Consolidative chemotherapy after definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a population based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The role of consolidative chemotherapy (CCT) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC) patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCCRT) is unclear. We aimed to compare the overall survival (OS) of those treated with vs without CCT via a population based approach. METHODS: Eligible LA-ESCC patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2017 were identified via the Taiwan Cancer Registry. We used propensity score (PS) weighting to balance observable potential confounders between groups. The hazard ratio (HR) of death and incidence of esophageal cancer mortality (IECM) were compared between those with vs without CCT. We also evaluated the OS in supplementary analyses via alternative approaches. RESULTS: Our primary analysis consisted of 368 patients in whom covariates were well balanced after PS weighting. The HR of death when CCT was compared to without was 0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.52-0.86, P = 0.002). The HR of IECM was 0.66 (P = 0.04). The HR of OS remained similarly in favor of CCT in supplementary analyses. CONCLUSIONS: We found that CCT was associated with significantly improved OS for LA-ESCC patients treated with dCCRT. Randomized controlled trials were needed to confirm this finding.

Chemotherapy alone versus definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cT4b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: The role of radiotherapy for cT4bNanyM0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESqCC) is relatively unclear, with both chemotherapy (C/T) alone and definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCCRT) being treatment options in the current guidelines. We aimed to compare the survival of dCCRT versus C/T for these patients via a population-based approach. METHODS: Eligible cT4b ESqCC patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2017 were identified via the Taiwan Cancer Registry. We used propensity score (PS) weighting to balance the observable potential confounders between groups. The hazard ratio (HR) of death and incidence of esophageal cancer mortality (IECM) were compared between dCCRT and C/T. We also evaluated OS in subgroups of either low or standard radiotherapy doses. RESULTS: Our primary analysis consisted of 247 patients in whom covariates were well balanced after PS weighing. The HR for death when dCCRT was compared with C/T was 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.24-0.53, P < 0.001). Similar results were found for IECM. Statistical significance was only observed in the standard RT dose but not in the low dose in subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based nonrandomized study of cT4bNanyM0 ESqCC patients from Asia (Taiwan), we found that the use of radiotherapy with chemotherapy was associated with better overall survival than chemotherapy alone. Further studies (especially RCTs) are needed to confirm our findings.

A retrospective study of clinicopathologic and molecular features of inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is the treatment of choice for medically inoperable, early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC). The influence of oncogenic driver alterations and comorbidities are not well known. Here we present treatment outcomes based on clinicopathologic features and molecular profiles. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients treated with SABR for inoperable ES-NSCLC. Molecular features of oncogenic driver alterations included EGFR, ALK, and ROS1. Comorbidities were assessed using the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI). Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox regression model was performed for univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors. Competing risk analysis was used to evaluate the cumulative incidence of disease progression. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2020, 100 patients (median age: 82 years) were enrolled. The majority of patients were male (64%), ever-smokers (60%), and had adenocarcinoma (65%). With a median follow-up of 21.5 months, the median overall survival (OS) and real-world progression-free survival were 37.7 and 25.1 months, respectively. The competing-risk-adjusted 3-year cumulative incidences of local, regional, and disseminated failure were 8.2%, 14.5%, and 31.2%, respectively. An ACCI ≥7 was independently associated with inferior OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.45, p = 0.03). Tumor size ≥4 cm (HR 4.16, p < 0.001) was the most important independent prognostic factor predicting real-world progression. EGFR mutation status had no impact on the outcomes. CONCLUSION: SABR provides excellent local control in ES-NSCLC, although disseminated failures remains a major concern. ACCI is the best indicator for OS, while tumor sizes ≥4 cm predicts poor disease control.

Impact of the interval between neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy in the modern era: a population-based propensity-score-matched retrospective cohort study in Asia.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (nCCRT) is one of the standard-of-care options for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESqCC). The optimal interval between nCCRT and esophagectomy is unknown. METHODS: We constructed a propensity-score-matched [1:1 for long (8-12 weeks) vs short (4-7 weeks) intervals] cohort of LA-ESqCC patients who were diagnosed from 2011 to 2015 and treated with nCCRT via the Taiwan Cancer Registry and related databases. We compared the hazard ratios (HRs) of death using a robust variance estimator. We also evaluated alternative covariables, outcomes, and interval definitions. RESULTS: Our study population included 80 patients for each group; groups were balanced with respect to the observed covariables. There was no significant difference for the HR of death [1.22; 95% confidence interval 0.78-1.91, P = 0.39] when the long interval group was compared to the short interval group. There were also no significant differences when alternative covariables, outcomes, or interval definitions were evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based study in modern Asia, we found that for LA-ESqCC patients treated with nCCRT and esophagectomy, overall survival was similar for either long or short intervals between nCCRT and esophagectomy. Randomized controlled trials are needed to verify this finding.

Neoadjuvant vs definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma remains unclear. We compared the clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by esophagectomy [the surgery group] and CCRT without surgery [the CCRT group] in patients with squamous cell carcinoma from an Asian population. METHODS: Eligible patients diagnosed from 2008 to 2015 were identified through the Taiwan Cancer Registry. To balance observable potential confounders, we constructed a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort [surgery vs CCRT]. We compared the hazard ratios between the surgery and CCRT groups for death using a robust variance estimator. We also evaluated the outcomes of patients for freedom from local regional recurrence (FFLRR) and esophageal cancer-specific survival (ECSS). Extensive supplementary analyses were performed to examine the robustness of our findings. RESULTS: Our study population included 298 patients balanced with respect to the observed covariables. The hazard ratio of death was 0.56 [95% confidence interval 0.42~0.75] when surgery was compared to CCRT. The results remained significant in the FFLRR and ECSS outcomes. In the supplementary analyses, our results also remained significant when additional covariables were taken into consideration or when the definition of the index date was changed. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to definitive CCRT, neoadjuvant CCRT followed by esophagectomy was associated with improved overall survival for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, given the nonrandomized nature of the study and the sensitivity to potentially unmeasured confounders, our results should be interpreted cautiously.

A Population-based Study of the Effectiveness of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Fractionated Radiotherapy for Clinical Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a promising option for non-operated early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT). However, results from conclusive randomized controlled trials are not yet available. The aim of our study was to explore the effectiveness of SABR vs. CFRT for non-operated early-stage NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used a comprehensive population-based database to identify clinical stage I non-operated NSCLC patients in Taiwan diagnosed from 2007 to 2013 who were treated with either SABR or CFRT. We used inverse probability weighting and the propensity score as the primary form of analysis to address the nonrandomization of treatment. In the supplementary analyses, we constructed subgroups based on propensity score matching to compare survival between patients treated with SABR vs. CFRT. RESULTS: We identified 238 patients in our primary analysis. A good balance of covariates was achieved using the propensity score weighting. Overall survival (OS) was not significantly different between those treated with SABR vs. CFRT (SABR vs. CFRT: probability weighting adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.586, 95% confidence interval 0.264-1.101, p = 0.102). However, SABR was significantly favored in supplementary analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based propensity-score adjusted analysis, we found that OS was not significantly different between those treated with SABR vs. CFRT in the primary analysis, although significance was observed in the supplementary analyses. Our results should be interpreted with caution given the database (i.e., nonrandomized) approach used in our study. Overall, further studies are required to explore these issues.

A review of cost communication in oncology: Patient attitude, provider acceptance, and outcome assessment.

The American Society of Clinical Oncology released its first guidance statement on the cost of cancer care in August 2009, affirming that patient-physician cost communication is a critical component of high-quality care. This forward-thinking recommendation has grown increasingly important in oncology practice today as the high costs of cancer care impose tremendous financial burden to patients, their families, and the health care system. For the current review, a literature search was conducted using the PubMed and Web of Science databases to identify articles that covered 3 topics related to patient-physician cost communication: patient attitude, physician acceptance, and the associated outcomes; and 15 articles from 12 distinct studies were identified. Although most articles that addressed patient attitude suggested that cost communication is desired by >50% of patients in the respective study cohorts, only <33% of patients in those studies had actually discussed costs with their physicians. The literature on physician acceptance indicated that, although 75% of physicians considered discussions of out-of-pocket costs with patients their responsibility, <30% felt comfortable with such communication. When asked about whether cost communication actually took place in their practice, percentages reported by physicians varied widely from <10% to >60%. The data suggested that cost communication was associated with improved patient satisfaction, lower out-of-pocket expenses, and a higher likelihood of medication nonadherence; none of the studies established causality. Both patients and physicians expressed a strong need for accurate, accessible, and transparent information about the cost of cancer care. Cancer 2017;123:928-39. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Celecoxib plus chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a phase II TCOG study.

BACKGROUND: To report the results of a phase II trial combining celecoxib and preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with clinical stage II or III rectal cancer were treated with radiotherapy of 44 Gy in 22 fractions. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of oral tegafur-uracil and folinate on days 1-30 and 38-65. Celecoxib (400 mg/day) given from days 1 to 65. Surgery was done on day 70. The expression of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) in tumor tissues was evaluated microscopically as a prognostic factor. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2011, 53 patients completed CRT+ celecoxib therapy and 47 received radical surgery. Grade 3 diarrhea developed in 5 (9%). Grade 4 anemia was seen in 2 (4%). Pathological complete response (pCR) was seen in 6 (13%). T or N downstaging found in 38 (81%). Sphincter preservation was achieved in 77% of low-positioned tumors. Patients with tumors expressing high-level COX-2 after CRT + celecoxib treatment had inferior pelvic control (P = 0.01), disease-free survival (P = 0.04), and overall survival (P = 0.03) than those with low-level expression. CONCLUSIONS: Celecoxib can be safely combined with preoperative CRT for rectal cancer. More intensified adjuvant therapy may be considered for tumors expressing high-level COX-2 after CRT and surgery.

Delayed time from first medical visit to diagnosis for breast cancer patients in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Delay in diagnosis may affect the survival of breast cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate delayed diagnosis for breast cancer patients in Taiwan. METHODS: This study was conducted via one-to-one interviews with structured questionnaires in hospital outpatient visit. Included were 600 breast cancer patients seeking medical care in two medical centers in central Taiwan. RESULTS: Average delay in breast cancer diagnosis was 27.8 days. Service level of the patients' first visit and number of hospitals patients visited before obtaining a correct diagnosis were significantly associated with delay in diagnosis. Logistic regression analysis found that patients who had visited two, and three or more hospitals before getting a correct diagnosis had longer delays in diagnosis than patients who had visited one hospital (odds ratio = 2.23 and 9.26, 95% confidence interval 1.37-3.63 and 95% CI:3.87-22.15, respectively). CONCLUSION: Results of this study are anticipated to serve as a reference for the government and medical institutions to develop policies to reduce the number of hospitals visited before diagnosis for breast cancer patients, and ultimately to achieve the goal of early detection and treatment.

Efficacy of Definitive Radiotherapy for Patients with Clinical Stage IIIB or IIIC Lung Adenocarcinoma and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutations Treated Using First- or Second-Generation EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

Background: The effectiveness of definitive radiotherapy (RT) for patients with clinical stage IIIB or IIIC lung adenocarcinoma and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations who received first- or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is unclear. Methods: Taiwan Cancer Registry data were used in this retrospective cohort study to identify adult patients diagnosed with EGFR-mutated stage IIIB or IIIC lung adenocarcinoma between 2011 and 2020. Patients treated with first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs were classified into RT and non-RT groups. Propensity score (PS) weighting was applied to balance covariates between groups. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the incidence of lung cancer mortality (ILCM) was considered as a supplementary outcome. Additional supplementary analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the findings. Results: Among 270 eligible patients, 41 received RT and 229 did not. After a median follow-up of 46 months, PS-weighted analysis showed the PS-weighted hazard ratio of death for the RT group compared to the non-RT group was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.61-1.45, p = 0.78). ILCM rates did not differ significantly between the two groups. Supplementary analyses yielded consistent results. Conclusion: The addition of definitive RT to first- or second-generation EGFR TKI treatment does not significantly improve OS of patients with EGFR-mutated stage IIIB or IIIC lung adenocarcinoma. NCT03521154NCT05167851.

Re-evaluating the role of pelvic radiation in the age of modern precision medicine and systemic therapy.

The efficacy of pelvic radiation in the management of locally advanced stage rectal cancer has come under scrutiny in the context of modern precision medicine and systemic therapy as evidenced by recent clinical trials such as FOWARC (J Clin Oncol 2019; 37: 3223-3233), NCT04165772 (N Engl J Med 2022; 386: 2363-2376), and PROSPECT (N Engl J Med 2023; 389: 322-334). In this review, we comprehensively assess these pivotal trials and offer additional insights into the evolving role of pelvic radiation in contemporary oncology.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy for clinical early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: a population-based study.

INTRODUCTION: The use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) over conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been advocated, but is also debated in the literature. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we adopted a target trial emulation framework to identify eligible patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2021 using the Taiwan Cancer Registry. In the primary analysis, the overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, whereas incidences of lung cancer mortality and radiation pulmonary toxicity were the secondary endpoints. Extensive supplementary analyses were also conducted. RESULTS: We included 351 patients in the primary analysis and found that the OS was not significantly different between the SABR (n = 290) and CFRT (n = 61) groups. The propensity score weighting adjusted hazard ratio of death was 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.53-1.07, p = 0.118). The secondary endpoints and supplementary analyses showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: The OS of patients with early-stage NSCLC treated with SABR was not significantly different from that of patients treated with CFRT alone. The results of the relevant ongoing clinical trials are eagerly awaited.

Use of FDG-PET or PET/CT to detect recurrent colorectal cancer in patients with elevated CEA: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: The purpose of the present study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature to assess the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET or PET/CT in the detection of recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC) rising in patients with elevated CEA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic MEDLINE search of published articles. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of each study. We estimated pooled sensitivity and specificity and positive and negative likelihood ratios, and summary receiver-operating characteristic curves in the detection of recurrent CRC in patients with elevated CEA. RESULTS: Eleven studies with a total of 510 patients met the inclusion criteria. One hundred and six patients (106/510 = 20.8%) had true-negative FDG-PET (PET/CT) results in detection of recurrent CRC when rising CEA. The pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity and positive and negative likelihood ratios of FDG-PET in the detection of tumor recurrence in CRC patients with elevated CEA were 90.3% (95% CI, 85.5-94.0%), 80.0% (95% CI, 67.0-89.6%), 2.88 (95% CI, 1.37-6.07), and 0.12 (95% CI, 0.07-0.20), respectively. The pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity and positive and negative likelihood ratios of FDG-PET/CT in the detection of tumor recurrence in CRC patients with elevated CEA were 94.1% (95% CI, 89.4-97.1%), 77.2% (95% CI, 66.4-85.9%), 4.70 (95% CI, 0.82-12.13), and 0.06 (95% CI, 0.03-0.13), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Whole-body FDG-PET and PET/CT are valuable imaging tools for the assessment of patients with suspected CRC tumor recurrence based on the increase of CEA.

Concurrent use of antiplatelets, anticoagulants, or digoxin with Chinese medications: a population-based cohort study.

PURPOSE: We examined the extent of concurrent use of antiplatelets, anticoagulants, or digoxin with Chinese medications (CMs) and identified its associated factors. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using one million random samples from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2005 in Taiwan. High-risk Western medications (HRWMs) focused on in this study were antiplatelets (aspirin, clopidogrel, dipyridamole, ticlopidine), anticoagulants (heparin, warfarin), and digoxin. Concurrent use was described as having an overlapping use period of HRWM with CMs any time in 2005. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and health service utilizations between patients with and without concurrent HRWM-CM use were compared. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with incident concurrent use. RESULTS: Of the 70,698 eligible HRWM users, 13.2 % used CMs concurrently for an average duration of 26.7 ± 43 days. The incidence of concurrent HRWM-CM use, which excluded prior CM use within 6 months preceding the first CM use, was 6.3 %. Warfarin or ticlopidine users were more likely to be prescribed with CMs than were the other HRWM users. Factors associated with an increasing incidence of concurrent HRWM-CM use included female sex, age 45-54 years, middle monthly income, higher number of outpatient visits or distinct prescribed medications, and a previous diagnosis of heart diseases, stroke, or hypertension. In contrast, age ≥ 65 years and higher medical expenditure were associated with a lower incidence of concurrent use. CONCLUSIONS: In the Taiwanese population, approximately one in eight HRWM users were concomitantly prescribed CMs. Whether such concurrent use is associated with adverse clinical outcomes warrants further investigations.

Prognostic analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiation has become the standard of treatment in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, the exact magnitude of the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy is still unclear. MATERIALS & METHODS: This is a retrospective assessment of 181 patients with newly diagnosed, locally advanced nasopharygeal carcinoma who received concurrent chemoradiation followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin plus fluorouracil in one institution between 2004 and 2010. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 40 months (range: 2.1-96.6 months). The estimated 5-year survival rate of patients with and without adjuvant chemotherapy were 83.6 and 66.7%, respectively (p = 0.027). Patients receiving two to three cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy had improved outcomes compared with those without adjuvant chemotherapy or who had received one cycle. Multivariate analysis showed that both advanced stage and suboptimal treatment of adjuvant chemotherapy were adverse risk factors in terms of overall survival and disease-specific survival. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant chemotherapy with two to three cycles of cisplatin plus fluorouracil improved the survival of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

Does initial 45Gy of pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy reduce late complications in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer? A cohort control study using definitive chemoradiotherapy with high-dose rate brachytherapy.

BACKGROUND: Comparing initial 45 Gy of pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and non-IMRT in terms of the late toxicities associated with advanced cervical cancer that has also been treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy and high-dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDRICB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 320 stage IB2-IIIB cervical cancer patients treated with CCRT (83 IMRT and 237 non-IMRT). The two groups had similar stage and HDRICB ratings. Following 45 Gy to the pelvis, HDRICB of 24 Gy in four courses was prescribed. Late toxicities, including rectal complications (RC), bladder complications (BC) and non-rectal intestinal injury (NRRII), were scored by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. A logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of the complications. RESULTS: With a median follow-up duration of 33 and 77 months for IMRT and non-IMRT, 33 patients had Grade 2 or higher late RC (7.2% IMRT, 11.4% non-IMRT), whereas that for BC was 40 (9.6% IMRT, 13.5% non-IMRT) and for NRRII was 48 (12.0% IMRT, 16.0% non-IMRT). The cumulative rate for total grade 3 or higher gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicities was 8.4% and 11.8% (p = 0.33). IMRT did not reduce the OR for all endpoints; however, the ORs for rectum and bladder reference doses to Point A were associated with RC and BC. CONCLUSIONS: Locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated with initial 45Gy of pelvic IMRT and HDRICB have similar treatment-related late toxicities as those treated with non-IMRT. Optimization of the brachytherapy scheme is essential to minimize late toxicities.

Health Economic Evaluation of Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, there have been no systematic reviews of health economic evaluations of proton therapy specific to lung cancer. METHODS: We conducted this systematic review according to the predefined protocol [PROSPERO CRD42022365869]. We summarized the results of the included studies via structured narrative synthesis. RESULTS: We identified four studies (all used passively scattered proton therapy) from 787 searches. Two cost analyses reported that proton therapy was more costly than photon therapy for early- or locally advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer, one cost-utility analysis reported that proton therapy was dominated by nonproton therapy in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer, and one cost-utility analysis reported that proton therapy was not cost-effective (vs. photon) in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Passively scattered proton therapy was more costly and not cost-effective than photon therapy for early- and locally advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Further health economic evaluations regarding modern proton therapy (such as scanning beam) for common radiotherapy indications of lung cancer are eagerly awaited.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With/Without Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The role of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in the management of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who have undergone neoadjuvant systemic therapy has been the subject of recent debate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified eligible rectal cancer patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2020 using data from the Taiwan Cancer Registry. In our primary analysis, we applied propensity score weighting (PSW) to balance observable potential confounders. We then compared the hazard ratio (HR) of death the neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (nCCRT) group and the neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiotherapy (nCT) group. Additionally, we conducted a comprehensive assessment of other outcomes and performed various supplementary analyses. RESULTS: The primary analysis included 2,298 patients. The overall survival did not exhibit statistically significant differences, with a PSW-adjusted HR of 0.72 (95% confidence interval=0.33-1.56, p=0.40) when comparing the nCCRT group to the nCT group. These findings were consistent with those of other long-term outcomes and supplementary analyses. CONCLUSION: In patients with LARC who have undergone neoadjuvant systemic therapy, the addition of radiotherapy did not yield statistically significant differences in long-term clinical outcomes.