A French classification to describe medical deserts: a multi-professional approach based on the first contact with the healthcare system.

BACKGROUND: Increasing inequalities in accessibility to primary care has generated medical deserts. Identifying them is key to target the geographic areas where action is needed. An extensive definition of primary care has been promoted by the World Health Organization: a first level of contact with the health system, which involves the co-presence of different categories of health professionals alongside the general practitioner for the diagnosis and treatment of patients. Previous analyses have focused mainly on a single type of provider while this study proposes an integrated approach including various ones to define medical deserts in primary care. METHOD: Our empirical approach focuses on the first point of contact with the health system: general practitioners, proximity primary care providers (nurses, physiotherapists, pharmacies, laboratories, and radiologists), and emergency services. A multiple analysis approach was performed, to classify French municipalities using the information on the evolution and needs of health care accessibility, combining a principal component analysis and a hierarchical ascending classification. RESULTS: Two clusters of medical deserts were identified with low accessibility to all healthcare professionals, socio-economic disadvantages, and a decrease in care supply. In other clusters, accessibility difficulties only concern a part of the health supply considered, which raises concern for the efficiency of primary care for optimal healthcare pathways. Even for clusters with better accessibility, issues were identified, such as a decrease and high needs of health care supply, revealing potential future difficulties. CONCLUSION: This work proposes a multi-professional and multi-dimensional approach to medical deserts based mainly on an extensive definition of primary care that shows the relevance of the co-presence of various healthcare professionals. The classification also makes it possible to identify areas with future problems of accessibility and its potential consequences. This framework could be easily applied to other countries according to their available data and their health systems' specificities.

Training, Migration and Retention of Doctors: Is Ireland a Danaides' Jar? Comment on "Doctor Retention: A Cross-sectional Study of How Ireland Has Been Losing the Battle".

In a context of global shortage of doctors, Ireland is in a paradoxical situation: the country trained a lot of medical students, native or foreign, but has difficulties to retain them. The paper of Brugha and his colleagues analyzes junior doctors' migration intentions, the reasons they leave, the likelihood of them returning and the characteristics of those who plan to emigrate. Results show determinants of junior doctor's emigration and may be useful to better calibrate the doctors' retention strategy of Ireland.

Medically underserved areas: are primary care teams efficient at attracting and retaining general practitioners?

The geographical imbalances of General Practitioners (GPs) may affect their accessibility for populations, especially in medically underserved areas. We investigate the effect of the dramatic and recent diffusion of Primary Care Teams (PCTs), especially in medically underserved areas, in order to attract and retain GPs through an improvement of their working conditions. We analyze the evolution of GPs and young GPs density between 2004 and 2017 according to a spatial taxonomy of French living areas in 6 clusters. Based on a quasi-experimental design comparing living areas, depending on the clusters, with PCTs (treated) and without PCTs (control), we used difference-in-differences models to estimate the impact of PCT new settlements on the evolution of both attraction and retention of GPs. Our results show that PCT settlements are efficient to attract young GPs and that the magnitude of the effects depends on the living area clusters. Results call for specific policies to address geographical inequalities of GPs that consider the type of place and also, in France, for new measures to attract and retain GPs in rural fringes.

Has the diffusion of primary care teams in France improved attraction and retention of general practitioners in rural areas?

Many countries, including France, are facing the old and persistent problem of geographical inequalities of their health human resources, in particular general practitioners (GPs). This situation leads, among other things, to underserved areas, which could result in a lower level of primary health care accessibility. Since the mid-2000s in France, several policies were implemented to provide financial as well as other incentives to support the development of multi-professional group practices, Primary Care Teams (PCTs), in order to attract and retain GPs in underserved areas. This study aims to measure the impact of PCTs settlement on the evolution of GP density in rural areas. To this end, we compare the evolution of GP density between rural areas with PCTs and similar rural areas without PCTs, before (2004-2008) and after (2008-2012) the development of PCTs facilities. The results show that PCTs are mainly located in underserved areas and suggest that they could attract and retain GPs there. Those results should be of interest to countries facing relatively similar geographical inequalities issues and that are also experimenting with multi-professional group practices.

["Medical deserts" and accessibility to care: what are we talking about?] / « Déserts médicaux ¼ et accessibilité aux soins : de quoi parle-t-on ?

In France, accessibility to primary health care seems to be threatened by the existence or the emergence of underserved areas often called "medical deserts". These areas are characterized by several parameters such as a poor number of health professionals, remoteness or high needs of care. We discuss here different methods to measure primary health care accessibility or imbalance between health care providers and needs. Thus, we aim to show the confusion generated by the concept of "medical deserts" and the stakes for public authorities to define measures to attract and retain general practitioners in such areas.