Antiretroviral therapy in HIV-2-infected patients: changes in plasma viral load, CD4+ cell counts, and drug resistance profiles of patients treated in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.

OBJECTIVE: To describe changes in plasma viral load, CD4+ cell counts, and drug resistance profiles of HIV-2-infected patients receiving antiretroviral (ARV) therapy in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire. METHODS: Consecutive blood samples were collected from 18 HIV-2-infected ARV-naive patients who had received ARV therapy in the UNAIDS drug access initiative (UNAIDS-DAI) in Abidjan between August 1998 and July 2000. Changes in HIV-2 plasma viral load, CD4+ cell counts, and genotypic and phenotypic drug resistance testing were determined. RESULTS: At baseline, 11 (61%) of the 18 patients initiated highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and seven (39%) received dual therapy. No significant change in median viral load was observed at 2 months (P = 0.09), at 6 months (P = 0.06), and at 12 months of therapy (P = 0.26). No significant increase in CD4+ cell counts was observed at 12 months (P = 0.10). All four patients on indinavir-containing HAART had undetectable viral loads at 2-4 months of therapy. However, none of seven patients on nelfinavir-containing HAART had a substantial decrease in viral load. Viruses from 14 patients were analyzed, 12 of which (86%) had at least one primary resistance mutation that is known to confer resistance to HIV-1 virus. Three patients had the multi-drug-resistant mutation, Q151M, two of whom showed reduced susceptibility to zidovudine, didanosine, stavudine and zalcitabine. CONCLUSION: Our limited findings show that nelfinavir-containing regimens may have limited virologic benefit to HIV-2-infected patients.

Antiretroviral drug resistance in human immunodeficiency virus-infected source patients for occupational exposures to healthcare workers.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of HIV antiretroviral resistance among source patients for occupational HIV exposures. DESIGN: Blood and data (eg, stage of HIV, previous antiretroviral drug therapy, and HIV RNA viral load) were collected from HIV-infected patients who were source patients for occupational exposures. SETTING: Seven tertiary-care medical centers in five U.S. cities (San Diego, California; Miami, Florida; Boston, Massachusetts; Albany, New York; and New York, New York [three sites]) during 1998 to 1999. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-four HIV-infected patients who were source patients for occupational exposures. RESULTS: Virus from 50 patients was sequenced; virus from 14 patients with an undetectable (ie, < 400 RNA copies/mL) viral load could not be sequenced. Overall, 19 (38%) of the 50 patients had primary genotypic mutations associated with resistance to reverse transcriptase or protease inhibitors. Eighteen of the 19 viruses with primary mutations and 13 wild type viruses were phenotyped by recombinant assays; 19 had phenotypic resistance to at least one antiretroviral agent. Of the 50 source patients studied, 26 had taken antiretroviral agents in the 3 months before the occupational exposure incident. Sixteen (62%) of the 26 drug-treated patients had virus that was phenotypically resistant to at least one drug. Four (17%) of 23 untreated patients had phenotypically resistant virus. No episodes of HIV transmission were observed among the exposed HCWs. CONCLUSIONS: There was a high prevalence of drug-resistant HIV among source patients for occupational HIV exposures. Healthcare providers should use the drug treatment information of source patients when making decisions about post-exposure prophylaxis.