Assessing the landscape of ovarian serous borderline tumors.

AIM: To compare distinct clinicopathological features between atypical proliferative serous tumors and non-invasive low-grade ovarian serous carcinomas. METHODS: Our study group comprised 203 cases of serous borderline tumors sub-classified as atypical proliferative serous tumors or as non-invasive low-grade serous carcinomas. All pathological features related to borderline tumors were re-evaluated by two gynecological pathologists. Data concerning recurrences and survival were retrieved from the medical records of the patients. RESULTS: When comparing atypical proliferative serous tumors to non-invasive low-grade serous carcinomas, the latter were statistically related to advanced stage at diagnosis, bilateral disease, exophytic pattern of growth, microinvasive carcinoma, and the presence of invasive implants. In univariate analysis, recurrences were statistically related to the exophytic pattern of growth, to microinvasion, and to the presence of implants (both invasive and non-invasive). Nevertheless, in multivariate analysis, only microinvasion and the presence of invasive implants were related to recurrence. Women who eventually succumbed to the disease were only those with invasive implants. Their ovarian tumor was either a non-invasive low-grade serous carcinoma or an atypical proliferative serous tumor with 'minimal' micropapillary pattern. Neither lymph node involvement nor endosalpingiosis seemed to influence the course of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study underline the increased possibility of non-invasive low-grade serous carcinomas to be related with features indicative of aggressive behavior as opposed to atypical proliferative serous tumors. Nevertheless, irrespective of tumor histology, the presence of invasive implants and microinvasion were the only independent prognostications of recurrence.

Morcellating uterine mesenchymal tumors: The pathologist's view.

AIM: The study was conducted to delineate the histological problems in diagnosing uterine mesenchymal tumors in morcellated material. METHODS: All cases of morcellated uteri performed between 2008 and 2014 were reviewed. The incidence of unexpected malignancy, defined as any neoplasm with a clear-cut diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma (LMS) or endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS), was noted. Cases with absolute discrepancy between the diagnosis of the morcellated tumor and the subsequent diagnosis were also included in the study. RESULTS: Out of 631 cases, a final diagnosis of LMS or ESS was made regarding three and five tumors, respectively. Patient age ranged from 25 to 48 years. Two further cases initially diagnosed as ESS proved to be endometrial stromal nodules with smooth muscle differentiation. Two cases were diagnosed as smooth muscle tumors with uncertain malignant potential and the patients remain free of disease. One tumor was diagnosed as an endometrial stromal neoplasm and proved to be benign and finally a leiomyoma variant presented with presumed peritoneal disease. CONCLUSION: Both endometrial stromal and smooth muscle tumors with malignant behavior can be encountered at a young age. Because of the limitations in histological evaluation, morcellated tumors may be overdiagnosed or underdiagnosed by pathologists.

MELF invasion in endometrial cancer as a risk factor for lymph node metastasis.

AIM: To investigate whether the microcystic, elongated and fragmented (MELF) pattern of myometrial invasion encountered in certain endometrioid endometrial carcinomas can be considered as a risk factor for lymph node metastasis. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 351 cases of total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with/without lymphadenectomy or lymph node sampling, performed for endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma, were included in this study. The existence of MELF invasion, vascular invasion, fibromyxoid stromal reaction and lymph node metastasis were recorded. Immunohistochemistry for endothelial and epithelial markers was performed on selected cases. MELF invasion was identified in 20 (10.81%) and 13 cases (13.13%) treated without and with lymphadenectomy, respectively. All these cases were either well or moderately differentiated carcinomas, stages IA-II (without considering lymph node status). Positive lymph nodes were detected in seven of 13 MELF-positive (53.84%) and six of 86 MELF-negative cases (6.97%) This observation was statistically significant. Of the seven MELF-positive tumours with lymph node metastasis, three cases exhibited intravascular tumour emboli while four showed a fibromyxoid stromal reaction. CONCLUSION: MELF pattern invasion was found to be related statistically to lymph node metastasis. Nevertheless, further studies are needed in order to evaluate the clinical significance of this observation.

Mucinous epithelial lesions in endometrial curettage material: a diagnostic challenge.

AIM: To evaluate the immunohistochemical expression of several benign or malignant mucinous lesions that can be encountered in endometrial curettage material. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen well-differentiated mucinous endometrial carcinomas, 12 papillary mucinous metaplasias, 11 cervical microglandular hyperplasias, 11 endocervical adenocarcinomas, 2 goblet cell metaplasias, 1 minimal-deviation adenocarcinoma, and 1 lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia entered the study. Immunohistochemistry was performed with the following antibodies against: estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, vimentin, p16, p63, carcinoembryonic antigen, and Ki-67. RESULTS: Immunohistochemistry could easily distinguish endocervical adenocarcinoma of usual type from all other lesions under study. A Vim(-)/p16(-)/p63(high) signature was found to favor a cervical microglandular hyperplasia, whereas both mucinous endometrial carcinoma and mucinous papillary metaplasia would be preferentially characterized by a Vim(+)/p16(+)/p63(low) immunophenotype. A high Ki-67 expression would be of help in differentiating the latter 2 conditions. Statistically, the expression of estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, and carcinoembryonic antigen did not aid in the differential diagnosis of these 3 conditions. For the 4 cases representing goblet cell metaplasia, minimal-deviation adenocarcinoma and lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia, no results could be drawn. CONCLUSIONS: In endometrial curettage material, the differential diagnosis of lesions comprising mucinous epithelium might be rendered by combining the immunohistochemical expression of vimentin, p16, p63, and Ki-67. Of all lesions, endocervical adenocarcinoma of usual type is the most easily identified.