphorylated in neuroendocrine tumors. The sst2 receptor phosphorylation was evaluated by IHC and Western blot analysis with the new Ra-1124 antibody specific for the sst2 receptor phosphorylated at Ser341/343 in receptor-positive neuroendocrine tumors obtained from 10 octreotide-treated and 7 octreotide-naïve patients. The specificity, time course, and subcellular localization of sst2 receptor phosphorylation were examined in human embryo kinase-sst2 cell cultures by immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. All seven octreotide-naïve tumors displayed exclusively nonphosphorylated cell surface sst2 expression. In contrast, 9 of the 10 octreotide-treated tumors contained phosphorylated sst2 that was predominantly internalized. Western blot analysis confirmed the IHC data. Octreotide treatment of human embryo kinase-sst2 cells in culture demonstrated that phosphorylated sst2 was localized at the plasma membrane after 10 seconds of stimulation and was subsequently internalized into endocytic vesicles. These data show, for the first time to our knowledge, that phosphorylated sst2 is present in most gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors from patients treated with octreotide but that a striking variability exists in the subcellular distribution of phosphorylated receptors among such tumors.

Syntheses, receptor bindings, in vitro and in vivo stabilities and biodistributions of DOTA-neurotensin(8-13) derivatives containing ß-amino acid residues - a lesson about the importance of animal experiments.

Neurotensin(8-13) (NTS(8-13)) analogs with C- and/or N-terminal ß-amino acid residues and three DOTA derivatives thereof have been synthesized (i.e., 1-6). A virtual docking experiment showed almost perfect fit of one of the 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) derivatives, 6a, into a crystallographically identified receptor NTSR1 (Fig.1). The affinities for the receptors of the NTS analogs and derivatives are low, when determined with cell-membrane homogenates, while, with NTSR1-exhibiting cancer tissues, affinities in the single-digit nanomolar range can be observed (Table 2). Most of the ß-amino acid-containing NTS(8-13) analogs (Table 1 and Fig.2), including the (68) Ga complexes of the DOTA-substituted ones (6; Figs.2 and 5), are stable for ca. 1 h in human serum and plasma, and in murine plasma. The biodistributions of two (68) Ga complexes (of 6a and 6b) in HT29 tumor-bearing nude mice, in the absence and in the presence of a blocking compound, after 10, 30, and 60 min (Figs. 3 and 4) lead to the conclusion that the amount of specifically bound radioligand is rather low. This was confirmed by PET-imaging experiments with the tumor-bearing mice (Fig.6). Comparison of the in vitro plasma stability (after 1 h) with the ex vivo blood content (after 10-15 min) of the two (68) Ga complexes shows that they are rapidly cleaved in the animals (Fig.5).

Development of a potent DOTA-conjugated bombesin antagonist for targeting GRPr-positive tumours.

PURPOSE: Radiolabelled somatostatin-based antagonists show a higher uptake in tumour-bearing mouse models than agonists of similar or even distinctly higher receptor affinity. Very similar results were obtained with another family of G protein-coupled receptor ligands, the bombesin family. We describe a new conjugate, RM2, with the chelator DOTA coupled to D-Phe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Sta-Leu-NH(2) via the cationic spacer 4-amino-1-carboxymethyl-piperidine for labelling with radiometals such as (111)In and (68)Ga. METHODS: RM2 was synthesized on a solid support and evaluated in vitro in PC-3 cells. IC(50) and K(d) values were determined. The antagonist potency was evaluated by immunofluorescence-based internalization and Ca(2+) mobilization assays. Biodistribution studies were performed in PC-3 and LNCaP tumour-bearing mice with (111)In-RM2 and (68)Ga-RM2, respectively. PET/CT studies were performed on PC-3 and LNCaP tumour-bearing nude mice with (68)Ga-RM2. RESULTS: RM2 and (111)In-RM2 are high-affinity and selective ligands for the GRP receptor (7.7 ± 3.3 nmol/l for RM2; 9.3 ± 3.3 nmol/l for (nat)In-RM2). The potent antagonistic properties were confirmed by an immunofluorescence-based internalization and Ca(2+) mobilization assays. (68)Ga- and (111)In-RM2 showed high and specific uptake in both the tumour and the pancreas. Uptake in the tumour remained high (15.2 ± 4.8%IA/g at 1 h; 11.7 ± 2.4%IA/g at 4 h), whereas a relatively fast washout from the pancreas and the other abdominal organs was observed. Uptake in the pancreas decreased rapidly from 22.6 ± 4.7%IA/g at 1 h to 1.5 ± 0.5%IA/g at 4 h. CONCLUSION: RM2 was shown to be a potent GRPr antagonist. Pharmacokinetics and imaging studies indicate that (111)In-RM2 and (68)Ga-RM2 are ideal candidates for clinical SPECT and PET studies.

On the terminal homologation of physiologically active peptides as a means of increasing stability in human serum--neurotensin, opiorphin, B27-KK10 epitope, NPY.

The terminal homologation by CH(2) insertion into the peptides mentioned in the title is described. This involves replacement of the N-terminal amino acid residue by a ß(2) - and of the C-terminal amino acid residue by a ß(3) -homo-amino acid moiety (ß(2) hXaa and ß(3) hXaa, resp.; Fig. 1). In this way, the structure of the peptide chain from the N-terminal to the C-terminal stereogenic center is identical, and the modified peptide is protected against cleavage by exopeptidases (Figs. 2 and 3). Neurotensin (NT; 1) and its C-terminal fragment NT(8-13) are ligands of the G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) NT1, NT2, NT3, and NT analogs are promising tools to be used in cancer diagnostics and therapy. The affinities of homologated NT analogs, 2b-2e, for NT1 and NT2 receptors were determined by using cell homogenates and tumor tissues (Table 1); in the latter experiments, the affinities for the NT1 receptor are more or less the same as those of NT (0.5-1.3 vs. 0.6 nM). At the same time, one of the homologated NT analogs, 2c, survives in human plasma for 7 days at 37° (Fig. 6). An NMR analysis of NT(8-13) (Tables 2 and 4, and Fig. 8) reveals that this N-terminal NT fragment folds to a turn in CD(3) OH. - In the case of the human analgesic opiorphin (3a), a pentapeptide, and of the HIV-derived B27-KK10 (4a), a decapeptide, terminal homologation (→3b and 4b, resp.) led to a 7- and 70-fold half-life increase in plasma (Fig. 9). With N-terminally homologated NPY, 5c, we were not able to determine serum stability; the peptide consisting of 36 amino acid residues is subject to cleavage by endopetidases. Three of the homologated compounds, 2b, 2c, and 5c, were shown to be agonists (Fig. 7 and 11). A comparison of terminal homologation with other stability-increasing terminal modifications of peptides is performed (Fig. 5), and possible applications of the neurotensin analogs, described herein, are discussed.

Switch from antagonist to agonist after addition of a DOTA chelator to a somatostatin analog.

PURPOSE: Peptide receptor targeting has become an increasingly attractive method to target tumors diagnostically and radiotherapeutically. Peptides linked to a variety of chelators have been developed for this purpose. They have, however, rarely been tested for their agonistic or antagonistic properties. We report here on a somatostatin antagonist that switched to an agonist upon coupling to a DOTA chelator. METHODS: Two novel somatostatin analogs, 406-040-15 and its DOTA-coupled counterpart 406-051-20, with and without cold Indium labeling, were tested for their somatostatin receptor subtypes 1-5 (sst(1)-sst(5)) binding affinity using receptor autoradiography. Moreover, they were tested functionally for their ability to affect sst(2) and sst(3) internalization in vitro in HEK293 cells stably expressing the human sst(2) or sst(3) receptor, using an immunofluorescence microscopy-based internalization assay. RESULTS: All three compounds were characterized as pan-somatostatin analogs having a high affinity for all five sst. In the sst(2) internalization assay, all three compounds showed an identical behavior, namely, a weak agonistic effect complemented by a weak antagonistic effect, compatible with the behavior of a partial agonist. Conversely, in the sst(3) internalization assay, 406-040-15 was a full antagonist whereas its DOTA-coupled counterpart, 406-051-20, with and without Indium labeling, switched to a full agonist. CONCLUSION: Adding the DOTA chelator to the somatostatin analog 406-040-15 triggers a switch at sst(3) receptor from an antagonist to an agonist. This indicates that potential radioligands for tumor targeting should always be tested functionally before further development, in particular if a chelator is added.

Tetraamine-derived bifunctional chelators for technetium-99m labelling: synthesis, bioconjugation and evaluation as targeted SPECT imaging probes for GRP-receptor-positive tumours.

Owing to its optimal nuclear properties, ready availability, low cost and favourable dosimetry, (99m)Tc continues to be the ideal radioisotope for medical-imaging applications. Bifunctional chelators based on a tetraamine framework exhibit facile complexation with Tc(V)O(2) to form monocationic species with high in vivo stability and significant hydrophilicity, which leads to favourable pharmacokinetics. The synthesis of a series of 1,4,8,11-tetraazaundecane derivatives (01-06) containing different functional groups at the 6-position for the conjugation of biomolecules and subsequent labelling with (99m)Tc is described herein. The chelator 01 was used as a starting material for the facile synthesis of chelators functionalised with OH (02), N(3) (04) and O-succinyl ester (05) groups. A straightforward and easy synthesis of carboxyl-functionalised tetraamine-based chelator 06 was achieved by using inexpensive and commercially available starting materials. Conjugation of 06 to a potent bombesin-antagonist peptide and subsequent labelling with (99m)Tc afforded the radiotracer (99m)Tc-N4-BB-ANT, with radiolabelling yields of >97% at a specific activity of 37 GBq micromol(-1). An IC(50) value of (3.7+/-1.3) nM was obtained, which confirmed the high affinity of the conjugate to the gastrin-releasing-peptide receptor (GRPr). Immunofluorescence and calcium mobilisation assays confirmed the strong antagonist properties of the conjugate. In vivo pharmacokinetic studies of (99m)Tc-N4-BB-ANT showed high and specific uptake in PC3 xenografts and in other GRPr-positive organs. The tumour uptake was (22.5+/-2.6)% injected activity per gram (% IA g(-1)) at 1 h post injection (p.i.). and increased to (29.9+/-4.0)% IA g(-1) at 4 h p.i. The SPECT/computed tomography (CT) images showed high tumour uptake, clear background and negligible radioactivity in the abdomen. The promising preclinical results of (99m)Tc-N4-BB-ANT warrant its potential candidature for clinical translation.

Highly efficient in vivo agonist-induced internalization of sst2 receptors in somatostatin target tissues.

UNLABELLED: The successful peptide receptor imaging of tumors, as exemplified for somatostatin receptors, is based on the overexpression of peptide receptors in selected tumors and the high-affinity binding to these tumors of agonist radioligands that are subsequently internalized into the tumor cells in which they accumulate. Although in vitro studies have shown ample evidence that the ligand-receptor complex is internalized, in vivo evidence of agonist-induced internalization of peptide receptors, such as somatostatin receptors, is missing. METHODS: Rats subcutaneously transplanted with the somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (sst(2))-expressing AR42J tumor cells were treated with intravenous injections of various doses of the sst(2) agonist [Tyr(3), Thr(8)]-octreotide (TATE) or of the sst(2) antagonist 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N'',N''',-tetraacetic acid (DOTA)-Bass and were sacrificed at various times ranging from 2.5 min to 24 h after injection. The tumors and pancreas were then removed from each animal. All tissue samples were processed for sst(2) immunohistochemistry using sst(2)-specific antibodies. RESULTS: Compared with the sst(2) receptors in untreated animals, which localized at the plasma membrane in pancreatic and AR42J tumor cells, the sst(2) receptors in treated animals are detected intracellularly after an intravenous injection of the agonist TATE. Internalization is fast, as the receptors are already internalizing 2.5 min after TATE injection. The process is extremely efficient, as most of the cell surface receptors internalize into the cell and are found in endosomelike structures after TATE injection. The internalization is most likely reversible, because 24 h after injection the receptors are again found at the cell surface. The process is also agonist-dependent, because internalization is seen with high-affinity sst(2) agonists but not with high-affinity sst(2) antagonists. The same internalization properties are seen in pancreatic and AR42J tumor cells. They can further be confirmed in vitro in human embryonic kidney-sst(2) cells, with an immunofluorescence microscopy-based sst(2) internalization assay. CONCLUSION: These animal data strongly indicate that the process of in vivo sst(2) internalization after agonist stimulation is fast, extremely efficient, and fully functional under in vivo conditions in neoplastic and physiologic sst(2) target tissues. This molecular process is, therefore, likely to be responsible for the high and long-lasting uptake of sst(2) radioligands seen in vivo in sst(2)-expressing tumors.

New pansomatostatin ligands and their chelated versions: affinity profile, agonist activity, internalization, and tumor targeting.

PURPOSE: Somatostatin receptor (sst) targeting is an established method to image and treat sst-positive tumors. Particularly, neuroendocrine tumors express the receptor subtype 2 in high density, but sst1, sst3, sst4, and sst5 are also expressed to some extent in different human tumors. Currently used targeting peptides mainly have sst2 affinity. We aimed at developing (radio)peptides that bind with high affinity to all receptor subtypes. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Carbocyclic octapeptides were coupled with macrocyclic chelators for radiometal labeling. Affinity, internalization, and agonist potencies were determined on sst1- to sst5-expressing cell lines. Biodistribution was determined on nude mice bearing HEK-sst2 or AR4-2J and HEK-sst3 tumors. RESULTS: High affinity to all receptor subtypes was found. Y(III)-KE88 showed agonistic properties at all five sst receptor subtypes as it inhibits forskolin-stimulated cyclic AMP production. Surprisingly, very low or even absent sst2 receptor internalization was found compared with currently clinically established octapeptides, whereas the sst3 internalization was very efficient. Biodistribution studies of [(111)In]KE88 and [(67)Ga]KE88/[(68)Ga]KE88 reflected the in vitro data. In nude mice with s.c. implanted sst2 (HEK-sst2, AR4-2J)-expressing and sst3 (HEK-sst3)-expressing tumors, high and persistent uptake was found in sst3-expressing tumors, whereas the uptake in the sst2-expressing tumors was lower and showed fast washout. The kidney uptake was high but blockable by coinjection of lysine. CONCLUSION: This peptide family shows pansomatostatin potency. As radiopeptides, they are the first to show a full pansomatostatin profile. Despite some drawback, they should be useful for imaging sst2-expressing tumors with short-lived radiometals, such as (68)Ga, at early time points and for sst3-expressing tumors at later time points with longer-lived radiometals, such as (64)Cu or (86)Y.

Ring size in octreotide amide modulates differently agonist versus antagonist binding affinity and selectivity.

H-DPhe (2)-c[Cys (3)-Phe (7)-DTrp (8)-Lys (9)-Thr (10)-Cys (14)]-Thr (15)-NH2 (1) (a somatostatin agonist, SRIF numbering) and H-Cpa (2)-c[DCys (3)-Tyr (7)-DTrp (8)-Lys (9)-Thr (10)-Cys (14)]-Nal (15)-NH2 (4) (a somatostatin antagonist) are based on the structure of octreotide that binds to three somatostatin receptor subtypes (sst 2/3/5) with significant binding affinity. Analogues of 1 and 4 were synthesized with norcysteine (Ncy), homocysteine (Hcy), or D-homocysteine (DHcy) at positions 3 and/or 14. Introducing Ncy at positions 3 and 14 constrained the backbone flexibility, resulting in loss of binding affinity at all sst s. The introduction of Hcy at positions 3 and 14 improved selectivity for sst 2 as a result of significant loss of binding affinity at the other sst s. Substitution by DHcy at position 3 in the antagonist scaffold (5), on the other hand, resulted in a significant loss of binding affinity at sst 2 and sst 3 as compared to the different affinities of the parent compound (4). The 3D NMR structures of the analogues in dimethylsulfoxide are consistent with the observed binding affinities.

Ring size of somatostatin analogues (ODT-8) modulates receptor selectivity and binding affinity.

The synthesis, biological testing, and NMR studies of several analogues of H-c[Cys (3)-Phe (6)-Phe (7)-DTrp (8)-Lys (9)-Thr (10)-Phe (11)-Cys (14)]-OH (ODT-8, a pan-somatostatin analogue, 1) have been performed to assess the effect of changing the stereochemistry and the number of atoms in the disulfide bridge on binding affinity. Cysteine at positions 3 and/or 14 (somatostatin numbering) were/was substituted with d-cysteine, norcysteine, D-norcysteine, homocysteine, and/or D-homocysteine. The 3D structure analysis of selected partially selective, bioactive analogues (3, 18, 19, and 21) was carried out in dimethylsulfoxide. Interestingly and not unexpectedly, the 3D structures of these analogues comprised the pharmacophore for which the analogues had the highest binding affinities (i.e., sst 4 in all cases).

Bombesin receptor antagonists may be preferable to agonists for tumor targeting.

UNLABELLED: Two bombesin analogs, Demobesin 4 and Demobesin 1, were characterized in vitro as gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) receptor agonist and antagonist, respectively, and were compared as (99m)Tc-labeled ligands for their in vitro and in vivo tumor-targeting properties. METHODS: N(4)-[Pro(1),Tyr(4),Nle(14)]Bombesin (Demobesin 4) and N(4)-[d-Phe(6),Leu-NHEt(13),des-Met(14)]bombesin(6-14) (Demobesin 1) were characterized in vitro for their binding properties with GRP receptor autoradiography using GRP receptor-transfected HEK293 cells, PC3 cells, and human prostate cancer specimens. Their ability to modulate calcium mobilization in PC3 and transfected HEK293 cells was analyzed as well as their ability to trigger internalization of the GRP receptor in transfected HEK293 cells, as determined qualitatively by immunofluorescence microscopy and quantitatively by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Further, their internalization properties as (99m)Tc-labeled radioligands were tested in vitro in both cell lines. Finally, their biodistribution was analyzed in PC3 tumor-bearing mice. RESULTS: A comparable binding affinity with the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) in the nanomolar range was measured for Demobesin 4 and Demobesin 1 in all tested tissues. Demobesin 4 behaved as an agonist by strongly stimulating calcium mobilization and by triggering GRP receptor internalization. Demobesin 1 was ineffective in stimulating calcium mobilization and in triggering GRP receptor internalization. However, in these assays, it behaved as a competitive antagonist as it reversed completely the agonist-induced effects in both systems. (99m)Tc-Labeled Demobesin 1 was only weakly taken up by PC3 cells or GRP receptor-transfected HEK293 cells (10% and 5%, respectively, of total added radioactivity) compared with (99m)Tc-labeled Demobesin 4 (45% of total added radioactivity in both cell lines). Remarkably, the biodistribution study revealed a much more pronounced uptake at 1, 4, and 24 h after injection of (99m)Tc-labeled Demobesin 1 in vivo into PC3 tumors than (99m)Tc-labeled Demobesin 4. In vivo competition experiments demonstrated a specific uptake in PC3 tumors and in physiologic GRP receptor-expressing tissues. The tumor-to-kidney ratios were 0.7 for Demobesin 4 and 5.2 for Demobesin 1 at 4 h. CONCLUSION: This comparative in vitro/in vivo study with Demobesin 1 and Demobesin 4 indicates that GRP receptor antagonists may be superior targeting agents to GRP receptor agonists, suggesting a change of paradigm in the field of bombesin radiopharmaceuticals.

GPR87 is an overexpressed G-protein coupled receptor in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. The overall 5-year survival after therapy is about 16% and there is a clear need for better treatment options, such as therapies targeting specific molecular structures. G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), as the largest family of cell surface receptors, represent an important group of potential targets for diagnostics and therapy. We therefore used laser capture microdissection and GPCR-focused Affymetrix microarrays to examine the expression of 929 GPCR transcripts in tissue samples of 10 patients with squamous cell carcinoma and 7 with adenocarcinoma in order to identify novel targets in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The relative gene expression levels were calculated in tumour samples compared to samples of the neighbouring alveolar tissue in every patient. Based on this unique study design, we identified 5 significantly overexpressed GPCRs in squamous cell carcinoma, in the following decreasing order of expression: GPR87 > CMKOR1 > FZD10 > LGR4 > P2RY11. All are non-olfactory and GRAFS (glutamate, rhodopsin, adhesion, frizzled/taste2, secretin family) classified. GPR87, LGR4 and CMKOR1 are orphan receptors. GPR87 stands out as a candidate for further target validation due to its marked overexpression and correlation on a mutation-based level to squamous cell carcinoma.

New sst4/5-selective somatostatin peptidomimetics based on a constrained tryptophan scaffold.

The synthesis and biological evaluation of four peptidomimetic analogs of somatostatin based on a constrained Trp residue, 3-amino-indolo[2,3-c]azepin-2-one (Aia), are reported. It is shown that dipeptidomimetics with a D-Aia-Lys sequence, functionalized with N- and C-terminal aromatic substituents, display a good selectivity for both sst4 and sst5. This study allowed us to identify a new highly potent sst5 agonist with good selectivity over the other receptors, except versus sst4.

Internalization of sst2, sst3, and sst5 receptors: effects of somatostatin agonists and antagonists.

UNLABELLED: The uptake of radiolabeled somatostatin analogs by tumor cells through receptor-mediated internalization is a critical process for the in vivo targeting of tumoral somatostatin receptors. In the present study, the somatostatin receptor internalization induced by a variety of somatostatin analogs was measured with new immunocytochemical methods that allow characterization of trafficking of the somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (sst2), somatostatin receptor subtype 3 (sst3), and somatostatin receptor subtype 5 (sst5) in vitro at the protein level. METHODS: Human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells expressing the sst2, sst3, or the sst5 were used in a morphologic immunocytochemical internalization assay using specific sst2, sst3 and sst5 antibodies to qualitatively and quantitatively determine the capability of somatostatin agonists or antagonists to induce somatostatin receptor internalization. In addition, the internalization properties of a selection of these agonists have been compared and quantified in sst2-expressing CHO-K1 cells using an ELISA. RESULTS: Agonists with a high sst2-binding affinity were able to induce sst2 internalization in the HEK293 and CHO-K1 cell lines. New sst2 agonists, such as Y-DOTA-TATE, Y-DOTA-NOC, Lu-DOTA-BOC-ATE (where DOTA is 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid; TATE is [Tyr3, Thr8]-octreotide; NOC is [1-NaI3]-octreotide; and BOC-ATE is [BzThi3, Thr8]-octreotide), iodinated sugar-containing octreotide analogs, or BIM-23244 were considerably more potent in internalizing sst2 than was DTPA-octreotide (where DTPA is diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid). Similarly, compounds with high sst3 affinity such as KE108 were able to induce sst3 internalization. In sst2- or sst3-expressing cell lines, agonist-induced receptor internalization was efficiently abolished by sst2- or sst3-selective antagonists, respectively. Antagonists alone had no effect on sst2 or sst3 internalization. We also showed that somatostatin-28 and somatostatin-14 can induce sst5 internalization. Unexpectedly, however, potent sst5 agonists such as KE108, BIM-23244, and L-817,818 were not able to induce sst5 internalization under the same conditions. CONCLUSION: Using sensitive and reproducible immunocytochemical methods, the ability of various somatostatin analogs to induce sst2, sst3, and sst5 internalization has been qualitatively and quantitatively determined. Whereas all agonists triggered sst2 and sst3 internalization, sst5 internalization was induced by natural somatostatin peptides but not by synthetic high-affinity sst5 agonists. Such assays will be of considerable help for the future characterization of ligands foreseen for nuclear medicine applications.

Upregulation of Key Molecules for Targeted Imaging and Therapy.

Targeted diagnosis and therapy enable precise tumor detection and treatment. Successful examples for precise tumor targeting are diagnostic and therapeutic radioligands. However, patients with tumors expressing low levels of the relevant molecular targets are deemed ineligible for such targeted approaches. METHODS: We performed a screen for drugs that upregulate the somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (sstr2). Then, we characterized the effects of these drugs on transcriptional, translational, and functional levels in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS: We identified 9 drugs that act as epigenetic modifiers, including the inhibitor of DNA methyltransferase decitabine as well as the inhibitors of histone deacetylase tacedinaline and romidepsin. In vitro, these drugs upregulated sstr2 on transcriptional, translational, and functional levels in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Thereby, their combinations revealed synergistic effects. In vivo, drug-based sstr2 upregulation improved the tumor-to-background and tumor-to-kidney ratios, which are the key determinants of successful sstr2-targeted imaging and radiopeptide therapy. CONCLUSION: We present an approach that uses epigenetic modifiers to improve sstr2 targeting in vitro and in vivo. Translation of this method into the clinic may potentially convert patients ineligible for targeted imaging and therapy to eligible candidates.

Somatostatin receptor 1 selective analogues: 3. Dicyclic peptides.

The binding affinity of short chain somatostatin (SRIF) analogues at the five human SRIF receptors (sst) was determined to identify sterically constrained somatostatin receptor subtype 1 (sst(1)) selective scaffolds. Des-AA(1,2,4,13)-[d-Trp(8)]SRIF (2) retained high binding affinity at all receptors but sst(1), Des-AA(1,2,4,5)-[d-Trp(8)]SRIF (3) at sst(4) and sst(5), and Des-AA(1,2,4,5,13)-[d-Trp(8)]SRIF (4) at sst(2) and sst(4) (AA = amino acid). Des-AA(1,2,4,12,13)-[d-Trp(8)]SRIF (6) was potent and sst(4)-selective (>25-fold); Des-AA(1,2,5,12,13)-[d-Trp(8)]SRIF (7) and Des-AA(1,2,4,5,12,13)-[d-Trp(8)]-SRIF (9, ODT-8) were most potent at sst(4) and moderately potent at all other receptors. Dicyclic SRIF agonists of the sst(1)-selective Des-AA(1,5)-[Tyr(2),d-Trp(8),IAmp(9)]SRIF, (14, sst(1) IC(50) = 14 nM) were prepared in which a lactam bridge introduced additional conformational constraint (IAmp = 4-(N-isopropyl)-aminomethylphenylalanine). Cyclo(7-12)Des-AA(1,5)-[Tyr(2),Glu(7),d-Trp(8),IAmp(9),hhLys(12)]SRIF (31) (sst(1) IC(50) = 16 nM) and cyclo(7-12) Des-AA(1,2,5)-[Glu(7),d-Trp(8),IAmp(9),m-I-Tyr(11),hhLys(12)]SRIF (45) (sst(1) IC(50) = 6.1 nM) had equal or improved affinities over that of the parent 14. Binding affinity was decreased in all other cases with alternate bridging constraints such as cyclo (6-11), cyclo (6-12), and cyclo (7-11). Compound 45 is an agonist (EC(50) = 8.8 nM) in the adenylate cyclase assay.

Somatostatin receptor 1 selective analogues: 2. N(alpha)-Methylated scan.

Des-AA(1,2,5)-[d-Trp(8)/d-Nal(8),IAmp(9)]SRIF (AA = amino acid, Nal = 3-(2-naphthyl)-alanine, IAmp = 4-(N-isopropyl)-aminomethylphenylalanine, SRIF = somatostatin), with or without a tyrosine or monoiodotyrosine, were scanned with the introduction of a backbone N-methyl group and tested for binding affinity at the five human somatostatin receptors (sst(1)(-)(5)). N(alpha)-Methylation resulted in loss of sst affinity (2- to >5-fold) when introduced at residues Lys(4) (6), Phe(6) (7), Phe(7) (8), Thr(10) (11), and Phe(11) (12) of the parent compound Des-AA(1,2,5)-[d-Nal(8),IAmp(9)]SRIF (4). N(alpha)-Methylation was tolerated at residues Cys(3) (5), d-Nal(8) (9), Thr(12) (13), and Cys(14) (15) with retention of binding sst affinity and selectivity and resulted in an increase in sst binding affinity at positions IAmp(9) (10) and Ser(13) (14). In these series, the d-Trp(8) substitution versus d-Nal(8) is clearly superior. C-Terminally lysine-extended analogues (21-25) retained sst(1) selectivity and binding affinity when compared to their d-Nal(8)- (4) or d-Trp(8)- (3) containing parent. Des-AA(1,2,5)-[d-Trp(8), (N(alpha)Me)IAmp(9)]SRIF (17), Des-AA(1,2,5)-[d-Trp(8),IAmp(9),(N(alpha)Me)Ser(13)]SRIF (19), Des-AA(1,2,5)-[d-Trp(8),IAmp(9),(N(alpha)Me)Cys(14)]SRIF (20), Des-AA(1,2,5)-[d-Trp(8),(N(alpha)Me)IAmp(9),Tyr(11)]SRIF (34), and Des-AA(1,2,5)-[d-Agl(8)(N(beta)Me,2-naphthoyl),IAmp(9),Tyr(11)]SRIF (42) (Agl = aminoglycine) are sst(1) agonists in their ability to inhibit forskolin-induced cAMP production.

Evaluation of three different families of bombesin receptor radioantagonists for targeted imaging and therapy of gastrin releasing peptide receptor (GRP-R) positive tumors.

Two new classes of radiolabeled GRP receptor antagonists are studied and compared with the well-established statine-based receptor antagonist DOTA-4-amino-1-carboxymethylpiperidine-d-Phe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Sta-Leu-NH2 (RM2, 1; DOTA:1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid; Sta:(3S,4S)-4-amino-3-hydroxy-6-methylheptanoic acid). The bombesin-based pseudopeptide DOTA-4-amino-1-carboxymethylpiperidine-d-Phe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Leuψ(CHOH-CH2)-(CH2)2-CH3 (RM7, 2), and the methyl ester DOTA-4-amino-1-carboxymethylpiperidine-d-Phe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Leu-OCH3 (ARBA05, 3) analogues are labeled with (111)In and evaluated in vitro in PC-3 cell line and in vivo in PC-3 tumor-bearing nude mice. Antagonist potency was assessed by immunofluorescence-based receptor internalization and Ca(2+) mobilization assays. The conjugates showed good binding affinity, the IC50 value of 2 (3.2 ± 1.8 nM) being 2 and 10 times lower than 1 and 3. Compared to (111)In-1, (111)In-2 showed higher uptake in target tissues such as pancreas (1.5 ± 0.5%IA/g and 39.8 ± 9.3%IA/g at 4 h, respectively), whereas the compounds had similar tumor uptake (11.5 ± 2.4%IA/g and 11.8 ± 3.9%IA/g at 4h, respectively). The displacement of the radioligand in vivo was different in different receptor positive organs and depended on the displacing peptide.

Novel sst(4)-selective somatostatin (SRIF) agonists. 2. Analogues with beta-methyl-3-(2-naphthyl)alanine substitutions at position 8.

We present a family of human sst(4)-selective, high-affinity (IC(50) = 2-4 nM) cyclic somatostatin (SRIF) octapeptides. These peptides result from the substitution of dTrp(8) in H-c[Cys(3)-Phe(6)-Phe(7)-DTrp(8)-Lys(9)-Thr(10)-Phe(11)-Cys(14)]-OH (SRIF numbering) (ODT-8) by one of the four conformationally biased stereoisomers of beta-methyl-3-(2-naphthyl)alanine (beta-Me2Nal). Whereas H-c[Cys-Phe-Phe-DNal-Lys-Thr-Phe-Cys]-OH (ODN-8, 2) has high affinity and marginal selectivity for human sst(3) (Reubi et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 13973-13978), H-c[Cys-Phe-Tyr-D-threo-beta-Me2Nal-Lys-Thr-Phe-Cys]-OH (5) has high affinity for all sst's except for sst(1); H-c[Cys-Phe-Tyr-L-threo-beta-Me2Nal-Lys-Thr-Phe-Cys]-OH (6) has high affinity for sst(4) (IC(50) = 2.1 nM), with more than 50-fold selectivity toward the other receptors. Analogues 7 and 8, containing d- and l-erythro-beta-Me2Nal instead of the corresponding threo derivatives at position 8, are essentially inactive at all receptors. Substitution of Tyr(7) in 5 and 6 by Aph(7) resulted in 9 and 10 with similar affinity patterns overall yet lowered affinity. The substitution of DCys(3) for Cys(3) in 5 and 6 yielded H-c[DCys-Phe-Tyr-D-threo-beta-Me2Nal-Lys-Thr-Phe-Cys]-OH (11) and H-c[DCys-Phe-Tyr-L-threo-beta-Me2Nal-Lys-Thr-Phe-Cys]-OH (12), with biological profiles almost identical to those of their parents 5 and 6 (i.e., high affinity for sst(2-5) for 11 and high affinity and selectivity for sst(4) for 12). Analogue 12, with high sst(4) affinity combined with the highest sst(4) selectivity among all tested compounds, is an agonist in the cAMP accumulation assay (EC(50) = 1.29 nM). Cold monoiodination of 12 yielded 14, with loss of sst(4) selectivity and loss of high affinity (IC(50) = 21 nM). Introduction of Tyr(2) in 9 and 10 and substitution of Cys(3) by dCys(3), to yield 15 and 16 (IC(50) = 9.8 and 61 nM, respectively, for sst(4) and limited selectivity), failed to generate a high-affinity (125)iodinatable sst(4)-selective ligand. Substitution of Phe by Tyr at position 11 in H-c[DCys-Phe-Phe-L-threo-beta-Me2Nal-Lys-Thr-Phe-Cys]-OH yielded 18 (IC(50) = 11.8 nM at sst(4)), with limited sst(4) selectivity (30-fold or greater at the other receptors) yet only slightly improved affinity over that of 14. Cold monoiodination of 18 yielded 20 (IC(50) = 30 nM at sst(4) and high selectivity). Whereas we were able, in this study, to identify a new family of sst(4)-selective, high-affinity compounds, our additional goal, to identify highly potent and sst(4)-selective ligands amenable to (125)iodination, could not be achieved satisfactorily. On the other hand, some of the diastereomers identified in this study, such as 5, 11, 17, and 19, are very potent ligands at all receptors but sst(1).

Novel sst(4)-selective somatostatin (SRIF) agonists. 3. Analogues amenable to radiolabeling.

After our discovery that H-c[Cys-Phe-Phe-DNal-Lys-Thr-Phe-Cys]-OH (ODN-8) had high affinity and marginal selectivity for human sst(3) (part 2 of this series: Erchegyi et al. J. Med. Chem., preceding paper in this issue)(11) and that H-c[Cys-Phe-Phe-DTrp-Lys-Thr-Phe-Cys]-OH (ODT-8, 3) had high affinity and marginal selectivity for human sst(4), that H-c[Cys-Phe-Tyr-D-threo-beta-Me2Nal-Lys-Thr-Phe-Cys]-OH had high affinity for all sst's except for sst(1), and that H-c[Cys-Phe-Tyr-L-threo-beta-Me2Nal-Lys-Thr-Phe-Cys]-OH had high affinity for sst(4) (IC(50) = 2.1 nM), with more than 50-fold selectivity toward the other receptors (parts 1 and 2 of this series: Rivier et al. and Erchegyi et al. J. Med. Chem., preceding papers in this issue), we found H-c[Cys-Phe-Phe-Trp-Lys-Thr-Phe-Cys]-OH (OLT-8, 2), H-c[Cys-Phe-Phe-L-threo-beta-MeTrp-Lys-Thr-Phe-Cys]-OH (4) and H-c[Cys-Phe-Phe-D-threo-beta-MeTrp-Lys-Thr-Phe-Cys]-OH (5) to have very high affinity for sst(4) (IC(50) = 0.7, 1.8, and 4.0 nM, respectively) and 5- to 10-fold selectivity versus the other sst's. From earlier work, we concluded that an l-amino acid at position 8 and a tyrosine or 4-aminophenylalanine substitution at position 7 may lead to high sst(4) selectivity. In fact, [Tyr(7)]-2 (6) and [Tyr(7)]-3 (7) show ca. 5-fold selectivity for sst(4), and [Aph(7)]-2 (8) and [Aph(7)]-3 (9) have high sst(4) affinity (IC(50) = 1.2 and 0.88 nM, respectively) and selectivity, suggesting that indeed an l-residue at position 8 will direct selectivity toward sst(4). Unexpectedly, [Ala(7)]-2 (10) and [Ala(7)]-3 (11) have very high sst(4) affinity (IC(50) = 0.84 and 0.98 nM, respectively) and selectivity (>600- and 200-fold, respectively). The combination of Tyr(2) and dTrp(8) in analogues 14 and 22 did not affect the affinity of the analogues for sst(4) (IC(50) = 1.2 and 1.1 nM, respectively) but resulted in loss of selectivity, whereas the combination of Tyr(2) and LTrp(8) in H-Tyr-c[Cys-Phe-Aph-Trp-Lys-Thr-Phe-Cys]-OH (13) and H-Tyr-c[Cys-Phe-Ala-Trp-Lys-Thr-Phe-Cys]-OH(19) retained high affinity (IC(50) = 1.9 and 1.98 nM, respectively) and sst(4) selectivity (>50 and >250, respectively). Interestingly, the same substitutions at positions 2 and 7, with l-threo-beta-MeTrp at position 8, yielded a much less selective analogue (20). Carbamoylation of the N-terminus of most of these analogues resulted in slightly improved affinity, selectivity, or both. Other amino acid substitutions in this series, such as those with Amp (25, 26), Orn (27), or IAmp (29) at position 7, were also tolerated but with a 2- to 3-fold loss of affinity and concomitant loss of selectivity. Analogous peptides with a tyrosine at position 11 (31-36) were less selective than the corresponding peptides with a tyrosine at position 2. Several analogues in this series compared favorably with the non-peptide L-803,087 (37) in terms of affinity and selectivity. Analogues 8, 10, and 21 potently inhibited the forskolin-stimulated cAMP production in sst(4)-transfected cells, therefore acting as full agonists. Cold monoiodination of 19 yielded 21, with retention of high sst(4) selectivity and affinity (IC(50) = 3.5 nM). (125)Iodinated 19 selectively binds to sst(4)-transfected cells but not to sst(1-3)- or sst(5)-transfected cells. Binding in sst(4)-transfected cells was completely displaced by SRIF-28 or the sst(4)-selective L-803,087.