Real world practice indirect comparison between guselkumab and risankizumab: Results from an Italian retrospective study.

IL-23-inhibitors, such as guselkumab and risankizumab, represent the newest class of biologics approved for psoriasis. Phase III trials have shown their efficacy and safety. However, real life data are still scant. to indirectly compare the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of guselkumab and risankizumab in real world practice. An Italian single-center retrospective cohort study enrolling moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients from September 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020 was performed to indirectly compare guselkumab and risankizumab efficacy and safety. Sixty eight patients were included (36 received guselkumab and 32 risankizumab). The groups were comparable for all analyzed characteristics, except for mean psoriasis duration (p < 0.01) which was higher for guselkumab. In guselkumab group, mean PASI reduced from 16.1 ± 6.4 (baseline) 2.1 ± 0.9 (week-28) (p < 0.001) up to 0.9 ± 0.8 (week-44) (p < 0.001). In risankizumab group mean PASI decreased from 13.5 ± 4.9 (baseline) 1.9 ± 0.8 (p < 0.001), (week-28) (p < 0.001) up to 0.9 ± 0.4 (week-40) (p < 0.001). No significant difference in mean PASI and BSA were observed between the treatments. No cases of serious AEs, injection site reaction, candida, malignancy, cardiovascular events were reported in both groups. Guselkumab and risankizumab showed favorable efficacy and safety profile, being comparable in terms of PASI90 and PASI100 responses as well as in AEs frequency and discontinuation rates.

Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in psoriasis patients who failed ustekinumab and/or anti-interleukin-17 treatment: A real-life 52-week retrospective study.

Recent major research advancements have significantly expanded our understanding of psoriasis pathophysiology, resulting in the development of highly effective, targeted therapies. Guselkumab is the first interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitor approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe-psoriasis, providing a new therapeutical option for psoriasis. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab in psoriatic patients who previously failed anti-IL-12/23 and/or anti-IL-17 treatment. A 52-week single-center retrospective study was performed enrolling moderate-to-severe patients attending our Psoriasis Care Center from October 2018 to May 2020. Study population included 13 patients; 46.1% have been previously treated with ustekinumab, while 69.2% have previously failed an anti-IL-17 treatment (38.5% secukinumab, 30.8% ixekizumab, and 38.5% both). At baseline, mean Psoriasis Area and Severity Index was 13.2 ± 6.8, reducing up to 0.5 ± 0.7 at week 52 (P < .001). Body surface area reduced from 22.3 ± 10.5 (baseline) to 0.8 ± 1.1 at week 52 (P < .001). No statistically significant differences have been found between patients previously treated with anti-IL-12/23 compared to anti-IL-17 or both. Only one patient discontinued guselkumab at week 36 due to secondary inefficacy. This is a single institution study with a relatively small sample size. Our real-life data confirm trial results, showing guselkumab as a safe and effective option in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis even in those who previously failed ustekinumab and/or anti-IL-17 treatment.

Therapeutic update of biologics and small molecules for scalp psoriasis: a systematic review.

Scalp psoriasis represents the most common difficult-to-treat area in psoriasis patients. Its presence is linked to severe discomfort and impairment of quality of life given the associated symptoms (most of all, scaling and pruritus) and the location in a highly visible area, thus a prompt treatment is required. Its management may be challenging as the scalp is quite sensitive to long-term treatment with topical corticosteroids and usually resistant to topical and systemic agents. Likely, the currently available therapeutic armamentarium has been enriched with biologicals and small molecules that revolutionized psoriasis treatment and that of scalp psoriasis. Nevertheless, the lack of international dedicated guidelines pushed us to perform a comprehensive review on the efficacy and safety of biologics and small molecules on scalp psoriasis with the aim to put the basis for a therapeutic algorithm. After reviewing all the available evidence on the short-term and long-term efficacy of biologics and small molecules on scalp psoriasis the use of the newest biologics (anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23) seems to be linked to the highest clinical performances in controlling scalp psoriasis. However, head-to-head comparisons between different biologics or biologics and small molecules are lacking. Hence, treatment selection should always be individualized.

Erythrodermic psoriasis successfully and rapidly treated with brodalumab: Report of two cases.

Erythrodermic psoriasis (EP) is a rare form of the disease clinically characterized by a generalized erythema covering ≥90% of the body surface area (BSA). The management of EP is challenging: no standardized guidelines exist with literature suggesting cyclosporine or infliximab as first-line therapy. However, a recent systematic review showed a positive response in EP patients treated with biologic agents. The most common biologic used for EP up until now has been ustekinumab, whereas infliximab might represent a first-line option in case of complicated EP (acute, severe, or unstable). Up until now, no case of brodalumab (a monoclonal antibody blocking IL-17 receptor) treatment for EP in real-life has ever been described. Here, we report the first two cases of efficacy and safety of brodalumab in real-life cases of EP.

Efficacy and safety of risankizumab in psoriasis patients who failed anti-IL-17, anti-12/23 and/or anti IL-23: Preliminary data of a real-life 16-week retrospective study.

Up until now, real-life experiences on the efficacy of risankizumab in patients who had previously failed anti-IL17, anti-IL12/23 or anti-IL23 inhibitor are not reported. We carried out a single-center, retrospective study, to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of patients under risankizumab who previously failed anti-IL17, anti-IL12/23, or anti-IL23 inhibitors in a real-life setting. A total of eight patients were enrolled (four men and four women, mean age 45.8 ± 14.3 years). Five of them (62.5%) had received ustekinumab, seven (87.5%) at least one anti-IL17, and only one (12.5%) patient guselkumab. Secukinumab had been used in five (62.5%) cases, and ixekizumab in four (50.0%). Baseline mean PASI and BSA were 11.9 ± 5.5, and 22.9 ± 13.1, respectively, and 3.3 ± 1.7 and 7.5 ± 5 (P < .001 and P < .01) at week 16. Mean baseline NAPSI (18.0 ± 8.5) reduced to 7 ± 1.4 at week 16. Palmo-plantar and scalp area showed a reduction of 67.5% and 99.9% at week 16, respectively. No AEs was reported. Real-life preliminary data show risankizumab as a promising therapeutic option in patients who failed anti-IL-17, anti-IL12/23 and even the other anti-IL-23 counterpart, guselkumab.

Micro needling: A novel therapeutic approach for androgenetic alopecia, A Review of Literature.

Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is an androgen-dependent hereditary trait resulting in hair miniaturization. It is the most common type of alopecia in men and women. During the last years, multiple treatment modalities have been studied, but only topical minoxidil and finasteride have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Microneedling (MN) is a minimally invasive technique that induces collagen formation, as well as growth factors production and neovascularization. Even though not many studies of MN in alopecia have been performed, it remains a favorable treatment modality; however, no standardized protocol for MN in hair loss has been proposed yet. Current evidence is not sufficient to allow a direct comparison with other therapies, but it shows promises to increase hair density, thickness, and quality of hair, especially when combined with other treatments or when used as a drug delivery system. This article aims to summarize the available literature regarding the use of MN alone or associated with other therapies for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia.

Safe distance, safe patients! Therapeutic management of oncological patients affected by cutaneous and mucosal adverse events during the COVID-19 pandemic: an Italian experience.

Stringent measures have been taken to contain COVID-19 spread, limiting access only for urgent visits, surgery procedures, or hospitalizations and using teledermatology services for non-urgent cases. Management of oncological patients affected by chemo-, immune-, and radiotherapy-related cutaneous and mucosal adverse events is a challenge. Firstly because of the differential diagnosis of cutaneous rash (e.g., drug-related rash or paraviral exanthema). Secondly, oncological patients can suffer from xerosis, pruritus, and mucositis that contribute to cutaneous and mucosal barrier lesions, thus becoming vulnerable site for viral or bacterial colonization. These lesions can also be aggravated by the use of protective mask and gloves. Here, we report also our results of a teledermatological survey on 87 oncological patients, where the health status of oncological patients referred to our dedicated clinic was assessed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, it is fundamental that oncological patients are followed up by their dermatologists even if the clinics are closed. Teledermatology represents a crucial means of communication. Patients can contact the dermatological staff by emails and telephone, 24 h a day, 7 days a week, for video calls and dermatological consultations.

A 15-year retrospective study on the prevalence of onychomycosis in psoriatic vs non-psoriatic patients: A new European shift from dermatophytes towards yeast.

Because of their similar clinical presentation, discrimination between nail psoriasis and onychomycosis often is difficult. We aim to investigate the actual frequency of onychomycosis in psoriatic patients and to compare it between psoriatic and non-psoriatic patients. This retrospective study included a total of 9281 patients, referring to our Mycology Laboratory from September 2003 to May 2018. The patients are divided into two groups: PsoGroup (patients with psoriasis) and non-PsoGroup (non-psoriatic patient). Direct microscopic examination with 20% KOH and culture was carried out in both groups. In PsoGroup (711 patients, 59.50% female, 40.50% male, median age of 52.22 ± 15.01), the prevalence of onychomycosis was 49.08%. On the other hand, in non-PsoGroup (8570 patients (71.65% female, 28.35% male, median age of 48.51 ± 19.31 years), the prevalence of onychomycosis was 51.30%. There was no statistically significant difference between the prevalence of onychomycosis in PsoGroup 49.08% (349/711) compared to 51.30% (4397/8570) of non-PsoGroup (P = 0.2578). However, yeasts were significantly more prevalent in non-psoriatic than in psoriatic patients (P = 0.0144.). In our Mycological Laboratory, we observed a similar prevalence of onychomycosis in psoriatic patients and non-psoriatic patients. However, the spectrum of fungal species isolated was different from each other, with a higher prevalence of yeasts in non-PsoGroup that reflect a recent oriental trends.