Validation of the Hepamet fibrosis score in a multi-ethnic Asian population.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The Hepamet fibrosis score was introduced for the diagnosis of advanced liver fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). To date, external validation is limited, and its utility in combination with liver stiffness measurement (LSM) has not been explored. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study on NAFLD patients who had a liver biopsy and LSM on the same day. The diagnostic performance of the Hepamet fibrosis score was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). RESULTS: The data for 196 patients were analyzed (mean age 50 ± 11 years old, 50% men, 56.6% Malay, 27.6% Chinese, 15.8% Indian, 67.9% NASH, 15.8% advanced liver fibrosis). The AUROC of Hepamet fibrosis score for the diagnosis of advanced liver fibrosis was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.80 - 0.91). Using the <0.12 and ≥0.47 cut-offs from the original study, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, the proportion of indeterminate results and misclassification rate were 81.8%, 91.8%, 47.4%, 98.2%, 32.1% and 6.1%, respectively. Using LSM <10 kPa and ≥15 kPa for the diagnosis of absence and presence of advanced liver fibrosis, respectively, in patients with Hepamet fibrosis score ≥0.47 (i.e., the two-step approach) reduced indeterminate results and misclassification to 16.1% and 3.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We found the Hepamet fibrosis score to have good diagnostic accuracy in a population that was largely unrepresented in earlier work and demonstrated its utility in a two-step approach with LSM for the diagnosis of advanced liver fibrosis.

Long-term clinical outcomes of adults with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: a single-centre prospective cohort study with baseline liver biopsy.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the long-term adverse clinical outcomes of adults with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). METHODS: This is a single-centre prospective study of a well-characterized cohort of MAFLD patients who underwent liver biopsy and followed every 6-12 months for adverse clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The data for 202 patients were analyzed [median age 55.0 (48.0-61.3) years old; male, 47.5%; obese, 88.6%; diabetes mellitus, 71.3%; steatohepatitis, 76.7%; advanced fibrosis, 27.2%]. The median follow-up interval was 7 (4-8) years. The cumulative incidence of liver-related events, cardiovascular events, malignancy and mortality was 0.43, 2.03, 0.60 and 0.60 per 100 person-years of follow-up, respectively. Liver-related events were only seen in patient with advanced fibrosis at 9.1% vs 0% in patient without advanced liver fibrosis (p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of liver-related events among patients with advanced fibrosis was 1.67 per 100 person-years of follow-up. When further stratified to bridging fibrosis and cirrhosis, the cumulative incidence of liver-related events was 1.47 and 3.85 per 100 person-years of follow-up, respectively. Advanced fibrosis was not significantly associated with cardiovascular events, malignancy or mortality. The cumulative incidence of liver-related events, cardiovascular events, malignancy and mortality were not significantly different between patients with and without steatohepatitis and between obese and non-obese patients. However, liver-related events were only seen among obese patients. CONCLUSION: Overall, the cumulative incidence of liver-related event is low in patients with MAFLD, but it is much higher among those with advanced fibrosis. However, there is a relatively high cumulative incidence of cardiovascular event among patients with MAFLD.