RESUMO
Background: Identifying actionable driver mutations via tissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is paramount in treatment decisions for metastatic non-squamous, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the role of CGP remains elusive in resectable NSCLC. Here, we elucidate the feasibility of CGP in early-stage NSCLC Korean patients and compare the tumor mutational burden (TMB) and mutation landscape using three different platforms. Methods: All surgically resected NSCLC samples (N = 96) were analyzed to assess the concordance in TMB calculation and targetable mutations using whole-exome sequencing (WES) and TruSight Oncology 500 (TSO500). In all, 26 samples were analyzed with Foundation One CDx Assay (F1CDx). Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was evaluated using Vectra Polaris. Results: Stage distribution post-surgery was 80% I (N = 77) and 20% II (N = 19). Ninety-nine percent (N = 95) were adenocarcinoma. The median TMB with WES and TSO500 was 1.6 and 4.7 mut/Mb, respectively (p < 0.05). Using all three platforms, the median TMB was 1.9, 5.5, and 4 mut/Mb for WES, TSO500, and F1CDx, respectively (p = 0.0048). Linear regression analysis of TMB values calculated between WES and TSO500 resulted in a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.83. For the PD-L1 tumor proportion score of <1% (negative, N = 18), 1-49% (low, N = 68), and ⩾50% (high, N = 10), the R2 values were 0.075, 0.79, and 0.95, respectively. The R2 values for TMB concordance were variable between the three platforms. Mutation landscape revealed EGFR mutation (51%, N = 49) as the most common actionable driver mutation, comprising L858R (N = 22), E19del (N = 20), and other non-common EGFR mutations (N = 7). Conclusion: TSO500 and F1CDx showed robust analytical performance for TMB assessment with TSO500 showing stronger concordance of TMB with high PD-L1 expression. As the paradigm for the management of early-resected NSCLC continues to evolve, understanding TMB and the mutation landscape may help advance clinical outcomes for this subset of patients.
RESUMO
BackgroundGlycogen storage disease type IV (GSD IV) is an ultrarare autosomal recessive disorder that causes deficiency of functional glycogen branching enzyme and formation of abnormally structured glycogen termed polyglucosan. GSD IV has traditionally been categorized based on primary hepatic or neuromuscular involvement, with hepatic GSD IV subclassified as discrete subtypes: classic (progressive) and nonprogressive.MethodsTo better understand the progression of liver disease in GSD IV, we present clinical and histopathology data from 23 patients from around the world and characterized the liver involvement in the Gbe1ys/ys knockin mouse model.ResultsWe propose an alternative to the established subtype-based terminology for characterizing liver disease in GSD IV and recognize 3 tiers of disease severity: (i) "severe progressive" liver disease, (ii) "intermediate progressive" liver disease, and (iii) "attenuated" liver disease. Analysis of liver pathology revealed that risk for liver failure cannot be predicted from liver biopsy findings alone in individuals affected by GSD IV. Moreover, analysis of postmortem liver pathology from an individual who died over 40 years after being diagnosed with nonprogressive hepatic GSD IV in childhood verified that liver fibrosis did not regress. Last, characterization of the liver involvement in a mouse model known to recapitulate the adult-onset neurodegenerative form of GSD IV (Gbe1ys/ys mouse model) demonstrated hepatic disease.ConclusionOur findings challenge the established subtype-based view of GSD IV and suggest that liver disease severity among patients with GSD IV represents a disease continuum.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02683512FundingNone.