Plant interactions balance under biotic and abiotic stressors: the importance of herbivory in semi-arid ecosystems.

Biotic and abiotic stressors commonly co-occur in plant communities and influence interactions between plants. However, their combined effects on plant interactions have not been widely studied and are still unclear. Here, we assessed the balance of interactions between neighboring plants along a grazing gradient and under two water regimes. We conducted a three-year-field experiment in semi-arid central Argentina with transplants of the dominant palatable grass Piptochaetium napostaense growing in Baccharis ulicina and open microsites across a gradient of grazing pressure. Additionally, we established a water addition treatment along that gradient. We recorded herbivory, size, and fecundity of P. napostaense. During the first two years, P. napostaense was consumed less and was larger below Baccharis than in the open. These differences were greatest under high grazing pressure. Differences in fecundity between microsites were only detected under high and medium grazing pressure in the first two years. In the third year, Baccharis lost their leaves for unclear reasons and provided poor herbivory protection; hence, P. napostaense plants in Baccharis were larger than those in the open only under medium and low grazing pressure, and there were no differences in fecundity between microsites under any grazing condition. Water additions exerted no effect on plant interactions. The balance of interactions changed from positive under heavy grazing to neutral at low and no grazing and water availability did not alter that balance. We conclude that herbivore pressure is an important driver of the balance of plant interactions in semi-arid environments.

The fluctuating resource hypothesis explains invasibility, but not exotic advantage following disturbance.

Invasibility is a key indicator of community susceptibility to changes in structure and function. The fluctuating resource hypothesis (FRH) postulates that invasibility is an emergent community property, a manifestation of multiple processes that cannot be reliably predicted by individual community attributes like diversity or productivity. Yet, research has emphasized the role of these individual attributes, with the expectation that diversity should deter invasibility and productivity enhance it. In an effort to explore how these and other factors may influence invasibility, we evaluated the relationship between invasibility and species richness, productivity, resource availability, and resilience in experiments crossing disturbance with exotic seed addition in 1-m2 plots replicated over large expanses of grasslands in Montana, USA and La Pampa, Argentina. Disturbance increased invasibility as predicted by FRH, but grasslands were more invasible in Montana than La Pampa whether disturbed or not, despite Montana's higher species richness and lower productivity. Moreover, invasibility correlated positively with nitrogen availability and negatively with native plant cover. These patterns suggested that resource availability and the ability of the community to recover from disturbance (resilience) better predicted invasibility than either species richness or productivity, consistent with predictions from FRH. However, in ambient, unseeded plots in Montana, disturbance reduced native cover by >50% while increasing exotic cover >200%. This provenance bias could not be explained by FRH, which predicts that colonization processes act on species' traits independent of origins. The high invasibility of Montana grasslands following disturbance was associated with a strong shift from perennial to annual species, as predicted by succession theory. However, this shift was driven primarily by exotic annuals, which were more strongly represented than perennials in local exotic vs. native species pools. We attribute this provenance bias to extrinsic biogeographic factors such as disparate evolutionary histories and/or introduction filters selecting for traits that favor exotics following disturbance. Our results suggest that (1) invasibility is an emergent property best explained by a community's efficiency in utilizing resources, as predicted by FRH but (2) understanding provenance biases in biological invasions requires moving beyond FRH to incorporate extrinsic biogeographic factors that may favor exotics in community assembly.